Real-life effectiveness of mepolizumab on remission and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in severe eosinophilic asthma

Mariye Doğru , Emel Atayik , Abdulkadir Basturk

Exploration of Asthma & Allergy ›› 2026, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (1) : 1009109

PDF (967KB)
Exploration of Asthma & Allergy ›› 2026, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (1) :1009109 DOI: 10.37349/eaa.2026.1009109
Original Article
research-article
Real-life effectiveness of mepolizumab on remission and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in severe eosinophilic asthma
Author information +
History +
PDF (967KB)

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of mepolizumab in enhancing asthma control, achieving clinical remission, and alleviating upper airway symptoms in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA) with comorbid nasal polyps and/or chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Additionally, it aimed to identify clinical and laboratory predictors of remission. The findings are based on real-world data from a single center. Methods: This retrospective, single-center, real-world study included 99 patients diagnosed with SEA. Patients were categorized into three groups based on the presence or absence of nasal polyps and CRS. Treatment response was evaluated using the asthma control test (ACT), spirometry, laboratory biomarkers, computed tomography (CT) scores, and nasal polyp scores. Remission was defined as the absence of asthma exacerbations and systemic corticosteroid use, along with improvements in both forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and ACT scores. Results: After 12 months of mepolizumab therapy, there were significant improvements in FEV1 values, asthma exacerbation frequency, systemic corticosteroid requirements, and nasal symptom scores. The overall remission rate was 30.6%. Patients with higher baseline FEV1 and no prior exposure to omalizumab were more likely to achieve remission. Conclusions: This real-world evidence suggests that mepolizumab provides meaningful clinical, functional, and radiological improvements in patients with SEA, regardless of comorbid nasal polyps or CRS. Furthermore, the study highlights independent predictors associated with treatment-induced remission in this population.

Keywords

severe asthma / mepolizumab / nasal polyps / chronic rhinosinusitis / remission

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Mariye Doğru, Emel Atayik, Abdulkadir Basturk. Real-life effectiveness of mepolizumab on remission and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in severe eosinophilic asthma. Exploration of Asthma & Allergy, 2026, 4 (1) : 1009109 DOI:10.37349/eaa.2026.1009109

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

2024 GINA Main Report [Internet]. Global Initiative for Asthma — GINA; c2026 [cited 2024 May 22]. Available from: https://ginasthma.org/2024—report/

[2]

Castagnoli R, Licari A, Brambilla I, Tosca M, Ciprandi G, Marseglia GL. An update on the role of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps as a co—morbidity in severe asthma. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2020; 14:1197-205.

[3]

Seccia V, D’Amato M, Scioscia G, Bagnasco D, Marco FD, Fadda G, et al. Management of Patients with Severe Asthma and Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps: A Multidisciplinary Shared Approach. J Pers Med. 2022; 12:1096.

[4]

Israel E, Canonica GW, Brusselle G, Yang S, Howarth PH, Martin AL, et al. Real—life effectiveness of mepolizumab in severe asthma: a systematic literature review. J Asthma. 2022; 59:2201—17.

[5]

Pavord ID, Bel EH, Bourdin A, Chan R, Han JK, Keene ON, et al. From DREAM to REALITI—A and beyond: Mepolizumab for the treatment of eosinophil—driven diseases. Allergy. 2022; 77:778-97.

[6]

Agache I, Rocha C, Beltran J, Song Y, Posso M, Solà I, et al. Efficacy and safety of treatment with biologicals (benralizumab, dupilumab and omalizumab) for severe allergic asthma: A systematic review for the EAACI Guidelines — recommendations on the use of biologicals in severe asthma. Allergy. 2020; 75:1043—57.

[7]

Scioscia G, Nolasco S, Campisi R, Quarato CMI, Caruso C, Pelaia C, et al. Switching Biological Therapies in Severe Asthma. Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24:9563.

[8]

Nagase H, Suzukawa M, Oishi K, Matsunaga K. Biologics for severe asthma: The real—world evidence, effectiveness of switching, and prediction factors for the efficacy. Allergol Int. 2023; 72:11-23.

[9]

Fokkens WJ, Lund VJ, Hopkins C, Hellings PW, Kern R, Reitsma S, et al. European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2020. Rhinology. 2020; 58:1-464.

[10]

Liu MC, Bagnasco D, Matucci A, Pilette C, Price RG, Maxwell AC, et al. Mepolizumab in Patients With Severe Asthma and Comorbidities: 1—Year REALITI—A Analysis. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023; 11:3650-61.e3.

[11]

Domínguez—Sosa MS, Cabrera—Ramírez MS, Marrero—Ramos MDC, Dávila—Quintana D, Cabrera—López C, Carrillo—Díaz T, et al. Real—Life Effectiveness of Mepolizumab in Refractory Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps. Biomedicines. 2023; 11:485.

[12]

Han JK, Bachert C, Fokkens W, Desrosiers M, Wagenmann M, Lee SE, et al. Mepolizumab for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (SYNAPSE): a randomised, double—blind, placebo—controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2021; 9:1141-53.

[13]

Perez—de—Llano L, Scelo G, Tran TN, Le TT, Fagerås M, Cosio BG, et al. Exploring Definitions and Predictors of Severe Asthma Clinical Remission after Biologic Treatment in Adults. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024; 210:869—80.

[14]

Lommatzsch M. Remission in asthma. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2024; 30:325—9.

[15]

Shackleford A, Heaney LG, Redmond C, McDowell PJ, Busby J. Clinical remission attainment, definitions, and correlates among patients with severe asthma treated with biologics: a systematic review and meta—analysis. Lancet Respir Med. 2025; 13:23-34.

[16]

Pavord I, Gardiner F, Heaney LG, Domingo C, Price RG, Pullan A, et al. Remission outcomes in severe eosinophilic asthma with mepolizumab therapy: Analysis of the REDES study. Front Immunol. 2023; 14:1150162.

[17]

Uysal MA, Mungan D, Yorgancioglu A, Yildiz F, Akgun M, Gemicioglu B, et al. ; Turkish Asthma Control Test (TACT) Study Group. The validation of the Turkish version of Asthma Control Test. Qual Life Res. 2013; 22:1773—9.

[18]

Atayık E, Aytekin G. A Single Center Experience of Super—Responders Among Severe Asthma Patients Receiving Treatment with Mepolizumab. Turk Thorac J. 2022; 23:348-54.

[19]

Bagnasco D, Caminati M, Menzella F, Milanese M, Rolla G, Lombardi C, et al. One year of mepolizumab. Efficacy and safety in real—life in Italy. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2019; 58:101836.

[20]

Pelaia C, Crimi C, Pelaia G, Nolasco S, Campisi R, Heffler E, et al. Real—life evaluation of mepolizumab efficacy in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma, according to atopic trait and allergic phenotype. Clin Exp Allergy. 2020; 50:780-8.

[21]

Kavanagh JE, d’Ancona G, Elstad M, Green L, Fernandes M, Thomson L, et al. Real—World Effectiveness and the Characteristics of a “Super—Responder” to Mepolizumab in Severe Eosinophilic Asthma. Chest. 2020; 158:491-500.

[22]

van Toor JJ, van der Mark SC, Kappen JH, In ’t Veenn JCCM, Braunstahl GJ. Mepolizumab add—on therapy in a real world cohort of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma: response rate, effectiveness, and safety. J Asthma. 2021; 58:651—8.

[23]

Harvey ES, Langton D, Katelaris C, Stevens S, Farah CS, Gillman A, et al. Mepolizumab effectiveness and identification of super—responders in severe asthma. Eur Respir J. 2020; 55:1902420.

[24]

Langton D, Sha J, Guo S, Sharp J, Banks C, Wang W, et al. Bronchial thermoplasty versus mepolizumab: Comparison of outcomes in a severe asthma clinic. Respirology. 2020; 25:1243-9.

[25]

Hussain M, Liu G. Eosinophilic Asthma: Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Horizons. Cells. 2024; 13:384.

[26]

Fokkens WJ, Mullol J, Kennedy D, Philpott C, Seccia V, Kern RC, et al. Mepolizumab for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (SYNAPSE): In—depth sinus surgery analysis. Allergy. 2023; 78:812-21.

[27]

Cameli P, Bergantini L, d’Alessandro M, Perruzza M, Cekorja B, Perillo F, et al. A Comprehensive Evaluation of Mepolizumab Effectiveness in a Real—Life Setting. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2020; 181:606—12.

[28]

Bachert C, Sousa AR, Han JK, Schlosser RJ, Sowerby LJ, Hopkins C, et al. Mepolizumab for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: Treatment efficacy by comorbidity and blood eosinophil count. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022; 149:1711-21.e6.

[29]

Crimi C, Nolasco S, Noto A, Maglio A, Quaranta VN, Bona DD, et al. Long—Term Clinical and Sustained REMIssion in Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Treated With Mepolizumab: The REMI—M Study. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2024; 12:3315—27.

[30]

Kallieri M, Papaioannou AI, Loukides S. Mepolizumab for severe eosinophilic asthma. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2026; 20:13-25.

[31]

Kennedy JL, Hubbard MA, Huyett P, Patrie JT, Borish L, Payne SC. Sino—nasal outcome test (SNOT—22): a predictor of postsurgical improvement in patients with chronic sinusitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2013; 111:246-51.

[32]

Ferguson BJ, Rizk H, Ramakrishnan J, Pant H. Categorization of Nasal Polyps. In: Önerci T, Ferguson B, editors. Nasal Polyposis. Berlin: Springer; 2010. pp. 103—10.

[33]

Detoraki A, Tremante E, D’Amato M, Calabrese C, Casella C, Maniscalco M, et al. Mepolizumab improves sino—nasal symptoms and asthma control in severe eosinophilic asthma patients with chronic rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps: a 12—month real—life study. Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2021; 15:17534666211009398.

PDF (967KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/