Long-term durability of silicone breast implants

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this study is to investigate the deformability and strength of silicone breast implant shells from different manufactures as a function of implantation time. Methods: The strength properties of about 200 shells of Eurosilicone, Mentor, Motiva, Allergan, Arion, PIP silicone breast implants removed for various reasons during repeated surgeries with a period of stay in the body from 6 months to 29 years were measured and compared with the corresponding properties of four shells of unused Eurosilicone and Motiva implants. Deformation was measured using a videoXtens extensometer. Results: The mechanical properties of the Allergan implant shell are almost completely consistent with the properties of the Eurosilicone shell after 9 years of use. The Mentor implants showed greater strength and stiffness. The Motiva implant shells initially had higher ultimate properties-rupture stress and rupture strain-in comparison with the Eurosilicone implant shells. Conclusions: The strength and deformation properties of all examined breast implant shells decrease in the course of time. After 13 years of use, the strength of breast implants is halved and their rupture strain is reduced by one third. The main mechanism responsible for loss of strength is the accumulation of microdamages during long-term use of breast implants. The thickness of the nano-textured shells of Motiva implants is twice less of the Eurosilicone implant shell thickness. This was possible due to a significant increase in the mechanical properties of Motiva shells.

Keywords

Mammoplasty / breast implants / rupture / stress / strain / implantation time / strength

References

[1] Swezey E, Shikhman R, Moufarrege R. Breast Implant Rupture. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025. [PubMed]

[2] Triana L, Huatuco RMP, Campilgio G, Liscano E. Trends in Surgical and Nonsurgical Aesthetic Procedures: A 14-Year Analysis of the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery-ISAPS. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024; 48: 4217-27. [DOI] [PubMed]

[3] Caplin DA, Calobrace MB, Wixtrom RN, Estes MM, Canady JW. MemoryGel Breast Implants: Final Safety and Efficacy Results after 10 Years of Follow-Up. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021; 147: 556-66. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]

[4] Calobrace MB, Schwartz MR, Kaufman DL, Gordon AE, Cohen R, Harrington J, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the Sientra Silicone Gel Round and Shaped Breast Implants: 6-Year Results of the U.S. Postapproval Study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024; 154: 44e-56e. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]

[5] Ryu AJ, Glazebrook KN, Samreen N, Bauer PR, Yi ES, Ryu JH. Spectrum of Chronic Complications Related to Silicone Leakage and Migration. Am J Med. 2018; 131: 1383-6. [DOI] [PubMed]

[6] Smith JE, Amariei DE, Herazo-Maya J, Niyazi S, Ruffolo RF, Patel KN, et al. Chronic Pulmonary Silicone Embolism Syndrome Following Saline Breast Implants. AIM Clin Cases. 2023; 2: e230396. [DOI]

[7] González FM, Alarza FH, Aguirre MDPC. Lung Siliconoma, a Rare Complication of Breast Prosthesis Rupture. Arch Bronconeumol (Engl Ed). 2018; 54: 580-1. [DOI] [PubMed]

[8] Oh JH, Song SY, Lew DH, Lee DW. Distant Migration of Multiple Siliconomas in Lower Extremities following Breast Implant Rupture: Case Report. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016; 4: e1011. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]

[9] Avgeri C, Sideris G, Margaris I, Tapponi L. Silicone Cervical Lymphadenopathy: A Rare Complication After Breast Augmentation. Cureus. 2023; 15: e50453. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]

[10] Van Bockstal MR, Libbrecht L, Dubail A, Berlière M, Galant C. Breast-implant Related Silicone Lymphadenopathy: Asteroid Bodies do not Always Equal Sarcoidosis! Int J Surg Pathol. 2023; 31: 1099-104. [DOI] [PubMed]

[11] Zambacos GJ, Molnar C, Mandrekas AD. Silicone lymphadenopathy after breast augmentation: case reports, review of the literature, and current thoughts. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013; 37: 278-89. [DOI] [PubMed]

[12] Rosenthal A, Nahmias AG, Heller L, Hadad E. Silicone Lymphadenopathy Following Augmentation Mammoplasty With Silicone Implants. Aesthet Surg J. 2024; 44: 1167-75. [DOI] [PubMed]

[13] Brandon HJ, Jerina KL, Wolf CJ, Young VL. Biodurability of retrieved silicone gel breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003; 111: 2295-306. [DOI] [PubMed]

