Programmable optical window bonding enabled 3D printing of high-resolution transparentmicrofluidic devices for biomedical applications

Mengguang Ye, Yuxiang Xue, Hongyu Zhao, Patricia Hazelton, Yuxuan Ji, Glen McHale, Xianfeng Chen

Droplet ›› 2025, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (1) : e153.

PDF
Droplet ›› 2025, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (1) : e153. DOI: 10.1002/dro2.153
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Programmable optical window bonding enabled 3D printing of high-resolution transparentmicrofluidic devices for biomedical applications

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Traditional technologies for manufacturing microfluidic devices often involve the use of molds for polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) casting generated from photolithography techniques, which are time-consuming, costly, and difficult to use in generating multilayered structure. As an alternative, 3D printing allows rapid and cost-effective prototyping and customization of complex microfluidic structures. However, 3Dprinted devices are typically opaque and are challenging to create small channels. Herein, we introduce a novel “programmable optical window bonding” 3D printing method that incorporates the bonding of an optical window during the printing process, facilitating the fabrication of transparent microfluidic devices with high printing fidelity. Our approach allows direct and rapid manufacturing of complex microfluidic structure without the use of molds for PDMS casting. We successfully demonstrated the applications of this method by fabricating a variety of microfluidic devices, including perfusable chips for cell culture, droplet generators for spheroid formation, and high-resolution droplet microfluidic devices involving different channel width and height for rapid antibiotic susceptibility testing. Overall, our 3D printing method demonstrates a rapid and cost-effective approach for manufacturing microfluidic devices, particularly in the biomedical field, where rapid prototyping and high-quality optical analysis are crucial.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Mengguang Ye, Yuxiang Xue, Hongyu Zhao, Patricia Hazelton, Yuxuan Ji, Glen McHale, Xianfeng Chen. Programmable optical window bonding enabled 3D printing of high-resolution transparentmicrofluidic devices for biomedical applications. Droplet, 2025, 4(1): e153 https://doi.org/10.1002/dro2.153

References

[1]
Velve-Casquillas G, Le Berre M, Piel M, Tran PT. Microfluidic tools for cell biological research. Nano Today. 2010;5:28-47.
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Ng JMK, Gitlin I, Stroock AD, Whitesides GM. Components for integrated poly(dimethylsiloxane) microfluidic systems. Electrophoresis. 2002;23:3461-3473.
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Qin D, Xia Y, Whitesides GM. Soft lithography for micro-and nanoscale patterning. Nat Protoc. 2010;5:491-502.
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Balakrishnan HK, Badar F, Doeven EH, et al. 3D printing: an alternative microfabrication approach with unprecedented opportunities in design. Anal Chem. 2020;93:350-366.
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Chen C, Mehl BT, Munshi AS, Townsend AD, Spence DM, Martin RS. 3D-printed microfluidic devices: fabrication, advantages and limitations-a mini review. Anal Methods. 2016;8:6005-6012.
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Waheed S, Cabot JM, Macdonald NP, et al. 3D printed microfluidic devices: enablers and barriers. Lab Chip. 2016;16:1993-2013.
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Mehta V, Rath SN. 3D printed microfluidic devices: a review focused on four fundamental manufacturing approaches and implications on the field of healthcare. Bio-Des Manuf. 2021;4:311-343.
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
de Almeida Monteiro Melo Ferraz M, Henning HHW, da Costa PF, et al. Potential health and environmental risks of three-dimensional engineered polymers. Environ Sci Technol Lett. 2018;5:80-85.
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Oskui SM, Diamante G, Liao C, et al. Assessing and reducing the toxicity of 3D-printed parts. Environ Sci Technol Lett. 2016;3:1-6.
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Carve M, Wlodkowic D. 3D-printed chips: compatibility of additive manufacturing photopolymeric substrata with biological applications. Micromachines. 2018;9:91.
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Venzac B, Deng S, Mahmoud Z, et al. PDMS curing inhibition on 3D-printed molds: why? Also, how to avoid it? Anal Chem. 2021;93:7180-7187.
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Comina G, Suska A, Filippini D. PDMS lab-on-a-chip fabrication using 3D printed templates. Lab Chip. 2014;14:424-430.
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Chan HN, Chen Y, Shu Y, Chen Y, Tian Q, Wu H. Direct, one-step molding of 3D-printed structures for convenient fabrication of truly 3D PDMS microfluidic chips. Microfluid Nanofluid. 2015;19:9-18.
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Olanrewaju A, Robillard A, Dagher M, Juncker D. Autonomous microfluidic capillaric circuits replicated from 3D-printed molds. Lab Chip. 2016;16:3804-3814.
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Fritschen A, Bell AK, Konigstein I, Stuhn L, Stark RW, Blaeser A. Investigation and comparison of resin materials in transparent DLP-printing for application in cell culture and organs-on-a-chip. Biomater Sci. 2022;10:1981-1994.
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Urrios A, Parra-Cabrera C, Bhattacharjee N, et al. 3D-printing of transparent bio-microfluidic devices in PEG-DA. Lab Chip. 2016;16:2287-2294.
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Xu Y, Qi F, Mao H, et al. In-situ transfer vat photopolymerization for transparent microfluidic device fabrication. Nat Commun. 2022;13:918.
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Ng WL, Lee JM, Zhou M, et al. Vat polymerization-based bioprinting-process, materials, applications and regulatory challenges. Biofabrication. 2020;12:022001.
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Gibson I, Rosen D, Stucker B, et al. Additive Manufacturing Technologies. Vol 17. Springer; 2021.
[20]
Shrestha J, Ghadiri M, Shanmugavel M, et al. A rapidly prototyped lung-on-a-chip model using 3D-printed molds. Organs-on-a-Chip. 2019;1:100001.
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
O’Grady BJ, Geuy MD, Kim H, et al. Rapid prototyping of cell culture microdevices using parylene-coated 3D prints. Lab Chip. 2021;21:4814-4822.
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Gong H, Beauchamp M, Perry S, Woolley AT, Nordin GP. Optical approach to resin formulation for 3D printed microfluidics. RSC Adv. 2015;5:106621-106632.
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Boaks M, Roper C, Viglione M, et al. Biocompatible high-resolution 3D-printed microfluidic devices: integrated cell chemotaxis demonstration. Micromachines. 2023;14:1589.
CrossRef Google scholar

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 2025 The Author(s). Droplet published by Jilin University and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
PDF

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/