Efficacy of nonsolvent flower pollen extracts in healthy women with urinary incontinence: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel study

Marc Moulin , Erin D. Lewis , David C. Crowley , Colleen E. May , Malkanthi Evans

Current Urology ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (3) : 203 -211.

PDF (530KB)
Current Urology ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (3) :203 -211. DOI: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000248
Advances in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Research
research-article
Efficacy of nonsolvent flower pollen extracts in healthy women with urinary incontinence: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel study
Author information +
History +
PDF (530KB)

Abstract

Background: Urinary incontinence (UI) is a debilitating and common condition that adversely affects quality of life. Prescriptive and surgical approaches for managing UI symptoms may result in undesirable risks and complications. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel study investigated the efficacy of 2 nonsolvent flower pollen extracts on UI in healthy women.

Materials and methods: One-hundred and fourteen women aged 40-75 years who scored ≥5 on the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-SF) were randomized to receive either Graminex® RCT Fem™ UI, Graminex® PollenBerry®, or placebo for 24 weeks. The primary outcome was the change in the ICIQ-SF score between the trial and placebo groups after 24 weeks of supplementation. The secondary outcomes included changes in the frequency of nocturia (recorded in 3-day void diaries) and 24-hour leakage volume (assessed via pad weight) after 6, 12, 18, and 24 weeks of supplementation and changes in stress-induced urinary leakage volume (after completion of a provocative maneuver challenge) after 24 weeks of supplementation.

Results: All the groups demonstrated improvement in ICIQ-SF scores at week 24 (p < 0.001). The RCT Fem™ UI group had the greatest improvement in ICIQ-SF scores (−4.07 ± 3.4), followed by the PollenBerry® group (−3.34 ± 2.87) and placebo group (−2.61 ± 3.52). The RCT Fem™ UI group had corresponding improvements in 24-hour leakage volume (−17.68 ± 39.84 g) and frequency of nocturia (−0.52 ± 1.26) (p ≤ 0.05). PollenBerry® supplementation significantly improved stress-induced urinary leakage volume (−7.12 ± 15.64 g) at week 24. The study products demonstrated safe hematological and chemical profiles.

Conclusions: RCT Fem™ UI supplementation resulted in significant and clinically meaningful reductions in UI severity, with corresponding improvements in daily urinary leakage volume and frequency of nocturia. PollenBerry® significantly improved stress-induced urinary leakage volume, suggesting that it may be efficacious in women who are prone to stress UI. The study products were safe and well tolerated in this population.

Keywords

Urinary incontinence / Pollen extract / Healthy women / Dietary supplement / ICIQ-SF / Urinary leakage

Author summay

Supplemental Digital Content is available for this article.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Marc Moulin, Erin D. Lewis, David C. Crowley, Colleen E. May, Malkanthi Evans. Efficacy of nonsolvent flower pollen extracts in healthy women with urinary incontinence: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel study. Current Urology, 2024, 18(3): 203-211 DOI:10.1097/CU9.0000000000000248

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the participants for their compliance to the conduct of the study.

Statement of ethics

This study was approved by the Natural and Non-Prescription Health Products Directorate, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, and ethical approval was granted by the IRB Services, Aurora, Ontario, Canada (Pro00033511). The study was conducted in compliance with the International Council for Harmonization of Technical Requirements for harmaceuticals for Human Use Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice guidelines and in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent amendments. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants before study initiation. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05510999).

Conflict of interest statement

CEM is an employee of Graminex, L.L.C. MM, EDL, DCC, and ME are employees of KGK Science Inc. and have no competing interests to declare.

Funding source

This study was funded by Graminex L.L.C. (Saginaw, MI, USA).

Author contributions

MM: Data interpretation, visualization, writing—original draft preparation, review, and editing; EDL: Writing—original draft preparation, review, and editing;

DCC: Study supervision;

CEM: Study design, writing—review and editing;

ME: Study design, data interpretation, writing—original draft preparation, review and editing, and supervision;

All the authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

[1]

Subak LL, Brown JS, Kraus SR, et al. The "costs" of urinary incontinence for women. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107(4):908-916.

[2]

Almousa S, Bandin van Loon A. The prevalence of urinary incontinence in nulliparous adolescent and middle-aged women and the associated risk factors: A systematic review. Maturitas 2018;107:78-83.

[3]

Long JE, Khairat S, Chmelo E, Palmer MH. Mind over bladder: Women, aging, and bladder health. Geriatr Nurs 2018; 39(2):230-237.

[4]

uckley BS, Lapitan MCM; Epidemiology Committee of the Fourth International Consultation on Incontinence, Paris, 2008. Prevalence of urinary incontinence in men, women, and children—Current evidence: Findings of the fourth international consultation on incontinence. Urology 2010; 76(2):265-270.

[5]

Muth CC. Urinary incontinence in women. JAMA 2017; 318(16):1622.

[6]

Markland AD, Richter HE, Fwu CW, Eggers P, Kusek JW. Prevalence and trends of urinary incontinence in adults in the United States, 2001 to 2008. J Urol 2011; 186(2):589-593.

[7]

Bardsley A. An overview of urinary incontinence. Br J Nurs 2016; 25(18):S14-S21.

[8]

Capobianco G, Madonia M, Morelli S, et al. Management of female stress urinary incontinence: A care pathway and update. Maturitas 2018;109:32-38.

