Ground vibration isolation using mass scatters: A comparative study with trench barriers and wave-impeding blocks

Abstract

Traffic-induced ground vibrations cause significant problems for residents and nearby structures. Reducing the effect of these vibrations on the neighboring environment is a key challenge, particularly in urban areas. This study presents both numerical and experimental investigations of the performance of mass scatters for screening ground vibrations. A three-dimensional numerical model is validated and extended to conduct a comparative study on the efficiency of three geotechnical methods of isolation. These methods include trench barriers, wave-impeding blocks (WIBs), and mass scatters. The results showed that mass scatters represent an efficient way of scattering ground vibrations, and their efficiency is mainly related to the weights of mass scatters and their natural frequency, which control the dynamic soil response in the frequency domain. Rigid trench barriers are less effective than soft ones, and their efficiency is more pronounced regarding the WIB. Soft barriers with a depth of an order of half of the wavelength can decrease the vibration levels by up to 50%, which is comparable to the performance of enormous mass scatters. The dimensions of WIBs must be chosen according to the wavelength of incident waves and the cutoff frequency of the topsoil layer. Considering the significant wavelength of traffic-induced vibration, the use of trench barriers or WIBs becomes impractical and expensive; therefore, mass scatters appear to be an efficient and practical solution.

Keywords

ground-borne vibration / isolation / mass scatter / trench barrier / wave-impeding block

References

[1] Adam M, Von Estorff O. Reduction of train-induced building vibrations by using open and filled trenches. Comput Struct. 2005; 83: 11-24.

[2] Ahmad S, Al-Hussaini TM, Fishman KL. Investigation on active isolation of machine foundations by open trenches. J Geotech Eng. 1996; 122: 454-461.

[3] Ajel HA, Al-Jubair HS, Ali JK. An experimental study on vibration isolation by open and in-filled trenches. Open Eng. 2022; 12: 555-569.

[4] Alzawi A, Hesham El Naggar M. Full scale experimental study on vibration scattering using open and in-filled (GeoFoam) wave barriers. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 2011; 31: 306-317.

[5] Antes H, Estorff V. Dynamic response of 2D and 3D block foundations on a halfspace with inclusions. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 1994; 13(5): 305-311.

[6] Baziar MH, Shahbazan P. Centrifuge modeling of heavy masses, placed on the ground, as a vibration attenuation countermeasure for surface trains. Transport Geotech. 2024; 45:101196.

[7] Bo Q, Ali L, Irini DM. Numerical study of wave barrier and its optimization design. Finite Elem Anal Design. 2014; 84: 1-13.

[8] Cao X, Zhou F, Liu J, Ma Q. Experimental study and numerical analysis for vibration isolation performance on open trench and wave impeding block combined vibration isolation barrier. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 2024; 177:108418.

[9] Çelebi E, Fırat S, Beyhan G, Çankaya I, Vural I, Kırtel O. Field experiments on wave propagation and vibration isolation by using wave barriers. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 2009; 29: 824-833.

[10] Chen J, Geng J, Gao G, Luo W, Liu Y, Li K. Mitigation of subway induced low-frequency vibrations using a wave impeding block. Transport Geotech. 2022; 37:100862.

[11] Chew JH, Leong EC. Field and numerical modelling of sand-rubber mixtures vibration barrier. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 2019; 125:105740.

[12] Coulier P, Cuéllar V, Degrande G, Lombaert G. Experimental and numerical evaluation of the effectiveness of a stiff wave barrier in the soil. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 2015; 77: 238-253.

[13] Gao G, Li N, Gu X. Field experiment and numerical study on active vibration isolation by horizontal blocks in layered ground under vertical loading. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 2015; 69: 251-261.

[14] Gao L, Cai C, Li C, Mak CM. Numerical analysis of the mitigation performance of a buried PT-WIB on environmental vibration. Sensors. 2023; 23:7666.

[15] Jazebi M, Ahmadi MM, Saberian M, Li J, Sahebalzamani P. Performance of open and in‑filled (geofoam) trenches in mitigating ground‑borne vibrations induced by impact loading. Int J Pavement Res Technol. 2023; 16: 718-730.

[16] Jones DV, Petyt M. Ground Borne Vibrations From Passing Train the Effect of Masses Placed on the Ground Surface. Technical Memorandum ISVR, University of Southampton. No. 671; 1986.

[17] Krylov VV. Control of traffic-induced ground vibrations by placing heavy masses on the ground surface. J Low Freq Noise Vibr Active Control. 2007; 26(4): 311-321.

[18] Leung KL, Vardoulakis IG, Beskos DE, Tassoulas JL. Vibration isolation by trenches in continuously nonhomogeneous soil by the BEM. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 1991; 10(3): 172-179.

[19] Lysmer J, Kuhlemeyer RL. Finite dynamic model for infinite media. J Eng Mech Div. 1969; 95(4): 859-877.

[20] Mhanna M, Sadek M, Shahrour I. Prediction and mitigation of traffic induced ground vibrations in an urban zone. In: Conference of Urban Transport XVII, WIT Transactions on the Built Environment. Vol 116. WIT Press; 2011: 701-711.

[21] Mhanna M, Shahrour I, Sadek M, Dunez P. Efficiency of heavy mass technology in traffic vibration reduction: experimental and numerical investigation. Comp Geotech. 2014; 55: 141-149.

[22] Mylonakis G, Nikolaou S, Gazetas G. Footings under seismic loading analysis and design issues with emphasis on bridge foundations. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 2006; 26: 824-853.

[23] Naggar MHE, Chehab AG. Vibration barriers for shock-producing equipment. Can Geotech J. 2005; 42: 297-306.

[24] Peplow AT, Jones CJC, Petyt M. Surface vibration propagation over a layered elastic half-space with an inclusion. Appl Acoust. 1999; 56: 283-296.

[25] Saikia A, Das UK. Analysis and design of open trench barriers in screening steady-state surface vibrations. Earthq Eng Eng Vib. 2014; 13: 545-554.

[26] Schmid G, Chouw N, Le R. Shielding of structures from soil vibrations. Soil Dynamics & Earthquake Engineering V, International Conference. Computational Mechanics Publications, co publised with Elsevier Applied Science; 1991: 651-662.

[27] Semblat J, Pecker A. Waves and Vibrations in Soils: Earthquakes, Traffic, Shocks, Constructions Work. IUSS Press; 2009.

[28] Shi G, Li Y. Passive vibration isolation effectiveness of wave impedance block under incident Rayleigh wave inelastic foundation. World Earthq Eng. 2019; 35(2): 11-17.

[29] Tandon K, Kumar D, Ayothiraman R, Manna B, Ramana G. Numerical evaluation of tire chips–filled trench barriers for effective vibration isolation. J Low Freq Noise Vib Active Control. 2023; 42(1): 325-344.

[30] Toygar O, Ulgen D. A full-scale field study on mitigation of environmental ground vibrations by using open trenches. Build Environ. 2021; 203:108070.

[31] Tsai PH, Chang TS. Effects of open trench siding on vibration-screening effectiveness using the two-dimensional boundary element method. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 2009; 29(5): 865-873.

[32] Xi Z, Weili L, Benhai L, Jiaofen Q, Cheng L. Vibration isolation effects of barriers filled with ceramsite and sand: full-scale model test and numerical investigation. Constr Build Mater. 2022; 341:127789.

[33] Yarmohammadi F, Rafiee-Dehkharghani R, Behnia C, Aref AJ. Design of wave barriers for mitigation of train–induced vibrations using a coupled genetic-algorithm/finite-element methodology. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 2019; 121: 262-275.

[34] Zhang M, Ma Q. Study on vibration isolation performance of wave impeding block in unsaturated soil foundation under an underground dynamic load. J Low Freq Noise Vib Active Control. 2023; 42(3): 1466-1481.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). Deep Underground Science and Engineering published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of China University of Mining and Technology.