Hydrogen sulfide in underground hydrogen storage sites: Implication of thermochemical sulfate reduction

Sadegh Ahmadpour , Raoof Gholami

Deep Underground Science and Engineering ›› 2025, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (4) : 709 -724.

PDF
Deep Underground Science and Engineering ›› 2025, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (4) :709 -724. DOI: 10.1002/dug2.70000
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Hydrogen sulfide in underground hydrogen storage sites: Implication of thermochemical sulfate reduction
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Hydrogen is recognized as a clean energy carrier that can decarbonize heavy industry and the aviation system. However, the infrastructure is not yet ready for a hydrogen economy and large-scale hydrogen storage is needed to balance the mismatch between supply and demand. Therefore, depleted gas fields have been proposed as suitable storage sites, given the presence of infrastructure and pipeline network for distribution and utilization. Attempts have been made to analyze the suitability of these reservoirs for hydrogen storage, with a focus on choosing higher temperature and salinity conditions to neutralize the effects of microbial activities as one of the main sources of hydrogen loss in the depleted gas reservoirs. However, thermochemical sulfate reduction (TSR) is activated at high temperatures and has a huge potential not only to consume hydrogen through abiotic reactions but also to generate a huge amount of @@H2S. In this study, a one-dimensional diffusion-based mass transport model was built using PHREEQC to highlight the potential challenges posed by the TSR in depleted gas fields. The results obtained indicated that the presence of iron minerals (pyrite and hematite) is crucial for @@H2S generation through TSR reactions. An increase in temperature also leads to an increase in @@H2S concentration in the brine and gas phase. However, since most of the @@H2S formation comes from pyrite dissolution and pyrite dissolution is still strong at lower temperatures, a low temperature is not necessarily the best selection criterion to avoid @@H2S formation. Thus, precautions must be taken to ensure that activation of TSR does not pose significant environmental problems.

Keywords

depleted gas fields / H2S / hydrogen storage / pyrite / thermochemical sulfate reduction

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Sadegh Ahmadpour, Raoof Gholami. Hydrogen sulfide in underground hydrogen storage sites: Implication of thermochemical sulfate reduction. Deep Underground Science and Engineering, 2025, 4(4): 709-724 DOI:10.1002/dug2.70000

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Arnaut L. Elementary reactions in solution. In: L Arnaut, ed. Chemical Kinetics. Elsevier; 2021: 263-293.

[2]

Azizian S, Bashiri H. Adsorption kinetics at the solid/solution interface: statistical rate theory at initial times of adsorption and close to equilibrium. Langmuir. 2008a; 24(20): 11669-11676.

[3]

Azizian S, Bashiri H. Description of desorption kinetics at the solid/solution interface based on the statistical rate theory. Langmuir. 2008b; 24(22): 13013-13018.

[4]

Bethke C. Geochemical Reaction Modeling: Concepts and Applications. Oxford University Press; 1996.

[5]

Bo Z, Zeng L, Chen Y, Xie Q. Geochemical reactions-induced hydrogen loss during underground hydrogen storage in sandstone reservoirs. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2021; 46(38): 19998-20009.

[6]

Cai C, Tang Y, Li K, Jiang K, Jiang C, Xiao Q. Relative reactivity of saturated hydrocarbons during thermochemical sulfate reduction. Fuel. 2019; 253: 106-113.

[7]

Cai C, Worden RH, Bottrell SH, Wang L, Yang C. Thermochemical sulphate reduction and the generation of hydrogen sulphide and thiols (mercaptans) in triassic carbonate reservoirs from the Sichuan Basin, China. Chem Geol. 2003; 202(1/2): 39-57.

[8]

Chabab S, Théveneau P, Coquelet C, Corvisier J, Paricaud P. Measurements and predictive models of high-pressure H2 solubility in brine (H2O+NaCl) for underground hydrogen storage application. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2020; 45(56): 32206-32220.

[9]

Dohrmann AB, Krüger M. Microbial H(2) consumption by a formation fluid from a natural gas field at High-Pressure conditions relevant for underground H(2) storage. Environ Sci Technol. 2023; 57(2): 1092-1102.

[10]

Drobner E, Huber H, Wächtershäuser G, Rose D, Stetter KO. Pyrite formation linked with hydrogen evolution under anaerobic conditions. Nature. 1990; 346(6286): 742-744.

[11]

Ezat Heydari H. The role of burial diagenesis in hydrocarbon destruction and H2S accumulation, upper jurassic smackover formation, black creek field, Mississippi. AAPG Bull. 1997; 81(1): 26-45.

[12]

Fatah A, Mahmud HB, Bennour Z, Gholami R, Hossain M. Geochemical modelling of CO2 interactions with shale: kinetics of mineral dissolution and precipitation on geological time scales. Chem Geol. 2022; 592:120742.

[13]

Fu Y. Reactive transport modeling to quantify key reservoir properties affecting H2S concentration resulting from thermochemical sulfate reduction. In: International Petroleum Technology Conference, Saudi Arabia. 2020.

[14]

Fu Y, van Berk W, Schulz H-M. Hydrogen sulfide formation, fate, and behavior in anhydrite-sealed carbonate gas reservoirs: a three-dimensional reactive mass transport modeling approach. Am Assoc Pet Geol Bull. 2016; 100(5): 843-865.

[15]

Haddad PG, Ranchou-Peyruse M, Guignard M, et al. Geological storage of hydrogen in deep aquifers: an experimental multidisciplinary study. Energy Environ Sci. 2022; 15(8): 3400-3415.

[16]

Hadian P, Rezaee R. The effect of supercritical CO2 on shaly caprocks. Energies. 2019; 13(1):149.

[17]

Hao F, Zhang X, Wang C, et al. The fate of CO2 derived from thermochemical sulfate reduction (TSR) and effect of TSR on carbonate porosity and permeability, Sichuan Basin, China. Earth-Sci Rev. 2015; 141: 154-177.

[18]

Hartwig A, Rinna J, Skeie JE, et al. Prediction and post-well analysis of H2S generation and drilling risks in the Barents Sea paleozoic play. In: 84th EAGE Annual Conference & Exhibition. Vol. 2023. 2023:1-5.

[19]

Hemme C, van Berk W. Hydrogeochemical modeling to identify potential risks of underground hydrogen storage in depleted gas fields. Appl Sci. 2018; 8(11):2282.

[20]

Jia S, Wen C, Fu X, Liu T, Xi Z. A caprock evaluation methodology for underground gas storage in a deep depleted gas reservoir: a case study for the X9 lithologic trap of Langgu Sag, Bohai Bay Basin, China. Energies. 2022; 15(12):4351.

[21]

Van Kampen NG. Chapter XII—First-Passage Problems. In: Vankampen , ed. Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry. Elsevier; 2007: 292-325.

[22]

Kilpatrick A, Edlmann K, Groenenberg R. Experimental assessment of the potential for hydrogen sulphide generation from abiotic pyrite reduction during geological storage of hydrogen, H2020 HyUSPRe project report 2023:43. https://www.hyuspre.eu/index.php/downloads/

[23]

Kiyosu Y, Krouse HR, Viau CA. Carbon isotope fractionation during oxidation of light hydrocarbon gases. In: ACS Public. 1990: 633-641.

[24]

Koukouzas N, Kypritidou Z, Purser G, Rochelle CA, Vasilatos C, Tsoukalas N. Assessment of the impact of CO2 storage in sandstone formations by experimental studies and geochemical modeling: the case of the Mesohellenic Trough, NW Greece. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control. 2018; 71: 116-132.

[25]

Lasaga AC. Chemical kinetics of water-rock interactions. J Geophys Res Solid Earth. 1984; 89(B6): 4009-4025.

[26]

Lemieux A, Sharp K, Shkarupin A. Preliminary assessment of underground hydrogen storage sites in ontario, Canada. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2019; 44(29): 15193-15204.

[27]

Liu N, Kovscek AR, Fernø MA, Dopffel N. Pore-scale study of microbial hydrogen consumption and wettability alteration during underground hydrogen storage. Front Energy Res. 2023; 11: 1-10.

[28]

Lu P, Zhang G, Apps J, Zhu C. Comparison of thermodynamic data files for PHREEQC. Earth-Sci Rev. 2022; 225:103888.

[29]

Ma Q, Ellis GS, Amrani A, Zhang T, Tang Y. Theoretical study on the reactivity of sulfate species with hydrocarbons. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 2008; 72(18): 4565-4576.

[30]

Machel HG. Bacterial and thermochemical sulfate reduction in diagenetic settings—old and new insights. Sediment Geol. 2001; 140(1/2): 143-175.

[31]

Machel HG, Krouse HR, Sassen R. Products and distinguishing criteria of bacterial and thermochemical sulfate reduction. Appl Geochem. 1995; 10(4): 373-389.

[32]

Mohd Amin S, Weiss DJ, Blunt MJ. Reactive transport modelling of geologic CO2 sequestration in saline aquifers: the influence of pure CO2 and of mixtures of CO2 with CH4 on the sealing capacity of cap rock at 37°C and 100 bar. Chem Geol. 2014; 367: 39-50.

[33]

Molíková A, Vítězová M, Vítěz T, et al. Underground gas storage as a promising natural methane bioreactor and reservoir? J Energy Storage. 2022; 47:103631.

[34]

Mougin P, Lamoureux-Var V, Bariteau A, Huc AY. Thermodynamic of thermochemical sulphate reduction. J Petrol Sci Eng. 2007; 58(3/4): 413-427.

[35]

Nöth S. High H2S contents and other effects of thermochemical sulfate reduction in deeply buried carbonate reservoirs: a review. Geol Rundsch. 1997; 86(2): 275-287.

[36]

Ozarslan A. Large-scale hydrogen energy storage in salt caverns. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2012; 37(19): 14265-14277.

[37]

Pal N, Saxena N, Mandal A. Equilibrium and dynamic adsorption of gemini surfactants with different spacer lengths at oil/aqueous interfaces. Colloids Surf A. 2017; 533: 20-32.

[38]

Parkhurst DL, Appelo CAJ. Description of Input and Examples for PHREEQC Version 3—A Computer Program for Speciation, Batch-Reaction, One-Dimensional Transport, and Inverse Geochemical Calculations: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods. 2013: 497. https://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/06/a43/

[39]

Parkhurst DL, Appelo CAJ. User's guide to PHREEQC (Version 2): A computer program for speciation, batch-reaction, one-dimensional transport, and inverse geochemical calculations Water-Resources Investigations Report (Nos. 99-4259). U.S. Geological Survey; 1999.

[40]

Thaysen EM, Armitage T, Slabon L, Hassanpouryouzband A, Edlmann K. Microbial risk assessment for underground hydrogen storage in porous rocks. Fuel. 2023; 352:128852.

[41]

Thaysen EM, McMahon S, Strobel GJ, et al. Estimating microbial growth and hydrogen consumption in hydrogen storage in porous media. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2021; 151:111481.

[42]

Tian J, Li J, Kong H, et al. Genesis of hydrogen sulfide in natural gas reservoirs in the Western Qaidam Basin. Interpretation. 2021; 9(1): T223-T233.

[43]

Torghabeh AK, Kalantariasl A, Ghorbani MR, Nematollahi H. Multivariate thermochemical sulphate reduction (TSR) low temperature origin for H2S production: a fars provinance gas field. J Nat Gas Sci Eng. 2021; 88:103795.

[44]

Truche L, Berger G, Destrigneville C, et al. Experimental reduction of aqueous sulphate by hydrogen under hydrothermal conditions: implication for the nuclear waste storage. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 2009; 73(16): 4824-4835.

[45]

Truche L, Berger G, Destrigneville C, Guillaume D, Giffaut E. Kinetics of pyrite to pyrrhotite reduction by hydrogen in calcite buffered solutions between 90 and 180°C: implications for nuclear waste disposal. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 2010; 74(10): 2894-2914.

[46]

Truche L, Jodin-Caumon M-C, Lerouge C, et al. Sulphide mineral reactions in clay-rich rock induced by high hydrogen pressure. Application to disturbed or natural settings up to 250°C and 30 bar. Chem Geol. 2013; 351: 217-228.

[47]

Wang G, Hao F, Zou H, Li P. Causes of variation in the concentration and distribution of H2S in carbonate reservoirs of the Feixianguan formation, lower triassic in the eastern Sichuan basin. Geoenergy Sci Eng. 2023; 221:211381.

[48]

Wang Y, Zhu C, Zhang L, et al. Study on the generation mechanism of hydrogen sulfide by thermochemical sulfate reduction in heavy oil hot water flooding at low temperature. Energy Fuel. 2023; 37(15): 10990-11003.

[49]

Worden RH, Smalley PC. H2S-producing reactions in deep carbonate gas reservoirs: Khuff formation, Abu Dhabi. Chem Geol. 1996; 133(1/4): 157-171.

[50]

Zhang J, Fang F, Lin W, et al. Research on injection-production capability and seepage characteristics of multi-cycle operation of underground gas storage in gas field: case study of the wen 23 gas storage. Energies. 2020; 13(15):3829.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 The Author(s). Deep Underground Science and Engineering published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of China University of Mining and Technology.

PDF

3

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/