Modified percutaneous nephropexy for nephroptosis: Technical description and short-term results

Honglei Liu , Wenzhi Gao , Zheng Zhang , Kunlin Yang , Chang Meng , Bing Wang , Yangjun Han , Mingxin Diao , Chao Zuo , Minghua Zhang , Yingzhi Diao , Zhihua Li , Xinfei Li , Gang Wang , Chunji Wang , Zihui Gao , Yaming Gu , Xuesong Li

Current Urology ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (3) : 168 -172.

PDF (272KB)
Current Urology ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (3) :168 -172. DOI: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000238
New Technique Highlights
research-article
Modified percutaneous nephropexy for nephroptosis: Technical description and short-term results
Author information +
History +
PDF (272KB)

Abstract

Objectives: Percutaneous nephropexy (PCN) has been demonstrated as a feasible method for treating nephroptosis. This study describes an improved technique for PCN that better addresses the issue of nephroptosis.

Materials and methods: We reviewed 4 patients who underwent the improved PCN procedure between January 2021 and January 2023. These patients were diagnosed with nephroptosis, with 1 case having both a narrow ureteropelvic junction and nephroptosis due to a kidney stone, and 3 cases having simple nephroptosis. Patient characteristics, perioperative data, and follow-up results were collected. Surgical success was determined by symptom relief (subjective success) and the absence of kidney descent by intravenous pyelography (objective success).

Results: Preoperative computed tomography urography showed that all patients had hydronephrosis, with severe hydronephrosis in 75% (3/4) and moderate hydronephrosis in 25% (1/4) of cases. The mean operative time was 63.8 minutes (range, 45-95 minutes), and the mean blood loss was 5 mL (range, 5-50 mL). The mean length of hospital stay was 4.5 days (range, 3-6 days). The mean time to removal of the nephrostomy tube was 2 months (range, 1-4 months). No serious complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3) occurred during or after the procedure. The mean postoperative serum creatinine level was 54.75 μmol/L (range, 43-65 μmol/L). The mean follow-up time was 6.25 months (range, 4-8 months). The objective and subjective success rates were both 100%.

Conclusions: The improved PCN procedure that was used in this study is feasible and provides a good option for treating nephroptosis.

Keywords

Nephroptosis / Nephropexy / Intravenous pyelography / Hydronephrosis

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Honglei Liu, Wenzhi Gao, Zheng Zhang, Kunlin Yang, Chang Meng, Bing Wang, Yangjun Han, Mingxin Diao, Chao Zuo, Minghua Zhang, Yingzhi Diao, Zhihua Li, Xinfei Li, Gang Wang, Chunji Wang, Zihui Gao, Yaming Gu, Xuesong Li. Modified percutaneous nephropexy for nephroptosis: Technical description and short-term results. Current Urology, 2025, 19(3): 168-172 DOI:10.1097/CU9.0000000000000238

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Acknowledgments

None.

Statement of ethics

The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. The trial was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013). This study was approved by the ethics committee of Peking University First Hospital-Miyun Hospital (no. 2023-099-001). Due to the retrospective nature of the study, the requirement for informed consent was waived.

Conflict of interest statement

XL is an associate editor of Current Urology. This article was accepted after a normal external review. No conflict of interest has been declared by the other authors.

Funding source

None.

Author contributions

HL, WG, YG, XL: Conception and design;

YG, XL: Administrative support;

HL, WG, ZZ, KY, CM, BW, YH, MD, CZ, MZ, YD: Provision of study materials or patients;

WG: Collection and assembly of data;

HL, WG, KY, BW, YH, MD, XL, CZ, MZ, YD, CW, ZG: Data analysis and interpretation;

All authors: Manuscript writing, final approval of manuscript.

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

[1]

Fornara P, Doehn C, Jocham D. Laparoscopic nephropexy: 3-year experience. J Urol 1997; 158(5):1679-1683.

