
Programmable optical window bonding enabled 3D printing of high-resolution transparentmicrofluidic devices for biomedical applications
Mengguang Ye, Yuxiang Xue, Hongyu Zhao, Patricia Hazelton, Yuxuan Ji, Glen McHale, Xianfeng Chen
Droplet ›› 2025, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (1) : e153.
Programmable optical window bonding enabled 3D printing of high-resolution transparentmicrofluidic devices for biomedical applications
Traditional technologies for manufacturing microfluidic devices often involve the use of molds for polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) casting generated from photolithography techniques, which are time-consuming, costly, and difficult to use in generating multilayered structure. As an alternative, 3D printing allows rapid and cost-effective prototyping and customization of complex microfluidic structures. However, 3Dprinted devices are typically opaque and are challenging to create small channels. Herein, we introduce a novel “programmable optical window bonding” 3D printing method that incorporates the bonding of an optical window during the printing process, facilitating the fabrication of transparent microfluidic devices with high printing fidelity. Our approach allows direct and rapid manufacturing of complex microfluidic structure without the use of molds for PDMS casting. We successfully demonstrated the applications of this method by fabricating a variety of microfluidic devices, including perfusable chips for cell culture, droplet generators for spheroid formation, and high-resolution droplet microfluidic devices involving different channel width and height for rapid antibiotic susceptibility testing. Overall, our 3D printing method demonstrates a rapid and cost-effective approach for manufacturing microfluidic devices, particularly in the biomedical field, where rapid prototyping and high-quality optical analysis are crucial.
[1] |
Velve-Casquillas G, Le Berre M, Piel M, Tran PT. Microfluidic tools for cell biological research. Nano Today. 2010;5:28-47.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[2] |
Ng JMK, Gitlin I, Stroock AD, Whitesides GM. Components for integrated poly(dimethylsiloxane) microfluidic systems. Electrophoresis. 2002;23:3461-3473.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[3] |
Qin D, Xia Y, Whitesides GM. Soft lithography for micro-and nanoscale patterning. Nat Protoc. 2010;5:491-502.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[4] |
Balakrishnan HK, Badar F, Doeven EH, et al. 3D printing: an alternative microfabrication approach with unprecedented opportunities in design. Anal Chem. 2020;93:350-366.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[5] |
Chen C, Mehl BT, Munshi AS, Townsend AD, Spence DM, Martin RS. 3D-printed microfluidic devices: fabrication, advantages and limitations-a mini review. Anal Methods. 2016;8:6005-6012.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[6] |
Waheed S, Cabot JM, Macdonald NP, et al. 3D printed microfluidic devices: enablers and barriers. Lab Chip. 2016;16:1993-2013.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Mehta V, Rath SN. 3D printed microfluidic devices: a review focused on four fundamental manufacturing approaches and implications on the field of healthcare. Bio-Des Manuf. 2021;4:311-343.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[8] |
de Almeida Monteiro Melo Ferraz M, Henning HHW, da Costa PF, et al. Potential health and environmental risks of three-dimensional engineered polymers. Environ Sci Technol Lett. 2018;5:80-85.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[9] |
Oskui SM, Diamante G, Liao C, et al. Assessing and reducing the toxicity of 3D-printed parts. Environ Sci Technol Lett. 2016;3:1-6.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[10] |
Carve M, Wlodkowic D. 3D-printed chips: compatibility of additive manufacturing photopolymeric substrata with biological applications. Micromachines. 2018;9:91.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[11] |
Venzac B, Deng S, Mahmoud Z, et al. PDMS curing inhibition on 3D-printed molds: why? Also, how to avoid it? Anal Chem. 2021;93:7180-7187.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[12] |
Comina G, Suska A, Filippini D. PDMS lab-on-a-chip fabrication using 3D printed templates. Lab Chip. 2014;14:424-430.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[13] |
Chan HN, Chen Y, Shu Y, Chen Y, Tian Q, Wu H. Direct, one-step molding of 3D-printed structures for convenient fabrication of truly 3D PDMS microfluidic chips. Microfluid Nanofluid. 2015;19:9-18.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[14] |
Olanrewaju A, Robillard A, Dagher M, Juncker D. Autonomous microfluidic capillaric circuits replicated from 3D-printed molds. Lab Chip. 2016;16:3804-3814.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[15] |
Fritschen A, Bell AK, Konigstein I, Stuhn L, Stark RW, Blaeser A. Investigation and comparison of resin materials in transparent DLP-printing for application in cell culture and organs-on-a-chip. Biomater Sci. 2022;10:1981-1994.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[16] |
Urrios A, Parra-Cabrera C, Bhattacharjee N, et al. 3D-printing of transparent bio-microfluidic devices in PEG-DA. Lab Chip. 2016;16:2287-2294.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[17] |
Xu Y, Qi F, Mao H, et al. In-situ transfer vat photopolymerization for transparent microfluidic device fabrication. Nat Commun. 2022;13:918.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[18] |
Ng WL, Lee JM, Zhou M, et al. Vat polymerization-based bioprinting-process, materials, applications and regulatory challenges. Biofabrication. 2020;12:022001.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[19] |
Gibson I, Rosen D, Stucker B, et al.
|
[20] |
Shrestha J, Ghadiri M, Shanmugavel M, et al. A rapidly prototyped lung-on-a-chip model using 3D-printed molds. Organs-on-a-Chip. 2019;1:100001.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[21] |
O’Grady BJ, Geuy MD, Kim H, et al. Rapid prototyping of cell culture microdevices using parylene-coated 3D prints. Lab Chip. 2021;21:4814-4822.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[22] |
Gong H, Beauchamp M, Perry S, Woolley AT, Nordin GP. Optical approach to resin formulation for 3D printed microfluidics. RSC Adv. 2015;5:106621-106632.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[23] |
Boaks M, Roper C, Viglione M, et al. Biocompatible high-resolution 3D-printed microfluidic devices: integrated cell chemotaxis demonstration. Micromachines. 2023;14:1589.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |