Na Nonstoichiometric Modifications Unraveling the Sodium Ion Mobility and Transport Mechanism in Sodium Solid Electrolyte Na_xZn₂TeO₆

Abstract

Sodium-ion conducting materials in sodium-ion battery have drawn widespread attention in energy storage technologies due to the advantages of low cost, high performance, and efficient environmental adaptability. Herein, bond valence site energy (BVSE) calculations were used to predict the sodium ion electrical performances by the Na nonstoichiometric modifications, and we have carried out fine experiments to modulate the sodium ion conductivity of Na_xZn₂TeO₆ guided by BVSE calculations. The optimized composition Na_2.1Zn₂TeO₆ shows the superior sodium ionic conductivity of 5.3×10⁻³ S/cm at 190 °C, with a low activation energy of 0.28 eV. The excess Na preferentially occupies the Na1 site with tetrahedral voids, which has a higher capacity for sodium ion migration, as revealed by the combined neutron powder diffraction technique with the 1D and 2D ²³Na solid-state NMR technique, which is responsible for the variations in sodium ion conductivity. In addition, it is worth noting that the resulting Na_2.1Zn₂TeO₆ material maintains superior thermal and phase stability, as well as approximately the same thermal expansion coefficient values even during the temperature rise and fall cycles in the temperature range of 25–800 °C. Furthermore, molecular dynamics simulations revealed that the sodium ions exhibit longrange anisotropic migration within the Na⁺ interlayers of Na_2.1Zn₂TeO₆.

Keywords

Sodium solid electrolyte / Bond valence site energy / Nonstoichiometric modification / Chemical Sciences / Physical Chemistry (incl. Structural)

References

[1] YangZ, ZhangJ, Kintner-MeyerM C, LuX, ChoiD, LemmonJ P, LiuJChem. Rev., 2011, 111: 3577.

[2] DunnB, KamathH, TarasconJ-MScience, 2011, 334: 928.

[3] LuoZ, LiX, WangX, DengS, HeL, LinK, LiQ, XingX, KuangXChem. Mater., 2024, 36: 2835.

[4] LiX, KuangX, SunJInorg. Chem. Front., 2021, 8: 1374.

[5] WangY, RichardsW D, OngS P, MiaraL J, KimJ C, MoY, CederGNat. Mater., 2015, 14: 1026.

[6] DengY, EamesC, ChotardJ-N, LalèreF, SeznecV, EmgeS, PecherO, GreyC P, MasquelierC, IslamM SJ. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137: 9136.

[7] MaC, ChenK, LiangC, NanC-W, IshikawaR, MoreK, ChiMEnergy Environ. Sci., 2014, 7: 1638.

[8] LiM, LuJ, ChenZ, AmineKAdv. Mater., 2018, 30: 1800561.

[9] EtacheriV, MaromR, ElazariR, SalitraG, AurbachDEnergy Environ. Sci., 2011, 4: 3243.

[10] ManthiramAJ. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2011, 2: 176.

[11] ZhangF, HeB, XinY, ZhuT, ZhangY, WangS, LiW, YangY, TianHChem. Rev., 2024, 124: 4778.

[12] SlaterM D, KimD, LeeE, JohnsonC SAdv. Funct. Mater., 2013, 23: 947.

[13] PalomaresV, Casas-CabanasM, Castillo-MartínezE, HanM H, RojoTEnergy Environ. Sci., 2013, 6: 2312.

[14] GoodenoughJ B, SinghPJ. Electrochem. Soc., 2015, 162: A2387.

[15] KimS W, SeoD H, MaX, CederG, KangKAdv. Energy Mater., 2012, 2: 710.

[16] LiangY, DongH, AurbachD, YaoYNat. Energy, 2020, 5: 646.

[17] HayashiA, NoiK, SakudaA, TatsumisagoMNat. Commun., 2012, 3: 856.

[18] WangH, ChenY, HoodZ D, SahuG, PandianA S, KeumJ K, AnK, LiangCAngew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2016, 128: 8693.

[19] ZhangZ, RamosE, LalèreF, AssoudA, KaupK, HartmanP, NazarL FEnergy Environ. Sci., 2018, 11: 87.

