Mini-Cog test predicts need for rehabilitation intervention during weaning after radical cystectomy

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to determine whether preoperative cognitive screening using the Mini-Cognitive Assessment Instrument (Mini-Cog) was useful for predicting the need for postoperative rehabilitation intervention in patients with bladder cancer who underwent radical cystectomy.

Materials and methods: We collected the medical records of consecutive patients who underwent radical cystectomy and preoperative cognitive screening based on the Mini-Cog test in our department between 2020 and 2021 (n = 114). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify the clinical risk factors for requiring rehabilitation intervention because of failure to wean postoperatively.

Results: The median age of the participants was 76 years, and 96 (84%) were male. Of the 114 patients, 31 (27%) required rehabilitation intervention for weaning. Based on the Mini-Cog test, the patients were classified into 2 groups: 22 (19%) had probable cognitive impairment (Mini-Cog score <3). Of the 22 patients with a Mini-Cog score of <3, 13 (59%) required rehabilitation intervention because of failure to wean postoperatively. In the multivariate analysis, being 75 years or older (odds ratio [OR], 9.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.6-36.3; p < 0.001), a Mini-Cog score of <3 (OR, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.2-11.2; p = 0.02), and an operative time ≥310 minutes (OR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.1-11.9; p = 0.04) were independent risk factors for requiring postoperative rehabilitation intervention.

Conclusions: Effective screening with the Mini-Cog test, a simple cognitive screening tool with only 2 components (delayed 3-word recall task and clock drawing), reflects not only cognitive function but also physical frailty and may lead to the establishment of appropriate rehabilitation programs during the perioperative period for early patient mobility after surgery.

Keywords

Mini-Cog / Screening / Geriatrics / Rehabilitation / Urology / Radical cystectomy

Acknowledgments

None.

Statement of ethics

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the National Cancer Center Institutional Review Board (approval no. 2018-159). An opt-out method was used to obtain consent for this retrospective study.

Conflict of interest statement

No conflict of interest has been declared by the authors.

Funding source

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author contributions

SY: study design, analysis and interpretation of the data, manuscript draft;

RY, KH, YU, and NO: Acquisition of the data;

YN: Critical revision of the manuscript;

HM: Critical revision of the manuscript, supervision of the study;

MK: Supervision of the study;

All authors: Read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

[1] Richters A, Aben KKH, Kiemeney L. The global burden of urinary bladder cancer: An update. World J Urol 2020; 38(8):1895-1904.

[2] Witjes JA, Bruins HM, Cathomas R, et al. European Association of Urology guidelines on muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer: Summary of the 2020 guidelines. Eur Urol 2021; 79(1):82-104.

[3] Jensen BT, Thomsen T, Mohamed N, et al. Efficacy of pre and rehabilitation in radical cystectomy on health related quality of life and physical function: A systematic review. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs 2022; 9(7):100046.

[4] Mehrotra S, Rowland M, Zhang H, et al. Scoping review protocol: Is there a role for physical activity interventions in the treatment pathway of bladder cancer? BMJ Open 2019; 9(11):e033518.

[5] Rammant E, Decaestecker K, Bultijnck R, et al. A systematic review of exercise and psychosocial re-habilitation interventions to improve health-related outcomes in patients with bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy. Clin Rehabil 2018; 32(5):594-606.

[6] Borson S, Scanlan J, Brush M, Vitaliano P, Dokmak A. The Mini-Cog: A cognitive ‘vital signs’ measure for dementia screening in multi-lingual elderly. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2000; 15(11):1021-1027.

[7] Steenland NK, Auman CM, Patel PM, et al. Development of a rapid screening instrument for mild cognitive impairment and undiagnosed dementia. J Alzheimers Dis 2008; 15(3):419-427.

[8] Tsoi KK, Chan JY, Hirai HW, Wong SY, Kwok TC. Cognitive tests to detect dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med 2015; 175(9):1450-1458.

[9] Borges MK, Canevelli M, Cesari M, Aprahamian I. Frailty as a predictor of cognitive disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Med (Lausanne) 2019;6:26.

[10] Ge ML, Simonsick EM, Dong BR, Kasper JD, Xue QL. Frailty, with or without cognitive impairment, is a strong predictor of recurrent falls in a US population-representative sample of older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2021; 76(11):e354-e360.

[11] Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 1969; 9(3):179-186.

[12] Kiyoshige E, Kabayama M, Gondo Y, et al. Age group differences in association between IADL decline and depressive symptoms in community-dwelling elderly. BMC Geriatr 2019; 19(1):309.

[13] Jensen BT, Laustsen S, Petersen AK, et al. Preoperative risk factors related to bladder cancer rehabilitation: A registry study. Eur J Clin Nutr 2013; 67(9):917-921.

[14] Bream MJ, Maurice MJ, Altschuler J, Zhu H, Abouassaly R. Increased use of cystectomy in patients 75 and older: A contemporary analysis of survival and perioperative outcomes from the National Cancer Database. Urology 2017;100:72-78.

[15] Hara T, Matsuyama H, Kamiryo Y, et al. Use of preoperative performance status and hemoglobin concentration to predict overall survival for patients aged ≥75 years after radical cystectomy for treatment of bladder cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 2016; 21(1):139-147.

[16] Kalis V, Smazinka M, Rusavy Z, et al. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy as the mainstay management for significant apical pelvic organ prolapse (LAP) study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2020;244:60-65.

[17] Gerbershagen HJ, Rothaug J, Kalkman CJ, Meissner W. Determination of moderate-to-severe postoperative pain on the numeric rating scale: A cut-off point analysis applying four different methods. Br J Anaesth 2011; 107(4):619-626.

[18] Galvin JE, Sadowsky CH; NINCDS-ADRDA. Practical guidelines for the recognition and diagnosis of dementia. J Am Board Fam Med 2012; 25(3):367-382.

[19] Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg 2002; 183(6):630-641.

[20] Blom JW, Doggen CJM, Osanto S, Rosendaal FR. Malignancies, prothrombotic mutations, and the risk of venous thrombosis. JAMA 2005; 293(6):715-722.

[21] Yajima S, Nakanishi Y, Matsumoto S, et al. The Mini-Cog: A simple screening tool for cognitive impairment useful in predicting the risk of delirium after major urological cancer surgery. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2022; 22(4):319-324.

[22] Chandler MJ, Lacritz LH, Cicerello AR, et al. Three-word recall in normal aging. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2004; 26(8):1128-1133.

[23] Shulman KI, Shedletsky R, Silver IL. The challenge of time: Clock-drawing and cognitive function in the elderly. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 1986; 1(2):135-140.

[24] Freedman M, Leach L, Kaplan E, et al. Clock-Drawing: A Neuro-Psychological Analysis. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1994.

[25] Forti P, Maioli F, Lega MV, Montanari L, Coraini F, Zoli M. Combination of the clock drawing test with the physical phenotype of frailty for the prediction of mortality and other adverse outcomes in older community dwellers without dementia. Gerontology 2014; 60(3):204-211.