Study on the failure mechanism of the shield excavation face in the sandy cobble stratum under different buried depths

Hua Jiang , Chongyang Liu , Ao Zhang , Xiaoyan Zhang , Yuhang Li

Deep Underground Science and Engineering ›› 2026, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (2) : 410 -425.

PDF (6761KB)
Deep Underground Science and Engineering ›› 2026, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (2) :410 -425. DOI: 10.1002/dug2.70012
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Study on the failure mechanism of the shield excavation face in the sandy cobble stratum under different buried depths
Author information +
History +
PDF (6761KB)

Abstract

One of the significant challenges faced in shield tunnel construction is the risk of collapse resulting from abrupt changes in soil conditions in advance of the working face, particularly within the sandy cobble stratum. This study aims to effectively manage these sudden variations and to further investigate the failure mechanisms associated with shield tunneling. The limit support pressure, instability patterns, and soil arch ranges at the excavation face under varying burial depths were analyzed using PFC3D discrete element software, specifically in relation to the shield section of the Beijing Subway New Airport Line 06 cigezhuang~1# wind shaft project. The findings of this research indicate the following: (1) The limit support pressure at the shield excavation face in sandy cobble strata increases with the burial depth ratio; however, the ratio of the limit support pressure decreases as the burial depth ratio increases. (2) A burial depth ratio threshold of 1.0–1.5 suggests that no soil arch forms in the stratum ahead of the excavation face when the burial depth ratio is below this range. Conversely, a soil arch develops when the burial depth ratio exceeds this threshold. (3) When the burial depth ratio is less than the threshold range of 1.0–1.5, the longitudinal instability zone transitions from a wedge shape to a barrel shape, extending to the surface. Conversely, when the burial depth ratio surpasses this range, the longitudinal instability zone changes from a wedge shape to a bulb shape and does not extend to the surface. (4) This paper proposes a calculation model for determining the limit support pressure of the excavation face under both shallow and deep burial conditions in the sandy cobble stratum, providing a calculation formula for the limit support pressure and establishing a reference range for the calculation parameters.

Keywords

calculation model / failure mechanism / numerical simulation / sandy cobble stratum / shield excavation face

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Hua Jiang, Chongyang Liu, Ao Zhang, Xiaoyan Zhang, Yuhang Li. Study on the failure mechanism of the shield excavation face in the sandy cobble stratum under different buried depths. Deep Underground Science and Engineering, 2026, 5 (2) : 410-425 DOI:10.1002/dug2.70012

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Anagnostou G. The contribution of horizontal arching to tunnel face stability. Geotechnik. 2012; 35(1): 34-44.

[2]

Anagnostou G, Kovári K. Face stability conditions with earth-pressure-balanced shields. Tunnel Undergr Space Technol. 1996; 11(2): 165-173.

[3]

Bai YX, Qi TY, Wu ZR. Face stability analysis of shield tunneling in sandy cobble stratum. Civil Architect Environ Eng. 2015; 34(6): 89-96.

[4]

Berthoz N, Branque D, Subrin D, Wong H, Humbert E. Face failure in homogeneous and stratified soft ground: theoretical and experimental approaches on 1g EPBS reduced scale model. Tunnel Undergr Space Technol. 2012; 30: 25-37.

[5]

Broms BB, Bennermark H. Stability of clay at vertical opening. J Soil Mech Found Div. 1967; 93(1): 71-94.

[6]

Chen R, Li J, Kong L, Tang L. Experimental study on face instability of shield tunnel in sand. Tunnel Undergr Space Technol. 2013; 33: 12-21.

[7]

Chen RP, Li J, Chen YM, et al. Large-scale tests on face stability of shield tunnelling in dry cohesionless soil. J Geotech Eng. 2011; 33(1): 117-122.

[8]

Chen RP, Tang LJ, Ling DS, Chen YM. Face stability analysis of shallow shield tunnels in dry sandy ground using the discrete element method. Comp Geotech. 2011; 38(2): 187-195.

[9]

Chen RP, Li J, Chen YM, et al. Large-scale tests on face stability of shield tunnelling in dry cohesionless soil. J Geotech Eng. 2011; 33(1): 117-122.

[10]

Cheng C, Chen Y, Zhao C, et al. Theoretical analysis of the shield tunnel face stability in dry sandy strata. Eur J Environ Civil Eng. 2022; 27(2): 712-732.

[11]

Cheng C, Zhao W, Qi D, et al. A case study on the stability of the shield excavation face in full-section coarse sand. Sustain Cities Soc. 2019; 47:101486.

[12]

Fellin W, King J, Kirsch A, Oberguggenberger M. Uncertainty modelling and sensitivity analysis of tunnel face stability. Struct Saf. 2010; 32(6): 402-410.

