Renal function in pediatric urologic surgical patients: Insight from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program—Pediatric cohort

Victor Chalfant , Carlos Riveros , Andrew A. Stec

Current Urology ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (3) : 224 -229.

PDF (134KB)
Current Urology ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (3) :224 -229. DOI: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000234
Original Articles
research-article
Renal function in pediatric urologic surgical patients: Insight from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program—Pediatric cohort
Author information +
History +
PDF (134KB)

Abstract

Background: Renal protection is a frequent indication for urological surgery in pediatric patients; however, preoperative assessment is not routinely performed. We assessed the rates of preoperative renal function testing and stratified outcomes after major pediatric urological surgery. Pediatric urology patients, specifically high-risk patients undergoing genitourinary surgeries, are likely to have an underdiagnosis of renal dysfunction after surgery.

Materials and methods: Cases were identified from the 2012 to 2019 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program—Pediatric database. Patients who underwent major urological surgery on an inpatient basis were included in this study. Abnormal renal function was defined as a creatinine (Cr) level of ≥0.5 mg/dL (younger than 2 years) and a glomerular filtration rate of <90 mL/min (2 years or older). Glomerular filtration rate was calculated using the bedside Schwartz equation (2 years or older): estimated glomerular filtration rate = 0.413 × (height/Cr).

Results: A total of 17,315 patients were included, of whom 3792 (21.9%) had documented Cr values. Based on the defined criteria, abnormal renal function was found in 7.3% of infants (younger than 2 years), 6.3% of children (2-9 years), and 15.0% of adolescents (10-18 years). Patients with abnormal preoperative renal function values were significantly (p < 0.001) more likely to experience readmission (10.2% vs. 5.8%), reoperation (3.7% vs. 1.6%), surgical organ/space infection (0.9% vs. 0.4%), transfusion (1.5% vs. 0.6%), renal insufficiency (1.6% vs. 0.4%), or urinary tract infection (5.1% vs. 3.6%).

Conclusions: In this pediatric population, 21.9% of the patients had documented preoperative Cr values before major urological surgery. Patients with documented abnormal preoperative renal function tests experienced higher complication rates. These patients have higher rates of progressive renal insufficiency and acute renal failure than those with normal renal function. The introduction of a standardized and unbiased risk assessment tool has the potential to offer patients benefits by pinpointing individuals with a heightened risk of complications. Further investigation is necessary to enhance the precise categorization of at-risk patients.

Keywords

Glomerular filtration rate / Preoperative care / Congenital abnormalities / Urological surgical procedures / Outcomes

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Victor Chalfant, Carlos Riveros, Andrew A. Stec. Renal function in pediatric urologic surgical patients: Insight from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program—Pediatric cohort. Current Urology, 2025, 19(3): 224-229 DOI:10.1097/CU9.0000000000000234

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Acknowledgments

None.

Statement of ethics

This study has been reviewed and granted exemption approval by the Institutional Review Board of Nemours Children's Health, and it was conducted in adherence with a Data Use Agreement from the NCDB program. No participants' consent statement was required for this study. All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Conflict of interest statement

The ACS NSQIP and the hospitals participating in the ACS NSQIP are the source of the data used herein; they have not verified and are not responsible for the statistical validity of the data analysis or the conclusions derived by the authors.

Funding source

This study did not receive any specific grants from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author contributions

VC: Data collection, statistical analysis, and manuscript writing, revision, and approval;

CR: Data collection, statistical analysis, and manuscript writing and approval;

AAS: Concept design, data collection, statistical analysis, and manuscript writing, revision, and approval.

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

[1]

Tain YL, Luh H, Lin CY, Hsu CN. Incidence and risks of congenital anomalies of kidney and urinary tract in newborns: A population-based case-control study in Taiwan. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016; 95(5):e2659.

[2]

Seikaly MG, Ho PL, Emmett L, Fine RN, Tejani A. Chronic renal insufficiency in children: The 2001 annual report of the NAPRTCS. Pediatr Nephrol 2003; 18(8):796-804.

