LIPUS-activated piezoelectric sutures exert antibacterial and pro-regenerative effects to promote wound healing

Yanhui Lu , Yunyang Bai , Liping Wu , Liqin Tang , Boon Chin Heng , Mingming Xu , Ting Song , Tingting Wu , Tingjun Li , Qiaomei Ren , Yaru Guo , Jifu Mao , Xuliang Deng , Xuehui Zhang

Dental Research ›› 2026, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (3) : 100044

PDF (13084KB)
Dental Research ›› 2026, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (3) :100044 DOI: 10.1016/j.dtrs.2026.100044
Research Article
research-article
LIPUS-activated piezoelectric sutures exert antibacterial and pro-regenerative effects to promote wound healing
Author information +
History +
PDF (13084KB)

Abstract

Introduction:Sutures are essential for preventing surgical site infections (SSIs) and promoting wound healing, yet current drug-based antibacterial strategies often fail to sustain long-term efficacy and may induce drug resistance. This study developed a drug-free dual-function electroactive (DE) suture with piezoelectric properties, and evaluate its antibacterial and wound-healing performance in vitro and in vivo. Materials and methods:DE sutures were fabricated and tested under low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS). Antibacterial activity was assessed via ROS generation and bacterial viability assays. In vivo evaluation was performed using rat full thickness incision model with histological and immunohistochemical analyses of inflammation, vascularization, and tissue regeneration. Results and discussion:LIPUS-activated DE sutures generated ROS that disrupted bacterial membranes, significantly reducing bacterial viability.In vivo, DE sutures attenuated inflammation, promoted angiogenesis, and enhanced tissue regeneration. Multi-strand designs showed improved mechanical and pro-healing performance. Conclusion:This piezoelectric-enabled, LIPUS-triggered DE suture provides a drug-free strategy for simultaneous infection control and tissue repair, offering a promising approach in regenerative tissue engineering.

Keywords

Dual-function electroactive suture / Antibacterial effects / Wound healing / Low intensity pulsed ultrasound

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yanhui Lu, Yunyang Bai, Liping Wu, Liqin Tang, Boon Chin Heng, Mingming Xu, Ting Song, Tingting Wu, Tingjun Li, Qiaomei Ren, Yaru Guo, Jifu Mao, Xuliang Deng, Xuehui Zhang. LIPUS-activated piezoelectric sutures exert antibacterial and pro-regenerative effects to promote wound healing. Dental Research, 2026, 1 (3) : 100044 DOI:10.1016/j.dtrs.2026.100044

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

G.C. Gurtner, S. Werner, Y. Barrandon, et al., Wound repair and regeneration, Nature 453 (2008) 314-321, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07039.

[2]

K. Iskandar, M. Sartelli, M. Tabbal, et al., Highlighting the gaps in quantifying the economic burden of surgical site infections associated with antimicrobial-resistant bacteria, World J. Emerg. Surg. 14 (2019) 50, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-019-0266-x.

[3]

A.N. Muhamad, C.S.J. Teh, M.R. Draman, et al., High incidence of multidrug-resistant organisms and modifiable risk factors associated with surgical site infections: a cohort study in a tertiary medical center in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia from 2020 to 2023, Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 14 (2025) 22, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-025-01537-2.

[4]

NIHR Global Health Research Unit on Global Surgery, Routine sterile glove and instrument change at the time of abdominal wound closure to prevent surgical site infection (ChEETAh): a model-based cost-effectiveness analysis of a pragmatic, cluster-randomised trial in seven low-income and middle-income countries, Lancet Glob. Health 12 (2024) e235-e242, https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00538-7.

[5]

D.R. Long, C. Bryson-Cahn, A. Waalkes, et al., Contribution of the patient microbiome to surgical site infection and antibiotic prophylaxis failure in spine surgery, Sci. Transl. Med. 16 (2024) eadk8222, https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.adk8222.

[6]

S. Prabha, J. Sowndarya, P.J.V.S. Ram, et al., Chitosan-coated surgical sutures prevent adherence and biofilms of mixed microbial communities, Curr. Microbiol. 78 (2021) 502-512, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-020-02306-7.

[7]

M.F. Bath, J. Davies, R. Suresh, et al., Surgical site infections: a scoping review on current intraoperative prevention measures, Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 104 (2022) 571-576, https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2022.0075.

[8]

G. Bedoux, B. Roig, O. Thomas, et al., Occurrence and toxicity of antimicrobial triclosan and by-products in the environment, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 19 (2012) 1044-1065, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-011-0632-z.

[9]

C.M. Cooney, Triclosan comes under scrutiny, Environ. Health Perspect. 118 (2010) A242, https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.118-2898873.

[10]

E. Hidalgo, C. Dominguez, Mechanisms underlying chlorhexidine-induced cytotoxicity, Toxicol. In Vitro 15 (2001) 271-276, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0887-2333(01)00020-0.

