Numerical investigation on the influence of mesoscopic deformation on contact area and hydraulic aperture to fracture seepage

Chenghao Han , Yuanlin Bai , Weijie Zhang , Jicheng Zhang , Hongfa Ma , Weiye Li

Deep Underground Science and Engineering ›› 2026, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (2) : 567 -580.

PDF (7931KB)
Deep Underground Science and Engineering ›› 2026, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (2) :567 -580. DOI: 10.1002/dug2.70028
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Numerical investigation on the influence of mesoscopic deformation on contact area and hydraulic aperture to fracture seepage
Author information +
History +
PDF (7931KB)

Abstract

Fluid flow through a single fracture is commonly described by the cubic law. However, deviations from this model are expected because natural fracture surfaces are rough and in contact with each other in discrete regions. In this study, the interactions between fracture closure, contact area, and hydraulic characterization of mesoscopic-scale rough fractures were investigated. First, natural-splitting fractures induced by Brazilian splitting were generated and digitally reproduced using a three-dimensional scanner. The distribution characterization of the initial mechanical fracture apertures was described, and the variation in fracture contact area during fracture closure was evaluated. Second, numerical simulations of fluid flow between rough surfaces were conducted, and the Stokes equations were solved. The results reveal that the hydraulic aperture underwent three stages. When the contact area was less than 0.34%, changes in the hydraulic aperture resulted in flow rate changes that were consistent with the cubic law. When the contact area was between 0.34% and 14.41%, the hydraulic aperture gradually deviated from the cubic law and fell below the mean fracture aperture. At this stage, the hydraulic aperture should be fully considered rather than the mean fracture aperture. When the contact area exceeds 14.41%, although the mechanical fracture decreases with increasing strain, the influence of the contact area on the hydraulic aperture gradually diminishes. This is because the fractures contain less fluid, and the hydraulic aperture approaches the minimum. Finally, the relationship between mechanical and hydraulic aperture strains was established, improving geological engineering applications that account for fracture deformation.

Keywords

contact area / hydraulic aperture / mesoscopic deformation / rough fracture / seepage characteristics

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Chenghao Han, Yuanlin Bai, Weijie Zhang, Jicheng Zhang, Hongfa Ma, Weiye Li. Numerical investigation on the influence of mesoscopic deformation on contact area and hydraulic aperture to fracture seepage. Deep Underground Science and Engineering, 2026, 5 (2) : 567-580 DOI:10.1002/dug2.70028

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Bandara KMAS, Ranjith PG, Kumari WGP. A coupled X-ray imaging and experimental permeability study of propped hydraulically induced fractures. Rock Mech Rock Eng. 2021; 55: 2581-2596.

[2]

Bonneau F, Stoyan D. Directional pair-correlation analysis of fracture networks. J Geophys Res Solid Earth. 2022; 127(9): 2022JB024424.

[3]

Brown SR. Fluid flow through rock joints: the effect of surface roughness. J Geophys Res Solid Earth. 1987; 92(B2): 1337-1347.

[4]

Brown SR, Scholz CH. Closure of random elastic surfaces in contact. J Geophys Res Solid Earth. 1985; 90(B7): 5531-5545.

[5]

Chai J, Qiu F, Zhu L, et al. Evolution characteristics of void in the caving zone using fiber optic sensing. Sensors. 2024; 2: 24.

[6]

Chen J, Che Z, Su X, Zhou L, Liu X, Zhang L. Nonlinear flow and permeability anisotropy characteristics in hydraulic fracturing-induced rock fractures subjected to various normal compressive stresses. Geomech Geophys Geo-Energy Geo-Res. 2023; 9: 49.

[7]

Chen S, Zhang J, Yin D, Li F, Lu J, Zhu P. Visualizing experimental investigation on gas–liquid replacements in a microcleat model using the reconstruction method. Deep Undergr Sci Eng. 2023; 2(3): 295-303.

[8]

Chen Y, Liang W, Lian H, Yang J, Nguyen VP. Experimental study on the effect of fracture geometric characteristics on the permeability in deformable rough-walled fractures. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci. 2017; 98: 121-140.

