A hybrid optimization and microsimulation framework for simulating weekly travel activities
MD Jahedul Alam , Md. Rifat Hossain Bhuiyan , Venkata Vijaya Rama Raju Mandapati , Muhammad Ahsanul Habib
Computational Urban Science ›› 2026, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (1) : 24
This paper introduces a simulation-based optimization framework to simulate weekly travel activities from single-day data, addressing the diminishing relevance of a "Typical Day." The framework builds on the integrated land use and energy modeling system (iTLE), combining long- and short-term decision components, a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC)-based activity generator, and an activity scheduler. The optimization model accounts for individual travel preferences through constraints, iteratively calibrating activity transition probabilities to match desired weekly travel patterns. Key activities simulated include in-home work (IHW), in-person work, shopping, eating out, and recreation. Calibration results show deviations of 19.0%, 16.4%, and 15.2% for IHW, in-person work, and shopping, respectively, with validation deviations of 4.3% for eating out and 2.3% for recreation. The model highlights distinct work patterns and commute behaviors, offering flexibility for post-pandemic transportation planning policies.
Activity-based model / Urban microsimulation / Travel behavior / Multi-day
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
Bowman, J. L. (1998). The day activity schedule approach to travel demand analysis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. |
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
Chen, K., Guan, J., Seshadri, R., Pattabhiraman, V., Aboutaleb, Y., Shamshiripour, A., Liang, C., Zhanag, X., & Ben-Akiva, M. (2023). A Multi-day Needs-based Modeling Approach for Activity and Travel Demand Analysis. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2312.15373 |
| [12] |
Chu, Z., Cheng, L., & Chen, H. (2012). A review of activity-based travel demand modeling. CICTP 2012: Multimodal Transportation Systems—Convenient, Safe, Cost-Effective, Efficient, (pp. 48–59). |
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
Giménez-Nadal, J. I., Molina, J. A., & Velilla, J. (2018). Telework, the timing of work, and instantaneous well-being: evidence from time use data. |
| [18] |
Habib, K. M. N., Miller, E. J., & Axhausen, K. W. (2007). How reasonable is the typical week modeling time frame approach in activity-based travel demand modeling. A Case Study on Shopping Activity, Trip Using Multi-Week Trip Diary Survey Data. ETH, Zürich, IVT. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-005562768 |
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
Halifax Travel Activity Survey (HaliTRAC). (2022). Halifax.ca. https://www.halifax.ca/about-halifax/regional-community-planning/transportation-planning/imp-monitoring-evaluation/halifax |
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
Horni, A., Nagel, K., & Axhausen, K. W. (2016). Introducing matsim. In The multi-agent transport simulation MATSim (pp. 3–7). Ubiquity Press. |
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
Kagerbauer, M., Mallig, N., Vortisch, P., & Pfeiffer, M. (2016). Modeling Variability and Stability of Travel Behavior in a Longitudinal View Using Agent Based Model mobiTopp. |
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
Khan, N. A., & Habib, M. A. (2023). Microsimulation of activity generation, activity scheduling and shared travel choices within an activity-based travel demand modelling system. Travel Behaviour and Society, 32, 100590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2023.100590 |
| [30] |
Kitamura, R., Yamamoto, T., Susilo, Y. O., & Axhausen, K. W. (2004). On the day-to-day variability of prism vertex location. 83rd Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board (TRB 2004). |
| [31] |
Lindblom, M. (2023). Your old workweek is extinct, Commute Seattle data shows. The Seattle Times. |
| [32] |
Lu, Y., Adnan, M., Basak, K., Pereira, F. C., Carrion, C., Saber, V. H., Loganathan, H., & Ben-Akiva, M. E. (2015). Simmobility mid-term simulator: A state of the art integrated agent based demand and supply model. 94th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. |
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
Ordóñez Medina, & Sergio A. (2016). Multi-day activity models An extension of the Multi-Agent Transport Simulation. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000120636 |
| [35] |
Ordóñez, S. A., Erath, A., & Axhausen, K. W. (2012). Simulating urban transport for a week time horizon. Working paper, ETH Zürich–Future Cities Laboratory. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000305201 |
| [36] |
Pendyala, R. M., & Pas, E. I. (2000). Multi-day and multi-period data for travel demand analysis and modeling: Resource paper. TRB Transportation Research Circular E-C008, Transportation Surveys: Raising the Standard, II-B/1–II-B/28. |
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
Pinjari, A. R., Eluru, N., Copperman, R. B., Sener, I. N., Guo, J. Y., Srinivasan, S., & Bhat, C. R. (2006). Activity-based travel-demand analysis for metropolitan areas in Texas: CEMDAP models, framework, software architecture and application results. No.FHWA/TX-07/0–4080–8 |
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
Schnittger, S., & Zumkeller, D. (2004). Longitudinal Microsimulation as a Tool to Merge Transport Planning and Traffic Engineering Models" The Mobitopp Model". ETC Conference Papers 2004. |
| [41] |
Simma, A., & Axhausen, K. (2001). Successive days, related travel behaviour ? |
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
Tajaddini, A., Rose, G., Kockelman, K. M., & Vu, H. L. (2020). Recent Progress in Activity-Based Travel Demand Modeling: Rising Data and Applicability. In S. de Luca, R. Di Pace, & C. Fiori (Eds.), Models and Technologies for Smart, Sustainable and Safe Transportation Systems (p. Ch. 2). IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.93827 |
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
The Author(s)
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |