Warty carcinoma of the uterine cervix is a very rare and specific variant of invasive squamous cell carcinoma, usually described as a hybrid of the features of both condyloma acuminatum and invasive squamous cell carcinoma. The diagnostic pitfalls of this lesion are: 1) the bland appearance of cytomorphology, 2) distinct koilocytotic atypia, and 3) p16 negativity. A case of warty carcinoma with a fungating mass on the uterine cervix of a 75-year-old woman is presented. The original diagnosis by punch biopsy was atypical squamous cells, undetermined for malignancy, adjunct with p16 negativity. The subsequent radical hysterectomy showed a protruding mass (5.7 cm in horizontal dimension) of the uterine cervix. Light microscopy revealed a protruding mass composed of exophytic papillae and inverted nests along the endocervical glands. There were multiple micro-invasive foci (< 1 mm) of tongue like projections at the nest base and slight involvement of the upper vagina and endometrial surface. The p16 immunohistochemical staining yielded negative results. The results of the HPV DNA chip test from paraffin-embedded tissue were 6 (low risk, +++) and 42 (low risk, +). The Ki-67 proliferation index was approximately 20%. The invasive foci and patient’s age were the determining differential factors for malignancy rather than benign condylomatous lesion.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
| [1] |
Kurman RJ, Norris HJ, Wilkinson EJ. Tumors of the cervix. In: Kurman RJ, Norris HJ, Wilkinson EJ, (Eds.) Atlas of tumor pathology. Washington, DC: AFIP; 1992. 29-36 p.
|
| [2] |
Cho NH, Joo HJ, Ahn HJ, et al. Detection of human papillo-mavirus in warty carcinoma of the uterine cervix: comparison of immunohistochemistry, in situ hybridization and in situ polymerase chain reaction methods. Pathol Res Pract. 1998; 194(10): 713-720. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0344-0338(98)80131-3
|
| [3] |
Izadi-Mood N, Asadi K, Shojaei H, et al. Potential diagnostic value of P16 expression in premalignant and malignant cervical lesions. J Res Med Sci. 2012; 17(5): 428-433. PMid: 23626605.
|
| [4] |
Kovi J, Tillman RL, Lee SM. Malignant transformation of condyloma acuminatium. A light microscopic and ultrastructural study. Am J Clin Pathol. 1974; 61(5): 702-710. PMid: 4827053. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/61.5.702
|
| [5] |
Shafeek MA, Osman MI, Hussein MA. Carcinoma of the vulva arising in condylomata acuminata. Obstet Gynecol. 1979; 54(1): 120-123. PMid: 450355. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006250-197907000-00027
|
| [6] |
Dawson DF, Duckworth JK, Bernhardt H, et al. Giant condyloma and verrucous carcinoma of the genital area. Arch Pathol. 1965; 79: 225-231. PMid: 14246201. https://doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0b013e3181c945ed
|
| [7] |
Dane B, Dane C, Erginbas M, et al. Verrucous carcinoma of the cervix in a case with uterine prolapse. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2009; 13(5): 344-346. PMid: 19751912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2009.02.005
|
| [8] |
Brinck U, Jakob C, Bau O, et al. Papillary squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: report of three cases and a review of its classification. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2000; 19(3): 231-235. PMid:10907171. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004347-200007000-00006
|
| [9] |
Kanthiya K, Khunnarong J, Tangjitgamol S, et al. Expression of the p16 and Ki67 in Cervical Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions and Cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016; 17(7): 3201-3206. PMid: 27509952.
|
| [10] |
Kimura M, Matsumoto T, Morizane T, et al. Histopathological study of the spreading neoplastic cells in cervical glands and surface epithelia in cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia and microinvasive squamous cell carcinoma: Ki-67 immunostaining is a useful marker for pathological diagnosis from the gland involvement site. Pathol Int. 2006; 56(8): 428-433. PMid: 16872436. https: //doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1827.2006.01984.x
|
| [11] |
Stoler M, Bergeron C, Colgan TJ, et al. Tumours of the Uterine Cervix In: Kurman RJ, Carcangiu ML, Herrington CS, Young RH (Eds.). WHO Classification of Tumours of Female Reproductive Organs, Lyon, France: IARC and WHO; 2014. 172-182 p.
|
| [12] |
Wentzensen N, Schwart zL, Zuna RE, et al. Performance of p16/Ki-67 immunostaining to detect cervical cancer precursors in a colposcopy referral population. Clin Cancer Res. 2012; 18(15): 4154-4162.PMid: 22675168. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-0270
|
| [13] |
Tan GC, Isa MR, Ng SP, et al. Unusual form of superficial spreading microinvasive squamous cell carcinoma of uterine cervix involving the endometrium of uterus. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2004; 30(5): 363-367. PMid: 15327449. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0756.2004.00210.x
|
| [14] |
Herfs M, Vargas SO, Yamamoto Y, et al. A novel blueprint for ’top down’ differentiation defines the cervical squamocolumnar junction during development, reproductive life, and neoplasia. J Pathol. 2013; 229(3): 460-468. PMid: 23007879. https://doi.org/10.1002/path.4110
|
| [15] |
Parra-Herran C, Herfs M, Doria M, et al. Giant condyloma of the cervix: an uncommon entity associated with low-risk human papilloma virus infection. Am J Surg Pathol. 2013; 37(2): 300-304. PMid: 23282973. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0b013e31826d261e
|