[13]

Han K, Zhang C, Zhang D. Upper-bound solutions for the face stability of a shield tunnel in multilayered cohesive–frictional soils. Comp Geotech. 2016; 79: 1-9.

[14]

Ibrahim E, Soubra A-H, Mollon G, Raphael W, Dias D, Reda A. Three-dimensional face stability analysis of pressurized tunnels driven in a multilayered purely frictional medium. Tunnel Undergr Space Technol. 2015; 49: 18-34.

[15]

Idinger G, Aklik P, Wu W, Borja RI. Centrifuge model test on the face stability of shallow tunnel. Acta Geotech. 2011; 6: 105-117.

[16]

Kirsch A. Experimental investigation of the face stability of shallow tunnels in sand. Acta Geotech. 2010; 5: 43-62.

[17]

Leca E, Dormieux L. Upper and lower bound solutions for the face stability of shallow circular tunnels in frictional material. Géotechnique. 1990; 40(4): 581-606.

[18]

Lee CJ, Wu BR, Chen HT, Chiang KH. Tunnel stability and arching effects during tunneling in soft clayey soil. Tunnel Undergr Space Technol. 2006; 21(2): 119-132.

[19]

Lü X, Zhou Y, Huang M, Zeng S. Experimental study of the face stability of shield tunnel in sands under seepage condition. Tunnel Undergr Space Technol. 2018; 74: 195-205.

[20]

Mollon G, Dias D, Soubra AH. Rotational failure mechanisms for the face stability analysis of tunnels driven by a pressurized shield. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech. 2011; 35(12): 1363-1388.

[21]

Mollon G, Dias D, Soubra AH. Continuous velocity fields for collapse and blowout of a pressurized tunnel face in purely cohesive soil. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech. 2013; 37(13): 2061-2083.

[22]

Qarmout M, König D, Gussmann P, Thewes M, Schanz T. Tunnel face stability analysis using kinematical element method. Tunnel Undergr Space Technol. 2019; 85: 354-367.

[23]

Senent S, Jimenez R. A tunnel face failure mechanism for layered ground, considering the possibility of partial collapse. Tunnel Undergr Space Technol. 2015; 47: 182-192.

[24]

Song W, Zhang P, Du X, Lin Q. Model test study on instability and failure of shield excavation face in sandy cobble stratum. J Beijing Univ Technol. 2022; 48(5): 486-495.

[25]

Soranzo E, Tamagnini R, Wu W. Face stability of shallow tunnels in partially saturated soil: centrifuge testing and numerical analysis. Géotechnique. 2015; 65(6): 454-467.

[26]

Soubra AH, Regenass P. Three-dimensional passive earth pressures by kinematical approach. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng. 2000; 126(11): 969-978.

[27]

Tang XW, Liu W, Albers B, Savidis S. Upper bound analysis of tunnel face stability in layered soils. Acta Geotech. 2014; 9: 661-671.

[28]

Ukritchon B, Yingchaloenkitkhajorn K, Keawsawasvong S. Three-dimensional undrained tunnel face stability in clay with a linearly increasing shear strength with depth. Comp Geotech. 2017; 88: 146-151.

[29]

Wan T, Li P, Zheng H, Zhang M. An analytical model of loosening earth pressure in front of tunnel face for deep-buried shield tunnels in sand. Comp Geotech. 2019; 115:103170.

[30]

Zhang C, Han K, Zhang D. Face stability analysis of shallow circular tunnels in cohesive–frictional soils. Tunnel Undergr Space Technol. 2015; 50: 345-357.

[31]

Zhang ZX, Hu XY, Scott KD. A discrete numerical approach for modeling face stability in slurry shield tunnelling in soft soils. Comp Geotech. 2011; 38(1): 94-104.

[32]

Zhang Y, Tao LJ, Liu J, et al. Method for calculating limit support pressure of face of shield tunnels considering principal stress axis rotation and soil arching effects in dry sand. J Geotech Eng. 2023; 45(3): 530-540.

[33]

Zhang ZX, Liu C, Huang X. Numerical analysis of volume loss caused by tunnel face instability in soft soils. Environ Earth Sci. 2017; 76: 563.

[34]

Zhao W, Cheng C, Li S, Xu H, Zhu L. Analysis and improvement of wedge supporting pressure model of shield tunnel excavation face. China J Highw Transp. 2017; 30(8): 74-81.

[35]

Zou J, Chen G, Qian Z. Tunnel face stability in cohesion-frictional soils considering the soil arching effect by improved failure models. Comp Geotech. 2019; 106: 1-17.

[36]

Zou J, Qian Z, Xiang X, Chen G. Face stability of a tunnel excavated in saturated nonhomogeneous soils. Tunnel Undergr Space Technol. 2019; 83: 1-17.

Rights & permissions

2025 The Author(s). Deep Underground Science and Engineering published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of China University of Mining and Technology.

PDF (6761KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