Diagnosis and treatment of pelvic organ prolapse complicated with stress urinary incontinence: A Chinese expert consensus

Female Urology Group , Chinese Urological Association

Current Urology ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (2) : 73 -76.

PDF (152KB)
Current Urology ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (2) :73 -76. DOI: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000237
Special Issue
research-article
Diagnosis and treatment of pelvic organ prolapse complicated with stress urinary incontinence: A Chinese expert consensus
Author information +
History +
PDF (152KB)

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Female Urology Group, Chinese Urological Association. Diagnosis and treatment of pelvic organ prolapse complicated with stress urinary incontinence: A Chinese expert consensus. Current Urology, 2025, 19(2): 73-76 DOI:10.1097/CU9.0000000000000237

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Acknowledgment

None.

Statement of ethics

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest statement.

Author contributions

This consensus was jointly written by the Female Urology Group, Chinese Urological Association.

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

[1]

Yan W, Li X, Sun S, et al. Risk factors for female pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence [in Chinese]. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban 2018; 43(12):1345-1350.

[2]

Karamustafaoglu Balci B, Gungor Ugurlucan F, Yasa C, Yalcin O. 5-year experience in the diagnosis and treatment of occult urinary incontinence in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2017;210:265-269.

[3]

Karjalainen PK, Gillor M, Dietz HP. Predictors of occult stress urinary incontinence. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2021; 61(2):263-269.

[4]

Xie J, Li S, Yao T, Shen J. A 2D equivalent mechanical model of the whole pelvic floor and impairment simulation. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng 2023; 39(1):e3659.

[5]

Li S, Wen X, Gao Z, et al. Comparison of the axes and positions of the uterus and vagina between women with and without pelvic floor organ prolapse. Front Surg 2022;9:760723.

[6]

Wang H, Shen J, Li S, Gao Z, Ke K, Gu P. The feasibility of uterine-vaginal axis MRI-based as evaluation of surgical efficacy in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Ann Transl Med 2022; 10(8):447.

[7]

Yang X, Wang X, Gao Z, et al. The anatomical pathogenesis of stress urinary incontinence in women. Medicina (Kaunas) 2022; 59(1):5.

[8]

Tian D, Gao Z, Zhou H, et al. A comparative study on the clinical efficacy of simple transobturator midurethal sling and posterior pelvic floor reconstruction. Medicina (Kaunas) 2023; 59(1):155.

[9]

Richardson DA, Bent AE, Ostergard DR. The effect of uterovaginal prolapse on urethrovesical pressure dynamics. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983; 146(8):901-905.

[10]

Colombo M, Maggioni A, Scalambrino S, Vitobello D, Milani R. Surgery for genitourinary prolapse and stress incontinence: A randomized trial of posterior pubourethral ligament plication and Pereyra suspension. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 176(2):337-343.

[11]

Nambiar AK, Arlandis S, K, et al. European Association of Urology guidelines on the diagnosis and management of female non-neurogenic lower urinary tract symptoms. Part 1: Diagnostics, overactive bladder, stress urinary incontinence, and mixed urinary incontinence. Eur Urol 2022; 82(1):49-59.

[12]

Dominguez AP, Isaza PG, Pantoja SN, Fusco I. Role of top flat magnetic stimulation for urinary incontinence as a debilitating condition of pelvic floor dysfunction: An observational evaluation of Latin American population. World J Urol 2023; 41(1):173-177.

[13]

Harvey MA, Lemieux MC, Robert M, Schulz JA. Guideline No. 411: Vaginal pessary use. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2021; 43(2):255-266.e1.

[14]

Tunn R, Baessler K, Knüpfer S, Hampel C. Urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in women. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2023; 120(5):71-80.

[15]

Wu YM, Welk B. Revisiting current treatment options for stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse: A contemporary literature review. Res Rep Urol 2019;11:179-188.

[16]

van der Ploeg JM, van der Steen A, Zwolsman S, van der Vaart CH, Roovers J. Prolapse surgery with or without incontinence procedure: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 2018; 125(3):289-297.

[17]

Ek M, Tegerstedt G, Falconer C, et al. Urodynamic assessment of anterior vaginal wall surgery: A randomized comparison between colporraphy and transvaginal mesh. Neurourol Urodyn 2010; 29(4):527-531.

[18]

Zhong C, Wang J, Wu J, Chu X, Wan B, Wang J. Urodynamics parameters in female urinary incontinence patients with pelvic organ prolapse [in Chinese]. Zhonghua Mi Niao Wai Ke Za Zhi 2010; 31(11):732-734.

[19]

Romeikienė KE, Bartkevičienė D. Pelvic-floor dysfunction prevention in prepartum and postpartum periods. Medicina (Kaunas) 2021; 57(4):387.

[20]

Urogynecology Subgroup, Chinese Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chinese Medical Association. Chinese guideline for the diagnosis and management of pelvic orang prolapse (2020 version) [in Chinese]. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 2020; 55(5):300-306.

[21]

Management of mesh and graft complications in gynecologic surgery. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2017; 23(3):171-176.

[22]

Karjalainen PK, Gillor M, Dietz HP. Predictors of occult stress urinary incontinence. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2021; 61(2):263-269.

PDF (152KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/