Effect of print parameters on the accuracy and fit of 3D-printed resin-based ceramic crowns

Abstract

This study evaluated the influence of print angle and layer thickness on the accuracy and fit of resin-based ceramic crowns fabricated using digital light processing (DLP). A mandibular first molar crown was virtually designed and then printed at two layer thicknesses (50 μm and 100 μm) and nine print angles (90°-270°). Accuracy was assessed by trueness, precision, and surface-resolved deviation metrics using 3D deviation analysis, whereas fit was evaluated with the triple-scan method. Both print angle and layer thickness significantly affected accuracy and fit (P<0.001). Trueness and fit values showed a nonlinear trend across print angles, with optimal results consistently observed at moderate inclinations of 150°-180°. Crowns printed at 50 μm showed better trueness and fit, whereas those printed at 100 μm showed more concentrated deviation distributions. Surface-resolved metrics revealed negative deviations at the marginal surfaces and positive deviations at the occlusal surfaces. Although all crowns showed clinically acceptable fit (<120 μm), the results indicate that a moderate print angle of 150°-180° combined with a 50 μm layer thickness provides the best balance between accuracy and clinical fit, while a 100 μm layer thickness may be preferable when printing consistency is prioritized.

Keywords

Digital light processing / Resin-based ceramic crown / Print angle / Layer thickness / Accuracy / Fit

References

[1] Suganna M, Kausher H, Tarek Ahmed S, et al. Contemporary Evidence of CAD-CAM in Dentistry: A Systematic Review[J/OL]. Cureus, 2022, 14(11): e31687. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36561580/. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.31687.

[2] Cioloca Holban C, Tatarciuc M, Vitalariu A M, et al. Three-Dimensional Printing and CAD/CAM Milling in Prosthodontics: A Scoping Review of Key Metrics Towards Future Perspectives[J/OL]. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2025, 14(14): 4837. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40725530/. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14144837.

[3] Camargo B, Willems E, Jacobs W, et al. 3D printing and milling accuracy influence full-contour zirconia crown adaptation[J/OL]. Dental Materials, 2022, 38(12): 1963-1976. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36411148/. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2022.11.002.

[4] Nima G, Ratzeburg F S G, Manrique Z, et al. Accuracy of additive and subtractive methods for interim tooth-supported restorations: An in vitro comparison of occlusal, axial, and intaglio surfaces [J/OL]. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2025, 134(2): 408.e1-408.e8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40274499/. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.04.006.

[5] Pagac M, Hajnys J, Ma Q P, et al. A Review of Vat Photopolymerization Technology: Materials, Applications, Challenges, and Future Trends of 3D Printing[J/OL]. Polymers, 2021, 13(4): 598. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33671195/. DOI: 10.3390/polym13040598.

[6] Ille C E, Jivanescu A, Pop D, et al. Exploring the Properties and Indications of Chairside CAD/CAM Materials in Restorative Dentistry[J/OL]. Journal of Functional Biomaterials, 2025, 16(2): 46. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39997580/. DOI: 10.3390/jfb16020046.

[7] Hwang H J, Lee S J, Park E J, et al. Assessment of the trueness and tissue surface adaptation of CAD-CAM maxillary denture bases manufactured using digital light processing[J/OL]. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2019, 121(1): 110-117. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30006217/. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.02.018.

[8] Song S W, Zhang J, Liu M, et al. Effect of build orientation and layer thickness on manufacturing accuracy, printing time, and material consumption of 3D printed complete denture bases[J/OL]. Journal of Dentistry, 2023, 130: 104435. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36693587/. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104435.

[9] Revilla-Leon M, Ozcan M . Additive Manufacturing Technologies Used for Processing Polymers: Current Status and Potential Application in Prosthetic Dentistry[J/OL]. Journal of Prosthodontics, 2019, 28(2): 146-158. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29682823/. DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12801.

[10] Quan H, Zhang T, Xu H, et al. Photo-curing 3D printing technique and its challenges[J/OL]. Bioactive Materials, 2020, 5(1): 110-115. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32021945/. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2019.12.003.

[11] Kessler A, Montenbruck L, Schwendicke F, et al. Narrative review of 3D-printed temporary and permanent dental resin restorations[J/OL]. Polymer Testing, 2025, 151: 108953. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142941825002673. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2025.108953.

[12] Abduo J, Lau D . Accuracy of static computer-assisted implant placement in long span edentulous area by novice implant clinicians: A cross-sectional in vitro study comparing fully-guided, pilot-guided, and freehand implant placement protocols [J/OL]. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 2021, 23(3): 361-372. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33817957/. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12998.

