Conditional Overexpression of Net1 Enhances the Trans-Differentiation of Lgr5⁺ Progenitors into Hair Cells in the Neonatal Mouse Cochlea

Abstract

Sensorineural hearing loss is mainly caused by damage to hair cells (HC), which cannot be regenerated spontaneously in adult mammals once damaged. Cochlear Lgr5⁺ progenitors are characterised by HC regeneration capacity in neonatal mice, and we previously screened several new genes that might induce HC regeneration from Lgr5⁺ progenitors. Net1, a guanine nucleotide exchange factor, is one of the screened new genes and is particularly active in cancer cells and is involved in cell proliferation and differentiation. Here, to explore in vivo roles of Net1 in HC regeneration, Net1^loxp/loxp mice were constructed and crossed with Lgr5^CreER/+ mice to conditionally overexpress (cOE) Net1 in cochlear Lgr5⁺ progenitors. We observed a large number of ectopic HCs in Lgr5^CreER/+Net1^loxp/loxp mouse cochlea, which showed a dose-dependent effect. Moreover, the EdU assay was unable to detect any EdU⁺/Sox2⁺ supporting cells, while lineage tracing showed significantly more regenerated tdTomato⁺ HCs in Lgr5^CreER/+Net1^loxp/loxptdTomato mice, which indicated that Net1 cOE enhanced HC regeneration by inducing the direct trans-differentiation of Lgr5⁺ progenitors rather than mitotic HC regeneration. Additionally, qPCR results showed that the transcription factors related to HC regeneration, including Atoh1, Gfi1 and Pou4f3, were significantly upregulated and are probably the mechanism behind the HC regeneration induced by Net1. In conclusion, our study provides new evidence for the role of Net1 in enhancing HC regeneration in the neonatal mouse cochlea.

Keywords

HC regeneration / Lgr5⁺ progenitors / Net1 / proliferation / trans-differentiation

References

[1] M. W. Kelley, “Regulation of Cell Fate in the Sensory Epithelia of the Inner Ear,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 7, no. 11 (2006): 837-849.

[2] M. W. Jang, J. Lim, M. G. Park, J. H. Lee, and C. J. Lee, “Active Role of Glia-Like Supporting Cells in the Organ of Corti: Membrane Proteins and Their Roles in Hearing,” Glia 70, no. 10 (2022): 1799-1825.

[3] G. Wan, G. Corfas, and J. S. Stone, “Inner Ear Supporting Cells: Rethinking the Silent Majority,” Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 24, no. 5 (2013): 448-459.

[4] M. Revuelta, F. Santaolalla, O. Arteaga, A. Alvarez, A. Sánchez-del-Rey, and E. Hilario, “Recent Advances in Cochlear Hair Cell Regeneration-A Promising Opportunity for the Treatment of Age-Related Hearing Loss,” Ageing Research Reviews 36 (2017): 149-155.

[5] M. Jiang, T. Karasawa, and P. S. Steyger, “Aminoglycoside-Induced Cochleotoxicity: A Review,” Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience 11 (2017): 308.

[6] E. L. Wagner and J.-B. Shin, “Mechanisms of Hair Cell Damage and Repair,” Trends in Neurosciences 42, no. 6 (2019): 414-424.

[7] Y. Shu, W. Li, M. Huang, et al., “Renewed Proliferation in Adult Mouse Cochlea and Regeneration of Hair Cells,” Nature Communications 10, no. 1 (2019): 5530.

[8] O. Bermingham-McDonogh and T. A. Reh, “Regulated Reprogramming in the Regeneration of Sensory Receptor Cells,” Neuron 71, no. 3 (2011): 389-405.

[9] B. C. Cox, R. Chai, A. Lenoir, et al., “Spontaneous Hair Cell Regeneration in the Neonatal Mouse Cochlea In Vivo,” Development 141, no. 4 (2014): 816-829.

[10] S. T. Sinkkonen, R. Chai, T. A. Jan, et al., “Intrinsic Regenerative Potential of Murine Cochlear Supporting Cells,” Scientific Reports 1 (2011): 26.

[11] G. Savoy-Burke, F. A. Gilels, W. Pan, et al., “Activated Notch Causes Deafness by Promoting a Supporting Cell Phenotype in Developing Auditory Hair Cells,” PLoS One 9, no. 9 (2014): e108160.