[9]

Chen YF, Zhou JQ, Hu SH, Hu R, Zhou CB. Evaluation of Forchheimer equation coefficients for non-Darcy flow in deformable rough-walled fractures. J Hydrol. 2015; 529: 993-1006.

[10]

Develi K, Babadagli T. Experimental and visual analysis of single-phase flow through rough fracture replicas. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci. 2015; 73: 139-155.

[11]

Dou Z, Sleep B, Zhan H, Zhou Z, Wang J. Multiscale roughness influence on conservative solute transport in self-affine fractures. Int J Heat Mass Transfer. 2019; 133: 606-618.

[12]

de Dreuzy J-R, Davy P, Bour O. Hydraulic properties of two-dimensional random fracture networks following a power law length distribution: 1. effective connectivity. Water Resour Res. 2001; 37(8): 2065-2078.

[13]

Feng P, Zhao J, Dai F, Wei M, Liu B. Mechanical behaviors of conjugate-flawed rocks subjected to coupled static–dynamic compression. Acta Geotechnica. 2022; 17: 1765-1784.

[14]

Fidelibus C. The 2D hydro-mechanically coupled response of a rock mass with fractures via a mixed BEM–FEM technique. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech. 2007; 31: 1329-1348.

[15]

Gao M, Zhang C, J, Oh. Assessments of the effects of various fracture surface morphology on single fracture flow: a review. Int J Min Sci Technol. 2023; 33: 1-29.

[16]

Goodman R. Methods of geological engineering in discontinuous rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr. 1976; 13: 115.

[17]

Guo P, Gao K, Wang M, Wang Y, He M. Numerical investigation on the influence of contact characteristics on nonlinear flow in 3D fracture. Comput Geotech. 2022; 149: 104863.

[18]

Han C, Wei J, Zhang W, et al. Numerical investigation of grout diffusion accounting for the dynamic pressure boundary condition and spatiotemporal variation in slurry viscosity. Int J Geomech. 2021; 21(4): 04021018.

[19]

Kashefi A, Rempe D, Guibas LJ. A point-cloud deep learning framework for prediction of fluid flow fields on irregular geometries. Phys Fluids. 2021; 33: 027104.

[20]

Kim D, Yeo IW. Flow visualization of transition from linear to nonlinear flow regimes in rock fractures. Water Resour Res. 2022; 58:e2022WR032088.

[21]

Lavoine E, Davy P, Darcel C, D, Ivars, Kasani HA. Assessing stress variability in fractured rock masses with frictional properties and power law fracture size distributions. Rock Mech Rock Eng. 2024; 57: 2407-2420.

[22]

Lei Q, Tsang CF. Numerical study of fluid injection-induced deformation and seismicity in a mature fault zone with a low-permeability fault core bounded by a densely fractured damage zone. Geomech Energy Environ. 2021; 31: 100277.

[23]

Lei Q, Latham JP, Tsang CF, Xiang J, Lang P. A new approach to upscaling fracture network models while preserving geostatisti-cal and geomechanical characteristics. J Geophys Res Solid Earth. 2015; 120: 4784-4807.

[24]

Li W, Wang Z, L, Qiao, Yang J, Li J. Representative elementary surface for morphology and permeability of natural rock fractures. Bull Eng Geol Environ. 2023; 82: 159.

[25]

Liang W, Wang J, Leung C, Goh S, Sang S. Opportunities and challenges for gas coproduction from coal measure gas reservoirs with coal-shale-tight sandstone layers: a review. Deep Undergr Sci Eng. 2025; 4: 83-104.

[26]

Liu C, Shi B, Gu K, et al. Negative pore water pressure in aquitard enhances land subsidence: field, laboratory, and numerical evidence. Water Resour Res. 2022; 58(1): e2021WR030085.

[27]

Ma H, Wang J, Qian J, Luo Q. Mesoscopic deformation of a hydraulic and mechanical aperture of a single fracture under normal stress. Lithosphere. 2023; 2023: 1-12.

[28]

Matsuki K, Wang EQ, Giwelli AA, Sakaguchi K. Estimation of closure of a fracture under normal stress based on aperture data. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci. 2008; 45: 194-209.