[13] Dias Resende C C, Quirino Barbosa T A, Moura G F, et al. Cost and effectiveness of 3-dimensionally printed model using three different printing layer parameters and two resins[J/OL]. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2023, 129(2): 350-353. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34218898/. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.06.006.

[14] Cakmak G, Cuellar A R, Donmez M B, et al. Effect of printing layer thickness on the trueness of 3-unit interim fixed partial dentures[J/OL]. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2024, 131(4): 718-725. https://www.thejpd.org/article/S0022-3913(22)00689-8/fulltext. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.04.015.

[15] Metin D S, Schmidt F, Beuer F, et al. Accuracy of the intaglio surface of 3D-printed hybrid resin-ceramic crowns, veneers and table-tops: An in vitro study [J/OL]. Journal of Dentistry, 2024, 144: 104960. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38513937/. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.104960.

[16] Revilla-Leon M, Fry E, Supaphakorn A, et al. Manufacturing accuracy of the intaglio surface of definitive resin-ceramic crowns fabricated at different print orientations by using a stereolithography printer[J/OL]. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2025, 133(2): 505-511. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37246096/. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.04.012.

[17] Osman R B, Alharbi N M . Influence of preparation design and build orientation on the accuracy of ceramic-filled composite veneers printed using Tilted Stereolithography technology. Anin vitro study [J/OL]. Journal of Dentistry, 2025, 161: 105875. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40482906/. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105875.

[18] Sabatini G P, Donmez M B, Cakmak G, et al. Additive manufacturing trueness and internal fit of crowns in resin modified with a commercially available ceramic composite concentrate[J/OL]. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2024, 132(6): 1323.e1-1323.e8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39304488/. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.09.005.

[19] Al-Ramadan A, Abualsaud R, Al-Dulaijan Y A, et al. Accuracy and Fit of Ceramic Filled 3D-Printed Resin for Permanent Crown Fabrication: An In Vitro Comparative Study[J/OL]. Prosthesis, 2024, 6(5): 1029-1041. https://www.mdpi.com/2673-1592/6/5/75. DOI: 10.3390/prosthesis6050075.

[20] Alghauli M A, Al-Gabri R S, Keshk A, et al. Clinical Complications and Survival Rate of Resin Matrix Ceramic Restorations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis[J/OL]. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 2025, 37(7): 1721-1739. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jerd.13471. DOI: 10.1111/jerd.13471.

[21] Zhang T, Zheng Y, Pradies G, et al. Factors affecting accuracy in the additive manufacturing of interim dental prostheses: A systematic review[J/OL]. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2025, 134(5): 1556-1566. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39294076/. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.08.011.

[22] Borba M, Cesar P F, Griggs J A, et al. Adaptation of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures[J/OL]. Dental Materials, 2011, 27(11): 1119-1126. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21920595/. DOI:10.1016/j.dental.2011.08.004.

[23] Shin H, Kang Y J, Kim H, et al. Effect of cement space settings on the marginal and internal fit of 3D-printed definitive resin crowns[J/OL]. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2025, 133(3): 821-826. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37202234/. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.03.021.

[24] Jang G, Kim S K, Heo S J, et al. Fit analysis of stereolithography-manufactured three-unit resin prosthesis with different 3D-printing build orientations and layer thicknesses[J/OL]. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2024, 131(2): 301-312. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36653209/. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.11.031.

[25] Piedra-Cascon W, Krishnamurthy V R, Att W, et al. 3D printing parameters, supporting structures, slicing, and post-processing procedures of vat-polymerization additive manufacturing technologies: A narrative review[J/OL]. Journal of Dentistry, 2021, 109: 103630. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33684463/. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103630.

[26] Derchi G, Carli E, Marchio V, et al. Evaluation of Accuracy of Different Print Angulations for 3D Printed Dental Crowns[J/OL]. Materials Science, 2024, 30(1): 114-120. https://matsc.ktu.lt/index.php/MatSc/article/view/33278. DOI: 10.5755/j02.ms.33278.

[27] Alghauli M A, Aljohani R, Almuzaini S, et al. Accuracy, Marginal, and Internal Fit of Additively Manufactured Provisional Restorations and Prostheses Printed at Different Orientations[J/OL]. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 2025, 37(4): 934-949. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jerd.13346. DOI: 10.1111/jerd.13346.

[28] Cakmak G, Agovic D, Donmez M B, et al. Effect of number of supports and build angle on the fabrication and internal fit accuracy of additively manufactured definitive resin-ceramic hybrid crowns[J/OL]. Journal of Dentistry, 2023, 134: 104548. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300571223001343. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104548.

[29] Khwanpuang N, Suphachartwong C, Klaisiri A, et al. Accuracy, Reproducibility, and Gaps in Different Angulations of 3D-Printed versus Milled Hybrid Ceramic Crown[J/OL]. European Journal of Dentistry, 2025, 19(4): 1015-1024. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39750518/. DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1795116.

[30] Ding H, Cui Z, Maghami E, et al. Morphology and mechanical performance of dental crown designed by 3D-DCGAN[J/OL]. Dental Materials, 2023, 39(3): 320-332. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36822895/. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2023.02.001.

[31] Li R, Chen H, Wang Y, et al. Suitability of the triple-scan method with a dental laboratory scanner to assess the 3D adaptation of zirconia crowns[J/OL]. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2021, 125(4): 651-656. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32331786/. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.02.010.

[32] Osman R B, Alharbi N, Wismeijer D . Build Angle: Does It Influence the Accuracy of 3D-Printed Dental Restorations Using Digital Light-Processing Technology?[J/OL]. International Journal of Prosthodontics, 2017, 30(2): 182-188. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28267830/. DOI: 10.11607/ijp.5117.

[33] O'Toole S, Osnes C, Bartlett D, et al. Investigation into the accuracy and measurement methods of sequential 3D dental scan alignment[J/OL]. Dental Materials, 2019, 35(3): 495-500. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30683418/. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2019.01.012.

[34] Yu B Y, Son K, Lee K B . Evaluation of intaglio surface trueness and margin quality of interim crowns in accordance with the build angle of stereolithography apparatus 3-dimensional printing[J/OL]. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2021, 126(2): 231-237. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32807402/. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.04.028.

[35] Holmer L, Othman A, Luhrs A K, et al. Comparison of the shear bond strength of 3D printed temporary bridges materials, on different types of resin cements and surface treatment[J/OL]. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 2019, 11(4): e367-e372. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31110617/. DOI: 10.4317/jced.55617.

[36] Kang S Y, Park J H, Kim J H, et al. Accuracy of provisional crowns made using stereolithography apparatus and subtractive technique[J/OL]. The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics, 2018, 10(5): 354-360. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30370026/. DOI: 10.4047/jap.2018.10.5.354.

[37] Moldovan O, Luthardt R G, Corcodel N, et al. Three-dimensional fit of CAD/CAM-made zirconia copings[J/OL]. Dental Materials, 2011, 27(12): 1273-1278. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21983002/. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.006.

[38] Alharbi N, Osman R B, Wismeijer D . Factors Influencing the Dimensional Accuracy of 3D-Printed Full-Coverage Dental Restorations Using Stereolithography Technology[J/OL]. International Journal of Prosthodontics, 2016, 29(5): 503-510. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27611757/. DOI: 10.11607/ijp.4835.

[39] Ryu J E, Kim Y L, Kong H J, et al. Marginal and internal fit of 3D printed provisional crowns according to build directions[J/OL]. The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics, 2020, 12(4): 225-232. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32879713/. DOI: 10.4047/jap.2020.12.4.225.

[40] Liang H W, Hu B W, Li R T, et al. Enhancing mechanical integrity of vat photopolymerization 3D printed hydroxyapatite scaffolds through overcoming peeling defects[J/OL]. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 2024, 44(14): 116642. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955221924004837. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2024.05.064.

[41] Li S Y, Cui Y H, Li J J . Thiol-terminated hyperbranched polymer for DLP 3D printing: Performance evaluation of a low shrinkage photosensitive resin[J/OL]. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2021, 138(22): 50525. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/app.50525. DOI: 10.1002/app.50525.

[42] Lee B I, You S G, You S M, et al. Evaluating the accuracy (trueness and precision) of interim crowns manufactured using digital light processing according to post-curing time: An in vitro study [J/OL]. The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics, 2021, 13(2): 89-99. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34025957/. DOI: 10.4047/jap.2021.13.2.89.

[43] Park G S, Kim S K, Heo S J, et al. Effects of Printing Parameters on the Fit of Implant-Supported 3D Printing Resin Prosthetics[J/OL]. Materials, 2019, 12(16): 2533. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31395801/. DOI: 10.3390/ma12162533.

[44] You S M, You S G, Kang S Y, et al. Evaluation of the accuracy (trueness and precision) of a maxillary trial denture according to the layer thickness: An in vitro study [J/OL]. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2021, 125(1): 139-145. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32089361/. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.12.014.

[45] Favero C S, English J D, Cozad B E, et al. Effect of print layer height and printer type on the accuracy of 3-dimensional printed orthodontic models[J/OL]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2017, 152(4): 557-565. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28962741/. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.06.012.