GCRA-FWVAE: Anomaly detection for IIoT univariate time series using time-frequency domain analysis

Xiaoling Tao , Haowei Liu , Wenbo Zhao , Weikun Li , Yaqi Nie , Jingqi Fu

›› 2026, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (3) : 405 -416.

PDF (1347KB)
›› 2026, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (3) :405 -416. DOI: 10.1016/j.dcan.2025.08.007
Research Article
research-article
GCRA-FWVAE: Anomaly detection for IIoT univariate time series using time-frequency domain analysis
Author information +
History +
PDF (1347KB)

Abstract

With the rapid development of Artificial Intelligence of Things (AIoT) technologies, the security of Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) data faces increasing challenges, particularly in time series anomaly detection. IIoT data are typically scarce in abnormal samples and noisy, making unsupervised learning a common solution. The security challenges of IIoT data in AIoT environments require robust unsupervised anomaly detection methods. While Variational Autoencoders (VAEs) excel in noise resilience, they face two critical challenges in IIoT data: difficulties in single-variable time-series modeling and conflicts between static prior assumptions and dynamic temporal features. To address these challenges, we propose the Greater Cane Rat Algorithm-enhanced Fourier-Wavelet Conditional Variational Autoencoder (GCRA-FWVAE). Our method introduces a time-frequency dual-branch architecture that synergistically combines wavelet transforms for localized transient feature extraction and Fourier transforms for global spectral characterization. These complementary representations jointly regulate the Conditional Variational Autoencoder (CVAE) reconstruction process, effectively preserving critical anomaly signatures while suppressing noise interference. The architecture is further optimized through bioinspired Greater Cane Rat Algorithm (GCRA) to improve adaptive learning capabilities. Extensive validation on the Yahoo benchmark indicates state-of-the-art performance, achieving an F1-score of 93.6% (an improvement of 4.5% over baseline VAEs) and a precision of 95.1%. These improvements significantly increase anomaly detection accuracy and robustness, particularly in the AIoT environment, where it effectively handles more complex and dynamic industrial data.

Keywords

Anomaly detection / Time series / GCRA / CVAE / Time-frequency domain

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xiaoling Tao, Haowei Liu, Wenbo Zhao, Weikun Li, Yaqi Nie, Jingqi Fu. GCRA-FWVAE: Anomaly detection for IIoT univariate time series using time-frequency domain analysis. , 2026, 12 (3) : 405-416 DOI:10.1016/j.dcan.2025.08.007

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Xiaoling Tao: Writing -- review & editing, Visualization, Validation, Supervision, Software, Resources, Project administration, Data curation, Conceptualization. Haowei Liu: Writing -- original draft, Visualization, Validation, Supervision, Software, Project administration, Methodology, Investigation, Funding acquisition, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization. Wenbo Zhao: Writing -- review & editing, Visualization, Validation, Supervision, Data curation, Conceptualization. Weikun Li: Writing -- review & editing, Visualization, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization. Yaqi Nie: Visualization, Software, Investigation, Data curation. Jingqi Fu: Visualization, Investigation, Funding acquisition, Formal analysis, Data curation.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this manuscript. All authors have contributed to the research and preparation of the manuscript, and there are no financial, professional, or personal relationships that could be perceived as influencing the research outcomes.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 62472118), the Guangxi Science and Technology Program (No. AB24010315), the Central Guidance on Local Science and Technology Development Fund of Guangxi Province (No. ZY23055008), the Innovation Project of Guangxi Graduate Education (No. YCSW2025348), the Innovation Platform and Talent Program of Guilin City (No. 20220124-12).

References

[1]

L.D. Xu, W. He, S. Li, Internet of things in industries: a survey, IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 10 (4) (2014) 2233-2243.

[2]

V. Chandola, A. Banerjee, V. Kumar, Anomaly detection: a survey, ACM Comput. Surv. 41 (3) (2009) 1-58.

[3]

G. Pang, C. Shen, L. Cao, A.V.D. Hengel, Deep learning for anomaly detection: a review, ACM Comput. Surv. 54 (2) (2021) 38.

[4]

H. Zhou, S. Zhang, J. Peng, S. Zhang, J. Li, H. Xiong, W. Zhang, Informer: beyond efficient transformer for long sequence time—series forecasting, Proc. AAAI Conf. Artif. Intell. 35 (2021) 11106-11115.

[5]

H. Wu, T. Hu, Y. Liu, H. Zhou, J. Wang, M. Long, Timesnet: temporal 2d—variation modeling for general time series analysis, in: International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023.

[6]

J. Xu, H. Wu, J. Wang, M. Long, Anomaly transformer: time series anomaly detection with association discrepancy, in: International Conference on Learning Representations, 2022.

[7]

L. Shen, Z. Li, J. Kwok, Timeseries anomaly detection using temporal hierarchical one—class network, in: H. Larochelle, M. Ranzato, R. Hadsell, M. Balcan, H. Lin (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 33, Curran Associates, Inc., 2020, pp. 13016-13026.

[8]

S. Huang, D. Wang, X. Wu, A. Tang, Dsanet: dual self—attention network for multivariate time series forecasting, in: Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM ’19, ACM, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2019, pp. 2129-2132.