[12] R. Chai, B. Kuo, T. Wang, et al., “Wnt Signaling Induces Proliferation of Sensory Precursors in the Postnatal Mouse Cochlea,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109, no. 21 (2012): 8167-8172.

[13] F. Shi, J. S. Kempfle, and A. S. Edge, “Wnt-Responsive Lgr5-Expressing Stem Cells Are Hair Cell Progenitors in the Cochlea,” Journal of Neuroscience 32, no. 28 (2012): 9639-9648.

[14] R. Chai, A. Xia, T. Wang, et al., “Dynamic Expression of Lgr5, a Wnt Target Gene, in the Developing and Mature Mouse Cochlea,” Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 12, no. 4 (2011): 455-469.

[15] W. J. McLean, X. Yin, L. Lu, et al., “Clonal Expansion of Lgr5-Positive Cells From Mammalian Cochlea and High-Purity Generation of Sensory Hair Cells,” Cell Reports 18, no. 8 (2017): 1917-1929.

[16] M. M. McGovern, M. R. Randle, C. L. Cuppini, K. A. Graves, and B. C. Cox, “Multiple Supporting Cell Subtypes Are Capable of Spontaneous Hair Cell Regeneration in the Neonatal Mouse Cochlea,” Development 146, no. 4 (2019): dev171009.

[17] F. Shi, L. Hu, and A. S. B. Edge, “Generation of Hair Cells in Neonatal Mice by β-Catenin Overexpression in Lgr5-Positive Cochlear Progenitors,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110, no. 34 (2013): 13851-13856.

[18] W. Ni, S. Zeng, W. Li, et al., “Wnt Activation Followed by Notch Inhibition Promotes Mitotic Hair Cell Regeneration in the Postnatal Mouse Cochlea,” Oncotarget 7, no. 41 (2016): 66754-66768.

[19] M. Waqas, S. Zhang, Z. He, M. Tang, and R. Chai, “Role of Wnt and Notch Signaling in Regulating Hair Cell Regeneration in the Cochlea,” Frontiers of Medicine 10, no. 3 (2016): 237-249.

[20] N. Yamamoto, K. Tanigaki, M. Tsuji, D. Yabe, J. Ito, and T. Honjo, “Inhibition of Notch/RBP-J Signaling Induces Hair Cell Formation in Neonate Mouse Cochleas,” Journal of Molecular Medicine 84, no. 1 (2006): 37-45.

[21] Y. Chen, X. Lu, L. Guo, et al., “Hedgehog Signaling Promotes the Proliferation and Subsequent Hair Cell Formation of Progenitor Cells in the Neonatal Mouse Cochlea,” Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience 10 (2017): 426.

[22] S.-H. Huh, J. Jones, M. E. Warchol, and D. M. Ornitz, “Differentiation of the Lateral Compartment of the Cochlea Requires a Temporally Restricted FGF20 Signal,” PLoS Biology 10, no. 1 (2012): e1001231.

[23] X.-J. Li, C. Morgan, L. A. Goff, and A. Doetzlhofer, “Follistatin Promotes LIN28B-Mediated Supporting Cell Reprogramming and Hair Cell Regeneration in the Murine Cochlea,” Science Advances 8, no. 6 (2022): eabj7651.

[24] M. C. Kelly, Q. Chang, A. Pan, X. Lin, and P. Chen, “Atoh1 Directs the Formation of Sensory Mosaics and Induces Cell Proliferation in the Postnatal Mammalian Cochlea In Vivo,” Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 32, no. 19 (2012): 6699-6710.

[25] B. R. Kuo, E. M. Baldwin, W. S. Layman, M. M. Taketo, and J. Zuo, “In Vivo Cochlear Hair Cell Generation and Survival by Coactivation of β-Catenin and Atoh1,” Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 35, no. 30 (2015): 10786-10798.

[26] Y. Chen, S. Zhang, R. Chai, and H. Li, “Hair Cell Regeneration,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 1130 (2019): 1-16.

[27] Y. Zhang, S. Zhang, Z. Zhang, et al., “Knockdown of Foxg1 in Sox9+ Supporting Cells Increases the Trans-Differentiation of Supporting Cells Into Hair Cells in the Neonatal Mouse Utricle,” Aging 12, no. 20 (2020): 19834-19851.

[28] S. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Y. Dong, et al., “Knockdown of Foxg1 in Supporting Cells Increases the Trans-Differentiation of Supporting Cells Into Hair Cells in the Neonatal Mouse Cochlea,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 77, no. 7 (2020): 1401-1419.

[29] P. Chen and N. Segil, “p27(Kip1) Links Cell Proliferation to Morphogenesis in the Developing Organ of Corti,” Development 126, no. 8 (1999): 1581-1590.

[30] H. Löwenheim, D. N. Furness, J. Kil, et al., “Gene Disruption of p27(Kip1) Allows Cell Proliferation in the Postnatal and Adult Organ of Corti,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96, no. 7 (1999): 4084-4088.

[31] S. Zhang, R. Qiang, Y. Dong, et al., “Hair Cell Regeneration From Inner Ear Progenitors in the Mammalian Cochlea,” American Journal of Stem Cells 9, no. 3 (2020): 25-35.

[32] C. Sage, M. Huang, K. Karimi, et al., “Proliferation of Functional Hair Cells In Vivo in the Absence of the Retinoblastoma Protein,” Science 307, no. 5712 (2005): 1114-1118.

[33] C. Sage, M. Huang, M. A. Vollrath, et al., “Essential Role of Retinoblastoma Protein in Mammalian Hair Cell Development and Hearing,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103, no. 19 (2006): 7345-7350.

[34] J. Ai, “The Overexpression of Rps14 in Lgr5+ Progenitor Cells Promotes Hair Cell Regeneration in the Postnatal Mouse Cochlea,” Engineered Regeneration 4, no. 3 (2023): 328-336.

[35] C. Xu, J. Qi, X. Hu, et al., “Rps14 Upregulation Promotes Inner Ear Progenitor Proliferation and Hair Cell Regeneration in the Neonatal Mouse Cochlea,” Cell Proliferation 56, no. 5 (2023): e13458.

[36] X. Lu, S. Sun, J. Qi, et al., “Bmi1 Regulates the Proliferation of Cochlear Supporting Cells via the Canonical Wnt Signaling Pathway,” Molecular Neurobiology 54, no. 2 (2017): 1326-1339.

[37] W. Li, J. Wu, J. Yang, et al., “Notch Inhibition Induces Mitotically Generated Hair Cells in Mammalian Cochleae via Activating the Wnt Pathway,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112, no. 1 (2015): 166-171.

[38] S.-J. Jeon, M. Fujioka, S. C. Kim, and A. S. B. Edge, “Notch Signaling Alters Sensory or Neuronal Cell Fate Specification of Inner Ear Stem Cells,” Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience 31, no. 23 (2011): 8351-8358.

[39] S. Lee, J. J. Song, L. A. Beyer, et al., “Combinatorial Atoh1 and Gfi1 Induction Enhances Hair Cell Regeneration in the Adult Cochlea,” Scientific Reports 10, no. 1 (2020): 21397.

[40] B. J. Walters, E. Coak, J. Dearman, et al., “In Vivo Interplay Between p27Kip1, GATA3, ATOH1, and POU4F3 Converts NonSensory Cells to Hair Cells in Adult Mice,” Cell Reports 19, no. 2 (2017): 307-320.

[41] Y. Chen, Y. Gu, Y. Li, et al., “Generation of Mature and Functional Hair Cells by Co-Expression of Gfi1, Pou4f3, and Atoh1 in the Postnatal Mouse Cochlea,” Cell Reports 35, no. 3 (2021): 109016.

[42] W. Ni, C. Lin, L. Guo, et al., “Extensive Supporting Cell Proliferation and Mitotic Hair Cell Generation by In Vivo Genetic Reprogramming in the Neonatal Mouse Cochlea,” Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience 36, no. 33 (2016): 8734-8745.

[43] Z. Liu, J. Fang, J. Dearman, L. Zhang, and J. Zuo, “In Vivo Generation of Immature Inner Hair Cells in Neonatal Mouse Cochleae by Ectopic Atoh1 Expression,” PLoS One 9, no. 2 (2014): e89377.

[44] S. Korrapati, I. Roux, E. Glowatzki, and A. Doetzlhofer, “Notch Signaling Limits Supporting Cell Plasticity in the Hair Cell-Damaged Early Postnatal Murine Cochlea,” PLoS One 8, no. 8 (2013): e73276.

[45] Z. Liu, J. A. Dearman, B. C. Cox, et al., “Age-Dependent In Vivo Conversion of Mouse Cochlear Pillar and Deiters' Cells to Immature Hair Cells by Atoh1 Ectopic Expression,” Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience 32, no. 19 (2012): 6600-6610.

[46] C. Cheng, L. Guo, L. Lu, et al., “Characterization of the Transcriptomes of Lgr5+ Hair Cell Progenitors and Lgr5- Supporting Cells in the Mouse Cochlea,” Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience 10 (2017): 122.

[47] M. Waqas, L. Guo, S. Zhang, et al., “Characterization of Lgr5+ Progenitor Cell Transcriptomes in the Apical and Basal Turns of the Mouse Cochlea,” Oncotarget 7, no. 27 (2016): 41123-41141.

[48] S. Zhang, Y. Zhang, P. Yu, et al., “Characterization of Lgr5+ Progenitor Cell Transcriptomes After Neomycin Injury in the Neonatal Mouse Cochlea,” Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience 10 (2017): 213.

[49] K. L. Rossman, C. J. Der, and J. Sondek, “GEF Means Go: Turning on RHO GTPases With Guanine Nucleotide-Exchange Factors,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 6, no. 2 (2005): 167-180.

[50] M. Symons and N. Rusk, “Control of Vesicular Trafficking by rho GTPases,” Current Biology 13, no. 10 (2003): 409-418.

[51] A. Ulu, W. Oh, Y. Zuo, and J. A. Frost, “Cdk1 Phosphorylation Negatively Regulates the Activity of Net1 Towards RhoA During Mitosis,” Cellular Signalling 80 (2021): 109926.

[52] Z. H. Chen, Q. Z. Ni, X. P. Zhang, et al., “NET1 Promotes HCC Growth and Metastasis In Vitro and In Vivo via Activating the Akt Signaling Pathway,” Aging 13, no. 7 (2021): 10672-10687.

[53] G. Bennett, D. Sadlier, P. P. Doran, P. MacMathuna, and D. W. Murray, “A Functional and Transcriptomic Analysis of NET1 Bioactivity in Gastric Cancer,” BMC Cancer 11 (2011): 50.

[54] S. Menon, W. Oh, H. S. Carr, and J. A. Frost, “Rho GTPase-Independent Regulation of Mitotic Progression by the RhoGEF Net1,” Molecular Biology of the Cell 24, no. 17 (2013): 2655-2667.

[55] C. Lahiff, E. Cotter, R. Casey, et al., “Expression of Neuroepithelial Transforming Gene 1 Is Enhanced in Oesophageal Cancer and Mediates an Invasive Tumour Cell Phenotype,” Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research 32, no. 1 (2013): 55.

[56] Y. Zuo, A. Ulu, J. T. Chang, and J. A. Frost, “Contributions of the RhoA Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor Net1 to Polyoma Middle T Antigen-Mediated Mammary Gland Tumorigenesis and Metastasis,” Breast Cancer Research 20, no. 1 (2018): 41.

[57] F. Zhao, Z. Zhao, Y. Han, S. Li, C. Liu, and K. Jia, “Baicalin Suppresses Lung Cancer Growth Phenotypes via miR-340-5p/NET1 Axis,” Bioengineered 12, no. 1 (2021): 1699-1707.

[58] H. Sun, Z. Zhang, W. Luo, J. Liu, Y. Lou, and S. Xia, “NET1 Enhances Proliferation and Chemoresistance in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Cells,” Oncology Research 27, no. 8 (2019): 935-944.

[59] D. Murray, G. Horgan, P. MacMathuna, and P. Doran, “NET1-Mediated RhoA Activation Facilitates Lysophosphatidic Acid-Induced Cell Migration and Invasion in Gastric Cancer,” British Journal of Cancer 99, no. 8 (2008): 1322-1329.

[60] S. Wei, G. Ning, L. Li, et al., “A GEF Activity-Independent Function for Nuclear Net1 in Nodal Signal Transduction and Mesendoderm Formation,” Journal of Cell Science 130, no. 18 (2017): 3072-3082.

[61] S. Wei, M. Dai, Z. Liu, et al., “The Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor Net1 Facilitates the Specification of Dorsal Cell Fates in Zebrafish Embryos by Promoting Maternal Beta-Catenin Activation,” Cell Research 27, no. 2 (2017): 202-225.

[62] Y. Shen, K. Schlessinger, X. Zhu, et al., “Essential Role of STAT3 in Postnatal Survival and Growth Revealed by Mice Lacking STAT3 Serine 727 Phosphorylation,” Molecular and Cellular Biology 24, no. 1 (2004): 407-419.

[63] C. Woods, M. Montcouquiol, and M. W. Kelley, “Math1 Regulates Development of the Sensory Epithelium in the Mammalian Cochlea,” Nature Neuroscience 7, no. 12 (2004): 1310-1318.

[64] D. Wallis, M. Hamblen, Y. Zhou, et al., “The Zinc Finger Transcription Factor Gfi1, Implicated in Lymphomagenesis, Is Required for Inner Ear Hair Cell Differentiation and Survival,” Development 130, no. 1 (2003): 221-232.

[65] J. Lee, H. J. Moon, J. M. Lee, and C. K. Joo, “Smad3 Regulates rho Signaling via NET1 in the Transforming Growth Factor-Beta-Induced Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition of Human Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells,” Journal of Biological Chemistry 285, no. 34 (2010): 26618-26627.

[66] T. Li, X. Xiong, Y. Wang, et al., “Neuroepithelial Cell-Transforming 1 Promotes Cardiac Fibrosis via the Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling Pathway,” iScience 26, no. 10 (2023): 107888.

[67] L. Zhang, Y. Fang, F. Tan, et al., “AAV-Net1 Facilitates the Trans-Differentiation of Supporting Cells Into Hair Cells in the Murine Cochlea,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences: CMLS 80, no. 4 (2023): 86.

[68] T. A. Jan, R. Chai, Z. N. Sayyid, et al., “Tympanic Border Cells Are Wnt-Responsive and Can Act as Progenitors for Postnatal Mouse Cochlear Cells,” Development 140, no. 6 (2013): 1196-1206.

[69] E. Papadimitriou, E. Vasilaki, C. Vorvis, et al., “Differential Regulation of the Two RhoA-Specific GEF Isoforms Net1/Net1A by TGF-β and miR-24: Role in Epithelial-To-Mesenchymal Transition,” Oncogene 31, no. 23 (2012): 2862-2875.

[70] T. Ohyama, M. L. Basch, Y. Mishina, K. M. Lyons, N. Segil, and A. K. Groves, “BMP Signaling Is Necessary for Patterning the Sensory and Nonsensory Regions of the Developing Mammalian Cochlea,” Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience 30, no. 45 (2010): 15044-15051.

[71] K. R. Koehler, A. M. Mikosz, A. I. Molosh, D. Patel, and E. Hashino, “Generation of Inner Ear Sensory Epithelia From Pluripotent Stem Cells in 3D Culture,” Nature 500, no. 7461 (2013): 217-221.

[72] N. A. Bermingham, B. A. Hassan, S. D. Price, et al., “Math1: An Essential Gene for the Generation of Inner Ear Hair Cells,” Science 284, no. 5421 (1999): 1837-1841.

[73] S. P. Gubbels, D. W. Woessner, J. C. Mitchell, A. J. Ricci, and J. V. Brigande, “Functional Auditory Hair Cells Produced in the Mammalian Cochlea by In Utero Gene Transfer,” Nature 455, no. 7212 (2008): 537-541.

[74] M. Xiang, L. Gan, D. Li, et al., “Essential Role of POU-Domain Factor Brn-3c in Auditory and Vestibular Hair Cell Development,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 94, no. 17 (1997): 9445-9450.

[75] R. Ikeda, K. Pak, E. Chavez, and A. F. Ryan, “Transcription Factors With Conserved Binding Sites Near ATOH1 on the POU4F3 Gene Enhance the Induction of Cochlear Hair Cells,” Molecular Neurobiology 51, no. 2 (2015): 672-684.

[76] R. Hertzano, M. Montcouquiol, S. Rashi-Elkeles, et al., “Transcription Profiling of Inner Ears From Pou4f3(Ddl/Ddl) Identifies Gfi1 as a Target of the Pou4f3 Deafness Gene,” Human Molecular Genetics 13, no. 18 (2004): 2143-2153.

[77] A. A. Iyer, I. Hosamani, J. D. Nguyen, et al., “Cellular Reprogramming With ATOH1, GFI1, and POU4F3 Implicate Epigenetic Changes and Cell-Cell Signaling as Obstacles to Hair Cell Regeneration in Mature Mammals,” eLife 11 (2022): e79712.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). Cell Proliferation published by Beijing Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.