Evaluating the usage of a building code calculator app as a design tool

Abstract

Building code knowledge is essential for designers, but it can be challenging to learn and master. While automated code compliance tools assist in navigating these complexities, they are typically used later in the design process. This study introduces the Building Code Calculator App as an early-stage design tool. Grounded in cognitive load theory, the app simplifies information to simplify the learning process. It also incorporates concept mapping, a visual tool that aids in knowledge construction. This research aimed to examine the effectiveness of the Building Code Calculator App as a tool for design education. The app offers a visual guide to building codes and includes calculation features with explanations. It was hypothesized that the app would improve designers’ knowledge and skills while reducing their stress levels as they work on building code tasks. The study also predicts that the app will be adopted by designers in the future. A survey was conducted with senior interior design students after they completed a building code task using traditional methods and then used the app. All of the survey participants indicated the usefulness of the Building Code Calculator App in assisting the application of building code’s content and expressed disposition to use the app in the future. Results also confirmed that using the app lowered the participants’ stress levels, demonstrating its value as a design tool. In conclusion, these results advocate for a more comprehensive approach to building code education that leverages technology to provide practical, hands-on learning opportunities.

Keywords

Building code / Interior design / Cognitive load / Mobile app / Design tool / Digital tool

References

[1] Ching FD, Winkel SR. Building Codes Illustrated: A Guide to Understanding the 2021 International Building Code. United States: John Wiley and Sons; 2021.

[2] Harmon SK, Kennon KE. The Codes Guidebook for Interiors. United States: John Wiley and Sons; 2006.

[3] Federal Emergency Management Agency. Building Codes Save: A National Study. Federal Emergency Management Agency; 2020. Available from: https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/2020-11/fema_building-codes-save_study.pdf [Last accessed on 2024 Aug 01].

[4] Bedigian L. How Building Codes Inform Architectural Design. Building Safety Journal; 2023. Available from: https://www.iccsafe.org/building-safety-journal/bsj-dives/how-building-codes-inform-architectural-design/# [Last accessed on 2024 Aug 01].

[5] Ismail AS, Ali KN, Iahad NA. A Review on BIM-based Automated Code Compliance Checking System. In: 2017 International Conference on Research and Innovation in Information Systems (ICRIIS). IEEE; 2017. p. 1-6. doi: 10.1109/ICRIIS.2017.8002486

[6] Solonsky RL. Advancing Critical Building Code Education through Modularized Lectures. In: 2018 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Utah; 2018.

[7] Eshrati P, Mokaberian A. Studying the current status of teaching national building codes in bachelor of architectural engineering and providing solutions to strengthen it. J Fine Arts Arch Urban Plan. 2022; 27(2):73-82. doi: 10.22059/jfaup.2022.324279.672632

[8] Dunham BD. Assessment of the Status of Model Building Codes in Interior Design Curricula. United States: Texas Tech University; 1998.

[9] Homer BD, Plass JL, Blake L. The effects of video on cognitive load and social presence in multimedia-learning. Comput Human Behav. 2008; 24(3):786-797. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2007.02.009

[10] Kirschner PA, Park B, Malone S, Jarodzka H. Toward a cognitive theory of multimedia assessment (CTMMA). In: Learning, Design, and Technology: An International Compendium of Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy. Berlin, Germany: Springer Nature; 2023. p. 153-175. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-17461-7_53

[11] Zhampeissova K, Gura A, Vanina E, Egorova E. Academic performance and cognitive load in mobile learning. Int J Interact Mobile Technol. 2020; 14:78-91. doi: 10.3991/ijim.v14i21.18439

[12] Jiang D, Renandya WA, Zhang LJ. Evaluating ELT multimedia courseware from the perspective of cognitive theory of multimedia learning. Comput Assist Lang Learn. 2017; 30(7):726-744. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2017.1359187

[13] Tabbers HK, Martens RL, Van Merriënboer JJ. Multimedia instructions and cognitive load theory: Effects of modality and cueing. Br J Educ Psychol. 2004; 74(1):71-81. doi: 10.1348/000709904322848824

[14] Sweller J. Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learn Instr. 1994; 4(4):295-312. doi: 10.1016/0959-4752(94)90003-5

[15] Van Merriënboer JJ, Ayres P. Research on cognitive load theory and its design implications for e-learning. Educ Technol Res Dev. 2005; 53(3):5-13. doi: 10.1007/BF02504793

[16] Plotnick E. Concept Mapping: A Graphical System for Understanding the Relationship between Concepts. Syracuse, NY: Education Resources Information Center; 1997.

[17] Yousoof M, Sapiyan M, Kamaluddin K. Reducing cognitive load in learning computer programming. Int J Comput Inf Eng. 2007; 1(12):4100-4103.

[18] Bruillard E, Baron GL. Computer-based Concept Mapping:A Review of a Cognitive Tool for Students. In: Proceedings of Conference on Educational Uses of Information and Communication Technologies. Beijing: House of Electronics Industry (PHEI); 2000. p. 331-338.

[19] Curum B, Khedo KK. Cognitive load management in mobile learning systems: Principles and theories. J Comput Educ. 2021; 8(1):109-136. doi: 10.1007/s40692-020-00173-6

[20] Jeno LM, Grytnes JA, Vandvik V. The effect of a mobile-application tool on biology students’ motivation and achievement in species identification: A self-determination Theory perspective. Comput Educ. 2017; 107:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.011

[21] McMullan M. Evaluation of a medication calculation mobile app using a cognitive load instructional design. Int J Med Inform. 2018; 118:72-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.07.005

[22] Zhonggen Y, Ying Z, Zhichun Y, Wentao C. Student satisfaction, learning outcomes, and cognitive loads with a mobile learning platform. Comput Assist Lang Learn. 2019; 32(4):323-341. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2018.1517093