DNA methylation regulates RNA m⁶A modification through transcription factor SP1 during the development of porcine somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos

Abstract

Epigenetic modifications play critical roles during somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) embryo development. Whether RNA N6-methyladenosine (m⁶A) affects the developmental competency of SCNT embryos remains unclear. Here, we showed that porcine bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (pBMSCs) presented higher RNA m⁶A levels than those of porcine embryonic fibroblasts (pEFs). SCNT embryos derived from pBMSCs had higher RNA m⁶A levels, cleavage, and blastocyst rates than those from pEFs. Compared with pEFs, the promoter region of METTL14 presented a hypomethylation status in pBMSCs. Mechanistically, DNA methylation regulated METTL14 expression by affecting the accessibility of transcription factor SP1 binding, highlighting the role of the DNA methylation/SP1/METTL14 pathway in donor cells. Inhibiting the DNA methylation level in donor cells increased the RNA m⁶A level and improved the development efficiency of SCNT embryos. Overexpression of METTL14 significantly increased the RNA m⁶A level in donor cells and the development efficiency of SCNT embryos, whereas knockdown of METTL14 suggested the opposite result. Moreover, we revealed that RNA m⁶A-regulated TOP2B mRNA stability, translation level, and DNA damage during SCNT embryo development. Collectively, our results highlight the crosstalk between RNA m⁶A and DNA methylation, and the crucial role of RNA m⁶A during nuclear reprogramming in SCNT embryo development.

References

[1] Morton DB, Berghardt GM, Smith JA. Animals, science, and ethics—section III. Critical anthropomorphism, animal suffering, and the ecological context. Hastings Cent Rep. 1990;20(3):S13-S19.

[2] Matoba S, Liu Y, Lu F, et al. Embryonic development following somatic cell nuclear transfer impeded by persisting histone methylation. Cell. 2014;159(4):884-895.

[3] Chung YG, Matoba S, Liu Y, et al. Histone demethylase expression enhances human somatic cell nuclear transfer efficiency and promotes derivation of pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2015;17(6):758-766.

[4] Song X, Liu Z, He H, et al. Dnmt1s in donor cells is a barrier to SCNT-mediated DNA methylation reprogramming in pigs. Oncotarget. 2017;8(21):34980-34991.

[5] Gao R, Wang C, Gao Y, et al. Inhibition of aberrant DNA Re-methylation improves post-implantation development of somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos. Cell Stem Cell. 2018;23(3):426-435.

[6] Matoba S, Wang H, Jiang L, et al. Loss of H3K27me3 imprinting in somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos disrupts post-implantation development. Cell Stem Cell. 2018;23(3):343-354.

[7] Powell AM, Talbot NC, Wells KD, Kerr DE, Pursel VG, Wall RJ. Cell donor influences success of producing cattle by somatic cell nuclear transfer. Biol Reprod. 2004;71(1):210-216.

[8] Li J, Gao Y, Petkov S, Purup S, Hyttel P, Callesen H. Passage number of porcine embryonic germ cells affects epigenetic status and blastocyst rate following somatic cell nuclear transfer. Anim Reprod Sci. 2014;147(1–2):39-46.

[9] Lai L, Tao T, Machaty Z, et al. Feasibility of producing porcine nuclear transfer embryos by using G2/M-stage fetal fibroblasts as donors. Biol Reprod. 2001;65(5):1558-1564.

[10] Li Z, He X, Chen L, et al. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells are an attractive donor cell type for production of cloned pigs as well as genetically modified cloned pigs by somatic cell nuclear transfer. Cell Reprogram. 2013;15(5):459-470.

[11] Wiater J, Samiec M, Wartalski K, et al. Characterization of mono- and Bi-transgenic pig-derived epidermal keratinocytes expressing human FUT2 and GLA genes-in vitro studies. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(18):9683.

[12] Oh HJ, Park JE, Park EJ, et al. Analysis of cell growth and gene expression of porcine adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells as nuclear donor cell. Dev Growth Differ. 2014;56(9):595-604.

[13] Liu Z, Xiang G, Xu K, et al. Transcriptome analyses reveal differential transcriptional profiles in early- and late-dividing porcine somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos. Genes (Basel). 2020;11(12):1251.

