The utility of KRAS mutation analysis in differentiating a lung primary mucinous carcinoma from a metastatic colorectal mucinous carcinoma

Mahmoud L. Soliman , Shi Yang , John Cho Lee

Case Reports in Clinical Pathology ›› 2017, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (4) : 17 -21.

PDF (914KB)
Case Reports in Clinical Pathology ›› 2017, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (4) :17 -21. DOI: 10.5430/crcp.v4n4p17
CASE REPORT
research-article

The utility of KRAS mutation analysis in differentiating a lung primary mucinous carcinoma from a metastatic colorectal mucinous carcinoma

Author information +
History +
PDF (914KB)

Abstract

A 58-year old male has a past medical history of a rectal low-grade mucinous adenocarcinoma with a KRAS codon 12/13 mutation (GGT>GAT), for which he received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation. Five months after diagnosis, the patient underwent a low anterior resection showing persistent tumor with the pathological staging being (ypT3, ypN0, ypMx). Six months after surgery, follow-up PET scan showed two right upper lung nodules measuring 1.0 and 1.8 cm. Subsequent video-assisted thoracic surgery with a lung wedge resection revealed two tumors: a mucinous adenocarcinoma and an acinar-predominant adenocarcinoma. The mucinous adenocarcinoma showed similar cytologic features as the rectal tumor; however, it showed more of a lepidic pattern. The immunohictochemical profile of the lung mucinous adenocarcinoma was positive CK7 (cytoplasmic), negative CK20, TTF1, napsin-A, and CDX2. KRAS codon 12/13 analysis also showed a mutation in the lung, however it was different compared to the previous rectal tumor and showed a GGT>AGT mutation. The acinar adenocarcinoma had a wild-type KRAS. In this case, we favored a primary lung mucinous carcinoma over a metastasis from the rectum based on the lepidic morphology, CK20 negativity and differing KRAS codon 12 mutations. A year after the resection of the lung adenocarcinomas, the patient presented with dyspnea and abnormal liver functions. Abdominal US and MRI revealed multiple liver lesions (up to 1.9 cm). Core liver biopsies showed a poorly-differentiated mucinous adenocarcinoma with positive CK7 (cytoplasmic) and negative CK20, TTF-1, napsin-A, CDX2 and HSA. KRAS codon 12/13 analysis also showed a mutation GGT>AGT, similar to that of the lung mucinous adenocarcinoma. The immunohistochemical profile and the KRAS mutation sequence of the hepatic tumor suggests a metastasis from the lung primary and corroborates the earlier premise that the lung tumor is distinct from the rectal one. In conclusion, in the unusual circumstance of a lung mucinous adenocarcinoma in a patient with established gastrointestinal mucinous primary, KRAS mutation analysis sequencing could help distinguish whether the lung mucinous is a primary tumor or metastasis from colorectal origin.

Keywords

KRAS / Mucinous / Adenocarcinoma / Lung / Colorectal

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Mahmoud L. Soliman, Shi Yang, John Cho Lee. The utility of KRAS mutation analysis in differentiating a lung primary mucinous carcinoma from a metastatic colorectal mucinous carcinoma. Case Reports in Clinical Pathology, 2017, 4(4): 17-21 DOI:10.5430/crcp.v4n4p17

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Janakiraman M, et al. Genomic and biological characterization of exon 4 KRAS mutations in human cancer. Cancer Res. 2010; 70(14): 5901-11. PMid:20570890. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-0192

[2]

Kerr EM, Martins CP. Metabolic rewiring in mutant Kras lung cancer. FEBS J. 2017.

[3]

Amado RG, et al. Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26(10): 1626-34. PMid:18316791. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.14.7116

[4]

Vauthey JN, et al. RAS mutation status predicts survival and patterns of recurrence in patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg. 2013; 258(4): 619-26; discussion 626-7.

[5]

Karagkounis G, et al. Incidence and prognostic impact of KRAS and BRAF mutation in patients undergoing liver surgery for colorectal metastases. Cancer. 2013; 119(23): 4137-44. PMid:24104864. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.28347

[6]

Tie J, et al. KRAS mutation is associated with lung metastasis in patients with curatively resected colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2011; 17(5): 1122-30. PMid:21239505. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1720

[7]

Riely GJ, Marks J, Pao W. KRAS mutations in non-small cell lung cancer. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2009; 6(2): 201-5. PMid:19349489. https://doi.org/10.1513/pats.200809-107LC

[8]

Tomasini P, et al. EGFR and KRAS Mutations Predict the Incidence and Outcome of Brain Metastases in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2016; 17(12).

[9]

Vakiani E, et al. Comparative genomic analysis of primary versus metastatic colorectal carcinomas. J Clin Oncol. 2012; 30(24): 2956-62. PMid:22665543. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.38.2994

[10]

Lee SY, et al. Comparative genomic analysis of primary and syn-chronous metastatic colorectal cancers. PLoS One. 2014; 9(3): e90459.

[11]

Kawamata H, et al. Discrepancies between the K-ras mutational status of primary colorectal cancers and corresponding liver metastases are found in codon 13. Genomics. 2015; 106(2): 71-5. PMid:26026309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2015.05.007

[12]

Marusyk A, Polyak K. Tumor heterogeneity: causes and con-sequences. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010; 1805(1): 105-17. PMid:19931353.

[13]

Leroi AM, Koufopanou V, Burt A. Cancer Selection. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003; 3(3): 226-31. PMid:12612657. https://doi.org/10.103 8/nrc1016

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (914KB)

164

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/