A hybrid optimization and microsimulation framework for simulating weekly travel activities

MD Jahedul Alam , Md. Rifat Hossain Bhuiyan , Venkata Vijaya Rama Raju Mandapati , Muhammad Ahsanul Habib

Computational Urban Science ›› 2026, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (1) : 24

PDF
Computational Urban Science ›› 2026, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (1) :24 DOI: 10.1007/s43762-026-00259-4
Original Paper
research-article
A hybrid optimization and microsimulation framework for simulating weekly travel activities
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

This paper introduces a simulation-based optimization framework to simulate weekly travel activities from single-day data, addressing the diminishing relevance of a "Typical Day." The framework builds on the integrated land use and energy modeling system (iTLE), combining long- and short-term decision components, a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC)-based activity generator, and an activity scheduler. The optimization model accounts for individual travel preferences through constraints, iteratively calibrating activity transition probabilities to match desired weekly travel patterns. Key activities simulated include in-home work (IHW), in-person work, shopping, eating out, and recreation. Calibration results show deviations of 19.0%, 16.4%, and 15.2% for IHW, in-person work, and shopping, respectively, with validation deviations of 4.3% for eating out and 2.3% for recreation. The model highlights distinct work patterns and commute behaviors, offering flexibility for post-pandemic transportation planning policies.

Keywords

Activity-based model / Urban microsimulation / Travel behavior / Multi-day

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
MD Jahedul Alam, Md. Rifat Hossain Bhuiyan, Venkata Vijaya Rama Raju Mandapati, Muhammad Ahsanul Habib. A hybrid optimization and microsimulation framework for simulating weekly travel activities. Computational Urban Science, 2026, 6(1): 24 DOI:10.1007/s43762-026-00259-4

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Anik AH, Nayeem MA, Habib MA. Development of a dynamic traffic microsimulator for on-demand transit operations within an integrated modelling system. Transportation Planning and Technology, 2024,

[2]

Arentze TA, Timmermans HJP. A learning-based transportation oriented simulation system. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2004, 38(7): 613-633

[3]

Arentze TA, Timmermans HJP. A need-based model of multi-day, multi-person activity generation. Transportation Research Part B, 2009, 43(2): 251-265

[4]

Auld J, Mohammadian A. Framework for the development of the agent-based dynamic activity planning and travel scheduling (ADAPTS) model. Transportation Letters: The International Journal of Transportation Research, 2009, 1: 245-255

[5]

Auld J, Mohammadian AK. Activity planning processes in the agent-based dynamic activity planning and travel scheduling (ADAPTS) model. Transportation Research Part A, 2012, 46(8): 1386-1403

[6]

Auld J, Hope M, Ley H, Sokolov V, Xu B, Zhang K. POLARIS: Agent-based modeling framework development and implementation for integrated travel demand and network and operations simulations. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2016, 64: 101-116

[7]

Bhat C, Frusti T, Zhao H, Schönfelder S, Axhausen K. Intershopping duration: An analysis using multiweek data. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2004, 38: 39-60

[8]

Bhuiyan MRH, Habib MA. Missing typical weekday in travel surveys: A pseudo-panel approach to explore weekly travel patterns. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2024,

[9]

Bowman, J. L. (1998). The day activity schedule approach to travel demand analysis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

[10]

Bradley M, Bowman JL, Griesenbeck B. SACSIM: An applied activity-based model system with fine-level spatial and temporal resolution. Journal of Choice Modelling, 2010, 3(1): 5-31

[11]

Chen, K., Guan, J., Seshadri, R., Pattabhiraman, V., Aboutaleb, Y., Shamshiripour, A., Liang, C., Zhanag, X., & Ben-Akiva, M. (2023). A Multi-day Needs-based Modeling Approach for Activity and Travel Demand Analysis. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2312.15373

[12]

Chu, Z., Cheng, L., & Chen, H. (2012). A review of activity-based travel demand modeling. CICTP 2012: Multimodal Transportation Systems—Convenient, Safe, Cost-Effective, Efficient, (pp. 48–59).

[13]

Deschaintres E, Morency C, Trépanier M. Cross-analysis of the variability of travel behaviors using one-day trip diaries and longitudinal data. Transportation Research Part A, Policy and Practice, 2022, 163(June): 228-246

[14]

Dianat L, Habib KN, Miller EJ. Modeling and forecasting daily non-work/school activity patterns in an activity-based model using skeleton schedule constraints. Transportation Research Part A, Policy and Practice, 2020, 133: 337-352

[15]

Doherty ST. Should we abandon activity type analysis? Redefining activities by their salient attributes. Transportation, 2006, 33: 517-536

[16]

Fatmi MR, Habib MA. Microsimulation of life-stage transitions and residential location transitions within a life-oriented integrated urban modeling system. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2018, 69: 87-103

[17]

Giménez-Nadal, J. I., Molina, J. A., & Velilla, J. (2018). Telework, the timing of work, and instantaneous well-being: evidence from time use data.

