Lactate Promotes the Second Cell Fate Decision in Blastocysts by Prompting Primitive Endoderm Formation Through an Intercellular Positive Feedback Loop That Couples Paracrine FGF Signalling

Abstract

Lactate has been widely recognised as an energy source and metabolic by-product, but increasing evidence supports its critical role as a signalling molecule or epigenetic substrate. During early embryogenesis, lactate production increases during the transition from early to late blastocyst, coinciding with the differentiation of inner mass cell (ICM) into epiblast (EPI) and primitive endoderm (PrE), termed the second cell fate decision. However, the role of this hallmark metabolic change in the second cell fate segregation remains unknown. Herein, using in vitro and in vivo models, we found lactate production is preferentially increased in PrE cells and is essential for ICM differentiation into PrE. Mechanically, increased lactate in PrE precursor cells and FGF signalling in EPI precursor cells reciprocally activate each other and synergise to prompt PrE specification, forming an intercellular positive feedback loop essential for this lineage commitment. Additionally, lactate enhanced histone lactylation levels during differentiation into PrE fate. Thus, our findings construct a complex multilayer model in which intracellular metabolite in PrE cooperates with intercellular growth factor signalling from EPI to regulate early embryonic lineage commitment. Highlighting the multifaceted lactate's function, our findings also advance the current knowledge that bridges epigenetic reprogramming and metabolic remodelling during early embryonic development.

Keywords

FGF4 / histone lactylation / lactate / pre-implantation embryo / primitive endoderm

References

[1] C. Chazaud and Y. Yamanaka, “Lineage Specification in the Mouse Preimplantation Embryo,” Development (Cambridge) 143, no. 7 (2016): 1063-1074, https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.128314.

[2] S. A. Morris, R. T. Y. Teo, H. Li, P. Robson, D. M. Glover, and M. Zernicka-Goetz, “Origin and Formation of the First Two Distinct Cell Types of the Inner Cell Mass in the Mouse Embryo,” National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107, no. 14 (2010): 6364-6369, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0915063107.

[3] R. L. Gardner, “Investigation of Cell Lineage and Differentiation in the Extraembryonic Endoderm of the Mouse Embryo,” Development 68, no. 1 (1982): 175-198, https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.68.1.175.

[4] R. L. Gardner and J. Rossant, “Investigation of the Fate of 4·5 Day Post-Coitum Mouse Inner Cell Mass Cells by Blastocyst Injection,” Development (Cambridge, England) 52, no. 1 (1979): 141-152, https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.52.1.141.

[5] A. Molotkov, P. Mazot, J. R. Brewer, R. M. Cinalli, and P. Soriano, “Distinct Requirements for FGFR1 and FGFR2 in Primitive Endoderm Development and Exit From Pluripotency,” Developmental Cell 41, no. 5 (2017): 511-526.e4, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2017.05.004.

[6] Y. Meng, R. Moore, W. Tao, et al., “GATA6 Phosphorylation by Erk1/2 Propels Exit From Pluripotency and Commitment to Primitive Endoderm,” Developmental Biology 436, no. 1 (2018): 55-65, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2018.02.007.

[7] C. Chazaud, Y. Yamanaka, T. Pawson, and J. Rossant, “Early Lineage Segregation Between Epiblast and Primitive Endoderm in Mouse Blastocysts Through the Grb2-MAPK Pathway,” Developmental Cell 10, no. 5 (2006): 615-624, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2006.02.020.

[8] S. Frankenberg, F. Gerbe, S. Bessonnard, et al., “Primitive Endoderm Differentiates via a Three-Step Mechanism Involving Nanog and RTK Signaling,” Developmental Cell 21, no. 6 (2011): 1005-1013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2011.10.019.

[9] M. Kang, A. Piliszek, J. Artus, and A. K. Hadjantonakis, “FGF4 Is Required for Lineage Restriction and Salt-And-Pepper Distribution of Primitive Endoderm Factors but Not Their Initial Expression in the Mouse,” Development 140, no. 2 (2013): 267-279, https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.084996.

[10] N. Schrode, N. Saiz, S. Di Talia, and A. K. Hadjantonakis, “GATA6 Levels Modulate Primitive Endoderm Cell Fate Choice and Timing in the Mouse Blastocyst,” Developmental Cell 29, no. 4 (2014): 454-467, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2014.04.011.

[11] S. Bessonnard, L. De Mot, D. Gonze, et al., “Gata6, Nanog and Erk Signaling Control Cell Fate in the Inner Cell Mass Through a Tristable Regulatory Network,” Development 141, no. 19 (2014): 3637-3648, https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.109678.

