Geological and geotechnical challenges on the Great Dyke of Zimbabwe and their impact on hardrock pillar design

Tawanda Zvarivadza , Hendrik Grobler , Moshood Onifade , Manoj Khandelwal

Deep Underground Science and Engineering ›› 2026, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (2) : 506 -538.

PDF (8362KB)
Deep Underground Science and Engineering ›› 2026, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (2) :506 -538. DOI: 10.1002/dug2.70024
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Geological and geotechnical challenges on the Great Dyke of Zimbabwe and their impact on hardrock pillar design
Author information +
History +
PDF (8362KB)

Abstract

The Great Dyke of Zimbabwe is a major geological formation renowned for its rich deposits of platinum group metals. This study addresses the geological and geotechnical challenges faced during mining on the Great Dyke, focusing on the implications for hardrock pillar design. The Great Dyke's geological complexity includes diverse rock types—dunites, harzburgites, pyroxenites, and norites—and notable structural features like joints, faults, and shear zones. These factors complicate the stability of underground workings. Traditional empirical methods and numerical modeling are used in pillar design but fall short in capturing the full complexity of the Great Dyke. The study highlights the absence of advanced methods such as machine learning (ML), artificial intelligence (AI), and geostatistical techniques in current pillar design practices. Incorporating these methods could significantly enhance pillar stability. Geostatistical techniques like kriging offer detailed estimates of rock quality and quantify prediction uncertainty, while ML and AI can analyze extensive data sets to uncover patterns and improve predictions. Integration of real-time data from Industrial Internet of Things sensors into these models allows for dynamic updates and better risk management. Continuous monitoring and adaptive design are essential for maintaining stability in this challenging geological environment. The study's findings aim to guide future mining practices, ensuring enhanced safety and efficiency on the Great Dyke.

Keywords

geological and geotechnical challenges / geostatistical methods / Great Dyke of Zimbabwe / machine learning pillar design

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Tawanda Zvarivadza, Hendrik Grobler, Moshood Onifade, Manoj Khandelwal. Geological and geotechnical challenges on the Great Dyke of Zimbabwe and their impact on hardrock pillar design. Deep Underground Science and Engineering, 2026, 5 (2) : 506-538 DOI:10.1002/dug2.70024

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Chaumba J. Hydrothermal alteration in the main sulfide zone at Unki Mine, Shurugwi Subchamber of the Great Dyke, Zimbabwe: evidence from petrography and silicates mineral chemistry. Minerals. 2017; 7(7): 127.

[2]

Chikande T. Reflection on Support Design in Geotechnically Challenging Ground Conditions: A Case of Zimbabwean Great Dyke Platinum Mining. MSc thesis. University of the Witwatersrand; 2018.

[3]

Chikande T, Zvarivadza T. Review of support systems used in poor ground conditions in platinum room and pillar mining: a Zimbabwean case study. J South Afr Inst Min Metall. 2016; 116(4): 323-332.

[4]

Chikande T, Zvarivadza T. Review of pillar design and cutting practices in geotechnically challenging ground conditions. In: R Schultz, ed. ARMA US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium. ARMA; 2018a.

[5]

Chikande T, Zvarivadza T. Evaluation of tendon support in anisotropic jointed rockmass. In: R Schultz, ed. ARMA US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium. ARMA; 2018b.

[6]

Chinyowa WC, Zvarivadza T. A review of pillar design for platinum mining to enhance stability: a Zimbabwean case study. In: J Morris, ed. ARMA US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium. ARMA; 2015.

[7]

Geja S, Meck M, Runganga D. Assessment of rock engineering risk management frameworks used in underground mines. Malays J Sci Adv Technol. 2023; 3(3): 190-203.

[8]

Elibol A, Tuncay D, Agioutantis Z. Assessing pillar stability in underground stone mines: impact of geological structures and stress variations in the Appalachian region. In: G Walton, ed. ARMA US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium. ARMA; 2024.

[9]

Feng XT, Yang CX, He BG, et al. Artificial intelligence technology in rock mechanics and rock engineering. Deep Res Eng. 2024; 1: 100008.

[10]

Hedley DGF, Grant F. Stope-and-pillar design for the Elliot Lake Uranium Mines. Bull Can Inst Min Metall. 1972; 65: 37-44.

[11]

Hopkins DL. The implications of joint deformation in analyzing the properties and behavior of fractured rock masses, underground excavations, and faults. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci. 2000; 37(1/2): 175-202.

[12]

Laubscher DH. A geomechanics classification system for the rating of rockmass in mine design. J South Afr Inst Min Metall. 1990; 90(10): 257-273.

