Effect of confining pressure on fracture characteristics and mineralogical behavior of tight sandstone specimens after hydraulic fracturing

Pankaj Rawat , Narendra Kumar Samadhiya

Deep Underground Science and Engineering ›› 2026, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (2) : 482 -505.

PDF (8681KB)
Deep Underground Science and Engineering ›› 2026, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (2) :482 -505. DOI: 10.1002/dug2.70015
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Effect of confining pressure on fracture characteristics and mineralogical behavior of tight sandstone specimens after hydraulic fracturing
Author information +
History +
PDF (8681KB)

Abstract

This study focuses on hydraulic fracturing experiments conducted under triaxial conditions on tight sandstone specimens from Shivpuri district, Madhya Pradesh, India. The experiments assessed the effect of confining pressure on specimens with 10 and 12 mm borehole diameters. Breakdown pressure observations indicates that increasing confining pressure results in higher breakdown pressures for both borehole sizes, with slightly higher breakdown pressures for the 10 specimens. Using BSE-SEM (backscattered electron-scanning electron microscope) imaging, the fracture was obtained, and four distributions that are Weibull, Lognormal, normal, and exponential, Anderson Darling coefficient were calculated to determine their goodness of fit corresponding to measured fracture width data from BSE-SEM images. On the basis of the Anderson Darling coefficient, lognormal distribution fitted best for both 10 and 12 mm fracture widths. Further, the Probability density function corresponding to fracture widths for both 10 and 12 mm borehole samples was determined by the maximum likelihood approach through Minitab software to reflect the variability and standard deviation of fractures. The research findings demonstrate that increasing confining pressure leads to decreased values of maximum fracture width, eventual fracture width, process zone width, and fractal dimension. In contrast, closure fracture width and tortuosity values were increased with increased confining pressures. Additionally, photomicrographs were utilized to study micro-crack propagation through quartz and feldspar minerals, highlighting the influence of confining pressures and quartz cementation and the absence of clay inclusions on micro-crack development. These findings contribute to the current understanding of hydraulic fracturing in tight sandstone and open up potential future research directions, such as investigating the influence of sandstone minerals and their fracture characteristics or studying the long-term effects of hydraulic fracturing on tight sandstone specimens.

Keywords

breakdown pressure / BSE-SEM / micro-cracks / photomicrographs / tight sandstone

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Pankaj Rawat, Narendra Kumar Samadhiya. Effect of confining pressure on fracture characteristics and mineralogical behavior of tight sandstone specimens after hydraulic fracturing. Deep Underground Science and Engineering, 2026, 5 (2) : 482-505 DOI:10.1002/dug2.70015

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Barton N. Suggested methods for the quantitative description of discontinuities in rock masses. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech. 1978; 15: 319-368.

[2]

Bohloli B, De Pater CJ. Experimental study on hydraulic fracturing of soft rocks: influence of fluid rheology and confining stress. J Petrol Sci Eng. 2006; 53(1/2): 1-12.

[3]

Brenne S, Molena M, Stockert F, Alber M. Hydraulic and sleeve fracturing laboratory experiments on six rock types. In: Proceedings of ISRM International Conference for Effective and Sustainable Hydraulic Fracturing (ISRM-ICHF). OnePetro; 2013: 535-547.

[4]

Chen Y, Nagaya Y, Ishida T. Observations of fractures induced by hydraulic fracturing in anisotropic granite. Rock Mech Rock Eng. 2015; 48(4): 1455-1461.

[5]

Collins TJ. ImageJ for microscopy. Biotechniques. 2007; 43(1S): S25-S30.

[6]

David C, Menéndez B, Bernabe Y. The mechanical behaviour of synthetic sandstone with varying brittle cement content. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci. 1998; 35(6): 759-770.

[7]

Dong Z, Tang S, Ranjith PG, Lang Y. A theoretical model for hydraulic fracturing through a single radial perforation emanating from a borehole. Eng Fract Mech. 2018; 196: 28-42.

[8]

Duan K, Kwok CY, Wu W, Jing L. DEM modeling of hydraulic fracturing in permeable rock: influence of viscosity, injection rate and in situ states. Acta Geotechnica. 2018; 13: 1187-1202.

[9]

Fialko YA, Rubin AM. Numerical simulation of high-pressure rock tensile fracture experiments: evidence of an increase in fracture energy with pressure. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth. 1997; 102(B3): 5231-5242.

[10]

Fredrich JT, Wong T. Micromechanics of thermally induced cracking in three crustal rocks. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth. 1986; 91(B12): 12743-12764.

[11]

Gehne S, Benson PM. Permeability enhancement through hydraulic fracturing: laboratory measurements combining a 3D printed jacket and pore fluid over-pressure. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1): 12573.

[12]

Guo F, Morgenstern NR, Scott JD. Interpretation of hydraulic fracturing breakdown pressure. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr. 1993; 30(6): 617-626.

[13]

Haimson B, Fairhurst C. Hydraulic fracturing in porous-permeable materials. J Pet Technol. 1969; 21(7): 811-817.

[14]

Haimson BC, Rummel F. Hydrofracturing stress measurements in the Iceland research drilling project drill hole at Reydarfjordur, Iceland. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth. 1982; 87(B8): 6631-6649.

[15]

Haimson BC, Zhao Z. Effect of Borehole Size and Pressurization Rate on Hydraulic Fracturing Breakdown Pressure: Proceeding of 32nd U.S. Symposium on Rock Mechanics (USRMS). Onepetro, Norman, Oklahoma. 1991; 205-216.

[16]

He J, Lin C, Li X, Wan X. Experimental investigation of crack extension patterns in hydraulic fracturing with shale, sandstone and granite cores. Energies. 2016; 9(12): 1018.

[17]

He J, Lin C, Li X, Zhang Y, Chen Y. Initiation, propagation, closure and morphology of hydraulic fractures in sandstone cores. Fuel. 2017; 208: 65-70.

[18]

Hertz H. The contact of elastic solids. J Reine Angew Math. 1881; 92: 156-171.

[19]

Hou P, Gao F, Ju Y, Yang Y, Gao Y, Liu J. Effect of water and nitrogen fracturing fluids on initiation and extension of fracture in hydraulic fracturing of porous rock. J Nat Gas Sci Eng. 2017; 45: 38-52.

[20]

Huang Z, Gu Q, Wu Y, et al. Effects of confining pressure on acoustic emission and failure characteristics of sandstone. Int J Min Sci Technol. 2021; 31(5): 963-974.

[21]

Hubbert MK, Willis DG. Mechanics of hydraulic fracturing. Trans AIME. 1957; 210(1): 153-168.

[22]

Ibemesi P, Benson P. Effect of pressure and stress cycles on fluid flow in hydraulically fractured, low-porosity, anisotropic sandstone. Rock Mech Rock Eng. 2023; 56(1): 19-34.

[23]

IS: 13047. Method for Determination of Strength of Rock Material in Triaxial Compression. Bureau of Indian Standards; 1991: 3-6.

[24]

Ishida T, Chen Q, Mizuta Y, Roegiers JC. Influence of fluid viscosity on the hydraulic fracturing mechanism. J Energy Resour Technol. 2004; 126(3): 190-200.

[25]

Ito T, Hayashi K. Physical background to the breakdown pressure in hydraulic fracturing tectonic stress measurements. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abs. 1991; 28(4): 285-293.

[26]

John C, Jenny L, David S, Chris L, Jerry L. Natural fractures in the spraberry formation, Midland Basin, Texas: the effects of mechanical stratigraphy on fracture variability and reservoir behavior. AAPG Bull. 2002; 86(3): 505-524.

[27]

Johns RA, Steude JS, Castanier LM, Roberts PV. Nondestructive measurements of fracture aperture in crystalline rock cores using X-ray computed tomography. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth. 1993; 98(B2): 1889-1900.

[28]

Kaperian A. FracLac for Image J. 2013. http://rsb.info.gov/ij/plugins/fraclac/FLHelp

[29]

Keller A. High resolution, non-destructive measurement and characterization of fracture apertures. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci. 1998; 35(8): 1037-1050.

[30]

Keller AA, Roberts PV, Blunt MJ. Effect of fracture aperture variations on the dispersion of contaminants. Water Resour Res. 1999; 35(1): 55-63.

[31]

Kumari WGP, Ranjith PG, Perera MSA, et al. Hydraulic fracturing under high temperature and pressure conditions with micro CT applications: geothermal energy from hot dry rocks. Fuel. 2018; 230: 138-154.

[32]

Lecampion B. Hydraulic fracture initiation from an open-hole: wellbore size, pressurization rate and fluid-solid coupling effects. In ARMA US Rock Mech./Geomech. Symp. ARMA; 2012.

