Analysis of overall survival in patients with second primary malignancies following with the first diagnosis of nonmetastatic prostate cancer: A study utilizing the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database

Guangyi Zhu , Runjin Wang , Tianyu Xiong , Zhanliang Liu , Zhemin Lin , Yinong Niu

Current Urology ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (1) : 23 -30.

PDF (588KB)
Current Urology ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (1) :23 -30. DOI: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000314
Special Topic
research-article
Analysis of overall survival in patients with second primary malignancies following with the first diagnosis of nonmetastatic prostate cancer: A study utilizing the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database
Author information +
History +
PDF (588KB)

Abstract

Background: Survival in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) is now significantly prolonged. However, the incidence of secondary primary malignancies (SPMs) has increased during the treatment for PCa, which adversely affects patient survival. This study explored the factors influencing the overall survival (OS) of SPM in patients with nonmetastatic PCa and the impact of SPM with different histologic types on OS.

Materials and methods: We evaluated the clinical data of patients diagnosed with PCa of T1N0M0 to T4N0M0 between 2010 and 2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The patients were divided into 2 groups: with or without SPM. The key risk factors affecting OS were analyzed using Cox regression analysis. To mitigate the influence of other confounding factors, we performed propensity score matching in a 1:1 ratio. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess the impact of SPM on OS across different histological types.

Results: In total, 208,984 patients with nonmetastatic PCa were enrolled, including 16,573 and 192, 411 patients in the SPM and non-SPM groups, respectively. Age (p < 0.05), chemotherapy (p = 0.010), presence of SPM (p < 0.05), Gleason score of the biopsy specimens (p < 0.05), and prostate-specific antigen levels (p < 0.05) were identified as independent risk factors for OS. Conversely, race (p < 0.05), radical prostatectomy (p < 0.05), and radiotherapy (p < 0.05) were independent protective factors of OS. The 5-year OS rate was worse in the SPM group than in the non-SPM group (72.9% vs. 91.2%, p < 0.05). Patients with SPM of the pulmonary and bronchial types have the worst long-term prognosis, whereas those with SPM of cutaneous melanoma have the best prognosis.

Conclusions: During the management of patients with PCa, we must extend our attention beyond potential PCa recurrence and metastasis to the possibility of SPM, which compromises patient survival.

Keywords

Second primary malignancies / Prostate cancer / Kaplan-Meier curve / Prognosis

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Guangyi Zhu, Runjin Wang, Tianyu Xiong, Zhanliang Liu, Zhemin Lin, Yinong Niu. Analysis of overall survival in patients with second primary malignancies following with the first diagnosis of nonmetastatic prostate cancer: A study utilizing the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Current Urology, 2026, 20(1): 23-30 DOI:10.1097/CU9.0000000000000314

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program for providing the data used in this study. The interpretation and reporting of these data are the sole responsibility of the authors.

Statement of ethics

This study was exempt from ethical approval and patient informed consent requirements because patient information in the SEER database is publicly available and anonymous. All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Conflict of interest statement

YN is a member of Editorial Board of Current Urology and confirms no involvement in any stage of this article's review process, ensuring unbiased editorial decision making. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Funding source

This work was supported by the Beijing Key Clinical Specialty Development Project (20240930), the National Key Clinical Specialty Development Project (20250829), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 82170783).

Author contributions

GZ: Conceptualization, methodology, writing-original draft, supervision, project administration;RW: Software, formal analysis, data curation, visualization, writing-review and editing; TX: Investigation, resources, validation, writing-review and editing;ZL: Resources, validation, writing-review and editing;ZL: Formal analysis, data curation, writing-review and editing;YN: Supervision, funding acquisition, writing-review and editing.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program (https://seer.cancer.gov/), but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission from the SEER program.

References

[1]

Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021; 71(3):209-249.

[2]

Welch HG, Albertsen PC. Reconsidering prostate cancer mortality — The future of PSA screening. N Engl J Med 2020; 382(16):1557-1563.

[3]

Teo MY, Rathkopf DE, Kantoff P. Treatment of advanced prostate cancer. Annu Rev Med 2019;70:479-499.

[4]

Mariotto AB, Rowland JH, Ries LA, Scoppa S, Feuer EJ. Multiple cancer prevalence: A growing challenge in long-term survivorship. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007; 16(3):566-571.

[5]

Siegel DA, O'Neil ME, Richards TB, Dowling NF, Weir HK. Prostate cancer incidence and survival, by stage and race/ethnicity — United States, 2001-2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2020; 69(41):1473-1480.

[6]

Shah S, Young HN, Cobran EK. Comparative effectiveness of conservative management compared to cryotherapy in localized prostate cancer patients. Am J Mens Health 2018; 12(5):1681-1691.

[7]

Buwenge M, Scirocco E, Deodato F, et al. Radiotherapy of prostate cancer: Impact of treatment characteristics on the incidence of second tumors. BMC Cancer 2020; 20(1):90.

[8]

Moertel CG, Dockerty MB, Baggenstoss AH. Multiple primary malignant neoplasms. I. Introduction and presentation of data. Cancer 1961;14:221-230.

[9]

Vogt A, Schmid S, Heinimann K, et al. Multiple primary tumours: Challenges and approaches, a review. ESMO Open 2017; 2(2):e000172.

[10]

Travis LB, Demark Wahnefried W, Allan JM, Wood ME, Ng AK. Aetiology, genetics and prevention of secondary neoplasms in adult cancer survivors. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2013; 10(5):289-301.

[11]

Fan CY, Huang WY, Lin CS, et al. Risk of second primary malignancies among patients with prostate cancer: A population-based cohort study. PloS One 2017; 12(4):e0175217.

[12]

Van Hemelrijck M, Feller A, Garmo H, et al. Incidence of second malignancies for prostate cancer. PloS One 2014; 9(7):e102596.

[13]

Chattopadhyay S, Zheng G, Hemminki O, Försti A, Sundquist K, Hemminki K. Prostate cancer survivors: Risk and mortality in second primary cancers. Cancer Med 2018; 7(11):5752-5759.

[14]

Mehtälä J, Zong J, Vassilev Z, et al. Overall survival and second primary malignancies in men with metastatic prostate cancer. PloS One 2020; 15(2):e0227552.

[15]

Saltus CW, Vassilev ZP, Zong J, et al. Incidence of second primary malignancies in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer: An observational retrospective cohort study in the United States. Prostate Cancer 2019;2019:4387415.

[16]

Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, et al. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer—2020 update. Part 1: Screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol 2021; 79(2):243-262.

[17]

Joung JY, Lim J, Oh CM, et al. Risk of second primary cancer among prostate cancer patients in Korea: A population-based cohort study. PloS One 2015; 10(10):e0140693.

[18]

Vassilev ZP, Gabarró MS, Kaye JA, et al. Incidence of second primary malignancies in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: Results from observational studies in three countries. Future Oncol 2020; 16(25):1889-1901.

[19]

Liu Y, Zhang P, Zhang Y, et al. Clinical characteristics and overall survival nomogram of second primary malignancies after prostate cancer, a SEER population-based study. Sci Rep 2021; 11(1):1293.

[20]

Bagshaw HP, Arnow KD, Trickey AW, Leppert JT, Wren SM, Morris AM. Assessment of second primary cancer risk among men receiving primary radiotherapy vs surgery for the treatment of prostate cancer. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5(7):e2223025.

[21]

Murray L, Henry A, Hoskin P, Siebert FA, Venselaar J; PROBATE group of GEC ESTRO. Second primary cancers after radiation for prostate cancer: A systematic review of the clinical data and impact of treatment technique. Radiother Oncol 2014; 110(2):213-228.

[22]

Murray L, Henry A, Hoskin P, Siebert FA, Venselaar J; BRAPHYQS/PROBATE Group of the GEC ESTRO. Second primary cancers after radiation for prostate cancer: A review of data from planning studies. Radiat Oncol 2013;8:172.

[23]

Chargari C, Cosset JM. The issue of low doses in radiation therapy and impact on radiation-induced secondary malignancies [in French]. Bull Cancer 2013; 100(12):1333-1342.

[24]

Jahreiß MC, Heemsbergen WD, Janus C, et al. Impact of advanced external beam radiotherapy on second haematological cancer risk in prostate cancer survivors. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35(4):e278-e288.

[25]

Pithadia KJ, Advani PG, Citrin DE, et al. Comparing risk for second primary cancers after intensity-modulated vs 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy for prostate cancer, 2002-2015. JAMA Oncol 2023; 9(8):1119-1123.

[26]

Wallis CJ, Mahar AL, Choo R, et al. Second malignancies after radiotherapy for prostate cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2016;352:i851.

[27]

Lin J, Zhan X, Chen R, et al. Increased burden of second bladder cancer and rectal cancer in prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy: Results from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results. Cancer Control 2023;30:10732748231177544.

[28]

de la Encarnación Castellano C, Canos Nebot A, Vargas Andreu P, et al. Incidence of bladder cancer in patients undergoing radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Arch Esp Urol 2022; 75(7):655-662.

[29]

Wood ME, Vogel V, Ng A, Foxhall L, Goodwin P, Travis LB. Second malignant neoplasms: Assessment and strategies for risk reduction. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30(30):3734-3745.

[30]

Chattopadhyay S, Hemminki O, Försti A, Sundquist K, Sundquist J, Hemminki K. Impact of family history of cancer on risk and mortality of second cancers in patients with prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2019; 22(1):143-149.

[31]

Donin N, Filson C, Drakaki A, et al. Risk of second primary malignancies among cancer survivors in the United States, 1992 through 2008. Cancer 2016; 122(19):3075-3786.

PDF (588KB)

33

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/