[9]

W. Chen, H. Xu, Z. Li, D. Pei, J. Chen, H. Qiao, Y. Feng, Z. Wang, Unsupervised anomaly detection for intricate kpis via adversarial training of vae, in: IEEE INFOCOM 2019 — IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, IEEE, 2019, pp. 1891-1899.

[10]

Y. Chen, C. Zhang, M. Ma, Y. Liu, R. Ding, B. Li, S. He, S. Rajmohan, Q. Lin, D. Zhang, Imdiffusion: imputed diffusion models for multivariate time series anomaly detection, in: Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, vol. 17, 2023, pp. 359-372.

[11]

Z. Li, W. Chen, D. Pei, Robust and unsupervised kpi anomaly detection based on conditional variational autoencoder, in: 2018 IEEE 37th International Performance Computing and Communications Conference (IPCCC), IEEE, 2018, pp. 1-9.

[12]

Y. Nie, N.H. Nguyen, P. Sinthong, J. Kalagnanam, A time series is worth 64 words: long—term forecasting with transformers, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023.

[13]

S. Zhang, Z. Zhong, D. Li, Q. Fan, Y. Sun, M. Zhu, Y. Zhang, D. Pei, J. Sun, Y. Liu, H. Yang, Y. Zou, Efficient kpi anomaly detection through transfer learning for large—scale web services, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 40 (8) (2022) 2440-2455.

[14]

J.O. Agushaka, A.E. Ezugwu, A.K. Saha, J. Pal, L. Abualigah, S. Mirjalili, Greater cane rat algorithm (gcra): a nature—inspired metaheuristic for optimization problems, Heliyon 10 (11) (2024) 104292.

[15]

D. Zheng, F. Li, T. Zhao, Self—adaptive statistical process control for anomaly detection in time series, Expert Syst. Appl. 57 (2016) 324-336.

[16]

M.M. Breunig, H.—P. Kriegel, R.T. Ng, J. Sander, Lof: identifying density—based local outliers, SIGMOD Rec. 29 (2) (2000) 93-104.

[17]

A. Siffer, P.—A. Fouque, A. Termier, C. Largouet, Anomaly detection in streams with extreme value theory, in: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD ’17, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2017, pp. 1067-1075.

[18]

H. Ren, B. Xu, Y. Wang, C. Yi, C. Huang, X. Kou, T. Xing, M. Yang, J. Tong, Q. Zhang, Time—series anomaly detection service at Microsoft, in: Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, KDD ’19, ACM, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2019, pp. 3009-3017.

[19]

C. Zhang, T. Zhou, Q. Wen, L. Sun, Tfad: a decomposition time series anomaly detection architecture with time—frequency analysis, in: Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management, CIKM ’22, ACM, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2022, pp. 2497-2507.

[20]

T. Kieu, B. Yang, C. Guo, R.—G. Cirstea, Y. Zhao, Y. Song, C.S. Jensen, Anomaly detection in time series with robust variational quasi—recurrent autoencoders, in: 2022 IEEE 38th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), 2022, pp. 1342-1354.

[21]

G. Venter, J. Sobieszczanski—Sobieski, Particle swarm optimization, AIAA J. 41 (8) (2003) 1583-1589.

[22]

J. Xue, B. Shen, A novel swarm intelligence optimization approach: sparrow search algorithm, Syst. Sci. Control Eng. 8 (1) (2020) 22-34.

[23]

M. Abdel—Basset, R. Mohamed, S.A.A. Azeem, M. Jameel, M. Abouhawwash, Kepler optimization algorithm: a new metaheuristic algorithm inspired by Kepler’s laws of planetary motion, Knowl.—Based Syst. 268 (2023) 104292.

[24]

J. Wayland, C. Coupette, B. Rieck, Mapping the multiverse of latent representations, in: Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML, ML Research Press, 2024, pp. 52372-52402.

[25]

A.X. Wang, B.P. Nguyen, Ttvae: transformer—based generative modeling for tabular data generation, Artif. Intell. 340 (2025) 104292.

[26]

Y. Bai, J. Wang, X. Zhang, X. Miao, Y. Lin, Crossfun: multiview joint cross—fusion network for time—series anomaly detection, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 72 (2023) 1-9.

[27]

X. Tao, Z. Liu, F. Zhao, R. Lan, R. Liu, L. Fu, Y. Ouyang, An ssa—lc—dae method for extracting network security elements, IEEE Trans. Netw. Sci. Eng. 10 (2) (2023) 1175-1185.

[28]

B. Hou, G. Chen, A new imbalanced data oversampling method based on bootstrap method and Wasserstein generative adversarial network, Math. Biosci. Eng. 21 (3) (2024) 4309-4327.

[29]

Z. Wang, C. Pei, M. Ma, X. Wang, Z. Li, D. Pei, S. Rajmohan, D. Zhang, Q. Lin, H. Zhang, J. Li, G. Xie, Revisiting vae for unsupervised time series anomaly detection: a frequency perspective, in: Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2024, WWW ’24, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2024, pp. 3096-3105.

[30]

H. Xu, Y. Feng, J. Chen, Z. Wang, H. Qiao, W. Chen, N. Zhao, Z. Li, J. Bu, Z. Li, Y. Liu, Y. Zhao, D. Pei, Unsupervised anomaly detection via variational auto—encoder for seasonal kpis in web applications, in: Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference on World Wide Web — WWW ’18, WWW ’18, ACM Press, 2018, pp. 187-196.

PDF (1347KB)

2

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/