[3]

Sanna-Cherchi S, Ravani P, Corbani V, et al. Renal outcome in patients with congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract. Kidney Int 2009; 76(5):528-533.

[4]

Vasconcelos MA, Oliveira EA, Simões E, et al. A predictive model of postnatal surgical intervention in children with prenatally detected congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract. Front Pediatr 2019;7:120.

[5]

National Kidney Foundation. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: Evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis 2002; 39(2Suppl 1): S1-S266.

[6]

Staples A, LeBlond R, Watkins S, Wong C, Brandt J. Validation of the revised Schwartz estimating equation in a predominantly non-CKD population. Pediatr Nephrol 2010; 25(11):2321-2326.

[7]

Dodson JL, Jerry-Fluker JV, Ng DK, et al. Urological disorders in chronic kidney disease in children cohort: Clinical characteristics and estimation of glomerular filtration rate. J Urol 2011; 186(4):1460-1466.

[8]

Coresh J, Selvin E, Stevens LA, et al. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in the United States. JAMA 2007; 298(17):2038-2047.

[9]

Warady BA, Chadha V. Chronic kidney disease in children: The global perspective. Pediatr Nephrol 2007; 22(12):1999-2009.

[10]

Ruggenenti P, Cravedi P, Chianca A, Caruso M, Remuzzi G. Achieving remission of proteinuria in childhood CKD. Pediatr Nephrol 2017; 32(2):321-330.

[11]

Wühl E, Trivelli A, et al. ESCAPE Trial Group. Strict blood-pressure control and progression of renal failure in children. N Engl J Med 2009; 361(17):1639-1650.

[12]

Kanda Y. Statistical analysis using freely-available “EZR (easy R)” software [in Japanese]. Rinsho Ketsueki 2015; 56(10):2258-2266.

[13]

Melhem N, Rasmussen P, Joyce T, et al. Acute kidney injury in children with chronic kidney disease is associated with faster decline in kidney function. Pediatr Nephrol 2021; 36(5):1279-1288.

[14]

Mian AN, Schwartz GJ. Measurement and estimation of glomerular filtration rate in children. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 2017; 24(6):348-356.

[15]

Neild GH, Thomson G, Nitsch D, Woolfson RG, Connolly JO, Woodhouse CR. Renal outcome in adults with renal insufficiency and irregular asymmetric kidneys. BMC Nephrol 2004;5:12.

[16]

Ruggenenti P, Perna A, Remuzzi G. ACE inhibitors to prevent end-stage renal disease: When to start and why possibly never to stop: A post hoc analysis of the REIN trial results. Ramipril efficacy in nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 2001; 12(12):2832-2837.

[17]

Chen TK, Knicely DH, Grams ME. Chronic kidney disease diagnosis and management: A review. JAMA 2019; 322(13):1294-1304.

[18]

Mishra OP, Prasad R. Congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract: Challenges and future prospects. Indian J Pediatr 2020; 87(9):680-681.

[19]

Katsoufis CP, DeFreitas MJ, Infante JC, et al. Risk assessment of severe congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT): A birth cohort. Front Pediatr 2019;7:182.

[20]

Kastl JT. Renal function in the fetus and neonate — The creatinine enigma. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2017; 22(2):83-89.

[21]

Aziz KT, Best MJ, Shi BY, Srikumaran U. Missing data in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database: How does it affect the identification of risk factors for shoulder surgery complications? Arthroscopy 2020; 36(5):1233-1239.e3.

[22]

Moffet HH, Parker MM, Sarkar U, et al. Adherence to laboratory test requests by patients with diabetes: The diabetes study of northern California (DISTANCE). Am J Manag Care 2011; 17(5):339-344.

[23]

Ondeck NT, Fu MC, Skrip LA, et al. Missing data treatments matter: An analysis of multiple imputation for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion procedures. Spine J 2018; 18(11):2009-2017.

[24]

Hamilton BH, Ko CY, Richards K, Hall BL. Missing data in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program are not missing at random: Implications and potential impact on quality assessments. J Am Coll Surg 2010; 210(2):125-139.e2.

PDF (134KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/