Testis-Specific PDHA2 Is Required for Proper Meiotic Recombination and Chromosome Organisation During Spermatogenesis

Abstract

Proper segregation of homologous chromosomes during meiosis requires crossovers that are tightly regulated by the chromosome structure. PDHA2 is the testis-specific paralog of PDHA1, a core subunit of pyruvate dehydrogenase. However, its role during spermatogenesis is unclear. We show that PDHA2 knockout results in male infertility in mice, but meiotic DSBs in spermatocytes occur normally and are efficiently repaired. Detailed analysis reveals that mid/late recombination intermediates are moderately reduced, resulting in fewer crossovers and many chromosomes without a crossover. Furthermore, defective chromosome structure is observed, including aberrant histone modifications, defective chromosome ends, precocious release of REC8 from chromosomes and fragmented chromosome axes after pachytene. These defects contribute to the failure of pyruvate conversion to acetyl-CoA, resulting in decreased acetyl-CoA and precursors for metabolites and energy in the absence of PDHA2. These findings reveal the important functions of PDHA2 in ensuring proper crossover formation and in modulating chromosome structure during spermatogenesis.

Keywords

chromosome structure / meiosis / PDHA2 / recombination / spermatogenesis

References

[1] N. Hunter, “Meiotic Recombination: The Essence of Heredity,” Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 7, no. 12 (2015): a016618, https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a016618.

[2] D. Zickler and N. Kleckner, “Meiosis: Dances Between Homologs,” Annual Review of Genetics 57 (2023): 1-63.

[3] S. Wang, T. Hassold, P. Hunt, et al., “Inefficient Crossover Maturation Underlies Elevated Aneuploidy in Human Female Meiosis,” Cell 168, no. 6 (2017): 977-989.e17.

[4] S. I. Nagaoka, T. J. Hassold, and P. A. Hunt, “Human Aneuploidy: Mechanisms and New Insights Into an Age-Old Problem,” Nature Reviews. Genetics 13, no. 7 (2012): 493-504.

[5] I. Lam and S. Keeney, “Mechanism and Regulation of Meiotic Recombination Initiation,” Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 7, no. 1 (2014): a016634.

[6] M. S. Brown and D. K. Bishop, “DNA Strand Exchange and RecA Homologs in Meiosis,” Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 7 (2014): a016659.

[7] J. Ribeiro, E. Abby, G. Livera, and E. Martini, “RPA Homologs and ssDNA Processing During Meiotic Recombination,” Chromosoma 125 (2016): 265-276.

[8] A. De Muyt, L. Zhang, T. Piolot, N. Kleckner, E. Espagne, and D. Zickler, “E3 Ligase Hei10: A Multifaceted Structure-Based Signaling Molecule With Roles Within and Beyond Meiosis,” Genes & Development 28, no. 10 (2014): 1111-1123.

[9] M. L. Lenzi, J. Smith, T. Snowden, et al., “Extreme Heterogeneity in the Molecular Events Leading to the Establishment of Chiasmata During Meiosis I in Human Oocytes,” American Journal of Human Genetics 76 (2005): 112-127.

[10] F. Baudat and B. De Massy, “Regulating Double-Stranded DNA Break Repair Towards Crossover or Non-Crossover During Mammalian Meiosis,” Chromosome Research 15, no. 5 (2007): 565-577.

[11] S. Gray and P. E. Cohen, “Control of Meiotic Crossovers: From Double-Strand Break Formation to Designation,” Annual Review of Genetics 50 (2016): 175-210.

[12] D. S. Kulkarni, S. N. Owens, M. Honda, et al., “PCNA Activates the MutLγ Endonuclease to Promote Meiotic Crossing Over,” Nature 586, no. 7830 (2020): 623-627.

[13] E. Cannavo, A. Sanchez, R. Anand, et al., “Regulation of the MLH1-MLH3 Endonuclease in Meiosis,” Nature 586, no. 7830 (2020): 618-622.

[14] A. Sanchez, C. Adam, F. Rauh, et al., “Exo1 Recruits Cdc5 Polo Kinase to MutLγ to Ensure Efficient Meiotic Crossover Formation,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 117, no. 48 (2020): 30577-30588.

[15] S. E. Peterson, S. Keeney, and M. Jasin, “Mechanistic Insight Into Crossing Over During Mouse Meiosis,” Molecular Cell 78, no. 6 (2020): 1252-1263.e3.

[16] A. Reynolds, H. Qiao, Y. Yang, et al., “RNF212 Is a Dosage-Sensitive Regulator of Crossing-Over During Mammalian Meiosis,” Nature Genetics 45 (2013): 269-278.

[17] H. Qiao, H. B. Prasada Rao, Y. Yang, et al., “Antagonistic Roles of Ubiquitin Ligase HEI10 and SUMO Ligase RNF212 Regulate Meiotic Recombination,” Nature Genetics 46 (2014): 194-199.

[18] H. B. Rao, H. Qiao, S. K. Bhatt, et al., “A SUMO-Ubiquitin Relay Recruits Proteasomes to Chromosome Axes to Regulate Meiotic Recombination,” Science 355 (2017): 403-407.

[19] N. R. Bhagwat, S. N. Owens, M. Ito, et al., “SUMO Is a Pervasive Regulator of Meiosis,” eLife 10 (2021): e57720.

[20] M. J. Whitley, P. Arjunan, N. S. Nemeria, et al., “Pyruvate Dehydrogenase Complex Deficiency Is Linked to Regulatory Loop Disorder in the αV138M Variant of Human Pyruvate Dehydrogenase,” Journal of Biological Chemistry 293, no. 34 (2018): 13204-13213.

[21] O. Byron and J. G. Lindsay, “The Pyruvate Dehydrogenase Complex and Related Assemblies in Health and Disease,” Sub-Cellular Biochemistry 83 (2017): 523-550.

[22] C. R. Barrera, G. Namihira, L. Hamilton, et al., “Keto Acid Dehydrogenase Complexes. XVI. Studies on the Subunit Structure of the Pyruvate Dehydrogenase Complexes From Bovine Kidney and Heart,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 148, no. 2 (1972): 343-358.

[23] F. Takakubo and H. H. Dahl, “The Expression Pattern of the Pyruvate Dehydrogenase E1 Alpha Subunit Genes During Spermatogenesis in Adult Mouse,” Experimental Cell Research 199 (1992): 39-49.

[24] A. Pinheiro, M. J. Silva, I. Graca, et al., “Pyruvate Dehydrogenase Complex: mRNA and Protein Expression Patterns of E1alpha Subunit Genes in Human Spermatogenesis,” Gene 506 (2012): 173-178.

[25] M. S. Patel, N. S. Nemeria, W. Furey, and F. Jordan, “The Pyruvate Dehydrogenase Complexes: Structure-Based Function and Regulation,” Journal of Biological Chemistry 289 (2014): 16615-16623.

[26] R. C. Iannello and H. H. Dahl, “Transcriptional Expression of a Testis-Specific Variant of the Mouse Pyruvate Dehydrogenase E1 Alpha Subunit,” Biology of Reproduction 47 (1992): 48-58.

[27] U. Datta, I. D. Wexler, D. S. Kerr, I. Raz, and M. S. Patel, “Characterization of the Regulatory Region of the Human Testis-Specific Form of the Pyruvate Dehydrogenase Alpha-Subunit (PDHA-2) Gene,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1447, no. 2-3 (1999): 236-243.

[28] V. Kumar, N. Rangaraj, and S. Shivaji, “Activity of Pyruvate Dehydrogenase A (PDHA) in Hamster Spermatozoa Correlates Positively With Hyperactivation and Is Associated With Sperm Capacitation,” Biology of Reproduction 75, no. 5 (2006): 767-777.

[29] Z. E. Kherraf, C. Cazin, A. Bouker, et al., “Whole-Exome Sequencing Improves the Diagnosis and Care of Men With Non-Obstructive Azoospermia,” American Journal of Human Genetics 109, no. 3 (2022): 508-517.

[30] K. Fang, Q. Li, Y. Wei, et al., “Prediction and Validation of Mouse Meiosis-Essential Genes Based on Spermatogenesis Proteome Dynamics,” Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 20 (2021): 100014.

[31] Y. Shang, T. Huang, H. Liu, et al., “MEIOK21: A New Component of Meiotic Recombination Bridges Required for Spermatogenesis,” Nucleic Acids Research 48, no. 12 (2020): 6624-6639.

[32] K. J. Livak and T. D. Schmittgen, “Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method,” Methods 25, no. 4 (2001): 402-408.

[33] X. Zhou, K. Fang, Y. Liu, et al., “ZFP541 and KCTD19 Regulate Chromatin Organization and Transcription Programs for Male Meiotic Progression,” Cell Proliferation 3 (2024): e13567.

[34] Q. Shao, Y. Zhang, Y. Liu, et al., “ATF7IP2, a Meiosis-Specific Partner of SETDB1, Is Required for Proper Chromosome Remodeling and Crossover Formation During Spermatogenesis,” Cell Reports 42, no. 8 (2023): 112953.

[35] Y. Liao, G. K. Smyth, and W. Shi, “featureCounts: An Efficient General Purpose Program for Assigning Sequence Reads to Genomic Features,” Bioinformatics 30 (2014): 923-930.

[36] M. I. Love, W. Huber, and S. Anders, “Moderated Estimation of Fold Change and Dispersion for RNA-Seq Data With DESeq2,” Genome Biology 15 (2014): 550.

[37] H. Li and R. Durbin, “Fast and Accurate Short Read Alignment With Burrows-Wheeler Transform,” Bioinformatics 25 (2009): 1754-1760.

[38] Y. Zhang, T. Liu, C. A. Meyer, et al., “Model-Based Analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS),” Genome Biology 9 (2008): R137.

[39] J. Fitzgerald, W. M. Hutchison, and H. H. Dahl, “Isolation and Characterisation of the Mouse Pyruvate Dehydrogenase E1 Alpha Genes,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1131 (1992): 83-90.

[40] L. Jiang, T. Li, X. Zhang, et al., “RPL10L Is Required for Male Meiotic Division by Compensating for RPL10 During Meiotic Sex Chromosome Inactivation in Mice,” Current Biology 27, no. 10 (2017): 1498-1505.

[41] E. A. Ahmed and D. G. de Rooij, “Staging of Mouse Seminiferous Tubule Cross-Sections,” Methods in Molecular Biology 558 (2009): 263-277.

[42] F. Sun and M. A. Handel, “Regulation of the Meiotic Prophase I to Metaphase I Transition in Mouse Spermatocytes,” Chromosoma 117 (2008): 471-485.

[43] T. Wiltshire, C. Park, K. A. Caldwell, and M. A. Handel, “Induced Premature G2/M-Phase Transition in Pachytene Spermatocytes Includes Events Unique to Meiosis,” Developmental Biology 169 (1995): 557-567.

[44] T. Ashley, D. Walpita, and D. G. de Rooij, “Localization of Two Mammalian Cyclin Dependent Kinases During Mammalian Meiosis,” Journal of Cell Science 114 (2001): 685-693.

[45] F. Cole, L. Kauppi, J. Lange, et al., “Homeostatic Control of Recombination Is Implemented Progressively in Mouse Meiosis,” Nature Cell Biology 14 (2012): 424-430.

[46] A. G. Hinch, P. W. Becker, T. Li, et al., “The Configuration of RPA, RAD51, and DMC1 Binding in Meiosis Reveals the Nature of Critical Recombination Intermediates,” Molecular Cell 79 (2020): 689-701.e10.

[47] B. Shi, J. Xue, H. Yin, et al., “Dual Functions for the ssDNA-Binding Protein RPA in Meiotic Recombination,” PLoS Genetics 15 (2019): e1007952.

[48] M. A. Morelli and P. E. Cohen, “Not All Germ Cells Are Created Equal: Aspects of Sexual Dimorphism in Mammalian Meiosis,” Reproduction 130, no. 6 (2005): 761-781.

[49] Q. Zhang, S. Y. Ji, K. Busayavalasa, and C. Yu, “SPO16 Binds SHOC1 to Promote Homologous Recombination and Crossing-Over in Meiotic Prophase I,” Science Advances 5, no. 1 (2019): eaau9780.

[50] C. A. Adelman and J. H. Petrini, “ZIP4H (TEX11) Deficiency in the Mouse Impairs Meiotic Double Strand Break Repair and the Regulation of Crossing Over,” PLoS Genetics 4, no. 3 (2008): e1000042.

[51] F. Yang, K. Gell, G. W. van der Heijden, et al., “Meiotic Failure in Male Mice Lacking an X-Linked Factor,” Genes & Development 22, no. 5 (2008): 682-691.

[52] G. V. Borner, N. Kleckner, and N. Hunter, “Crossover/Noncrossover Differentiation, Synaptonemal Complex Formation, and Regulatory Surveillance at the Leptotene/Zygotene Transition of Meiosis,” Cell 117 (2004): 29-45.

[53] T. Snowden, S. Acharya, C. Butz, M. Berardini, and R. Fishel, “hMSH4-hMSH5 Recognizes Holliday Junctions and Forms a Meiosis-Specific Sliding Clamp That Embraces Homologous Chromosomes,” Molecular Cell 15 (2004): 437-451.

[54] M. Fujimuro, H. Sawada, and H. Yokosawa, “Production and Characterization of Monoclonal Antibodies Specific to Multi-Ubiquitin Chains of Polyubiquitinated Proteins,” FEBS Letters 349 (1994): 173-180.

[55] B. J. E. Martin, J. Brind'Amour, A. Kuzmin, et al., “Transcription Shapes Genome-Wide Histone Acetylation Patterns,” Nature Communications 12, no. 1 (2021): 210.

[56] J. Xu, J. Gao, J. Liu, et al., “ZFP541 Maintains the Repression of Pre-Pachytene Transcriptional Programs and Promotes Male Meiosis Progression,” Cell Reports 38, no. 12 (2022): 110540.

[57] P. Tessarz and T. Kouzarides, “Histone Core Modifications Regulating Nucleosome Structure and Dynamics,” Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology 15, no. 11 (2014): 703-708.

[58] Y. Wang, B. Zhai, T. Tan, et al., “ESA1 Regulates Meiotic Chromosome Axis and Crossover Frequency via Acetylating Histone H4,” Nucleic Acids Research 49, no. 16 (2021): 9353-9373.

[59] U. Biswas, K. Hempel, E. Llano, A. Pendas, and R. Jessberger, “Distinct Roles of Meiosis-Specific Cohesin Complexes in Mammalian Spermatogenesis,” PLoS Genetics 12, no. 10 (2016): e1006389.

[60] R. Ladurner, V. Bhaskara, P. in't Veld, et al., “Cohesin's ATPase Activity Couples Cohesin Loading Onto DNA With Smc3 Acetylation,” Current Biology 24, no. 19 (2014): 2228-2237.

[61] J. Lee and T. Hirano, “RAD21L, a Novel Cohesin Subunit Implicated in Linking Homologous Chromosomes in Mammalian Meiosis,” Journal of Cell Biology 192, no. 2 (2011): 263-276.

[62] K. Ishiguro, J. Kim, S. Fujiyama-Nakamura, S. Kato, and Y. Watanabe, “A New Meiosis-Specific Cohesin Complex Implicated in the Cohesin Code for Homologous Pairing,” EMBO Reports 12, no. 3 (2011): 267-275.

[63] N. Petela, T. Gligoris, J. Metson, et al., “Scc2 Is a Potent Activator of Cohesin's ATPase That Promotes Loading by Binding Scc1 Without Pds5,” Molecular Cell 70, no. 6 (2018): 1134-1148.

[64] G. Varuzhanyan, R. Rojansky, M. J. Sweredoski, et al., “Mitochondrial Fusion Is Required for Spermatogonial Differentiation and Meiosis,” eLife 8 (2019): e51601.

[65] M. A. Handel, “The XY Body: A Specialized Meiotic Chromatin Domain,” Experimental Cell Research 296, no. 1 (2004): 57-63.

[66] J. M. Turner, “Meiotic Silencing in Mammals,” Annual Review of Genetics 49 (2005): 395-412.

[67] L. Schrader and J. Schmitz, “The Impact of Transposable Elements in Adaptive Evolution,” Molecular Ecology 28, no. 6 (2019): 1537-1549.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 The Author(s). Cell Proliferation published by Beijing Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.