[11]

H. Han, L. Tang, Y. Li, et al., A multifunctional surgical suture with electroactivity assisted by oligochitosan/gelatin-tannic acid for promoting skin wound healing and controlling scar proliferation, Carbohydr. Polym. 320 (2023) 121236, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.121236.

[12]

O.J. Rauhala, L. Ma, D.J. Wisniewski, et al., E-Suture: mixed-conducting suture for medical devices, Adv. Healthc. Mater. 13 (2024) e2302613, https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202302613.

[13]

M. Parirokh, S. Asgary, M.J. Eghbal, et al., A scanning electron microscope study of plaque accumulation on silk and PVDF suture materials in oral mucosa, Int. Endod. J. 37 (2004) 776-781, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00873.x.

[14]

S. Wang, Y. Feng, X. Jia, et al., Cotton fiber-based dressings with wireless electrical stimulation and antibacterial activity for wound repair, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 256 (2024) 128496, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.128496.

[15]

J. Song, Y. Lu, T. Pan, et al., Manipulation of surface electrical charge on nanocomposite membranes confers wide spectrum bactericidal effects and promotes tissue regeneration, Adv. Funct. Mater. 34 (2024) 2314024, https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202314024.

[16]

C. Li, S. Zhang, Y. Yao, et al., Piezoelectric bioactive glasses composite promotes angiogenesis by the synergistic effect of wireless electrical stimulation and active ions, Adv. Healthc. Mater. 12 (2023) e2300064, https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202300064.

[17]

W. Fan, X. Yang, X. Hu, et al., A novel conductive microtubule hydrogel for electrical stimulation of chronic wounds based on biological electrical wires, J. Nanobiotechnol. 22 (2024) 258, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-024-02524-2.

[18]

S. Löffler, K. Melican, K.P.R. Nilsson, et al., Organic bioelectronics in medicine, J. Intern. Med. 282 (2017) 24-36, https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.12595.

[19]

Y. Liu, G. Dzidotor, T.T. Le, et al., Exercise-induced piezoelectric stimulation for cartilage regeneration in rabbits, Sci. Transl. Med. 14 (2022) eabi7282, https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.abi7282.

[20]

X. Xiao, X. Meng, D. Kim, et al., Ultrasound-driven injectable and fully biodegradable triboelectric nanogenerators, Small Methods 7 (2023) e2201350, https://doi.org/10.1002/smtd.202201350.

[21]

D. Zhao, G. Zhong, Z. Cao, et al., Piezoelectric neuromodulation of the subthalamic nucleus ameliorates motor and nonmotor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease, Sci. Adv. 12 (2026) eaec6955, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aec6955.

[22]

X. Meng, X. Xiao, S. Jeon, et al., An ultrasound-driven bioadhesive triboelectric nanogenerator for instant wound sealing and electrically accelerated healing in emergencies, Adv. Mater. 35 (2023) e2209054, https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202209054.

[23]

X. Qiu, L. Nie, P. Liu, et al., From hemostasis to proliferation: accelerating the infected wound healing through a comprehensive repair strategy based on GA/OKGM hydrogel loaded with MXene@TiO2 nanosheets, Biomaterials 308 (2024) 122548, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2024.122548.

[24]

Y. Huang, X. Wan, Q. Su, et al., Ultrasound-activated piezo-hot carriers trigger tandem catalysis coordinating cuproptosis-like bacterial death against implant infections, Nat. Commun. 15 (2024) 1643, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-45619-y.

[25]

L. Wu, Y. Lu, L. Liu, et al., BaTiO3 doping enhances ultrasound-driven piezoelectric bactericidal effects of fibrous poly(L-lactic acid) dressings to accelerate septic wound healing, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 16 (2024) 67477-67490, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.4c17407.

[26]

Y. Wang, X. Wen, Y. Jia, et al., Piezo-catalysis for nondestructive tooth whitening, Nat. Commun. 11 (2020) 1328, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15015-3.

[27]

Y. Han, H. Zhang, R. Yang, et al., Ba2+-doping introduced piezoelectricity and efficient ultrasound-triggered bactericidal activity of brookite TiO2 nanorods, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 670 (2024) 742-750, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2024.05.148.

[28]

T. Xu, C. Wang, Effect of two-step sintering on micro-honeycomb BaTiO3 ceramics prepared by freezecasting process, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 36 (2016) 2647-2652, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2016.03.032.

[29]

S. Poddar, P. de Sa, R. Cai, et al., Room-temperature magnetic switching of the electric polarization in ferroelectric nanopillars, ACS Nano 12 (2018) 576-584, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.7b07389.

[30]

Z. Zhou, J. Zhang, X. Duan, et al., Laser annealing of graphene/P(VDF-TrFE) composite films and its effects on protein adsorption, Mater. Lett. 308 (2022) 131119, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2021.131119.