[29]

Niu Y, Wang Y, Li J, et al. Effects of forward and reverse shear displacements on geometric and hydraulic characteristics of single rough fracture by the finite volume method. Lithosphere. 2022; 7799052.

[30]

Pan W, Zhang Z, Wang S, Lei Q. Earthquake-induced fracture displacements and transmissivity changes in a 3D fracture network of crystalline rock for spent nuclear fuel disposal. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng. 2023; 15: 2313-2329.

[31]

Panja P, Velasco R, Asai P, Deo M. New discrete fracture networks (DFN) model with coupled geomechanics and fluid flow. Unconventional Resources Technology Conference. 2022; 3039-3051.

[32]

Renshaw CE. On the relationship between mechanical and hydraulic apertures in rough-walled fractures. J Geophys Res Solid Earth. 1995; 100: 24629-24636.

[33]

Tatone BSA, Grasselli G. Quantitative measurements of fracture aperture and directional roughness from rock cores. Rock Mech Rock Eng. 2012; 45(4): 619-629.

[34]

Velasco R, Panja P, Pathak M, M, Deo. Analysis of North-American tight oil production. AIChE J. 2018; 64: 1479-1484.

[35]

Walsh JB. Effect of pore pressure and confining pressure on fracture permeability. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr. 1981; 18: 429-435.

[36]

Wang Z, Guo J, Qiao L, Liu J, Li W. Matrix–fracture flow transfer in fractured porous media: experiments and simulations. Rock Mech Rock Eng. 2022; 55: 2407-2423.

[37]

Wei X, Ma H, Qian J, Luo Q, Deng Y. Explore the influence of fracture void space geometry on seepage: the effect of cross-sectional area and the blockage of contact area. Phys Fluids. 2023a; 35: 086607.

[38]

Wei X, Ma H, Qian J, Ma L. Study on the geometric characteristics effect of contact area on fracture seepage. Phys Fluids. 2023b; 35: 016603.

[39]

Xing K, Qian J, Ma H, Luo Q, Ma L. Characterizing the relationship between non-Darcy effect and hydraulic aperture in rough single fractures. Water Resour Res. 2021; 57:e2021WR030451.

[40]

Xiong F, Jiang Q, Ye Z, Zhang X. Nonlinear flow behavior through rough-walled rock fractures: the effect of contact area. Comp Geotech. 2018; 102: 179-195.

[41]

Xiong X, Li B, Jiang Y, Koyama T, Zhang C. Experimental and numerical study of the geometrical and hydraulic characteristics of a single rock fracture during shear. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci. 2011; 48: 1292-1302.

[42]

Zhang J, Chen S, Ji S, Feng F, Aleksey AK, Zaki MM. Imaging dynamic water invasion behavior in microfractures based on microfluidics. J Cent South Univ. 2022; 29(12): 3986-4001.

[43]

Zhang J, Lü D, Zhang JJ, Wang F, Yin D, Yu H. Dual-scale insights of two-phase flow in inter-cleats based on microfluidics: interface jumps and energy dissipation. Int J Min Sci Technol. 2025; 35: 451-465.

[44]

Zhang W, Peng Z, Han C, Chen S. Numerical investigation of an equivalent hydraulic aperture for rough rock fractures based on cosimulation. Comp Geotech. 2023; 156: 105281.

[45]

Zimmerman R, Bodvarsson G. Hydraulic conductivity of rock fractures. Trans Porous Med. 1996; 23: 1-13.

[46]

Zimmerman, RW, Chen G, Hadgu T, Bodvarsson GS. A numerical dual-porosity model with semianalytical treatment of fracture/matrix flow. Water Resour Res. 1993; 29(7): 2127-2137.

[47]

Zimmerman RW, Paluszny A. Fluid flow in fractured rocks. 2024.

[48]

Zou L, Cvetkovic V. Disposal of high-level radioactive waste in crystalline rock: on coupled processes and site development. Rock Mech Bull. 2023; 2: 100061.

Rights & permissions

2025 The Author(s). Deep Underground Science and Engineering published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of China University of Mining and Technology.

PDF (7931KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