Intrarenal pressure monitoring via flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath in retrograde intrarenal surgery: A preclinical animal study and a pilot clinical study

Wei Zhu , Steffi Kar Kei Yuen , Jianwei Cao , Chu Ann Chai , Shusheng Liu , Jingzeng Du , Wen Zhong , Zhijian Zhao , Yongda Liu , Guohua Zeng

Clinical and Translational Discovery ›› 2025, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1) : e70031

PDF
Clinical and Translational Discovery ›› 2025, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1) : e70031 DOI: 10.1002/ctd2.70031
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Intrarenal pressure monitoring via flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath in retrograde intrarenal surgery: A preclinical animal study and a pilot clinical study

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Background: Elevated intrarenal pressure (IRP) during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) can lead to deleterious complications. Emerging non-invasive, real-time IRP monitoring tools are proving crucial for enhancing procedural safety. This study evaluates a newly developed flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS) with IRP monitoring capabilities through animal study and a clinical trial, assessing its accuracy and operational benefits.

Methods: A preclinical animal study and a prospective clinical trial involving 100 patients were conducted. The animal study confirmed the accuracy of IRP-monitoring FANS, whilst the clinical trial compared its performance to conventional FANS in RIRS. The evaluated outcomes included the accuracy of IRP measurements, the irrigation flow rate, the duration of the operation, and the stone-free rate (SFR). Statistical comparisons were performed using appropriate tests with a significant threshold of p < .05. Registration for this study is recorded under the identifier NCT06729801 at ClinicalTrials.gov.

Results: In the animal study, IRP-monitoring FANS demonstrated high accuracy in real-time IRP measurement, comparable to percutaneous nephrostomy-based monitoring. In the clinical study, IRP-monitoring FANS enabled increased irrigation flow whilst maintaining safe IRP levels within 30 mmHg. Operative time was significantly shortened in IRP-monitoring FANS group (50.9 vs. 67.6 min, p < .01), with similar SFRs between groups. No notable discrepancies in the rates of complications were observed.

Conclusions: The IRP-monitoring FANS improves stone retrieval efficiency and shortens operative time whilst ensuring safety through real-time IRP monitoring. This novel device marks a major improvement in both the safety and effectiveness of RIRS for managing large renal stones.

Keywords

FANS / intrarenal pressure / IRP / RIRS / ureteral access sheath

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Wei Zhu, Steffi Kar Kei Yuen, Jianwei Cao, Chu Ann Chai, Shusheng Liu, Jingzeng Du, Wen Zhong, Zhijian Zhao, Yongda Liu, Guohua Zeng. Intrarenal pressure monitoring via flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath in retrograde intrarenal surgery: A preclinical animal study and a pilot clinical study. Clinical and Translational Discovery, 2025, 5(1): e70031 DOI:10.1002/ctd2.70031

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

ZengG, TraxerO, ZhongW, et al. International alliance of urolithiasis guideline on retrograde intrarenal surgery. BJU Int. 2023;131:153-164.

[2]

YuenSKK, TraxerO, WroclawskiML, et al. Scoping review of experimental and clinical evidence and its influence on development of the suction ureteral access sheath. Diagnostics. 2024;14:1034.

[3]

ZhuW, LiuS, CaoJ, et al. Tip bendable suction ureteral access sheath versus traditional sheath in retrograde intrarenal stone surgery: an international multicentre, randomized, parallel group, superiority study. EClinMed. 2024;74:102724. Epub ahead of print.

[4]

GauharV, TraxerO, CastellaniD, et al. Could use of a flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath be a potential game-changer in retrograde intrarenal surgery? Outcomes at 30 days from a large, prospective, multicenter, real-world study by the European Association of Urology Urolithiasis Section. Eur Urol Focus. 2024.

[5]

CorralesM, SierraA, DoiziS, Traxer O. Risk of sepsis in retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022;44:84.

[6]

ChewB, Shalabi N, HeroutR, et al. Intrarenal pressure measured using a novel flexible ureteroscope with pressure sensing capabilities: a study of the effects of ureteral access sheath, irrigation, and working channel accessories. J Endourol. 2023;37:1200-1208.

[7]

PanthierF, Pauchard F, TraxerO. Retrograde intra renal surgery and safety: pressure and temperature. A systematic review. Curr Opin Urol. 2023;33:308-317.

[8]

ZhuW, LiJ, YuanJ, et al. A prospective and randomised trial comparing fluoroscopic, total ultrasonographic, and combined guidance for renal access in mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy. BJU Int. 2017;119(4):612-618.

[9]

MitropoulosD, Artibani W, GraefenM, et al. Reporting and grading of complications after urologic surgical procedures: an ad hoc EAU guidelines panel assessment and recommendations. Eur Urol. 2012;61:341-349.

[10]

GauharV, OngCS-H, TraxerO, et al. Step-by-step guide to flexible and navigable suction ureteric access sheath (FANS). Urol Video J. 2023;20:100250.

[11]

SamarasA, Tatanis V, PeteinarisA, et al. The evaluation of intrarenal pressure using a novel single-use flexible ureteroscope with live intrarenal pressure monitoring—an experimental study in porcine models. Life. 2024;14:1060.

[12]

BhojaniN, KooKC, BensaadiK, Halawani A, WongVK, ChewBH. Retrospective first-in-human use of the LithoVue Elite ureteroscope to measure intrarenal pressure. BJU Int. 2023;132:678-685.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 The Author(s). Clinical and Translational Discovery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Shanghai Institute of Clinical Bioinformatics.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

231

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/