[2]

Wang K, Fan M, Shao F, Hu F, Xia X. Nephroptosis incidentally found on 99 m Tc-DTPA renal dynamic scan. Clin Nucl Med 2022; 47(12):1099-1100.

[3]

Yoshida S, Matsumura M, Maekawa K, et al. Recurrent abdominal pain caused by nephroptosis. Clin J Gastroenterol 2020; 13(4):621-625.

[4]

Plas E, Daha K, Riedl CR, Hübner WA, Pflüger H. Long-term followup after laparoscopic nephropexy for symptomatic nephroptosis. J Urol 2001; 166(2):449-452.

[5]

Grauer R, Gray M, Schenkman N. Modified Whitaker test: A novel diagnostic for nephroptosis. BMJ Case Rep 2020; 13(4):e235108.

[6]

Srirangam SJ, Pollard AJ, Adeyoju AA, O'Reilly PH. Nephroptosis: Seriously misunderstood? BJU Int 2009; 103(3):296-300.

[7]

Bratt DG, Jaffer A, Chandra L, Patel C, Biyani CS. Nephroptosis: Is body mass index (BMI) the key? Scand J Urol 2018; 52(4):309-311.

[8]

El-Moula MG, Izaki H, Kishimoto T, Takahashi M, Fukumori T, Kanayama HO. Laparoscopic nephropexy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2008; 18(2):230-236.

[9]

Székely JG. Re: Laparoscopic nephropexy: Washington University experience. J Urol 1997; 157(1):266.

[10]

Marcovich R, Wolf JS Jr. Laparoscopy for the treatment of positional renal pain. Urology 1998; 52(1):38-43.

[11]

McDougall EM, Afane JS, Dunn MD, Collyer WC, Clayman RV. Laparoscopic nephropexy: Long-term follow-up—Washington University experience. J Endourol 2000; 14(3):247-250.

[12]

Chan VSH, Lam TPW, Lam WWM. Nephroptosis: The wandering kidney. Kidney Res Clin Pract 2018; 37(3):306-307.

[13]

Thomson WN, Innes JA, Munro JF, Geddes AM, Prescott RJ, Murdoch JM. Renal mobility in women attending a pyelonephritis clinic and in controls. Br J Urol 1978; 50(2):73-75.

[14]

Rehman J, Hoenig DM. Laparoscopic nephropexy. J Endourol 2000; 14(10):881-887 discussion 887-888.

[15]

Chueh SC, Hsieh JT, Chen J, Young YL, Chen SC, Tu YP. Retroperitoneoscopic nephropexy for symptomatic nephroptosis. Surg Endosc 2002; 16(11):1603-1607.

[16]

Khan AM, Holman E, Tóth C. Percutaneous nephropexy. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2000; 34(3):157-161.

[17]

Urban DA, Clayman RV, Kerbl K, Figenshau RS, McDougall EM. Laparoscopic nephropexy for symptomatic nephroptosis: Initial case report. J Endourol 1993; 7(1):27-30.

[18]

Manzi A, Menghini I, Manfrini R, Bonini CA. Nephropexy using the Aglietti procedure. Case reports [in German]. Minerva Urol Nefrol 1993; 45(2):67-72.

[19]

Gözen AS, Rassweiler JJ, Neuwinger F, et al. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic retroperitoneal nephropexy. J Endourol 2008; 22(10):2263-2267.

[20]

Wyler SF, Sulser T, Casella R, Hauri D, Bachmann A. Retroperitoneoscopic nephropexy for symptomatic nephroptosis using a modified three-point fixation technique. Urology 2005; 66(3):644-648.

[21]

Gatti L, Antonelli A, Peroni A, et al. Sliding-clip robotic nephropexy [in Italian]. Urologia 2012; 79(suppl 19):50-52.

[22]

Baldassarre E, Marcangeli P, Vigano M, et al. Robotic nephropexy in case of symptomatic nephroptosis. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2011; 83(3):160-162.

PDF (272KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/