[18]

Habib, K. M. N., Miller, E. J., & Axhausen, K. W. (2007). How reasonable is the typical week modeling time frame approach in activity-based travel demand modeling. A Case Study on Shopping Activity, Trip Using Multi-Week Trip Diary Survey Data. ETH, Zürich, IVT. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-005562768

[19]

Habib KMN, Miller EJ, Axhausen KW. Weekly rhythm in joint time expenditure for all at-home and out-of-home activities application of Kuhn-Tucker demand system model using multiweek travel diary data. Transportation Research Record, 2008, 2054: 64-73

[20]

Nurul Habib KM, Miller EJ. Modelling daily activity program generation considering within-day and day-to-day dynamics in activity-travel behaviour. Transportation, 2008, 35(4): 467-484

[21]

Habib MA, McCarthy S. Development of an integrated transportation and land use microsimulation model on a flexible modeling platform. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2021, 2675(12): 355-369

[22]

Halifax Travel Activity Survey (HaliTRAC). (2022). Halifax.ca. https://www.halifax.ca/about-halifax/regional-community-planning/transportation-planning/imp-monitoring-evaluation/halifax

[23]

Henson K, Goulias K, Golledge R. An assessment of activity-based modeling and simulation for applications in operational studies, disaster preparedness, and homeland security. Transportation Letters, 2009, 1(1): 19-39

[24]

Hilgert T, Heilig M, Kagerbauer M, Vortisch P. Modeling week activity schedules for travel demand models. Transportation Research Record, 2017, 2666(1): 69-77

[25]

Horni, A., Nagel, K., & Axhausen, K. W. (2016). Introducing matsim. In The multi-agent transport simulation MATSim (pp. 3–7). Ubiquity Press.

[26]

Jara-Díaz S, Rosales-Salas J. Understanding time use: Daily or weekly data?. Transportation Research Part A, Policy and Practice, 2015, 76: 38-57

[27]

Kagerbauer, M., Mallig, N., Vortisch, P., & Pfeiffer, M. (2016). Modeling Variability and Stability of Travel Behavior in a Longitudinal View Using Agent Based Model mobiTopp.

[28]

Khan NA. Modelling and Microsimulation of Activity Generation, 2020, Dalhousie University

[29]

Khan, N. A., & Habib, M. A. (2023). Microsimulation of activity generation, activity scheduling and shared travel choices within an activity-based travel demand modelling system. Travel Behaviour and Society, 32, 100590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2023.100590

[30]

Kitamura, R., Yamamoto, T., Susilo, Y. O., & Axhausen, K. W. (2004). On the day-to-day variability of prism vertex location. 83rd Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board (TRB 2004).

[31]

Lindblom, M. (2023). Your old workweek is extinct, Commute Seattle data shows. The Seattle Times.

[32]

Lu, Y., Adnan, M., Basak, K., Pereira, F. C., Carrion, C., Saber, V. H., Loganathan, H., & Ben-Akiva, M. E. (2015). Simmobility mid-term simulator: A state of the art integrated agent based demand and supply model. 94th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

[33]

Miller EJ, Roorda MJ. Prototype model of household activity-travel scheduling. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2003, 1831(1): 114-121

[34]

Ordóñez Medina, & Sergio A. (2016). Multi-day activity models An extension of the Multi-Agent Transport Simulation. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000120636

[35]

Ordóñez, S. A., Erath, A., & Axhausen, K. W. (2012). Simulating urban transport for a week time horizon. Working paper, ETH Zürich–Future Cities Laboratory. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000305201

[36]

Pendyala, R. M., & Pas, E. I. (2000). Multi-day and multi-period data for travel demand analysis and modeling: Resource paper. TRB Transportation Research Circular E-C008, Transportation Surveys: Raising the Standard, II-B/1–II-B/28.

[37]

Pendyala RM, Kitamura R, Kikuchi A, Yamamoto T, Fujii S. Florida Activity Mobility Simulator: Overview and preliminary validation results. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2005, 1921(1): 123-130

[38]

Pinjari, A. R., Eluru, N., Copperman, R. B., Sener, I. N., Guo, J. Y., Srinivasan, S., & Bhat, C. R. (2006). Activity-based travel-demand analysis for metropolitan areas in Texas: CEMDAP models, framework, software architecture and application results. No.FHWA/TX-07/0–4080–8

[39]

Schlich R, Axhausen KW. Habitual travel behaviour: Evidence from a six-week travel diary. Transportation, 2003, 30: 13-36

[40]

Schnittger, S., & Zumkeller, D. (2004). Longitudinal Microsimulation as a Tool to Merge Transport Planning and Traffic Engineering Models" The Mobitopp Model". ETC Conference Papers 2004.

[41]

Simma, A., & Axhausen, K. (2001). Successive days, related travel behaviour ?

[42]

Smith L, Beckman R, Baggerly K. TRANSIMS: Transportation analysis and simulation system, 1995, Los Alamos National Lab.(LANL)

[43]

Tajaddini, A., Rose, G., Kockelman, K. M., & Vu, H. L. (2020). Recent Progress in Activity-Based Travel Demand Modeling: Rising Data and Applicability. In S. de Luca, R. Di Pace, & C. Fiori (Eds.), Models and Technologies for Smart, Sustainable and Safe Transportation Systems (p. Ch. 2). IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.93827

[44]

Verreault H, Morency C. Transcending the typical weekday with large-scale single-day survey samples. Transportation Research Record, 2011, 2230(1): 38-47

[45]

Vohra V, Singh S, Dutta T. Embracing flexibility post-COVID-19: A systematic review of flexible working arrangements using the SCM-TBFO framework. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 2024, 25(1): 1-26

[46]

Zhang A, Kang JE, Axhausen K, Kwon C. Multi-day activity-travel pattern sampling based on single-day data. Transportation Research Part C, 2018, 89(February): 96-112

[47]

Zhao Y, Zhu X, Guo W, She B, Yue H, Li M. Exploring the weekly travel patterns of private vehicles using automatic vehicle identification data: A case study of Wuhan, China. Sustainability, 2019,

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)

PDF

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/