
Design and preparation of a simplifiedmicrodroplet generation device for nanoliter volume collection and measurementwith liquidmicrojunction–surface sampling probe–mass spectrometry
Daniel O. Reddy, Lishen Zhang, Thomas R. Covey, Richard D. Oleschuk
Droplet ›› 2025, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (1) : e158.
Design and preparation of a simplifiedmicrodroplet generation device for nanoliter volume collection and measurementwith liquidmicrojunction–surface sampling probe–mass spectrometry
Given recent interest in laboratory automation and miniaturization, the microdroplet research space has expanded across research disciplines and sectors. In turn, the microdroplet field is continually evolving and seeking new methods to generate microdroplets, especially in ways that can be integrated into diverse (microfluidic) workflows. Herein, we present a convenient, low-cost, and re-usable microdroplet generation device, termed as the “NanoWand,” which enables microdroplet formation in the nanoliter volume range through modulated surface energy and roughness, that is, an open surface energy trap (oSET), using commercially available and readily assembled coating and substrate materials. A wand-like shape is excised from a microscope glass cover slip via laser-micromachining and rendered hydrophobic; a circle is then cut-out from the hydrophobically modified wand’s tip using laser-micromachining to create the oSET. By adjusting the size of the oSET with laser-micromachining, the volume of the microdroplet can be similarly controlled. Using liquid microjunction–surface sampling probe–mass spectrometry (LMJ-SSPMS), specific NanoWand droplet capture volumeswere estimated to be 117 ± 23.6 nL, 198 ± 30.3 nL, and 277 ± 37.1 nL, corresponding to oSET diameters of 0.75, 1.00, and 1.25 mm, respectively. This simple approach provides a user-friendly way to form and transfer microdroplets that could be integrated into different liquid handling applications, especially when combined with the LMJ-SSP and ambient ionization MS as a powerful and rapid analytical tool.
[1] |
Huebner A, Sharma S, Srisa-Art M, Hollfelder F, Edel JB, deMello AJ. Microdroplets: a sea of applications? Lab Chip. 2008;8:1244.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[2] |
Kelly BT, Baret JC, Taly V, Griffiths AD. Miniaturizing chemistry and biology in microdroplets. Chem Commun. 2007:1773-1788.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[3] |
Garcia-Cordero JL, Fan ZH. Sessile droplets for chemical and biological assays. Lab Chip. 2017;17:2150-2166.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[4] |
Theberge AB, Courtois F, Schaerli Y, et al. Microdroplets in microfluidics: an evolving platform for discoveries in chemistry and biology. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2010;49:5846-5868.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[5] |
Dunn DA, Feygin I. Challenges and solutions to ultra-high-throughput screening assay miniaturization: submicroliter fluid handling. Drug Discov Today. 2000;5: S84-S91.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[6] |
Shang L, Cheng Y, Zhao Y. Emerging droplet microfluidics. Chem Rev. 2017;117:7964-8040.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Wei Y-Y, Sun Z-Q. Ren H-H, Li L. Advances in microdroplet generation methods. Chin J Anal Chem. 2019;47:795-804.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[8] |
Ding Y, Howes PD, deMello AJ. Recent advances in droplet microfluidics. Anal Chem. 2020;92:132-149.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[9] |
Yan X. Emerging microdroplet chemistry for synthesis and analysis. Int J Mass Spectrom. 2021;468:116639.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[10] |
Kafeenah H, Jen H, Chen S. Microdroplet mass spectrometry: accelerating reaction and application. Electrophoresis. 2022;43:74-81.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[11] |
MarketsAndMarkets. Liquid Handling System Market. Accessed October 30, 2024. https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/liquid-handling-system-market-192124302.html
|
[12] |
BioDot. Technology. Accessed October 30, 2024. https://www.biodot.com/technology
|
[13] |
M2 Automation. Microdispensers-Choose One or Multiple for Your Instrument. Accessed October 30, 2024. https://www.m2-automation.com/en/microdispenser?gclid=Cj0KCQjw-_mvBhDwARIsAA-Q0Q7EN_pNyWny3RcdhbVNj8_YxEEKHmwAoY7MHu3XjJmHtdyy9-UY5p4aArMkEALw_wcB
|
[14] |
sptlabtech. Mosquito®. Accessed October 30, 2024. https://www.sptlabtech.com/products/mosquito
|
[15] |
Lübbert C, Peukert W. Characterization of electrospray drop size distributions by mobility-classified mass spectrometry: implications for ion clustering in solution and ion formation pathways. Anal Chem. 2021;93:12862-12871.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[16] |
Tang K, Gomez A. Generation by electrospray of monodisperse water droplets for targeted drug delivery by inhalation. J Aerosol Sci. 1994;25:1237-1249.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[17] |
Brouzes E, Carniol A, Bakowski T, Strey HH. Precise pooling and dispensing of microfluidic droplets towards micro-to macro-world interfacing. RSC Adv. 2014;4:38542-38550.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[18] |
Ge A, Diao Z, Li Y, et al. An integrated microfluidic platform for on-demand single droplet dispenser with high accuracy by electrohydrodynamic (EHD) printing technique. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2024;405:135334.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[19] |
Awashra M, Elomaa P, Ojalehto T, Saavalainen P, Jokinen V. Superhydrophilic/superhydrophobic droplet microarrays of low surface tension biofluids for nucleic acid detection. Adv Mater Inter. 2024;11:2300596.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[20] |
Wu L, Dong Z, Li F, Song Y. Designing Laplace pressure pattern for microdroplet manipulation. Langmuir. 2018;34:639-645.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[21] |
Hattori S, Tang C, Tanaka D, et al. Development of microdroplet generation method for organic solvents used in chemical synthesis. Molecules. 2020;25:5360.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[22] |
Shen Z, Zou Y, Chen X. Characterization of microdroplets using optofluidic signals. Lab Chip. 2012;12:3816-3820.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[23] |
Zhan Y, Yu S, Amirfazli A, Siddiqui AR, Li W. Magnetically responsive superhydrophobic surfaces for microdroplet manipulation. Adv Mater Inter. 2022;9:2102010.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[24] |
Sullivan DE. Surface tension and contact angle of a liquid-solid interface. J Chem Phys. 1981;74:2604-2615.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[25] |
Chen L, Bonaccurso E. Effects of surface wettability and liquid viscosity on the dynamic wetting of individual drops. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2014;90:022401.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[26] |
Ortiz-Young D, Chiu HC, Kim S, Voïtchovsky K, Riedo E. The interplay between apparent viscosity and wettability in nanoconfined water. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2482.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[27] |
Lei BUW, Prow TW. A review of microsampling techniques and their social impact. Biomed Microdevices. 2019;21:81.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[28] |
Londhe V, Rajadhyaksha M. Opportunities and obstacles for microsampling techniques in bioanalysis: special focus on DBS and VAMS. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2020;182:113102.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[29] |
Denniff P, Spooner N. Volumetric absorptive microsampling: a dried sample collection technique for quantitative bioanalysis. Anal Chem. 2014;86:8489-8495.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[30] |
Kok MGM, Fillet M. Volumetric absorptive microsampling: current advances and applications. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2018;147:288-296.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[31] |
Protti M, Mandrioli R, Mercolini L. Tutorial: volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS). Anal Chim Acta. 2019;1046:32-47.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[32] |
Gao L, Smith N, Kaushik D, Milner S, Kong R. Validation and application of volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) dried blood method for phenylalanine measurement in patients with phenylketonuria. Clin Biochem. 2023;116:65-74.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[33] |
Mandrioli R, Mercolini L, Protti M. Blood and plasma volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) coupled to LC-MS/MS for the forensic assessment of cocaine consumption. Molecules. 2020;25:1046.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[34] |
Volani C, Malfertheiner C, Caprioli G, et al. VAMS-based blood capillary sampling for mass spectrometry-based human metabolomics studies. Metabolites. 2023;13:146.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[35] |
Palmisani M, Tartara E, Landmark CJ, et al. Therapeutic salivary monitoring of perampanel in patients with epilepsy using a volumetric absorptive microsampling technique. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15:2030.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[36] |
Rudge J, Kushon S. Volumetric absorptive microsampling: its use in COVID-19 research and testing. Bioanalysis. 2021;13:1851-1863.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[37] |
Penot M, Linard C, Taudon N. A validated volumetric absorptive microsampling-liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method to quantify doxycycline levels in urine: an application to monitor the malaria chemoprophylaxis compliance. J Anal Methods Chem. 2020;2020:8868396.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[38] |
Protti M, Marasca C, Cirrincione M, Sberna AE, Mandrioli R, Mercolini L. Dried urine microsampling coupled to liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) for the analysis of unconjugated anabolic androgenic steroids. Molecules. 2020;25:3210.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[39] |
Protti M, Sberna PM, Sardella R, Vovk T, Mercolini L, Mandrioli R. VAMS and StAGE as innovative tools for the enantioselective determination of clenbuterol in urine by LC-MS/MS. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2021;195:113873.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[40] |
Seemann R, Brinkmann M, Pfohl T, Herminghaus S. Droplet based microfluidics. Rep Prog Phys. 2012;75:016601.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[41] |
Lisowski P, Zarzycki PK. Microfluidic paper-based analytical devices (μPADs) and micro total analysis systems (μTAS): development, applications and future trends. Chromatographia. 2013;76:1201-1214.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[42] |
Zhang L, Reddy DO, Salomons TT, Oleschuk RD. Micro “Hyper-Channels”on laser-refined cellulose structures. Small Methods. 2024;8:2301164.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[43] |
Zhang L, Salomons TT, Reddy D, Hillen P, Oleschuk R. A universally adaptable micropatterning method through laser-induced wettability inversion. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2023;390:133983.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[44] |
Zhang Y, Wang T-H. Flip-drop: droplet array created by surface energy trap for combinatorial screening. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 26th International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS), Taipei, Taiwan, 2013:20-24.
|
[45] |
Jackman RJ, Duffy DC, Ostuni E, Willmore ND, Whitesides GM. Fabricating large arrays of microwells with arbitrary dimensions and filling them using discontinuous dewetting. Anal Chem. 1998;70:2280-2287.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[46] |
Tucker B, Hermann M, Mainguy A, Oleschuk R. Hydrophobic/hydrophilic patterned surfaces for directed evaporative preconcentration. Analyst. 2020;145:643-650.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[47] |
Hermann M, Agrawal P, Liu C, LeBlanc JCY, Covey TR, Oleschuk RD. Rapid mass spectrometric calibration and standard addition using hydrophobic/hydrophilic patterned surfaces and discontinuous dewetting. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2022;33:660-670.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[48] |
McEwen RAH, Hermann M, Metwally H, et al. Discontinuously dewetting solvent arrays: droplet formation and poly-synchronous surface extraction for mass spectrometry imaging applications. Anal Chem. 2022;94:7219-7228.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[49] |
Zhang L, Kwok H, Li X, Yu H-Z. Superhydrophobic substrates from off-the-shelf laboratory filter paper: simplified preparation, patterning, and assay application. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9:39728-39735.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[50] |
Sriramulu D, Reed EL, Annamalai M, Venkatesan TV, Valiyaveettil S. Synthesis and characterization of superhydrophobic, self-cleaning NIR-reflective silica nanoparticles. Sci Rep. 2016;6:35993.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[51] |
Milionis A, Fragouli D, Martiradonna L, et al. Spatially controlled surface energy traps on superhydrophobic surfaces. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2014;6:1036-1043.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[52] |
Parvate S, Dixit P, Chattopadhyay S. Superhydrophobic surfaces: insights from theory and experiment. J Phys Chem B. 2020;124:1323-1360.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[53] |
Bachus KJ, Mats L, Choi HW, Gibson GTT, Oleschuk RD. Fabrication of patterned superhydrophobic/hydrophilic substrates by laser micromachining for small volume deposition and droplet-based fluorescence. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9:7629-7636.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[54] |
Hillen P.
|
[55] |
Van Berkel GJ, Kertesz V, Koeplinger KA, Vavrek M, Kong ANT. Liquid microjunction surface sampling probe electrospray mass spectrometry for detection of drugs and metabolites in thin tissue sections. J Mass Spectrom. 2008;43:500-508.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[56] |
Simon D, Oleschuk R. The liquid micro junction-surface sampling probe (LMJ-SSP);a versatile ambient mass spectrometry interface. Analyst. 2021;146:6365-6378.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[57] |
Liu S, Xu Q, Li Y, Xu W, Zhai Y. Coupling handheld liquid microjunction-surface sampling probe (hLMJ-SSP) to the miniature mass spectrometer for automated and in-situ surface analysis. Talanta. 2022;242:123090.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |