Damage modeling of CO2 injection well interfaces under coupled thermal, hydraulic and mechanical behavior

Lee J. Hosking , Xiangming Zhou

Deep Underground Science and Engineering ›› 2025, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (4) : 762 -776.

PDF
Deep Underground Science and Engineering ›› 2025, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (4) :762 -776. DOI: 10.1002/dug2.70014
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Damage modeling of CO2 injection well interfaces under coupled thermal, hydraulic and mechanical behavior
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

This paper presents an investigation of well integrity during low-temperature CO2 injection using a model of thermo-poroelasticity with interface damage mechanics. The casing–cement and cement–formation interfaces are described using cohesive interface elements and a bilinear traction–separation law. Verification testing is performed to establish the correct implementation of the coupled thermal, hydraulic, and mechanical equations. Simulation scenarios are developed to determine well interface damage initiation and development for intact wells and wells with an initial defect in the form of a 45@@° debonded azimuth. Each intact and defective well was simulated for 30 days of CO2 injection at selected temperatures. Under the conditions considered, tensile radial stress developed at both the casing–cement and cement–formation interfaces. Hoop stress in the cement sheath remained compressive after 30 days but with reduced magnitude at the lower injection temperature, indicating greater risk of tensile stress and radial cracking as the injection temperature was reduced. Damage occurred in two of four scenarios considered, namely, the intact and defective wells at an injection temperature of 10@@°C, and was limited to the casing–cement interface, with no damage to the cement–formation interface. Inclusion of the pre-existing defect led to earlier damage initiation, at 2.75 days compared to 4 days, and produced a microannulus with over double the peak aperture at 0.077 mm compared to 0.037 mm. These findings emphasize the importance of accounting for initial defects and damage evolution when investigating the integrity of CO2 injection wells.

Keywords

CCS / damage modeling / interface debonding / well integrity

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Lee J. Hosking, Xiangming Zhou. Damage modeling of CO2 injection well interfaces under coupled thermal, hydraulic and mechanical behavior. Deep Underground Science and Engineering, 2025, 4(4): 762-776 DOI:10.1002/dug2.70014

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Ahmed S, Salehi S. Failure mechanisms of the wellbore mechanical barrier systems: implications for well integrity. J Energy Resour Technol. 2021; 143(7):073007.

[2]

de Andrade J, Sangesland S. Cement sheath failure mechanisms: numerical estimates to design for long-term well integrity. J Petrol Sci Eng. 2016; 147: 682-698.

[3]

de Andrade J, Sangesland S, Todorovic J, Vrålstad T. Cement sheath integrity during thermal cycling: a novel approach for experimental tests of cement systems. SPE Bergen One Day Seminar, Bergen, Norway, SPE-173871-MS. 2015.

[4]

de Andrade J, Torsæter M, Todorovic J, Opedal N, Stroisz A, Vrålstad T. Influence of casing centralization on cement sheath integrity during thermal cycling. IADC/SPE Drilling Conference and Exhibition, Fort Worth, Texas, USA, SPE-168012-MS. 2014.

[5]

Benzeggagh ML, Kenane M. Measurement of mixed-mode delamination fracture toughness of unidirectional glass/epoxy composites with mixed-mode bending apparatus. Compos Sci Technol. 1996; 56(4): 439-449.

[6]

Bishop AW. The influence of an undrained change in stress on the pore pressure in porous media of low compressibility. Géotechnique. 1973; 23(3): 435-442.

[7]

Carroll S, Carey JW, Dzombak D, et al. Review: role of chemistry, mechanics, and transport on well integrity in CO2 storage environments. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control. 2016; 49: 149-160.

[8]

COMSOL. Structural Mechanics Module User's Guide. COMSOL; 2022.

[9]

Crow W, Carey JW, Gasda S, Brian Williams D, Celia M. Wellbore integrity analysis of a natural CO2 producer. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control. 2010; 4(2): 186-197.

[10]

Duguid A, Kirksey J, Riestenberg D, et al. CO2 well construction: lessons learned from United States department of Energy Sponsored Projects. 14th Greenhouse Gas Cont Technol Conf. 2018.

[11]

Goodwin KJ, Crook RJ. Cement sheath stress failure. SPE Dril Eng. 1992; 7(4): 291-296.

[12]

Huan X, Xu G, Zhang Y, Sun F, Xue S. Study on thermo-hydro-mechanical coupling and the stability of a geothermal wellbore structure. Energies. 2021; 14(3):649.

[13]

IPCC. Global warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change. Int Panel Clim Change. 2018; 1-24. https://www.ipcc.ch/

[14]

Jackson PB, Murphey CE. Effect of casing pressure on gas flow through a sheath of set cement. SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, Amsterdam, Netherlands, SPE-25698-MS. 1993.

[15]

Khalili N, Selvadurai APS. A fully coupled constitutive model for thermo-hydro-mechanical analysis in elastic media with double porosity. Geophys Res Lett. 2003; 30(24).