[9]

Palacios S, Ramirez M, Lilue M, Vega B. Evaluation of Femaxeen® for control of urinary incontinence in women: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Maturitas 2020;133:1-6.

[10]

Kimura M, Kimura I, Nakase K, Sonobe T, Mori N. Micturition activity of pollen extract: Contractile effects on bladder and inhibitory effects on urethral smooth muscle of mouse and pig. Planta Med 1986;2:148-151.

[11]

Locatelli M, Macchione N, Ferrante C, et al. Graminex pollen: Phenolic pattern, colorimetric analysis and protective effects in immortalized prostate cells (PC3) and rat prostate challenged with LPS. Molecules 2018; 23(5):1145.

[12]

Cai T, Verze P, La Rocca R, Anceschi U, De Nunzio C, Mirone V. The role of flower pollen extract in managing patients affected by chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: A comprehensive analysis of all published clinical trials. BMC Urol 2017; 17(1):32.

[13]

Rugendorff EW, Weidner W, Ebeling L, Buck AC. Results of treatment with pollen extract (Cernilton N) in chronic prostatitis and prostatodynia. Br J Urol 1993; 71(4):433-438.

[14]

Wagenlehner FME, Schneider H, Ludwig M, Schnitker J, Brähler E, Weidner W. A pollen extract (Cernilton) in patients with inflammatory chronic prostatitis-chronic pelvic pain syndrome: A multicentre, randomised, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study. Eur Urol 2009; 56(3):544-551.

[15]

Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, et al. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Int J Surg 2012; 10(1):28-55.

[16]

Klovning A, Avery K, Sandvik H, Hunskaar S. Comparison of two questionnaires for assessing the severity of urinary incontinence: The ICIQ-UI SF versus the incontinence severity index. Neurourol Urodyn 2009; 28(5):411-415.

[17]

Avery K, Donovan J, Peters TJ, Shaw C, Gotoh M, Abrams P. ICIQ: A brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 2004; 23(4):322-330.

[18]

Wagner TH, Patrick DL, Bavendam TG, Martin ML, Buesching DP. Quality of life of persons with urinary incontinence: Development of a new measure. Urology 1996; 47(1):67-71; discussion71-72.

[19]

Coyne K, Lai J, Zyczynski T, et al. An overactive bladder symptom and quality-of-life short form: Development of the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire Short Form (OAB-q SF). 34th joint meeting of the International Continence Society and the International Urogynecological Association; 2004.

[20]

Blaivas JG, Tsui JF, Mekel G, et al. Validation of the lower urinary tract symptom score. Can J Urol 2015; 22(5):7952-7958.

[21]

Moulin M, Lewis ED, Crowley DC, Langston J, Evans M. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over pilot study to investigate the efficacy of rest-ZZZ formula in healthy participants with occasional sleeplessness. Sleep Biol Rhythms 2022; 21(1):59-68.

[22]

Krhut J, Zachoval R, Smith PP, et al. Pad weight testing in the evaluation of urinary incontinence. NeurourolUrodyn 2014; 33(5):507-510.

[23]

Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge; 1988.

[24]

R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2019.

[25]

McGlothlin AE, Lewis RJ. Minimal clinically important difference: Defining what really matters to patients. JAMA 2014; 312(13):1342-1343.

[26]

Lim R, Liong ML, Lim KK, Leong WS, Yuen KH. The minimum clinically important difference of the international consultation on incontinence questionnaires (ICIQ-UI SF and ICIQ-LUTSqol). Urology 2019;133:91-95.

[27]

van Leeuwen JH, Castro R, Busse M, Bemelmans BL. The placebo effect in the pharmacologic treatment of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms. Eur Urol 2006; 50(3):440-452; discussion 453.

[28]

Hansen BJ, Meyhoff HH, Nordling J, Mensink HJ, Mogensen P, Larsen EH. Placebo effects in the pharmacological treatment of uncomplicated benign prostatic hyperplasia. The ALFECH study group. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1996; 30(5):373-377.

[29]

Obloza A, Teo R, Marriott E, Parker G, Tincello D. Association of baseline severity of lower urinary tract symptoms with the success conservative therapy for urinary incontinence in women. Int Urogynecol J 2019; 30(5):705-710.

[30]

Stanley N. The underestimated impact of nocturia on quality of life. Eur Urol Suppl 2005; 4(7):17-19.

[31]

Yu H-J, Chen F-Y, Huang P-C, Chen TH-H, Chie W-C, Liu C-Y. Impact of nocturia on symptom-specific quality of life among community-dwelling adults aged 40 years and older. Urology 2006; 67(4):713-718.

[32]

Luber KM. The definition, prevalence, and risk factors for stress urinary incontinence. Rev Urol 2004; 6(Suppl 3(Suppl 3)):S3-S9.

[33]

Norton P, Brubaker L. Urinary incontinence in women. Lancet 2006; 367(9504):57-67.

[34]

Fitzgerald ST, Palmer MH, Kirkland VL, Robinson L. The impact of urinary incontinence in working women: A study in a production facility. Women Health 2002; 35(1):1-16.

[35]

Palmer MH, Fitzgerald S. Urinary incontinence in working women: A comparison study. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2002; 11(10):879-888.

PDF (530KB)

14

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/