[33]

Lee J, Kang JM, Choe J. Experimental analysis on the effects of variable apertures on tracer transport. Water Resour Res. 2003; 39(1): 1015.

[34]

Lesik SA. Applied statistical inference with MINITAB®. Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2018.

[35]

Li J, Li XR, Song MS, Liu HM, Feng YC, Liu C. Investigating microscopic seepage characteristics and fracture effectiveness of tight sandstones: a digital core approach. Pet Sci. 2021; 18: 173-182.

[36]

Li M, Guo Y, Wang H, Li Z, Hu Y. Effects of mineral composition on the fracture propagation of tight sandstones in the Zizhou area, east Ordos Basin, China. J Nat Gas Sci Eng. 2020; 78: 103334.

[37]

Li Y, Jiang X, Tang J, Liu B. Simulation study of acid fracturing initiation with consideration of rock mechanics parameter variations. Rock Mech Rock Eng. 2024; 57: 5743-5761.

[38]

Li Y, Liu W, Yan W, Deng J, Li H. Mechanism of casing failure during hydraulic fracturing: lessons learned from a tight-oil reservoir in China. Eng Failure Anal. 2019; 98: 58-71.

[39]

Liang X, Hou P, Xue Y, Yang X, Gao F, Liu J. A fractal perspective on fracture initiation and propagation of reservoir rocks under water and nitrogen fracturing. Fractals. 2021; 29(7): 2150189.

[40]

Lin H, Oh J, Canbulat I, Stacey TR. Experimental and analytical investigations of the effect of hole size on borehole breakout geometries for estimation of in situ stresses. Rock Mech Rock Eng. 2020; 53: 781-798.

[41]

Liu Y, Huang D, Cen D, et al. Tensile strength and fracture surface morphology of granite under confined direct tension test. Rock Mech Rock Eng. 2021; 54(9): 4755-4769.

[42]

Lloyd GE. Grain boundary contact effects during faulting of quartzite: an SEM/EBSD analysis. J Struct Geol. 2000; 22(11/12): 1675-1693.

[43]

Ma D, Cheng C, Ding C, Song J, Hu D, Zhou H. Comparisons of fracturing mechanism of tight sandstone using liquid CO2 and water. J Nat Gas Sci Eng. 2021; 94: 104108.

[44]

Ma D, Wu Y, Geng H, et al. Mechanical behavior of multi-fracturing under confining pressure: effects of borehole diameter and rock type. Rock Mech Rock Eng. 2024; 57: 11333-11350.

[45]

Martin CD, Chandler NA., The progressive fracture of Lac du Bonnet granite. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr. 1994; 31(6): 643-659.

[46]

Matsunag I, Kobayashi H, Sasaki S, Ishida T. Studying hydraulic fracturing mechanism by laboratory experiments with acoustic emission monitoring. ARMA US Rock Mech/Geomech Symposium. ARMA; 1993.

[47]

Morita N, Black AD, Fuh GF. Borehole breakdown pressure with drilling fluids—I. Empirical results. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abs. 1996; 33(1): 39-51.

[48]

Patel SM, Sondergeld CH, Rai CS. Laboratory studies of hydraulic fracturing by cyclic injection. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci. 2017; 95: 8-15.

[49]

Phillips T, Bultreys T, Bisdom K, et al. A systematic investigation into the control of roughness on the flow properties of 3D-printed fractures. Water Resour Res. 2021; 57(4): ewrcr-25233.

[50]

Pyrak-Nolte LJ, Myer LR, Cook NG, Witherspoon PA. Hydraulic and mechanical properties of natural fractures in low permeability rock. ISRM Congress (ISRM-6CONGRESS). ISRM; 1987.

[51]

Rawat P, Samadhiya NK. Laboratory hydraulic fracturing experiments on thermally treated tight sandstone samples under step-up incremental loading. ISRM Congress (ISRM-15CONGRESS). ISRM; 2023.

[52]

Rummel F, Hansen J. Interpretation of hydrofrac pressure recordings using a simple fracture mechanics simulation model. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr. 1989; 26(6): 483-488.

[53]

Tuckwell GW, Lonergan L, Jolly RJH. The control of stress history and flaw distribution on the evolution of polygonal fracture networks. J Struct Geol. 2003; 25(8): 1241-1250.

[54]

Underwood CA, Cooke ML, Simo JA, Muldoon MA. Stratigraphic controls on vertical fracture patterns in Silurian dolomite, northeastern Wisconsin. AAPG Bull. 2003; 87(1): 121-142.