[14] Kang SH, Bengtson BP, Heo CY. Various Properties of Silicone Breast Implant Surfaces and Multimodal Techniques for the Functional Surface Modification. Clin Plast Surg. 2021; 48: 87-99. [DOI] [PubMed]

[15] Necchi S, Molina D, Turri S, Rossetto F, Rietjens M, Pennati G. Failure of silicone gel breast implants: is the mechanical weakening due to shell swelling a significant cause of prostheses rupture? J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2011; 4: 2002-8. [DOI] [PubMed]

[16] Brown T, Harvie F, Kluess D. Testing mechanical properties of silicone gel-filled breast implants and their degradation. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024; 48: 3362-9. [DOI]

[17] Marotta JS, Goldberg EP, Habal MB, Amery DP, Martin PJ, Urbaniak DJ, et al. Silicone gel breast implant failure: evaluation of properties of shells and gels for explanted prostheses and meta-analysis of literature rupture data. Ann Plast Surg. 2002; 49: 227-47. [DOI] [PubMed]

[18] Kononetz OA, Vissarionov VA, Alekseeva EI. Modern problems of aesthetic mammoplasty. Ann Plast Reconstr Aesth Surg. 2013; 2: 53-7. Russian.

[19] Handel N, Garcia ME, Wixtrom R. Breast implant rupture: causes, incidence, clinical impact, and management. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013; 132: 1128-37. [DOI] [PubMed]

[20] Scalise A, Pau A, Licini C, Brancorsini D, Mattioli Belmonte Cima M, Goteri G, et al. Use of Hydrosurgical Debridement System for Silicone Gel Removal after Breast Implant Rupture. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024; 12: e5862. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]

[21] Wazir U, Kasem A, Mokbel K. The clinical implications of poly implant prothèse breast implants: an overview. Arch Plast Surg. 2015; 42: 4-10. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]

[22] Patrick R, Bormann S, Karu H. A case of extracapsular silicone gel implant rupture with contralateral gel migration. Case Reports Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2024; 11: 2357121. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]

[23] Shadrin VV, Plaksin SA, Platunova VA. Mechanical properties of silicon breast implants. Russ J Biomech. 2024; 28: 164-70. [DOI]

[24] Hillard C, Fowler JD, Barta R, Cunningham B. Silicone breast implant rupture: a review. Gland Surg. 2017; 6: 163-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]

[25] Hadad E, Sualhi I, Legarda C, Seligman Y, Sorkin A, Dor O, et al. Silicone breast implant rupture is more prevalent in the dominant limb side: A retrospective cohort study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2023; 80: 126-32. [DOI] [PubMed]

[26] Perry D, Frame JD. The history and development of breast implants. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2020; 102: 478-82. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]

[27] Janzekovic J, Hunt J, Peltz T, Wagels M, Brown T, Hutmacher DW. Biomechanical Principles of Breast Implants and Current State of Research in Soft Tissue Engineering for Cosmetic Breast Augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022; 46: 1-10. [DOI] [PubMed]

[28] Janszen G, Arnoldi M, Vinci V, Klinger M, Di Landro L. On the Safety of Implanted Breast Prostheses in Accidental Impacts. Materials (Basel). 2023; 16: 4807. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]

[29] Greco C. The Poly Implant Prothèse breast prostheses scandal: Embodied risk and social suffering. Soc Sci Med. 2015; 147: 150-7. [DOI] [PubMed]

[30] Jewell ML, Bengtson BP, Smither K, Nuti G, Perry T. Physical Properties of Silicone Gel Breast Implants. Aesthet Surg J. 2019; 39: 264-75. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]

[31] Martin Del Yerro JL, Bengoa SD. Single-Center, Long-Term Experience with Mentor Contour Profile Gel Implants: What Can We Learn after 21 Years of Follow-Up? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024; 154: 942-53. [DOI] [PubMed]

[32] Benito-Ruiz J. Breast Implant Removal-Only: The Role of Targeted Compression. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025; 49: 224-33. [DOI] [PubMed]

[33] Kaoutzanis C, Winocour J, Unger J, Gabriel A, Maxwell GP. The evolution of breast implants. Semin Plast Surg. 2019; 33: 217-23. [DOI]

[34] Glicksman C, Wolfe A, McGuire P. The Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of Motiva SmoothSilk Silicone Gel-Filled Breast Implants in Patients Undergoing Primary and Revisional Breast Augmentation: Three-Year Clinical Data. Aesthet Surg J. 2024; 44: 1273-85. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]