[12] Y. Yamanaka, F. Lanner, and J. Rossant, “FGF Signal-Dependent Segregation of Primitive Endoderm and Epiblast in the Mouse Blastocyst,” Development 137, no. 5 (2010): 715-724, https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.043471.

[13] R. Aizawa, M. Ibayashi, T. Tatsumi, et al., “Synthesis and Maintenance of Lipid Droplets Are Essential for Mouse Preimplantation Embryonic Development,” Development 146, no. 22 (2019): dev181925, https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.181925.

[14] L. C. Hewitson and H. J. Leese, “Energy Metabolism of the Trophectoderm and Inner Cell Mass of the Mouse Blastocyst,” Journal of Experimental Zoology 267, no. 3 (1993): 337-343, https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.1402670310.

[15] J. Zhao, W. Wang, L. Zhang, J. Zhang, R. Sturmey, and J. Zhang, “Dynamic Metabolism During Early Mammalian Embryogenesis,” Development 150, no. 20 (2023): dev202148, https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.202148.

[16] M. S. Sharpley, F. Chi, J. T. Hoeve, and U. Banerjee, “Metabolic Plasticity Drives Development During Mammalian Embryogenesis,” Developmental Cell 56, no. 16 (2021): 2329-2347, e6, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2021.07.020.

[17] G. G. Stirparo, A. Kurowski, A. Yanagida, et al., “OCT4 Induces Embryonic Pluripotency via STAT3 Signaling and Metabolic Mechanisms,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 118, no. 3 (2021): e2008890118, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2008890118.

[18] J. Mathieu and H. Ruohola-Baker, “Metabolic Remodeling During the Loss and Acquisition of Pluripotency,” Development 144, no. 4 (2017): 541-551, https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.128389.

[19] J. Wu, A. Ocampo, and J. C. I. Belmonte, “Cellular Metabolism and Induced Pluripotency,” Cell 166, no. 6 (2016): 1371-1385, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.008.

[20] J. Zhang, J. Zhao, P. Dahan, et al., “Metabolism in Pluripotent Stem Cells and Early Mammalian Development,” Cell Metabolism 27, no. 2 (2018): 332-338, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2018.01.008.

[21] S. Ghosh-Choudhary, J. Liu, and T. Finkel, “Metabolic Regulation of Cell Fate and Function,” Trends in Cell Biology 30, no. 3 (2020): 201-212, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2019.12.005.

[22] K. Ito and K. Ito, “Metabolism and the Control of Cell Fate Decisions and Stem Cell Renewal,” Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 32, no. Volume 32, 2016 (2016): 399-409, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-111315-125134.

[23] S. Tatapudy, F. Aloisio, D. Barber, and T. Nystul, “Cell Fate Decisions: Emerging Roles for Metabolic Signals and Cell Morphology,” EMBO Reports 18, no. 12 (2017): 2105-2118, https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201744816.

[24] F. Chi, M. S. Sharpley, R. Nagaraj, S. S. Roy, and U. Banerjee, “Glycolysis-Independent Glucose Metabolism Distinguishes TE From ICM Fate During Mammalian Embryogenesis,” Developmental Cell 53, no. 1 (2020): 9-26.e4, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2020.02.015.

[25] H. J. Leese and A. M. Barton, “Pyruvate and Glucose Uptake by Mouse Ova and Preimplantation Embryos,” Reproduction 72, no. 1 (1984): 9-13, https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0720009.

[26] M. Certo, A. Llibre, W. Lee, and C. Mauro, “Understanding Lactate Sensing and Signalling,” Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism 33, no. 10 (2022): 722-735, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2022.07.004.

[27] L. F. Barros, “Metabolic Signaling by Lactate in the Brain,” Trends in Neurosciences 36, no. 7 (2013): 396-404, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2013.04.002.

[28] P. J. Magistretti and I. Allaman, “Lactate in the Brain: From Metabolic End-Product to Signalling Molecule,” Nature Reviews. Neuroscience 19, no. 4 (2018): 235-249, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2018.19.

[29] A. Dubois, L. Vincenti, A. Chervova, et al., “H3K9 Tri-Methylation at Nanog Times Differentiation Commitment and Enables the Acquisition of Primitive Endoderm Fate,” Development (Cambridge, England) 149, no. 17 (2022): dev201074, https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.201074.

[30] P. J. Rugg-Gunn, B. J. Cox, A. Ralston, and J. Rossant, “Distinct Histone Modifications in Stem Cell Lines and Tissue Lineages From the Early Mouse Embryo,” National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107, no. 24 (2010): 10783-10790, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0914507107.

[31] F. Merkuri, M. Rothstein, and M. Simoes-Costa, “Histone Lactylation Couples Cellular Metabolism With Developmental Gene Regulatory Networks,” Nature Communications 15 (2024): 90, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-44121-1.

[32] D. Zhang, Z. Tang, H. Huang, et al., “Metabolic Regulation of Gene Expression by Histone Lactylation,” Nature 574, no. 7779 (2019): 575-580, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1678-1.

[33] K. K. Niakan, N. Schrode, L. T. Y. Cho, and A. K. Hadjantonakis, “Derivation of Extraembryonic Endoderm Stem (XEN) Cells From Mouse Embryos and Embryonic Stem Cells,” Nature Protocols 8, no. 6 (2013): 1028-1041, https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2013.049.

[34] L. T. Y. Cho, S. E. Wamaitha, I. J. Tsai, et al., “Conversion From Mouse Embryonic to Extra-Embryonic Endoderm Stem Cells Reveals Distinct Differentiation Capacities of Pluripotent Stem Cell States,” Development 139, no. 16 (2012): 2866-2877, https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.078519.

[35] H. Mohammed, I. Hernando-Herraez, A. Savino, et al., “Single-Cell Landscape of Transcriptional Heterogeneity and Cell Fate Decisions During Mouse Early Gastrulation,” Cell Reports 20, no. 5 (2017): 1215-1228, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2017.07.009.

[36] G. Minadakis and G. M. Spyrou, “A Systems Bioinformatics Approach to Interconnect Biological Pathways,” in Methods in Molecular Biology (Springer US, 2021), 231-249, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0822-7_17.

[37] A. Forkasiewicz, M. Dorociak, K. Stach, P. Szelachowski, R. Tabola, and K. Augoff, “The Usefulness of Lactate Dehydrogenase Measurements in Current Oncological Practice,” Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters 25, no. 1 (2020): 35, https://doi.org/10.1186/s11658-020-00228-7.

[38] M. Chu, F. Yao, G. Xi, et al., “Vitamin C Rescues In Vitro Embryonic Development by Correcting Impaired Active DNA Demethylation,” Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology 9 (2021): 784244, https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.784244.

[39] J. M. Ross, J. Öberg, S. Brené, et al., “High Brain Lactate Is a Hallmark of Aging and Caused by a Shift in the Lactate Dehydrogenase A/B Ratio,” National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107, no. 46 (2010): 20087-20092, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1008189107.

[40] J. Li, W. Hou, Q. Zhao, et al., “Lactate Regulates Major Zygotic Genome Activation by H3K18 Lactylation in Mammals,” National Science Review 11, no. 2 (2024): nwad295, https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwad295.

[41] Y. Ohinata, T. A. Endo, H. Sugishita, et al., “Establishment of Mouse Stem Cells That Can Recapitulate the Developmental Potential of Primitive Endoderm,” Science 375, no. 6580 (2022): 574-578, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay3325.

[42] X. Huang, N. Bashkenova, J. Yang, D. Li, and J. Wang, “ZFP281 Recruits Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 to Restrict Extraembryonic Endoderm Potential in Safeguarding Embryonic Stem Cell Pluripotency,” Protein & Cell 12, no. 3 (2021): 213-219, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13238-020-00775-x.

[43] K. G. V. Anderson, W. B. Hamilton, F. V. Roske, et al., “Insulin Fine-Tunes Self-Renewal Pathways Governing Naive Pluripotency and Extra-Embryonic Endoderm,” Nature Cell Biology 19, no. 10 (2017): 1164-1177, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb3617.

[44] M. Kang, V. Garg, and A. K. Hadjantonakis, “Lineage Establishment and Progression Within the Inner Cell Mass of the Mouse Blastocyst Requires FGFR1 and FGFR2,” Developmental Cell 41, no. 5 (2017): 496-510, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2017.05.003.

[45] D. C. Lee, H. A. Sohn, Z. Y. Park, et al., “A Lactate-Induced Response to Hypoxia,” Cell 161, no. 3 (2015): 595-609, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.011.

[46] H. Kantarci, Y. Gou, and B. B. Riley, “The Warburg Effect and Lactate Signaling Augment Fgf-MAPK to Promote Sensory-Neural Development in the Otic Vesicle,” eLife 9 (2020): 9, https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.56301.

[47] Y. Ohno, A. Oyama, H. Kaneko, et al., “Lactate Increases Myotube Diameter via Activation of MEK/ERK Pathway in C2C12 Cells,” Acta Physiologica 223, no. 2 (2018): e13042, https://doi.org/10.1111/apha.13042.

[48] W. B. Hamilton and J. M. Brickman, “Erk Signaling Suppresses Embryonic Stem Cell Self-Renewal to Specify Endoderm,” Cell Reports 9, no. 6 (2014): 2056-2070, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2014.11.032.

[49] K. Sugiura, Y. Q. Su, F. J. Diaz, et al., “Oocyte-Derived BMP15 and FGFs Cooperate to Promote Glycolysis in Cumulus Cells,” Development 134, no. 14 (2007): 2593-2603, https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.006882.

[50] R. Bhattacharya, S. Ray Chaudhuri, and S. S. Roy, “FGF9-Induced Ovarian Cancer Cell Invasion Involves VEGF-A/VEGFR2 Augmentation by Virtue of ETS1 Upregulation and Metabolic Reprogramming,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry 119, no. 10 (2018): 8174-8189, https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.26820.

[51] Q. Li, Y. Li, L. Liang, et al., “Klotho Negatively Regulated Aerobic Glycolysis in Colorectal Cancer via ERK/HIF1α Axis,” Cell Communication and Signaling 16, no. 1 (2018): 26, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12964-018-0241-2.

[52] W. Fu, Y. Yue, K. Miao, et al., “Repression of FGF Signaling Is Responsible for Dnmt3b Inhibition and Impaired De Novo DNA Methylation During Early Development of In Vitro Fertilized Embryos,” International Journal of Biological Sciences 16, no. 15 (2020): 3085-3099, https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.51607.

[53] K. Zhang, L. Li, C. Huang, et al., “Distinct Functions of BMP4 During Different Stages of Mouse ES Cell Neural Commitment,” Development 137, no. 13 (2010): 2095-2105, https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.049494.

[54] L. Li, K. Chen, T. Wang, et al., “Glis1 Facilitates Induction of Pluripotency via an Epigenome-Metabolome-Epigenome Signalling Cascade,” Nature Metabolism 2, no. 9 (2020): 882-892, https://doi.org/10.1038/s42255-020-0267-9.

[55] Q. Tian and L. q. Zhou, “Lactate Activates Germline and Cleavage Embryo Genes in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells,” Cells 11, no. 3 (2022): 548, https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11030548.

[56] H. Pan, X. Zhang, H. Jiang, et al., “Ndrg3 Gene Regulates DSB Repair During Meiosis Through Modulation the ERK Signal Pathway in the Male Germ Cells,” Scientific Reports 7, no. 1 (2017): 44440, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep44440.

[57] M. Xu, S. Chen, W. Yang, et al., “FGFR4 Links Glucose Metabolism and Chemotherapy Resistance in Breast Cancer,” Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry 47, no. 1 (2018): 151-160, https://doi.org/10.1159/000489759.

[58] J. Liu, G. Chen, Z. Liu, et al., “Aberrant FGFR Tyrosine Kinase Signaling Enhances the Warburg Effect by Reprogramming LDH Isoform Expression and Activity in Prostate Cancer,” Cancer Research 78, no. 16 (2018): 4459-4470, https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-3226.

[59] H. Cerda-Kohler, C. Henríquez-Olguín, M. Casas, T. E. Jensen, P. Llanos, and E. Jaimovich, “Lactate Administration Activates the ERK1/2, mTORC1, and AMPK Pathways Differentially According to Skeletal Muscle Type in Mouse,” Physiological Reports 6, no. 18 (2018): e13800, https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.13800.

[60] N. Pértega-Gomes, J. R. Vizcaíno, J. Attig, S. Jurmeister, C. Lopes, and F. Baltazar, “A Lactate Shuttle System Between Tumour and Stromal Cells Is Associated With Poor Prognosis in Prostate Cancer,” BMC Cancer 14, no. 1 (2014): 352, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-352.

[61] M. L. Goodwin, L. B. Gladden, M. W. N. Nijsten, and K. B. Jones, “Lactate and Cancer: Revisiting the Warburg Effect in an Era of Lactate Shuttling,” Frontiers in Nutrition 1 (2015): 27, https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2014.00027.

[62] R. J. Zuo, X. W. Gu, Q. R. Qi, et al., “Warburg-Like Glycolysis and Lactate Shuttle in Mouse Decidua During Early Pregnancy,” Journal of Biological Chemistry 290, no. 35 (2015): 21280-21291, https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M115.656629.

[63] K. Yang, M. Fan, X. Wang, et al., “Lactate Promotes Macrophage HMGB1 Lactylation, Acetylation, and Exosomal Release in Polymicrobial Sepsis,” Cell Death and Differentiation 29, no. 1 (2022): 133-146, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41418-021-00841-9.

[64] J. Jia, H. Fan, X. Wan, et al., “FUS Reads Histone H3K36me3 to Regulate Alternative Polyadenylation,” Nucleic Acids Research 52, no. 10 (2024): 5549-5571, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkae184.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 The Author(s). Cell Proliferation published by Beijing Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.