[31]

J.E. Tidwell, V.L. Kish, J.B. Samora, et al., Knot security: how many throws does it really take? Orthopedics 35 (2012) e532-e537, https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20120327-16.

[32]

X. Chen, D. Hou, L. Wang, et al., Antibacterial surgical silk sutures using a high-performance slow-release carrier coating system, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7 (2015) 22394-22403, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b06239.

[33]

P. Johanns, C. Baek, P. Grandgeorge, et al., The strength of surgical knots involves a critical interplay between friction and elastoplasticity, Sci. Adv. 9 (2023) eadg8861, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adg8861.

[34]

Z. Ma, Z. Yang, Q. Gao, et al., Bioinspired tough gel sheath for robust and versatile surface functionalization, Sci. Adv. 7 (2021) eabc3012, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abc3012.

[35]

M. Wu, Y. Liu, C. Liu, et al., Core-shell filament with excellent wound healing property made of cellulose nanofibrils and guar gum via interfacial polyelectrolyte complexation spinning, Small 19 (2023) e2205867, https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202205867.

[36]

S. Abbasi, S. Sinha, E. Labit, et al., Distinct regulatory programs control the latent regenerative potential of dermal fibroblasts during wound healing, Cell Stem Cell 27 (2020) 396-412.e6, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2020.07.008.

[37]

A.A. Almet, Y. Liu, Q. Nie, et al., Integrated single-cell analysis reveals spatially and temporally dynamic heterogeneity in fibroblast states during wound healing, J. Invest. Dermatol. 145 (2025) 645-659.e25, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2024.06.1281.

[38]

R. Ramos, M.V. Plikus, Moving on after trauma: fibroblasts thrive in the right environment, Cell Stem Cell 27 (2020) 349-351, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2020.08.007.

[39]

W.Q. Qu, J.X. Fan, D.W. Zheng, et al., Deep-penetration functionalized cuttlefish ink nanoparticles for combating wound infections with synergetic photothermal-immunologic therapy, Biomaterials 301 (2023) 122231, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2023.122231.

[40]

B. Ezraty, A. Gennaris, F. Barras, et al., Oxidative stress, protein damage and repair in bacteria, Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 15 (2017) 385-396, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro.2017.26.

[41]

X. Wu, M. Yang, J.S. Kim, et al., Reactivity differences enable ROS for selective ablation of bacteria, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61 (2022) e202200808, https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202200808.

[42]

T.I. Shaheen, M.F. Abdelhameed, S. Zaghloul, et al., vivo assessment of the durable, green and in situ biofunctional cotton fabrics based carboxymethyl chitosan nanohybrid for wound healing application, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 209 (2022) 485-497, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.04.027.

[43]

N. Han, Z. Xu, C. Cui, et al., A Fe3+-crosslinked pyrogallol-tethered gelatin adhesive hydrogel with antibacterial activity for wound healing, Biomater. Sci. 8 (2020) 3164-3172, https://doi.org/10.1039/d0bm00188k.

[44]

R. Luo, J. Dai, J. Zhang, et al., Accelerated skin wound healing by electrical stimulation, Adv. Healthc. Mater. 10 (2021) e2100557, https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202100557.

[45]

J. Lee, M. Ahn, B. Kim, 3D bioprinting-assisted tissue assembly of endocrine adipose units for enhanced skin regeneration, Adv. Funct. Mater. 35 (2025) 2419680, https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202419680.

[46]

Q. Guan, S. Hou, K. Wang, et al., Micropore structure engineering of injectable granular hydrogels via controlled liquid-liquid phase separation facilitates regenerative wound healing in mice and pigs, Biomaterials 318 (2025) 123192, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2025.123192.

[47]

L. Li, C. Yang, B. Ma, et al., Hydrogel-encapsulated engineered microbial consortium as a photoautotrophic "living material" for promoting skin wound healing, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 15 (2023) 6536-6547, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c20399.

[48]

Z. Sun, Y. Jin, J. Luo, et al., A bioabsorbable mechanoelectric fiber as electrical stimulation suture, Nat. Commun. 15 (2024) 8462, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-52354-x.

[49]

Y. Qian, X. Zhao, Q. Han, et al., An integrated multi-layer 3D-fabrication of PDA/RGD coated graphene loaded PCL nanoscaffold for peripheral nerve restoration, Nat. Commun. 9 (2018) 323, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02598-7.

[50]

G. Pan, Q. Zhong, T. Wang, et al., MoS2/Cu-MOF heterojunction-engineered smart scaffold: dual-mode chemo-sonodynamic synergy and sonocurrent-driven osteogenic integration for bone regeneration, Biomater. Adv. 180 (2026) 214551, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioadv.2025.214551.

PDF (13084KB)

3

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/