Evaluating UAS Integration into Geoinformatics: An Operational, Regulatory and Policy Analysis in Greek Geoinformatics Service Providers

Anastasia Tsotra , Dimos Pantazis

Drones Auton. Veh. ›› 2026, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (1) : 10003

PDF (373KB)
Drones Auton. Veh. ›› 2026, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (1) :10003 DOI: 10.70322/dav.2026.10003
Article
research-article
Evaluating UAS Integration into Geoinformatics: An Operational, Regulatory and Policy Analysis in Greek Geoinformatics Service Providers
Author information +
History +
PDF (373KB)

Abstract

The rapid evolution of geoinformatics technologies, particularly through the adoption of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS), has brought significant changes to the collection, processing, and analysis of spatial data. UAS are increasingly integrated into Geographic Information Systems (GIS), remote sensing, and spatial analysis, enhancing efficiency and accuracy in applications such as precision agriculture and infrastructure management. However, limited empirical research has examined the consequences of their integration for operational efficiency, regulatory compliance, and related management practices in the Greek context. This study evaluates how UAS integration into the operations of Greek geoinformatics firms enhances efficiency and supports compliance with Greek and European regulatory frameworks. A qualitative multi-case study methodology is employed across five Greek geoinformatics service providers, and data are collected through semi-structured interviews and secondary sources. Findings indicate that UAS integration improves the quality of spatial data, reduces data collection costs, and facilitates regulatory compliance of these firms. Finally, the study highlights the emergence of optimal operational management policies of UAS including standardized end-to-end workflows, clear role allocation and compliance responsibilities, systematic QA/QC procedures, proactive regulatory monitoring (PDRA/SORA readiness), which strengthen and promote innovative geoinformatics technologies.

Keywords

UAS / GIS / Service providers / Efficiency / Regulatory compliance / Spatial data

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Anastasia Tsotra, Dimos Pantazis. Evaluating UAS Integration into Geoinformatics: An Operational, Regulatory and Policy Analysis in Greek Geoinformatics Service Providers. Drones Auton. Veh., 2026, 3(1): 10003 DOI:10.70322/dav.2026.10003

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.T. and D.P.; Methodology, A.T.; Software, A.T. and D.P.; Validation, A.T. and D.P.; Formal Analysis, A.T. and D.P.; Investigation, A.T.; Resources, A.T. and D.P.; Data Curation, A.T. and D.P.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, A.T.; Writing—Review & Editing, A.T. and D.P.; Visualization, A.T. and D.P.; Supervision, D.P.; Project Administration, D.P.

Ethics Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study, as the research did not involve clinical interventions, experiments, or sensitive personal data. The study was based on expert interviews conducted on a voluntary basis with informed consent, focusing exclusively on professional experience and regulatory perspectives. All participants were anonymized, and no identifiable personal data were collected.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are not publicly available due to ethical and confidentiality considerations related to the use of expert interviews. Data may be made available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

[1]

Quamar MM, Al-Ramadan B, Khan K, Shafiullah M, El Ferik S. Advancements and Applications of Drone-Integrated Geographic Information System Technology—A Review. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 5039. DOI:10.3390/rs15205039

[2]

Hutsul T, Lysko B, Zhezhera I, Tkach V, Tsvyk T. Recommendations for planning UAV flight missions for geodata collection. Rep. Geod. Geoinf. 2025, 119, 62-70. DOI:10.2478/rgg-2025-0007

[3]

Li Q, Deliberty T. Integrating drones, participatory mapping and GIS to enhance resiliency for remote villages. Trans. GIS 2022, 26, 818-838. DOI:10.1111/tgis.12886

[4]

Tomczyk AM, Ewertowski MW, Creany N, Ancin-Murguzur FJ, Monz C. The application of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) surveys and GIS to the analysis and monitoring of recreational trail conditions. Int. J. Appl. Earth Observ. Geoinf. 2023, 123, 103474. DOI:10.1016/j.jag.2023.103474

[5]

McKee T, Hashemi-Beni L. Developing geospatial scientists—Using students as partners in drone research. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. 2020, 44, 69-72. DOI:10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIV-M-2-2020-69-2020

[6]

Vörös F, Kovács B, Zentai L. The rising role of drones in the training of cartographers at Eötvös Loránd University (ELTE). Proc. ICA 2023, 5, 1-8. DOI:10.5194/ica-proc-5-23-2023

[7]

Budiharto W, Irwansyah E, Suroso JS, Chowanda A, Ngarianto H, Gunawan AAS. Mapping and 3D modelling using quadrotor drone and GIS software. J. Big Data 2021, 8, 48. DOI:10.1186/s40537-021-00436-8

[8]

Doumit JA. From Drones to Geospatial Data. KubGU, Krasnodar. Courtesy of assistant professor Steve Scott. 2018. Available online: https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/58391588/Doumit_2018-libre.pdf?1550044058=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3DFrom_drones_to_geospatial_analysis.pdf&Expires=1771992096&Signature=P6jfg6z-3ZlC8- -IIHEPcXQc3Or8kYbcaOH2rvoPG28TEdJ9PIdnPzNYm7O3BFGN8xHrrgF-ncVRh5JzYpSCHcaM1PuHIDCTg-kmTLDtbCvmjpYQ5mrQVK8VPycXfdyGfQyow5xomDHILYw2AT-22TrIZnKSrcViDxwj2-0x1FCKD-02U0G-zznVh3Jg2BVLpwjxcGMkAPPGE41F4YOaI-iUzH8WZk4kstARG4omY3ZqQn2qEBEUIFgD-nLTaDwSlzffhGHq-GVnSXnp4jyK0oLYI8xPpZEEdJMKHRMs7e3jaJwKTt6c-7DGf98ghFn11q3q-HzkWbxBY-Iw4eRy8w__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA (accessed on 12 December 2025).

[9]

Rogers SR, Singh KK, Mathews AJ, Cummings AR. Drones and Geography: Who Is Using Them and Why? Prof. Geogr. 2022, 74, 516-528. DOI:10.1080/00330124.2021.2000446

[10]

Lercel DJ, Hupy JP. Exploring the Use of Geographic Information Systems to Identify Spatial Patterns of Remote UAS Pilots and Possible National Airspace Risk. Safety 2023, 9, 18. DOI:10.3390/safety9010018

[11]

McNeil B, Snow C. The Truth About Drones in Mapping and Surveying 2016. Available online: https://droneanalyst.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/TheTruthAboutDrones_mapping-1.pdf (accessed on 12 December 2025).

[12]

Nazir MF, Atif S, Hussain E. An integrated geographic information system (GIS) and analytical hierarchy process (AHP)-based approach for drone-optimized large-scale flood imaging. Drone Syst. Appl. 2025, 13, 1-18. DOI:10.1139/dsa-2024-0039

[13]

Yang B, Hawthorne TL, Hessing-Lewis M, Duffy EJ, Reshitnyk LY, Feinman M, et al. Developing an Introductory UAV/Drone Mapping Training Program for Seagrass Monitoring and Research. Drones 2020, 4, 70. DOI:10.3390/drones4040070

[14]

Kováčiková N, Dědič M, Lorencová I. Geoinformatics, 3D Modelling of Buildings with Drones for Civil Engineering Experts. TEM J. 2025, 14, 35-43. DOI:10.18421/TEM141-04

[15]

Joyce KE, Meiklejohn N, Mead PCH. Using Minidrones to Teach Geospatial Technology Fundamentals. Drones 2020, 4, 57. DOI:10.3390/drones4030057

[16]

Adams CR, Barrio Minton CA, Hightower J, Blount AJ. A systematic approach to multiple case study design in professional counseling and counselor education. J. Couns. Prep. Superv. 2022, 15. Available online: https://research.library.kutztown.edu/jcps/vol15/iss2/24 (accessed on 12 December 2025).

[17]

Yin RK. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2018.

[18]

Eisenhardt KM, Graebner ME. Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges. Acad. Manag. J. 2007, 50, 25-32. DOI:10.5465/amj.2007.24160888

[19]

Thomas DR. A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data. Am. J. Eval. 2006, 27, 237-246. DOI:10.1177/1098214005283748

[20]

Hellenic Civil Aviation Authority. Regulation on Training Centers and Licensing of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Remote Pilots (Government Gazette B 4527/2016). Available online https://www.e-nomothesia.gr/kat-aerodromia- aeroporia/apophase-upa-d2-d-30005-12541-2016.html (accessed on 12 December 2025).

[21]

European Union. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/947 of 24 May 2019 on the Rules and Procedures for the Operation of Unmanned Aircraft. 2019. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32019R0947 (accessed on 12 December 2025).

[22]

European Union. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/945 of 12 March 2019 on Unmanned Aircraft Systems and on Third-Country Operators of Unmanned Aircraft Systems. 2019. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32019R0945 (accessed on 12 December 2025).

[23]

Tsotra A. Critical Comparative Analysis of UAS Legislative Developments. ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. 2024, 10, 223-230. DOI:10.5194/isprs-annals-X-4-W4-2024-223-2024

PDF (373KB)

8

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/