Overcoming the H4K20me3 epigenetic barrier improves somatic cell nuclear transfer reprogramming efficiency in mice

Zhihui Liu, Weiguo Wang, Yuhan Xia, Yuan Gao, Zhisong Wang, Mingyang Li, Giorgio Antonio Presicce, Liyou An, Fuliang Du

PDF
Cell Proliferation ›› 2024, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (1) : e13519. DOI: 10.1111/cpr.13519
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Overcoming the H4K20me3 epigenetic barrier improves somatic cell nuclear transfer reprogramming efficiency in mice

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Epigenetic reprogramming during fertilization and somatic cell nuclear transfer (NT) is required for cell plasticity and competent development. Here, we characterize the epigenetic modification pattern of H4K20me3, a repressive histone signature in heterochromatin, during fertilization and NT reprogramming. Importantly, the dynamic H4K20me3 signature identified during preimplantation development in fertilized embryos differed from NT and parthenogenetic activation (PA) embryos. In fertilized embryos, only maternal pronuclei carried the canonical H4K20me3 peripheral nucleolar ring-like signature. H4K20me3 disappeared at the 2-cell stage and reappeared in fertilized embryos at the 8-cell stage and in NT and PA embryos at the 4-cell stage. H4K20me3 intensity in 4-cell, 8-cell, and morula stages of fertilized embryos was significantly lower than in NT and PA embryos, suggesting aberrant regulation of H4K20me3 in PA and NT embryos. Indeed, RNA expression of the H4K20 methyltransferase Suv4-20h2 in 4-cell fertilized embryos was significantly lower than NT embryos. Knockdown of Suv4-20h2 in NT embryos rescued the H4K20me3 pattern similar to fertilized embryos. Compared to control NT embryos, knockdown of Suv4-20h2 in NT embryos improved blastocyst development ratios (11.1% vs. 30.5%) and full-term cloning efficiencies (0.8% vs. 5.9%). Upregulation of reprogramming factors, including Kdm4b, Kdm4d, Kdm6a, and Kdm6b, as well as ZGA-related factors, including Dux, Zscan4, and Hmgpi, was observed with Suv4-20h2 knockdown in NT embryos. Collectively, these are the first findings to demonstrate that H4K20me3 is an epigenetic barrier of NT reprogramming and begin to unravel the epigenetic mechanisms of H4K20 trimethylation in cell plasticity during natural reproduction and NT reprogramming in mice.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Zhihui Liu, Weiguo Wang, Yuhan Xia, Yuan Gao, Zhisong Wang, Mingyang Li, Giorgio Antonio Presicce, Liyou An, Fuliang Du. Overcoming the H4K20me3 epigenetic barrier improves somatic cell nuclear transfer reprogramming efficiency in mice. Cell Proliferation, 2024, 57(1): e13519 https://doi.org/10.1111/cpr.13519