[13]

Mandingaisa O. Quantification of the Impacts of Rockmass Quality on Stope Width Control and Pillar Stability in a Hardrock Narrow Reef Mine. MSc thesis. University of the Witwatersrand; 2018.

[14]

Mandingaisa O, Musa C. Stable span re-design and support optimisation for a shallow hardrock bord-and-pillar mine on the Great Dyke: the case of Unki Mine, Zimbabwe. In: W Joughin, ed. ISRM AfriRock-Rock Mechanics for Africa, 69-84. ISRM; 2017.

[15]

Morgenroth J. Practical Applications of Machine Learning to Underground Rock Engineering. PhD thesis. York University; 2022.

[16]

Moyo S, Chikande T, Zvarivadza T, et al. Investigation into the rockmass response to pillar extraction in a hardrock tabular mine. In: G Walton, ed. 58th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium. American Rock Mechanics Association; 2024.

[17]

Mponya E. Determination of Rock Material Properties to Design Robust Support at Unki Mine. MSc thesis. University of the Witwatersrand; 2016.

[18]

Muaka JJM, Duma S, Mushangwe P, et al. Modelling hardrock jointed pillars using a distinct element and discrete fracture network approach considering the effect of a clay-filled shear structure. In: J Wessseloo, ed. Deep Mining 2017: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Deep and High Stress Mining. Australian Centre for Geomechanics; 2017: 311-328.

[19]

Mukasa SB, Wilson AH, Carlson RW. A multielement geochronologic study of the Great Dyke, Zimbabwe: significance of the robust and reset ages. Earth Planet Sci Lett. 1998; 164(1/2): 353-369.

[20]

Mushangwe PC. Analysis of Pillar/Rockmass Failure and Propagation Dynamics Due to Mining in Hardrock Platinum Mines. MSc thesis. University of the Witwatersrand; 2018.

[21]

Onifade M, Adebisi JA, Zvarivadza T. Recent advances in blockchain technology: prospects, applications and constraints in the minerals industry. Int J Min Reclam Environ. 2024; 38: 497-533.

[22]

Prendergast MD, Wilson AH. The great dyke of Zimbabwe: II-mineralisation and mineral deposits. Mag Sulph Field Conf. 1989; 5: 21-42.

[23]

Roberts MKC, Clark-Mostert V. Is there some commonality between the geological structures in the Bushveld Complex and the Great Dyke. In: MH Rogers, ed. The 4th International Platinum Conference, Platinum in Transition ‘Boom or Bust’. Vol 118. The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy; 2010: 149-155.

[24]

Söderlund, U, Hofmann A, Klausen MB, Olsson JR, Ernst RE, Persson PO. Towards a complete magmatic barcode for the Zimbabwe craton: Baddeleyite U–Pb dating of regional dolerite dyke swarms and sill complexes. Precambrian Res. 2010; 183(3): 388-398.

[25]

Unki. Rock Engineering Department, Data Base, Shurugwi, Zimbabwe; 2014.

[26]

Walls J, Mpunzi P. Geotechnical characterisation and revision of the pillar design for a hardrock bord and pillar mine. In: W Joughin, ed. ISRM AfriRock-Rock Mechanics for Africa, 847-860. ISRM; 2017.

[27]

Wilson AH. The great dyke of Zimbabwe. Dev Petrol. 1996; 15: 365-402.

[28]

Wilson AH, Prendergast MD. The Great Dyke of Zimbabwe: I-tectonic setting, stratigraphy, petrology, structure, emplacement and crystallisation. Mag Sulph Field Conf. 1989; 5: 1-20.

[29]

Wilson JF. A craton and its cracks: some of the behaviour of the Zimbabwe block from the Late Archaean to the Mesozoic in response to horizontal movements, and the significance of some of its mafic dyke fracture patterns. J Afr Earth Sci. 1990; 10(3): 483-501.

[30]

Xie J, Huang J, Zeng C, Huang S, Burton GJ. A generic framework for geotechnical subsurface modeling with machine learning. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng. 2022; 14(5): 1366-1379.

[31]

Zvarivadza T. Evaluation of Pillar Design Systems for Low Reef Platinum Mining. MSc thesis. University of the Witwatersrand; 2012.

[32]

Zvarivadza T. Reflections on narrow-reef platinum mining pillar design systems as applied to a large platinum exploration feasibility project. J South Afr Inst Min Metall 2017; 117(2): 169-178.

[33]

Zvarivadza T, Onifade M, Dayo-Olupona O, et al. On the impact of Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT)-mining sector perspectives. Int J Min Reclam Environ. 2024; 38: 771-809.

Rights & permissions

2025 The Author(s). Deep Underground Science and Engineering published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of China University of Mining and Technology.

PDF (8362KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