Signifier Fetishism and Biopolitics: Production of Subjectivity in Reading Activity

Penghan Zhang

Critical Theory ›› 2024, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (2) : 110 -120.

PDF (193KB)
Critical Theory ›› 2024, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (2) :110 -120. DOI: 10.47297/wspctWSP2515-470212.20240802
ARTICLE
research-article

Signifier Fetishism and Biopolitics: Production of Subjectivity in Reading Activity

Author information +
History +
PDF (193KB)

Abstract

In Truth and Method, Gadamer attempts to articulate the process of understanding as a less subjective event, but presupposes a certain subjectivity with his construction of a textual ethics. Such program of de-subjectivation in the notion of reading also has its malaise in its (post-)structuralist variants, especially the idea of self-deriving texts, which I will term as signifier fetishism and describe in its three modalities. Baudrillard's critique of notions of use value and need exemplifies that signifier fetishism ignores the productivity in the realization of use value. By adapting Paolo Virno's arguments on immaterial labor, reading activity can be considered as consumption with its productivity mostly beyond dominant capitalist productive relations. Referring to the notion of biopolitical production from Hardt and Negri, a tentative characterization of reading as production will convert the issue of hermeneutic subject into the one of becoming-subjectivity.

Keywords

Reading / Signifier fetishism / Use value / Immaterial labor / Biopolitical production

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Penghan Zhang. Signifier Fetishism and Biopolitics: Production of Subjectivity in Reading Activity. Critical Theory, 2024, 8(2): 110-120 DOI:10.47297/wspctWSP2515-470212.20240802

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Althusser, Louis, and Étienne Balibar (1970). Reading Capital. Translated by B. Brewster. London: NLB.

[2]

Baudrillard, Jean (1981). For a Critique of the Political Economy of the Sign. Translated by C. Levin. St. Louis: Telos Press,1981.

[3]

Beetz, Johannes (2016). Materiality and Subject in Marxism,(Post-)structuralism, and Material Semiotics. London:Palgrave Macmillan.

[4]

Derrida, Jacques (1988). "Signature Event Context." Translated by S. Weber and J.Mehlman. Limited Inc. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

[5]

Derrida, Jacques (1979). "Living on." Translated by J. Hulbert in Harold Bloom et al., Deconstruction and Criticism. New York: Seabury Press.

[6]

Gadamer, Hans-Georg (2004).Truth and Method. Translated by J. Weinsheimer and D.G. Marshall, London:Continuum.

[7]

Hardt, Michael, and Antonio Negri (2005). Multitude:War and Democracy in the Age of Empire. New York: Penguin Book.

[8]

Hardt, Michael, and Antonio Negri (2009). Commonwealth. Cambridge (MA): Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

[9]

Poulantzas, Nicos (1978). Political Power and Social Classe. Translated by T. O'Hagan. London: Verso.

[10]

Puar,Jasbir K (2012). "'I would rather be a cyborg than a goddess': Becoming-Intersectional in Assemblage Theory. "philoSOPHIA,2.1:49-66.

[11]

Virno, Paolo (1996). 'Immaterial Labor.' in Radical Thought in Italy:A Potential Politics. Edited by P. Virno and M. Hardt.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

[12]

Vološinov, V N (1986). Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Translated by L. Matejka and I. R. Titunik. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.

PDF (193KB)

89

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/