[20] ZhangL, YangK, MiJ, LuL, ZhaoL, WangL, LiY, ZengHAdv. Energy Mater., 2015, 5: 39

[21] LeeD-H, LeeS-T, KimJ-S, LimS-KMater. Res. Bull., 2017, 96: 143.

[22] WangC, FuK, KammampataS P, McOwenD W, SamsonA J, ZhangL, HitzG T, NolanA M, WachsmanE D, MoYChem. Rev., 2020, 120: 4257.

[23] AnantharamuluN, Koteswara RaoK, RambabuG, Vijaya KumarB, RadhaV, VithalMJ. Mater. Sci., 2011, 46: 2821.

[24] LuX, XiaG, LemmonJ P, YangZJPS, 2010, 195: 2431

[25] MaQ, GuinM, NaqashS, TsaiC-L, TietzF, GuillonOChem. Mater., 2016, 28: 4821.

[26] HongH-PMater. Res. Bull., 1976, 11: 173.

[27] LuZ, LiuJ, CiucciFESM, 2020, 28: 146

[28] HuangH, WuH-H, ChiC, ZhuJ, HuangB, ZhangT-YNanoscale, 2019, 11: 18758.

[29] MizushimaK, JonesP, WisemanP, GoodenoughJ BMater. Res. Bull., 1980, 15: 783.

[30] ZhaoS, LuoJ, ZhouP, ZhangS Q, SunZ, HongMJ. RSC Adv., 2013, 3: 14000.

[31] EvstigneevaM A, NalbandyanV B, PetrenkoA A, MedvedevB S, KataevA AChem. Mater., 2011, 23: 1174.

[32] BerthelotR, SchmidtW, SleightA, SubramanianMJ. Solid State Chem., 2012, 196: 225.

[33] ChenH, WongL L, AdamsSActa Cryst., 2019, 75: 18

[34] WongL L, PhuahK C, DaiR, ChenH, ChewW S, AdamsSChem. Mater., 2021, 33: 625.

[35] ChenH, AdamsSIUCrJ, 2017, 4: 614.

[36] TanibataN, TakimotoS, NakanoK, TakedaH, NakayamaM, SumiHACS Mater. Lett., 2020, 2: 880.

[37] TanibataN, KondoY, YamadaS, MaedaM, TakedaH, NakayamaM, AsakaT, KitajouA, OkadaSSci. Rep., 2018, 8: 17199.

[38] ChenJ, KangL, LuH, LuoP, WangF, HeLPhysica B, 2018, 551: 370.

[39] CoelhoATOPAS: General Profile and Structure Analysis Software for Powder Diffraction Data, 2003Karlsruhe, GermanyBruker AXS GmbH

[40] PilolliR, DitarantoN, CioffiN, SabbatiniLAnal. Bioanal. Chem., 2013, 405: 713.

[41] MassiotD, FayonF, CapronM, KingI, Le CalvéS, AlonsoB, DurandJ O, BujoliB, GanZ, HoatsonGMagn. Reson. Chem., 2002, 40: 70.

[42] JohnsonDZview for Windows, Impedance/Gain Phase Graphing and Analysis Software, 2001North CarolinaScribner Associates

[43] GaleJ D, RohlA LMol. Simul., 2003, 29: 291.

[44] CatlowC R AJ. Chem. Soc., 1989, 85: 335

[45] BushT S, GaleJ D, CatlowC R AJ. Mater. Chem., 1994, 4: 831.

[46] BinksD JComputational Modelling of Zinc Oxide and Related Oxide Ceramics, 1994United KingdomUniversity of Surrey Guildford

[47] SangsterM, AtwoodRJournal of Physics C: Solid State Physics, 1978, 11: 1541.

[48] HumphreyW, DalkeA, SchultenKJ. Mol. Graphics., 1996, 14: 33.

[49] RógT, MurzynK, HinsenK, KnellerG RJ. Comput. Chem., 2003, 24: 657.

[50] EvstigneevaM A, NalbandyanV B, PetrenkoA A, MedvedevB S, KataevA AChem. Mater., 2011, 23: 1174.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Jilin University, The Editorial Department of Chemical Research in Chinese Universities and Springer-Verlag GmbH