Visualization of the hepatic and renal cell uptake and trafficking of tetrahedral DNA origami in tumour

Abstract

DNA nanostructures, known for their programmability, ease of modification, and favourable biocompatibility, have gained widespread application in the biomedical field. Among them, Tetrahedral DNA Origami (TDOs), as a novel DNA nanostructure, possesses well-defined structures, multiple modification sites, and large cavities, making it a promising drug carrier. However, current understanding of TDOs’ interactions with biological systems, particularly with target cells and organs, remains unexplored, limiting its further applications in biomedicine. In this work, we prepared TDOs with an average particle size of 40 nm and labelled them with Cy5 fluorescent molecules. Following intravenous injection in mice, the uptake of TDOs by different types of liver and kidney cells was observed. Results indicated that TDOs accumulate in renal tubules and are metabolized by Kupffer cells, epithelial cells, and hepatocytes in the liver. Additionally, in a tumour-bearing mouse model, TDOs passively targeted tumour tissues and exhibited excellent tumour penetration and retention after rapid metabolism in hepatocytes. Our findings provide crucial insights for the development of TDO-based drug delivery systems.

References

[1] SeemanNC, Sleiman HF. DNA nanotechnology. Nat Rev Mater. 2018;3(1):17068.

[2] AldayeFA, Sleiman HF. Modular access to structurally switchable 3D discrete DNA assemblies. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129(44):13376-13377.

[3] HeY, YeT, SuM, et al. Hierarchical self-assembly of DNA into symmetric supramolecular polyhedra. Nature. 2008;452(7184):198-201.

[4] TianC, LiX, LiuZY, Jiang W, WangGS, MaoCD. Directed self-assembly of DNA tiles into complex nanocages. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2014;53(31):8041-8044.

[5] KwonPS, RenS, KwonSJ, et al. Designer DNA architecture offers precise and multivalent spatial pattern-recognition for viral sensing and inhibition. Nat Chem. 2020;12(1):26-35.

[6] YurkeB, Turberfield AJ, MillsAP, SimmelFC, Neumann JL. A DNA-fuelled molecular machine made of DNA. Nature. 2000;406(6796):605-608.

[7] YanH, ZhangXP, ShenZY, Seeman NC. A robust DNA mechanical device controlled by hybridization topology. Nature. 2002;415(6867):62-65.

[8] FengLP, ParkSH, ReifJH, Yan H. A two-state DNA lattice switched by DNA nanoactuator. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2003;42(36):4342-4346.

[9] EdwardsonTGW, Carneiro KMM, McLaughlinCK, SerpellCJ, Sleiman HF. Site-specific positioning of dendritic alkyl chains on DNA cages enables their geometry-dependent self-assembly. Nat Chem. 2013;5(10):868-875.

[10] SerpellCJ, Edwardson TGW, ChidchobP, CarneiroKMM, Sleiman HF. Precision polymers and 3D DNA nanostructures: emergent assemblies from new parameter space. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136(44):15767-15774.

[11] ChidchobP, Edwardson TGW, SerpellCJ, SleimanHF. Synergy of two assembly languages in DNA nanostructures: self-assembly of sequence-defined polymers on DNA cages. J Am Chem Soc. 2016;138(13):4416-4425.

[12] WalshAS, YinHF, ErbenCM, Wood MJA, TurberfieldAJ. DNA cage delivery to mammalian cells. ACS Nano. 2011;5(7):5427-5432.

[13] HamblinGD, Carneiro KMM, FakhouryJF, BujoldKE, Sleiman HF. Rolling circle amplification-templated DNA nanotubes show increased stability and cell penetration ability. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134(6):2888-2891.

[14] LiangL, LiJ, LiQ, et al. Single-particle tracking and modulation of cell entry pathways of a tetrahedral DNA nanostructure in live cells. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2014;53(30):7745-7750.

[15] JungmannR, Avendaño MS, WoehrsteinJB, DaiMJ, ShihWM, YinP. Multiplexed 3D cellular super-resolution imaging with DNA-PAINT and exchange-PAINT. Nat Methods. 2014;11(3):313-318.

[16] LinCX, Jungmann R, LeiferAM, et al. Submicrometre geometrically encoded fluorescent barcodes self-assembled from DNA. Nat Chem. 2012;4(10):832-839.

[17] JiangQ, SongC, NangreaveJ, et al. DNA origami as a carrier for circumvention of drug resistance. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134(32):13396-13403.

[18] LinSY, ZhangQ, LiSH, QinX, CaiXX, Wang HM. Tetrahedral framework nucleic acids-based delivery promotes intracellular transfer of healing peptides and accelerates diabetic would healing. Cell Proliferat. 2022;55(9):e13729.

[19] ZhangBW, QinX, ZhouM, et al. Tetrahedral DNA nanostructure improves transport efficiency and anti-fungal effect of histatin 5 against. Cell Prolif. 2021;54(5):e13020.

[20] OravaEW, CicmilN, GariépyJ. Delivering cargoes into cancer cells using DNA aptamers targeting internalized surface portals. Biochim Biophys Acta, Biomembr. 2010;1798(12):2190-2200.

[21] LeeH, Lytton-Jean AKR, ChenY, et al. Molecularly self-assembled nucleic acid nanoparticles for targeted SiRNA delivery. Nat Nanotechnol. 2012;7(6):389-393.

[22] DingHM, LiJ, ChenN, et al. DNA nanostructure-programmed like-charge attraction at the cell-membrane Interface. ACS Cent Sci. 2018;4(10):1344-1351.

[23] PengXY, FangSB, JiB, et al. DNA nanostructure-programmed cell entry via corner angle-mediated molecular interaction with membrane receptors. Nano Lett. 2021;21(16):6946-6951.

[24] ErbenCM, Goodman RP, TurberfieldAJ. Single-molecule protein encapsulation in a rigid DNA cage. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2006;45(44):7414-7417.

[25] DeyS, FanCH, GothelfKV, et al. DNA origami. Nat Rev Methods Primers. 2021;1(1):24.

[26] RothemundPWK. Folding DNA to create nanoscale shapes and patterns. Nature. 2006;440(7082):297-302.

[27] BensonE, Mohammed A, GardellJ, et al. DNA rendering of polyhedral meshes at the nanoscale. Nature. 2015;523(7561):441-445.

[28] SunW, Boulais E, HakobyanY, et al. Casting inorganic structures with DNA molds. Science. 2014;346(6210):717.

[29] DouglasSM, DietzH, LiedlT, Högberg B, GrafF, ShihWM. Self-assembly of DNA into nanoscale three-dimensional shapes. Nature. 2009;459(7245):414-418.

[30] DietzH, Douglas SM, ShihWM. Folding DNA into twisted and curved nanoscale shapes. Science. 2009;325(5941):725-730.

[31] HanDR, PalS, NangreaveJ, Deng ZT, LiuY, YanH. DNA origami with complex curvatures in three-dimensional space. Science. 2011;332(6027):342-346.

[32] LiSP, JiangQ, LiuSL, et al. A DNA Nanorobot functions as a cancer therapeutic in response to a molecular trigger. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36(3):258-264.

[33] LiuSL, JiangQ, ZhaoX, et al. A DNA nanodevice-based vaccine for cancer immunotherapy. Nat Mater. 2021;20(3):421-430.

[34] LiuWY, TagawaM, XinHLL, et al. Diamond family of nanoparticle Superlattices. Science. 2016;351(6273):582-586.

[35] TianY, Lhermitte JR, BaiL, et al. Ordered three-dimensional nanomaterials using DNA-prescribed and valence-controlled material voxels. Nat Mater. 2020;19(7):789-796.

[36] WangPF, RahmanMA, ZhaoZX, et al. Visualization of the cellular uptake and trafficking of DNA origami nanostructures in cancer cells. J Am Chem Soc. 2018;140(7):2478-2484.

[37] VindigniG, Raniolo S, OttavianiA, et al. Receptor-mediated entry of pristine octahedral DNA nanocages in mammalian cells. ACS Nano. 2016;10(6):5971-5979.

[38] BaigMMFA, ZhangCF, AkhtarMF, Saleem A, MudassirJ. The effective transfection of a low dose of negatively charged drug-loaded DNA-nanocarriers into cancer cells via scavenger receptors. J Pharm Anal. 2021;11(2):174-182.

[39] UmemuraK, Ohtsuki S, NagaokaM, et al. Critical contribution of macrophage scavenger receptor 1 to the uptake of nanostructured DNA by immune cells. Nanomed-Nanotechnol. 2021;34:102386.

[40] UdomprasertA, Wootthichairangsan C, DuangratR, et al. Enhanced functional properties of three DNA origami nanostructures as doxorubicin carriers to breast cancer cells. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2022;5(5):2262-2272.

[41] KongHT, SunB, YuF, WangQS, XiaK, JiangDW. Exploring the potential of three-dimensional DNA crystals in nanotechnology: design, optimization, and applications. Adv Sci. 2023;10(24):2302021.

[42] BellotG, McClintock MA, ChouJJ, ShihWM. DNA nanotubes for NMR structure determination of membrane proteins. Nat Protoc. 2013;8(4):755-770.

[43] SchmiedJJ, RaabM, ForthmannC, et al. DNA origami-based standards for quantitative fluorescence microscopy. Nat Protoc. 2014;9(6):1367-1391.

[44] ZhangQ, LinSY, WangL, et al. Tetrahedral framework nucleic acids act as antioxidants in acute kidney injury treatment. Chem Eng J. 2021;413:127426.

[45] JiangDW, GeZL, ImHJ, et al. DNA origami nanostructures can exhibit preferential renal uptake and alleviate acute kidney injury. Nat Biomed Eng. 2018;2(11):865-877.

[46] WangXW, ZhongXY, LiJX, LiuZ, ChengL. Inorganic nanomaterials with rapid clearance for biomedical applications. Chem Soc Rev. 2021;50(15):8669-8742.

[47] DingF, ZhangSY, LiuSY, et al. Molecular visualization of early-stage acute kidney injury with a DNA framework nanodevice. Adv Sci. 2022;9(20):2105947.

[48] IlinskayaAN, Dobrovolskaia MA. Understanding the immunogenicity and antigenicity of nanomaterials: past, present and future. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2016;299:70-77.

[49] ElsabahyM, WooleyKL. Cytokines as biomarkers of nanoparticle Immunotoxicity. Chem Soc Rev. 2013;42(12):5552-5576.

[50] HuangBW, GaoJQ. Application of 3D cultured multicellular spheroid tumor models in tumor-targeted drug delivery system research. J Control Release. 2018;270:246-259.

[51] HuangKY, MaHL, LiuJ, et al. Size-dependent localization and penetration of Ultrasmall gold nanoparticles in cancer cells, multicellular spheroids, and tumors. ACS Nano. 2012;6(5):4483-4493.

[52] KostarelosK, Emfietzoglou D, PapakostasA, YangWH, Ballangrud ÅM, SgourosG. Engineering lipid vesicles of enhanced Intratumoral transport capaabilities: correlating liposome characteristics with penetration into human prostate tumor spheroids. J Liposome Res. 2005;15(1):15-27.

[53] MingX, CarverK, WuL. Albumin-based nanoconjugates for targeted delivery of therapeutic oligonucleotides. Biomaterials. 2013;34(32):7939-7949.

[54] DhanikulaRS, ArgawA, BouchardJF, Hildgen P. Methotrexate loaded polyether-copolyester dendrimers for the treatment of gliomas: enhanced efficacy and Intratumoral transport capability. Mol Pharm. 2008;5(1):105-116.

[55] HoVHB, SlaterNKH, ChenRJ. pH-responsive endosomolytic pseudo-peptides for drug delivery to multicellular spheroids tumour models. Biomaterials. 2011;32(11):2953-2958.

[56] YuhasJM, LiAP, MartinezAO, Ladman AJ. A simplified method for production and growth of multicellular tumor spheroids. Cancer Res. 1977;37(10):3639-3643.

[57] AlbaneseA, LamAK, SykesEA, Rocheleau JV, ChanWCW. Tumour-on-a-chip provides an optical window into nanoparticle tissue transport. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2718.

[58] WangB, HeX, ZhangZY, Zhao YL, FengWY. Metabolism of nanomaterials: blood circulation and organ clearance. Acc Chem Res. 2013;46(3):761-769.

[59] SunPC, ZhangN, TangYF, Yang YN, ChuX, ZhaoYX. SL2B aptamer and folic acid dual-targeting DNA nanostructures for synergic biological effect with chemotherapy to combat colorectal cancer. Int J Nanomedicine. 2017;12:2657-2672.

[60] MaWJ, ZhangYX, ZhangYX, et al. An intelligent DNA nanorobot with enhanced protein lysosomal degradation of HER2. Nano Lett. 2019;19(7):4505-4517.

[61] BatesPJ, LaberDA, MillerDM, Thomas SD, TrentJO. Discovery and development of the G-rich oligonucleotide AS1411 as a novel treatment for cancer. Exp Mol Pathol. 2009;86(3):151-164.

[62] ShiP, WangXL, DavisB, et al. In situ synthesis of an aptamer-based polyvalent antibody mimic on the cell surface for enhanced interactions between immune and cancer cells. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2020;59(29):11892-11897.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Authors. Cell Proliferation published by Beijing Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.