Comparison of incidence of acute kidney injury after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with that after open retropubic and extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomies in patients with prostate cancer

Shunsuke Sato , Toshiaki Tanaka , Takeshi Maehana , Kohei Hashimoto , Ko Kobayashi , Naoya Masumori

Current Urology ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (2) : 139 -143.

PDF (146KB)
Current Urology ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (2) :139 -143. DOI: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000216
Advances in Prostate Cancer Treatment
research-article
Comparison of incidence of acute kidney injury after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with that after open retropubic and extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomies in patients with prostate cancer
Author information +
History +
PDF (146KB)

Abstract

Background: We retrospectively evaluated the postoperative renal function in patients who had undergone radical prostatectomy to compare the incidences of postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) among the patients who had undergone robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP), and extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (exLRP).

Materials and methods: Patients with prostate cancer who had undergone radical prostatectomy at our institution between 2008 and 2014 were included. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy was performed using an intraperitoneal approach in a 25-degree Trendelenburg position, whereas other procedures were performed with the patient in the supine position. We evaluated the serum creatinine levels and estimated glomerular filtration rates immediately after surgery and on postoperative day 1. We evaluated the incidence of AKI after prostatectomy using the Acute Kidney Injury Network criteria of the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes guidelines.

Results: A total of 150 consecutive patients were included, with each of the 3 groups (RARP, RRP, and exLRP) comprising 50 patients. Postoperative AKI was observed in 15 (30.0%), 1 (2.0%), and 3 (6.0%) patients in the RARP, RRP, and exLRP groups, respectively. Stage 1 AKI was observed in all the patients except one. The incidence of AKI in RARP group was significantly higher than that in the other groups (p < 0.001). In the RARP group, the serum creatinine level was significantly elevated immediately after the surgery; however, it returned to baseline on postoperative day 1. Surgical procedures were the only independent factor associated with AKI incidence.

Conclusions: This study suggest that compared with RRP and exLRP, RARP is associated with a higher incidence of postoperative AKI, although most patients recover rapidly. Intra-abdominal pneumoperitoneum may contribute to AKI onset.

Keywords

Acute kidney injury / Renal function / Prostatectomy

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Shunsuke Sato, Toshiaki Tanaka, Takeshi Maehana, Kohei Hashimoto, Ko Kobayashi, Naoya Masumori. Comparison of incidence of acute kidney injury after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with that after open retropubic and extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomies in patients with prostate cancer. Current Urology, 2024, 18(2): 139-143 DOI:10.1097/CU9.0000000000000216

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Mr Kim Barrymore for improving the language used in the manuscript.

Statement of ethics

This study was approved by the institutional research committee of the institution at which the study was conducted (Sapporo Medical University no. 342-57). Because this was an observational and not a prospective intervention study, the ethics committee waived the need for written informed consent. We announced the commencement of this study on our Web site (http://web.sapmed.ac.jp/uro/) with the proviso that participants could withdraw later. All procedures involving human participants were performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee of the institution at which the study was conducted (Sapporo Medical University no. 342-57) and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Conflict of interest statement

No conflict of interest has been declared by the author.

Funding source

None.

Author contributions

SS: Participated in research, data analysis, and writing the manuscript;TT: Participated in data analysis and writing the manuscript;TM: Participated in research design and data analysis;KH, KK: Participated in data analysis;NM: Supervised the research and participated in writing the manuscript.

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

[1]

Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Briers E, et al. EAU - ESTRO - ESUR - SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Avaliable at: https://uroweb.org/guideline/prostate-cancer/. Accessed January 10, 2021.

[2]

National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Prostate Cancer (version 1. 2021). Avaliable at: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/prostate.pdf. Accessed February 4, 2021.

[3]

Novara G, Ficarra V, Rosen RC, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012; 62(3):431-452.

[4]

Schuessler WW, Schulam PG, Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Initial short-term experience. Urology 1997; 50(6):854-857.

[5]

De Carlo F, Celestino F, Verri C, Masedu F, Liberati E, Di Stasi SM. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Surgical, oncological, and functional outcomes: A systematic review. Urol Int 2014; 93(4):373-383.

[6]

Ilic D, Evans SM, Allan CA, Jung JH, Murphy D, Frydenberg M. Laparoscopic and robot-assisted vs open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localized prostate cancer: A Cochrane systematic review. BJU Int 2018; 121(6):845-853.

[7]

Coughlin GD, Yaxley JW, Chambers SK, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: 24-month outcomes from a randomised controlled study. Lancet Oncol 2018; 19(8):1051-1060.

[8]

Basiri A, de la Rosette JJ, Tabatabaei S, Woo HH, Laguna MP, Shemshaki H. Comparison of retropubic, laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy: Who is the winner? World J Urol 2018; 36(4):609-621.

[9]

Menon M, Tewari A, Peabody J; VIP Team. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: Technique. J Urol 2003; 169(6):2289-2292.

[10]

Patel VR, Thaly R, Shah K. Robotic radical prostatectomy: Outcomes of 500 cases. BJU Int 2007; 99(5):1109-1112.