[16]

King GE, King DE. Environmental risk arising from well-construction failure—differences between barrier and well failure, and estimates of failure frequency across common well types, locations, and well age. SPE Produ Operat. 2013; 28(4): 323-344.

[17]

Kuanhai D, Yue Y, Yi H, Zhonghui L, Yuanhua L. Experimental study on the integrity of casing-cement sheath in shale gas wells under pressure and temperature cycle loading. J Petrol Sci Eng. 2020; 195:107548.

[18]

Lavrov A. Stiff cement, soft cement: nonlinearity, arching effect, hysteresis, and irreversibility in CO2-well integrity and near-well geomechanics. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control. 2018; 70: 236-242.

[19]

Li X-R, Gu C-W, Ding Z-C, Feng Y-C. THM coupled analysis of cement sheath integrity considering well loading history. Petrol Sci. 2023; 20(1): 447-459.

[20]

Li Z, Zhang K, Guo X, Liu J, Cheng X, Du J. Study of the failure mechanisms of a cement sheath based on an equivalent physical experiment. J Nat Gas Sci Eng. 2016; 31: 331-339.

[21]

Liu W, Yu B, Deng J. Analytical method for evaluating stress field in casing-cement-formation system of oil/gas wells. Appl Math Mech. 2017; 38(9): 1273-1294.

[22]

Liu Z, Deng Z, Davis SJ, Ciais P. Global carbon emissions in 2023. Nat Rev Earth Eng. 2024; 5(4): 253-254.

[23]

Najari M, Selvadurai APS. Thermo-hydro-mechanical response of granite to temperature changes. Environ Earth Sci. 2014; 72(1): 189-198.

[24]

Roberts JJ, Stalker L. What have we learnt about CO2 leakage from CO2 release field experiments, and what are the gaps for the future? Earth-Sci Rev. 2020; 209:102939.

[25]

Roy P, Morris JP, Walsh SDC, Iyer J, Carroll S. Effect of thermal stress on wellbore integrity during CO2 injection. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control. 2018; 77: 14-26.

[26]

Selvadurai APS, Nguyen TS. Computational modelling of isothermal consolidation of fractured porous media. Comp Geotech. 1995; 17(1): 39-73.

[27]

Selvadurai APS, Suvorov AP. Thermo-Poroelasticity and Geomechanics. Cambridge University Press; 2016.

[28]

Stormont JC, Fernandez SG, Taha MR, Matteo EN. Gas flow through cement-casing microannuli under varying stress conditions. Geomech Energy Environ. 2018; 13: 1-13.

[29]

Sule I, Imtiaz S, Khan F, Butt S. Nonlinear model predictive control of gas kick in a managed pressure drilling system. J Petrol Sci Eng. 2019; 174: 1223-1235.

[30]

Taghipour A, Ghaderi A, Cerasi P, Gheibi S. Novel laboratory setup for realistic wellbore cement and formation integrity studies. J Petrol Sci Eng. 2022; 208:109664.

[31]

Therond E, Bois A-P, Whaley K, Murillo R. Large-scale testing and modeling for cement zonal isolation in water-injection wells. SPE Dril Comp. 2017; 32(4): 290-300.

[32]

Torsæter M, Todorovic J, Lavrov A, et al. Avoiding damage of CO2 injection wells caused by temperature variations. Energy Proc. 2017; 114: 5275-5286.

[33]

Valov AV, Golovin SV, Shcherbakov VV, Kuznetsov DS. Thermoporoelastic model for the cement sheath failure in a cased and cemented wellbore. J Petrol Sci Eng. 2022; 210:109916.

[34]

Vilarrasa V, Rutqvist J. Thermal effects on geologic carbon storage. Earth Sci Rev. 2017; 165: 245-256.

[35]

Vilarrasa V, Silva O, Carrera J, Olivella S. Liquid CO2 injection for geological storage in deep saline aquifers. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control. 2013; 14: 84-96.

[36]

Viswanathan HS, Pawar RJ, Stauffer PH, et al. Development of a hybrid process and system model for the assessment of wellbore leakage at a geologic CO2 sequestration site. Environ Sci Technol. 2008; 42(19): 7280-7286.

[37]

Witherspoon PA, Wang JSY, Iwai K, Gale JE. Validity of cubic law for fluid flow in a deformable rock fracture. Water Resour Res. 1980; 16(6): 1016-1024.

[38]

Zhang M, Bachu S. Review of integrity of existing wells in relation to CO2 geological storage: what do we know? Int J Greenhouse Gas Control. 2011; 5(4): 826-840.

[39]

Zhang W, Eckert A. Micro-annulus generation under downhole conditions: insights from three-dimensional staged finite element analysis of cement hardening and wellbore operations. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng. 2020; 12(6): 1185-1200.

[40]

Zhang W, Eckert A, Liu X. Numerical simulation of micro-annuli generation by thermal cycling. 51st U.S. Rock Mech Geomech Symp. ARMA-2017-0354. 2017.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 The Author(s). Deep Underground Science and Engineering published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of China University of Mining and Technology.

PDF

4

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/