References

[1]
Qian C, Zhou MM. SET domain protein lysine methyltransferases: structure, specificity and catalysis. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2006;63(23):2755-2763.
[2]
Balakrishnan L, Milavetz B. Decoding the histone H4 lysine 20 methylation mark. Crit Rev Biochem Mol. 2010;45(5):440-452.
[3]
Schotta G, Lachner M, Sarma K, et al. A silencing pathway to induce H3-K9 and H4-K20 trimethylation at constitutive heterochromatin. Gene Dev. 2004;18(11):1251-1262.
[4]
Jorgensen S, Schotta G, Sorensen CS. Histone H4 lysine 20 methylation: key player in epigenetic regulation of genomic integrity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(5):2797-2806.
[5]
Lyu GL, Guan YT, Zhang C, et al. TGF-beta signaling alters H4K20me3 status via miR-29 and contributes to cellular senescence and cardiac aging. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):2560.
[6]
Cao X, Chen Y, Wu B, et al. Histone H4K20 demethylation by two hHR23 proteins. Cell Rep. 2020;30(12):4152-4164.
[7]
Wongtawan T, Taylor JE, Lawson KA, Wilmut I, Pennings S. Histone H4K20me3 and HP1 alpha are late heterochromatin markers in development, but present in undifferentiated embryonic stem cells. J Cell Sci. 2011;124(11):1878-1890.
[8]
Xu J, Kidder BL. H4K20me3 co-localizes with activating histone modifications at transcriptionally dynamic regions in embryonic stem cells. BMC Genomics. 2018;19(1):514.
[9]
Eid A, Rodriguez-Terrones D, Burton A, Torres-Padilla ME. SUV4-20 activity in the preimplantation mouse embryo controls timely replication. Gene Dev. 2016;30(22):2513-2526.
[10]
Gurdon JB. The developmental capacity of nuclei taken from intestinal epithelium cells of feeding tadpoles. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1962;10:622-640.
[11]
Wakayama T, Perry AC, Zuccotti M, Johnson KR, Yanagimachi R. Full-term development of mice from enucleated oocytes injected with cumulus cell nuclei. Nature. 1998;394(6691):369-374.
[12]
Matoba S, Liu Y, Lu F, et al. Embryonic development following somatic cell nuclear transfer impeded by persisting histone methylation. Cell. 2014;159(4):884-895.
[13]
Matoba S, Zhang Y. Somatic cell nuclear transfer reprogramming: mechanisms and applications. Cell Stem Cell. 2018;23(4):471-485.
[14]
Okae H, Matoba S, Nagashima T, et al. RNA sequencing-based identification of aberrant imprinting in cloned mice. Hum Mol Genet. 2014;23(4):992-1001.
[15]
Liu W, Liu X, Wang C, et al. Identification of key factors conquering developmental arrest of somatic cell cloned embryos by combining embryo biopsy and single-cell sequencing. Cell Discov. 2016;2:16010.
[16]
Zhang S, Chen X, Wang F, et al. Aberrant DNA methylation reprogramming in bovine SCNT preimplantation embryos. Sci Reports. 2016;6:30345.
[17]
Gao R, Wang C, Gao Y, et al. Inhibition of aberrant DNA Re-methylation improves post-implantation development of somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos. Cell Stem Cell. 2018;23(3):426-435.
[18]
Inoue K, Kohda T, Sugimoto M, et al. Impeding Xist expression from the active X chromosome improves mouse somatic cell nuclear transfer. Science. 2010;330(6003):496-499.
[19]
Li-Ying S, Shen PC, B.-Seon J, et al. Premature chromosome condensation is not essential for nuclear reprogramming in bovine somatic cell nuclear transfer. Biol Reprod. 2007;76(2):232-240.
[20]
Campbell KH, Loi P, Otaegui PJ, Wilmut I. Cell cycle co-ordination in embryo cloning by nuclear transfer. Rev Reprod. 1996;1(1):40-46.
[21]
Liu ZH, Cui J, Wang WG, et al. Dynamic and aberrant patterns of H3K4me3, H3K9me3, and H3K27me3 during early zygotic genome activation in cloned mouse embryos. Zygote. 2022;30(6):903-909.
[22]
An LY, Liu YH, Li MY, et al. Site specificity of blastocyst hatching significantly influences pregnancy outcomes in mice. FASEB J. 2021;35(9):e21812.
[23]
Xiong K, Wu W, Wang XG, Ma XS, Chen J, Liu HL. Mouse oocyte meiosis is disturbed by knockdown of Suv4-20h. Reprod Fert Develop. 2013;25(3):503-510.
[24]
Adenot PG, Mercier Y, Renard JP, Thompson EM. Differential H4 acetylation of paternal and maternal chromatin precedes DNA replication and differential transcriptional activity in pronuclei of 1-cell mouse embryos. Development. 1997;124(22):4615-4625.
[25]
Yang L, Song L, Liu X, Bai L, Li G. KDM6A and KDM6B play contrasting roles in nuclear transfer embryos revealed by MERVL reporter system. EMBO Rep. 2018;19(12):e46240.
[26]
Zhou C, Wang YZ, Zhang JC, et al. H3K27me3 is an epigenetic barrier while KDM6A overexpression improves nuclear reprogramming efficiency. FASEB J. 2019;33(3):4638-4652.
[27]
Wang CF, Chen C, Liu XY, et al. Dynamic nucleosome organization after fertilization reveals regulatory factors for mouse zygotic genome activation. Cell Res. 2022;32(9):801-813.
[28]
Ko MSH. Zygotic genome activation revisited: looking through the expression and function of Zscan4. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2016;120:103-124.
[29]
Yang G, Zhang LF, Liu WQ, et al. Dux-mediated corrections of aberrant H3K9ac during 2-cell genome activation optimize efficiency of somatic cell nuclear transfer. Cell Stem Cell. 2021;28(1):150-163.
[30]
Regha K, Sloane MA, Huang R, et al. Active and repressive chromatin are interspersed without spreading in an imprinted gene cluster in the mammalian genome. Mol Cell. 2007;27(3):353-366.
[31]
Cleard F, Delattre M, Spierer P. SU(VAR)3–7, a Drosophila heterochromatin-associated protein and companion of HP1 in the genomic silencing of position-effect variegation. EMBO J. 1997;16(17):5280-5288.
[32]
Matoba S, Wang H, Jiang L, et al. Loss of H3K27me3 imprinting in somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos disrupts post-implantation development. Cell Stem Cell. 2018;23(3):343-354.
[33]
Wang LY, Li ZK, Wang LB, et al. Overcoming intrinsic H3K27me3 imprinting barriers improves post-implantation development after somatic cell nuclear transfer. Cell Stem Cell. 2020;27(2):315-325.
[34]
Chung YG, Matoba S, Liu YT, et al. Histone demethylase expression enhances human somatic cell nuclear transfer efficiency and promotes derivation of pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2015;17(6):758-766.
[35]
Liu ZH, Li MY, Sun Y, et al. Epigenetic dynamics of H4K20me3 modification during oocyte maturation and early reprogramming of somatic cell nuclear transfer goat embryos. Am J Transl Res. 2022;14(8):5941-5951.
[36]
Svoboda P. Mammalian zygotic genome activation. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2018;84:118-126.
[37]
Ng RK, Gurdon JB. Epigenetic memory of an active gene state depends on histone H3.3 incorporation into chromatin in the absence of transcription. Nat Cell Biol. 2008;10(1):102-109.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2023 2023 The Authors. Cell Proliferation published by Beijing Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PDF

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/