[14] Martinez-Diaz MA, Che L, Albornoz M, et al. Pre- and postimplantation development of swine-cloned embryos derived from fibroblasts and bone marrow cells after inhibition of histone deacetylases. Cell Reprogram. 2010;12(1):85-94.

[15] Hormanseder E, Simeone A, Allen GE, et al. H3K4 methylation-dependent memory of somatic cell identity inhibits reprogramming and development of nuclear transfer embryos. Cell Stem Cell. 2017;21(1):135-143.

[16] Xu W, Li H, Zhang M, et al. Locus-specific analysis of DNA methylation patterns in cloned and in vitro fertilized porcine embryos. J Reprod Dev. 2020;66(6):505-514.

[17] Oh SH, Lee SE, Han DH, et al. Treatments of porcine nuclear recipient oocytes and somatic cell nuclear transfer-generated embryos with various reactive oxygen species scavengers Lead to improvements of their quality parameters and developmental competences by mitigating oxidative stress-related impacts. Cell Reprogram. 2023;25(2):73-81.

[18] Gorczyca G, Wartalski K, Romek M, Samiec M, Duda M. The molecular quality and mitochondrial activity of porcine cumulus-oocyte complexes are affected by their exposure to three endocrine-active compounds under 3D in vitro maturation conditions. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(9):4572.

[19] Samiec M, Skrzyszowska M. Biological transcomplementary activation as a novel and effective strategy applied to the generation of porcine somatic cell cloned embryos. Reprod Biol. 2014;14(2):128-139.

[20] Liu X, Chen L, Wang T, et al. TDG is a pig-specific epigenetic regulator with insensitivity to H3K9 and H3K27 demethylation in nuclear transfer embryos. Stem Cell Rep. 2021;16(11):2674-2689.

[21] Samiec M, Skrzyszowska M. Extranuclear inheritance of mitochondrial genome and epigenetic reprogrammability of chromosomal telomeres in somatic cell cloning of mammals. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(6):3099.

[22] Dominissini D, Moshitch-Moshkovitz S, Schwartz S, et al. Topology of the human and mouse m6A RNA methylomes revealed by m6A-seq. Nature. 2012;485(7397):201-206.

[23] An S, Huang W, Huang X, et al. Integrative network analysis identifies cell-specific trans regulators of m6A. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48(4):1715-1729.

[24] Yang Y, Hsu PJ, Chen YS, Yang YG. Dynamic transcriptomic m(6)A decoration: writers, erasers, readers and functions in RNA metabolism. Cell Res. 2018;28(6):616-624.

[25] Zhang M, Zhai Y, Zhang S, Dai X, Li Z. Roles of N6-Methyladenosine (m(6)a) in stem cell fate decisions and early embryonic development in mammals. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:782.

[26] Shi H, Wei J, He C. Where, when, and how: context-dependent functions of RNA methylation writers, readers, and erasers. Mol Cell. 2019;74(4):640-650.

[27] Choe J, Lin S, Zhang W, et al. mRNA circularization by METTL3-eIF3h enhances translation and promotes oncogenesis. Nature. 2018;561(7724):556-560.

[28] Wei X, Huo Y, Pi J, et al. METTL3 preferentially enhances non-m(6)a translation of epigenetic factors and promotes tumourigenesis. Nat Cell Biol. 2022;24(8):1278-1290.

[29] Khodeer S, Klungland A, Dahl JA. ALKBH5 regulates somatic cell reprogramming in a phase-specific manner. J Cell Sci. 2022;135(11):jcs259824.

[30] Chen T, Hao YJ, Zhang Y, et al. M(6)a RNA methylation is regulated by microRNAs and promotes reprogramming to pluripotency. Cell Stem Cell. 2015;16(3):289-301.

[31] Wu R, Liu Y, Zhao Y, et al. M(6)A methylation controls pluripotency of porcine induced pluripotent stem cells by targeting SOCS3/JAK2/STAT3 pathway in a YTHDF1/YTHDF2-orchestrated manner. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10(3):171.

[32] Meng TG, Lu X, Guo L, et al. Mettl14 is required for mouse postimplantation development by facilitating epiblast maturation. FASEB J. 2019;33(1):1179-1187.

[33] Zhang L, Yuan M, Huang X, et al. Inhibition of METTL5 improves preimplantation development of mouse somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos. Reproduction. 2022;164(5):221-230.

[34] Zhai Y, Li W, Zhang Z, et al. Epigenetic states of donor cells significantly affect the development of somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) embryos in pigs. Mol Reprod Dev. 2018;85(1):26-37.

[35] Deng S, Zhang J, Su J, et al. RNA m(6)A regulates transcription via DNA demethylation and chromatin accessibility. Nat Genet. 2022;54(9):1427-1437.

[36] Yang X, Mei C, Raza SHA, et al. Interactive regulation of DNA demethylase gene TET1 and m(6)a methyltransferase gene METTL3 in myoblast differentiation. Int J Biol Macromol. 2022;223:916-930.

[37] Zhai Y, Yu H, An X, et al. Profiling the transcriptomic signatures and identifying the patterns of zygotic genome activation – a comparative analysis between early porcine embryos and their counterparts in other three mammalian species. BMC Genomics. 2022;23(1):772.

[38] Yang Y, Fan X, Yan J, et al. A comprehensive epigenome atlas reveals DNA methylation regulating skeletal muscle development. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(3):1313-1329.

[39] Zhai Y, Zhang Z, Yu H, et al. Dynamic methylation changes of DNA and H3K4 by RG108 improve epigenetic reprogramming of somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos in pigs. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018;50(4):1376-1397.

[40] He S, Wang H, Liu R, et al. mRNA N6-methyladenosine methylation of postnatal liver development in pig. PLoS One. 2017;12(3):e0173421.

[41] Jiang A, Ma Y, Zhang X, et al. The defects of epigenetic reprogramming in dox-dependent porcine-iPSCs. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(19):11941.

[42] Xi C, Sun J, Xu X, et al. Mettl14-driven senescence-associated secretory phenotype facilitates somatic cell reprogramming. Stem Cell Rep. 2022;17(8):1799-1809.

[43] Liu P, Li F, Lin J, et al. M(6)A-independent genome-wide METTL3 and METTL14 redistribution drives the senescence-associated secretory phenotype. Nat Cell Biol. 2021;23(4):355-365.

[44] Uuskula-Reimand L, Wilson MD. Untangling the roles of TOP2A and TOP2B in transcription and cancer. Sci Adv. 2022;8(44):eadd4920.

[45] Hu HL, Shiflett LA, Kobayashi M, et al. TOP2beta-dependent nuclear DNA damage shapes extracellular growth factor responses via dynamic AKT phosphorylation to control virus latency. Mol Cell. 2019;74(3):466-480.

[46] Liu J, Gao M, Xu S, et al. YTHDF2/3 are required for somatic reprogramming through different RNA Deadenylation pathways. Cell Rep. 2020;32(10):108120.

[47] Wilmut I, Schnieke AE, McWhir J, Kind AJ, Campbell KH. Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells. Nature. 1997;385(6619):810-813.

[48] Wakayama T, Perry AC, Zuccotti M, et al. Full-term development of mice from enucleated oocytes injected with cumulus cell nuclei. Nature. 1998;394(6691):369-374.

[49] Baguisi A, Behboodi E, Melican DT, et al. Production of goats by somatic cell nuclear transfer. Nat Biotechnol. 1999;17(5):456-461.

[50] Yu C, Ji SY, Dang YJ, et al. Oocyte-expressed yes-associated protein is a key activator of the early zygotic genome in mouse. Cell Res. 2016;26(3):275-287.

[51] Long C, Li H, Li X, Yang W, Zuo Y. Nuclear transfer arrest embryos show massive dysregulation of genes involved in transcription pathways. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(15):8817.

[52] Gao Q, Wang L, Wang S, Huang B, Jing Y, Su J. Bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells: identification, classification, and differentiation. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:787118.

[53] Plikus MV, Wang X, Sinha S, et al. Fibroblasts: origins, definitions, and functions in health and disease. Cell. 2021;184(15):3852-3872.

[54] Yao H, Gao CC, Zhang D, et al. Scm(6)A-seq reveals single-cell landscapes of the dynamic m(6)a during oocyte maturation and early embryonic development. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):315.

[55] Wu Y, Xu X, Qi M, et al. N(6)-methyladenosine regulates maternal RNA maintenance in oocytes and timely RNA decay during mouse maternal-to-zygotic transition. Nat Cell Biol. 2022;24(6):917-927.

[56] Sui X, Hu Y, Ren C, et al. METTL3-mediated m(6)A is required for murine oocyte maturation and maternal-to-zygotic transition. Cell Cycle. 2020;19(4):391-404.

[57] Ivanova I, Much C, Di Giacomo M, et al. The RNA m(6)A reader YTHDF2 is essential for the post-transcriptional regulation of the maternal transcriptome and oocyte competence. Mol Cell. 2017;67(6):1059-1067.

[58] Zhao BS, Wang X, Beadell AV, et al. M(6)A-dependent maternal mRNA clearance facilitates zebrafish maternal-to-zygotic transition. Nature. 2017;542(7642):475-478.

[59] Zhao Y, Chen Y, Jin M, Wang J. The crosstalk between m(6)a RNA methylation and other epigenetic regulators: a novel perspective in epigenetic remodeling. Theranostics. 2021;11(9):4549-4566.

[60] Huang H, Weng H, Zhou K, et al. Histone H3 trimethylation at lysine 36 guides m(6)a RNA modification co-transcriptionally. Nature. 2019;567(7748):414-419.

[61] Wang Y, Li Y, Yue M, et al. N(6)-methyladenosine RNA modification regulates embryonic neural stem cell self-renewal through histone modifications. Nat Neurosci. 2018;21(2):195-206.

[62] Li Y, Xia L, Tan K, et al. N(6)-Methyladenosine co-transcriptionally directs the demethylation of histone H3K9me2. Nat Genet. 2020;52(9):870-877.

[63] Lyko F, Brown R. DNA methyltransferase inhibitors and the development of epigenetic cancer therapies. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97(20):1498-1506.

[64] Yu T, Qi X, Zhang L, et al. Dynamic reprogramming and function of RNA N(6)-methyladenosine modification during porcine early embryonic development. Zygote. 2021;29(6):417-426.

[65] Dou X, Huang L, Xiao Y, et al. METTL14 is a chromatin regulator independent of its RNA N6-methyladenosine methyltransferase activity. Protein & Cell. 2023;14:683-697.

[66] Mu M, Li X, Dong L, et al. METTL14 regulates chromatin bivalent domains in mouse embryonic stem cells. Cell Rep. 2023;42(6):112650.

[67] Uuskula-Reimand L, Hou H, Samavarchi-Tehrani P, et al. Topoisomerase II beta interacts with cohesin and CTCF at topological domain borders. Genome Biol. 2016;17(1):182.

[68] Bohrer RC, Duggavathi R, Bordignon V. Inhibition of histone deacetylases enhances DNA damage repair in SCNT embryos. Cell Cycle. 2014;13(13):2138-2148.

[69] Zhang JJ, Liu X, Chen L, et al. Advanced maternal age alters expression of maternal effect genes that are essential for human oocyte quality. Aging (Albany NY). 2020;12(4):3950-3961.

[70] Xiang Y, Laurent B, Hsu CH, et al. RNA m(6)A methylation regulates the ultraviolet-induced DNA damage response. Nature. 2017;543(7646):573-576.

[71] Hao J, Huang S, Wang D, et al. Loss of WTAP impairs early parthenogenetic embryo development. Animals (Basel). 2021;11(6):1675.

[72] Liu Y, Liu L, Ma X, Yin Y, Tang B, Li Z. Characteristics and neural-like differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells derived from foetal porcine bone marrow. Biosci Rep. 2013;33(2):e00032.

[73] Zhang M, Zhang S, Zhai Y, et al. Cycloleucine negatively regulates porcine oocyte maturation and embryo development by modulating N6-methyladenosine and histone modifications. Theriogenology. 2022;179:128-140.

[74] Xiao Y, Wang Y, Tang Q, Wei L, Zhang X, Jia G. An elongation- and ligation-based qPCR amplification method for the radiolabeling-free detection of locus-specific N(6)-Methyladenosine modification. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2018;57(49):15995-16000.

[75] Zhao Y, Vartak SV, Conte A, et al. “Stripe” transcription factors provide accessibility to co-binding partners in mammalian genomes. Mol Cell. 2022;82(18):3398-3411.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2023 2023 The Authors. Cell Proliferation published by Beijing Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.