[11]

Ragavan N, Dholakia K, Ramesh M, Stolzenburg JU. Extraperitoneal vs. transperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy-analysis of perioperative outcomes, a single surgeon's experience. J Robot Surg 2019; 13(2):275-281.

[12]

O'Leary E, Hubbard K, Tormey W, Cunningham AJ. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Haemodynamic and neuroendocrine responses after pneumoperitoneum and changes in position. Br J Anaesth 1996; 76(5):640-644.

[13]

Villa G, Samoni S, De Rosa S, Ronco C. The pathophysiological hypothesis of kidney damage during intra-abdominal hypertension. Front Physiol 2016;7:55.

[14]

Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Acute Kidney Injury Work Group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury. Kidney Int Suppl 2012; 2(1):1-138.

[15]

Matsuo S, Imai E, Horio M, et al. Revised equations for estimated GFR from serum creatinine in Japan. Am J Kidney Dis 2009; 53(6):982-992.

[16]

Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software 'EZR' for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 2013; 48(3):452-458.

[17]

Bellomo R, Ronco C, Kellum JA, Mehta RL, Palevsky P; Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative Workgroup. Acute renal failure—Definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs:The Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group. Crit Care 2004; 8(4):R204-R212.

[18]

Mehta RL, Kellum JA, Shah SV, et al. Acute Kidney Injury Network: Report of an initiative to improve outcomes in acute kidney injury. Crit Care 2007; 11(2):R31.

[19]

Chertow GM, Burdick E, Honour M, Bonventre JV, Bates DW. Acute kidney injury, mortality, length of stay, and costs in hospitalized patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 2005; 16(11):3365-3370.

[20]

Bihorac A, Yavas S, Subbiah S, et al. Long-term risk of mortality and acute kidney injury during hospitalization after major surgery. Ann Surg 2009; 249(5):851-858.

[21]

Hobson C, Ozrazgat-Baslanti T, Kuxhausen A, et al. Cost and mortality associated with postoperative acute kidney injury. Ann Surg 2015; 261(6):1207-1214.

[22]

Stallwood MI, Grayson AD, Mills K, Scawn ND. Acute renal failure in coronary artery bypass surgery: Independent effect of cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 77(3):968-972.

[23]

Birnie K, Verheyden V, Pagano D, et al. Predictive models for Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) defined acute kidney injury in UK cardiac surgery. Crit Care 2014; 18(6):606.

[24]

Hansen MK, Gammelager H, Mikkelsen MM, et al. Post-operative acute kidney injury and five-year risk of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke among elective cardiac surgical patients: A cohort study. Crit Care 2013; 17(6):R292.

[25]

Ikehata Y, Tanaka T, Ichihara K, et al. Incidence and risk factors for acute kidney injury after radical cystectomy. Int J Urol 2016; 23(7):558-563.

[26]

Biteker M, Dayan A, Tekkeşin , et al. Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of perioperative acute kidney injury in noncardiac and nonvascular surgery. Am J Surg 2014; 207(1):53-59.

[27]

Naito A, Taguchi S, Suzuki M, et al. Transient acute kidney injury observed immediately after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy but not after open radical prostatectomy. Mol Clin Oncol 2020; 13(3):18.

[28]

Joo EY, Moon YJ, Yoon SH, Chin JH, Hwang JH, Kim YK. Comparison of acute kidney injury after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus retropubic radical prostatectomy: A propensity score matching analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016; 95(5):e2650.

[29]

Wever KE, Bruintjes MH, Warlé MC, Hooijmans CR. Renal perfusion and function during pneumoperitoneum: A systematic review and meta-analysis of animal studies. PloS One 2016; 11(9):e0163419.

[30]

Sato H, Narita S, Saito M, et al. Acute kidney injury and its impact on renal prognosis after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Int J Med Robot 2020; 16(5):1-7.

[31]

Hirose M, Hashimoto S, Tanaka Y. Effect of the head-down tilt position during lower abdominal surgery on endocrine and renal function response. Anesth Analg 1993; 76(1):40-44.

[32]

Meininger D, Westphal K, Bremerich DH, et al. Effects of posture and prolonged pneumoperitoneum on hemodynamic parameters during laparoscopy. World J Surg 2008; 32(7):1400-1405.

[33]

Coca SG, Yusuf B, Shlipak MG, Garg AX, Parikh CR. Long-term risk of mortality and other adverse outcomes after acute kidney injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis 2009; 53(6):961-973.

[34]

Sawhney S, Marks A, Fluck N, Levin A, Prescott G, Black C. Intermediate and long-term outcomes of survivors of acute kidney injury episodes: A large population-based cohort study. Am J Kidney Dis 2017; 69(1):18-28.

[35]

Kuitunen A, Vento A, Suojaranta-Ylinen R, Pettilä V. Acute renal failure after cardiac surgery: Evaluation of the RIFLE classification. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 81(2):542-546.

PDF (146KB)

12

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/