[55]

Wanniarachchi WAM, Ranjith PG, Perera MSA, Rathnaweera TD, Zhang DC, Zhang C. Investigation of effects of fracturing fluid on hydraulic fracturing and fracture permeability of reservoir rocks: an experimental study using water and foam fracturing. Eng Fract Mech. 2018; 194: 117-135.

[56]

Wong T, Baud P. The brittle-ductile transition in porous rock: a review. J Struct Geol. 2012; 44: 25-53.

[57]

Wu Z, Cui C, Jia P, Wang Z, Sui Y. Advances and challenges in hydraulic fracturing of tight reservoirs: a critical review. Energy Geosci. 2022; 3(4): 427-435.

[58]

Xiong F, Jiang Q, Ye Z, Zhang X. Nonlinear flow behavior through rough-walled rock fractures: the effect of contact area. Comput Geotech. 2018; 102: 179-195.

[59]

Xu P, Cheng Y, Liu X, Zhang X, Shi L. Explosive fracturing simulation experiment for low permeability reservoirs and fractal characteristics of cracks produced. Petrol Explorat Dev. 2013; 40(5): 682-686.

[60]

Yang W, Huang C, Zhang Y, Lv X, Yu R, Yao J. Study on the influence of stress differences on hydraulic fracturing based on true triaxial experiments and discrete element numerical simulations. Geomech Geophys Geo-Energy Geo-Resour. 2022; 8(5): 139.

[61]

Yang W, Lü X, Wang L, Peng D, Chen X. A DEM–CFD coupling method for modelling two-hole synchronous hydraulic fracturing. Geomech Geophys Geo-Energy Geo-Resour. 2023; 9(1): 6.

[62]

Yang Z, Niemi A, Fagerlund F, Illangasekare T. Effects of single-fracture aperture statistics on entrapment, dissolution and source depletion behavior of dense non-aqueous phase liquids. J Contam Hydrol. 2012; 133: 1-16.

[63]

Yi P, Haifeng F, Mingyue C, et al. What do hydraulic fractures look like in different types of reservoirs: implications from a series of large-scale polyaxial hydraulic fracturing experiments from conventional to unconventional. In: Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Denver, Colorado, 2019.

[64]

Zhai C, Xu J, Liu S, Qin L. Investigation of the discharge law for drill cuttings used for coal outburst prediction based on different borehole diameters under various side stresses. Powder Technol. 2018; 325: 396-404.

[65]

Zhang W, Wang C, Guo T, et al. Study on the cracking mechanism of hydraulic and supercritical CO2 fracturing in hot dry rock under thermal stress. Energy. 2021; 221: 119886.

[66]

Zheng S, Lin M, Jiang W, Qiu X, Chen Z. New method of in situ high-resolution experiments and analysis of fracture networks formed by hydraulic fracturing. J Petrol Sci Eng. 2022; 217: 110849.

[67]

Zhong R, Miska S, Yu M, Meng M, Ozbayoglu E, Takach N. Experimental investigation of fracture-based wellbore strengthening using a large-scale true triaxial cell. J Petrol Sci Eng. 2019; 178: 691-699.

[68]

Zhou F, Su H, Liang X, et al. Integrated hydraulic fracturing techniques to enhance oil recovery from tight rocks. Petrol Explorat Dev. 2019; 46(5): 1065-1072.

[69]

Zhou J, Jin Y, Chen M. Experimental investigation of hydraulic fracturing in random naturally fractured blocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci. 2010; 47(7): 1193-1199.

[70]

Zhou Q, Xie HP, Zhu ZM, et al. Fracture toughness anisotropy in shale under deep in situ stress conditions. Rock Mech Rock Eng. 2023; 56(10): 7535-7555.

[71]

Zhu Q, Li D, Han Z, Li X, Zhou Z. Mechanical properties and fracture evolution of sandstone specimens containing different inclusions under uniaxial compression. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci. 2019; 115: 33-47.

[72]

Zhuang L, Kim KY, Shin HS, Jung SG, Diaz M. Experimental investigation of effects of borehole size and pressurization rate on hydraulic fracturing breakdown pressure of granite. In: PARMS 10: 10th Asian Rock Mechanics Symposium. OnePetro; 2018: 978-981.

Rights & permissions

2025 The Author(s). Deep Underground Science and Engineering published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of China University of Mining and Technology.

PDF (8681KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