RADAR: A rapid discovery algorithm for routes in SDN-based IoV

Zahid Khan , Nauman Khan , Anis Koubaa , Adel Ammar , Wadii Boulila

›› 2026, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (3) : 495 -504.

PDF (2567KB)
›› 2026, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (3) :495 -504. DOI: 10.1016/j.dcan.2024.08.001
Research Article
research-article
RADAR: A rapid discovery algorithm for routes in SDN-based IoV
Author information +
History +
PDF (2567KB)

Abstract

Link failures are a critical issue that disrupts consistent communications in the fast-evolving Internet-of-Vehicles ( IoV) environment. In response to the aforementioned limitation, we introduce the rapid discovery algorithm for routes ( RADAR), a novel scheme designed for rapid route discovery in the event of abrupt link failures or topological changes. Built on a heuristic 𝑇ℎ𝑒𝑡𝑎 algorithm, RADAR operates within a three-layered Software-Defined Networking ( SDN) architecture to ensure seamless communications. The first layer collects vital vehicle information, including location, speed, direction, and vehicle ID. The second layer uses an SDN edge controller to carry out local and intra-zone path discovery with the 𝑇ℎ𝑒𝑡𝑎 heuristic algorithm. The third layer introduces a global controller that oversees inter-zone route discovery, thereby expanding the network’s reach and capabilities. To validate RADAR’s effectiveness, we compare its performance to those of Dijkstra-based and 𝐴 path planning algorithms across key metrics—Route Discovery Messages ( RDM), Path Length ( PL), and Route Discovery Time ( RDT). Our analysis shows significant improvements with RADAR over Dijkstra, achieving up to an 80% increase in RDM, 20% in PL, and 70% in RDT. It also surpasses 𝐴 by up to 70% in RDM and 60% in RDT. These results indicate that RADAR enhances routing reliability in IoV systems, thereby improving overall network performance.

Keywords

Route discovery / Software defined networking (SDN) / Link failure / Intra-zone communications / Inter-zone communications / 𝑇ℎ𝑒𝑡𝑎*

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Zahid Khan, Nauman Khan, Anis Koubaa, Adel Ammar, Wadii Boulila. RADAR: A rapid discovery algorithm for routes in SDN-based IoV. , 2026, 12 (3) : 495-504 DOI:10.1016/j.dcan.2024.08.001

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Zahid Khan: Writing – original draft, Validation, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Conceptualization. Nauman Khan: Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Validation, Investigation, Formal analysis. Anis Koubaa: Writing – review & editing, Supervision. Adel Ammar: Writing – review & editing, Software. Wadii Boulila: Resources, Funding acquisition, Formal analysis.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by the Robotics and Internet-of-Things Lab of Prince Sultan University.

References

[1]

L.E. Alatabani, E.S. Ali, R.A. Saeed, Deep learning approaches for iov applications and services, in: Intelligent Technologies for Internet of Vehicles, Springer, 2021, pp. 253-291.

[2]

W. Duan, J. Gu, M. Wen, G. Zhang, Y. Ji, S. Mumtaz, Emerging technologies for 5g—iov networks: applications, trends and opportunities, IEEE Netw. 34 (5) (2020) 283-289.

[3]

T. Kayarga, S.A. Kumar, A study on various technologies to solve the routing problem in Internet of vehicles (iov), Wirel. Pers. Commun. 119 (2021) 459-487.

[4]

L. Alouache, N. Nguyen, M. Aliouat, R. Chelouah, Survey on iov routing protocols: security and network architecture, Int. J. Commun. Syst. 32 (2) (2019) e3849.

[5]

M. Ayyub, A. Oracevic, R. Hussain, A.A. Khan, Z. Zhang, A comprehensive survey on clustering in vehicular networks: current solutions and future challenges, Ad Hoc Netw. 124 (2022) 102729.

[6]

N.H. Hussein, S.P. Koh, C.T. Yaw, S.K. Tiong, F. Benedict, T. Yusaf, K. Kadirgama, T.C. Hong, Sdn—based vanet routing: a comprehensive survey on architectures, protocols, analysis, and future challenges, IEEE Access (2024).

[7]

A. Narwaria, A.P. Mazumdar, Software—defined wireless sensor network: a comprehensive survey, J. Netw. Comput. Appl. (2023) 103636.

[8]

L. Zhao, J. Li, A. Al—Dubai, A.Y. Zomaya, G. Min, A. Hawbani, Routing schemes in software—defined vehicular networks: design, open issues and challenges, IEEE Intell. Transp. Syst. Mag. 13 (4) (2020) 217-226.

[9]

Y.—C. Liu, C. Chen, S. Chakraborty, A software defined network architecture for geobroadcast in vanets, in: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), IEEE, 2015, pp. 6559-6564.

[10]

Z. Khan, P. Fan, S. Fang, F. Abbas, An unsupervised cluster—based vanet—oriented evolving graph (cvoeg) model and associated reliable routing scheme, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 20 (10) (2019) 3844-3859.

[11]

M.H. Eiza, Q. Ni, An evolving graph—based reliable routing scheme for vanets, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 62 (4) (2013) 1493-1504.

[12]

Z. Khan, A. Koubaa, S. Fang, M.Y. Lee, K. Muhammad, A connectivity—based clustering scheme for intelligent vehicles, Appl. Sci. 11 (5) (2021) 2413.

[13]

Z. Khan, P. Fan, F. Abbas, H. Chen, S. Fang, Two—level cluster based routing scheme for 5g v2x communication, IEEE Access 7 (2019) 16194-16205.

[14]

Z. Khan, P. Fan, A multi—hop moving zone (mmz) clustering scheme based on cellular—v2x, China Commun. 15 (7) (2018) 55-66.

[15]

A. Rammohan, et al., Revolutionizing intelligent transportation systems with cellular vehicle—to—everything (c—v2x) technology: current trends, use cases, emerging technologies, standardization bodies, industry analytics and future directions, Veh. Commun. (2023) 100638.

[16]

O.S. Oubbati, M. Atiquzzaman, P. Lorenz, A. Baz, H. Alhakami, Search: an sdn—enabled approach for vehicle path—planning, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 69 (12) (2020) 14523-14536.

[17]

K. Mershad, Surfer: a secure sdn—based routing protocol for Internet of vehicles, IEEE Int. Things J. 8 (9) (2020) 7407-7422.

[18]

P. Kumar, K. Pal, M.C. Govil, A. Choudhary, Rapid a*: a robust path planning scheme for uavs, Int. J. Intell. Robot. Appl. 7 (2023) 720-739.

[19]

S. Siddiqui, S. Hameed, S.A. Shah, I. Ahmad, A. Aneiba, D. Draheim, S. Dustdar, Towards software—defined networking—based iot frameworks: a systematic literature review, taxonomy, open challenges and prospects, IEEE Access 10 (2022) 70850-70901.

[20]

K. Behravan, N. Farzaneh, M. Jahanshahi, S.A.H. Seno, A comprehensive survey on using fog computing in vehicular networks, Veh. Commun. (2023) 100604.

[21]

M. Mao, P. Yi, T. Hu, Roadside infrastructure deployment scheme based on Internet of vehicles information service demand, Trans. Emerg. Telecommun. Technol. 34 (1) (2023) e4671.

[22]

M.A. Karabulut, A.S. Shah, H. Ilhan, A.—S.K. Pathan, M. Atiquzzaman, Inspecting vanet with various critical aspects—a systematic review, Ad Hoc Netw. (2023) 103281.

[23]

M. Maleknasab Ardakani, M.A. Tabarzad, M.A. Shayegan, Detecting sybil attacks in vehicular ad hoc networks using fuzzy logic and arithmetic optimization algorithm, J. Supercomput. 78 (14) (2022) 16303-16335.

[24]

J. Liu, H. Weng, Y. Ge, S. Li, X. Cui, A self—healing routing strategy based on ant colony optimization for vehicular ad hoc networks, IEEE Int. Things J. 9 (22) (2022) 22695-22708.

[25]

Z. Khan, A. Koubaa, B. Benjdira, W. Boulila, A game theory approach for smart traffic management, Comput. Electr. Eng. 110 (2023) 108825.

[26]

Z. Khan, S. Fang, A. Koubaa, P. Fan, F. Abbas, H. Farman, Street—centric routing scheme using ant colony optimization—based clustering for bus—based vehicular ad—hoc network, Comput. Electr. Eng. 86 (2020) 106736.

[27]

A. Alomari, S.K. Subramaniam, N. Samian, R. Latip, Z. Zukarnain, Resource management in sdn—based cloud and sdn—based fog computing: taxonomy study, Symmetry 13 (5) (2021) 734.

[28]

Z. Arefian, M.R. Khayyambashi, N. Movahhedinia, Delay reduction in mtc using sdn based offloading in fog computing, PLoS ONE 18 (5) (2023) e0286483.

[29]

N. Kumar, P.K. Verma, V. Kumar, Adv—leach2 energy—efficient clustering protocols for three—tier heterogeneous wireless sensor networks, IEIE Trans. Smart Process. Comput. 11 (1) (2022) 49-56.

[30]

J. Han, S. Koenig, A multiple surrounding point set approach using theta* algorithm on eight—neighbor grid graphs, Inf. Sci. 582 (2022) 618-632.

[31]

L.A. Trinh, M. Ekström, B. Cürüklü, Toward shared working space of human and robotic agents through dipole flow field for dependable path planning, Front. Neurorobot. 12 (2018) 1-16.

[32]

M. Shamim Akhter, N. Ahsan, S. Quaderi, M. Al Forhad, S. Sumit, M. Rahman, A sumo based simulation framework for intelligent traffic management system, J. Traffic Logist. Eng. 8 (2020) 1-5.

[33]

Y. Ma, Y. Zhao, Z. Li, X. Yan, H. Bi, G. Krolczyk, A new coverage path planning algorithm for unmanned surface mapping vehicle based on a—star based searching, Appl. Ocean Res. 123 (2022) 103163.

[34]

M. Fazio, A. Buzachis, A. Galletta, A. Celesti, J. Wan, A. Longo, M. Villari, A map—reduce approach for the Dijkstra algorithm in sdn over osmotic computing systems, Int. J. Parallel Program. 49 (2021) 347-375.

[35]

Y. Tong, Pedestrian route choice in buildings: experiments and modelling, Ph.D. thesis, University of Bristol, 2023.

PDF (2567KB)

2

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/