Use of a continuous glucose monitoring device: Perceptions of nursing staff

Victoria Smith

Clinical Nursing Studies ›› 2024, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (1) : 17 -22.

PDF (326KB)
Clinical Nursing Studies ›› 2024, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (1) :17 -22. DOI: 10.5430/cns.v12n1p17
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
research-article
Use of a continuous glucose monitoring device: Perceptions of nursing staff
Author information +
History +
PDF (326KB)

Abstract

Objective: Wearable continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices, when included in the plan of care for patients in inpatient settings, provides real time blood glucose data. This allows treatment to be proactive and timely. Implementation of these devices alters nursing care. The objective of this study was to describe the perceived barriers and facilitators, from the perspective of direct care providers in an inpatient clinical setting, when the plan of care includes a CGM device.
Methods: Guided by a review of the literature and anecdotal data, a 20 item Likert-scaled survey was developed. Once study approval was secured an invitational email was sent to the password protected emails of all potential participants. Frequency and descriptive analyses were used to analyze the responses.
Results: Survey data from 31 direct care providers describe a positive experience specific to the education and resources available. The addition of a CGM device into the plan of care is not perceived to be an additional burden for the provider.
Conclusions: Pre-implementation, appropriate education and exposure to the device is critical for providing confidence and trust. The availability of ongoing support ensures that care is enhanced when a CGM device is included in the plan of care.

Keywords

Continuous glucose monitor device / Remote glucose monitoring / Direct care provider / Survey data / Competency

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Victoria Smith. Use of a continuous glucose monitoring device: Perceptions of nursing staff. Clinical Nursing Studies, 2024, 12 (1) : 17-22 DOI:10.5430/cns.v12n1p17

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Acknowledge Ashely Peacock for her guidance in study and development and manuscript review, Melissa Thomassy for her assistance in data collection and manuscript review, and Peggy Ward-Smith for her statistical advice.

AUTHORS CONTRIBUTIONS

Ms. Smith was responsible for the study design, data collection, and manuscript writing. Ms. Peacock, Ms. Thomassy, and Dr. Ward-Smith assisted with various activities. These contributions of individuals are acknowledged.

FUNDING

There is no funding associated with this research.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE

The author has no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could appear to have influenced the work reported in this paper.

INFORMED CONSENT

Not applicable.

ETHICS APPROVAL

The Publication Ethics Committee of the Sciedu Press. The journal’s policies adhere to the Core Practices established by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

PROVENANCE AND PEER REVIEW

Not commissioned; externally double-blind peer reviewed.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

DATA SHARING STATEMENT

No additional data are available.

OPEN ACCESS

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

COPYRIGHTS

Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the journal.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE

The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]

Avari P, Reddy M, Oliver N. Is it possible to constantly and accurately monitor blood sugar levels, in people with Type 1 diabetes, with a discrete device (non-invasive or invasive)? Diabet Med. 2020; 37(4): 532-544. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.13942 PMid: 30803028.

[2]

Dexcom. G7. (n.d.). Available from: https://www.dexcom.com/en-us(n.d.)

[3]

Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 2016. Dexcom: Executive Summary. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/media/98967

[4]

Dexcom. 2020. Use of Dexcom continuous glucose monitoring systems in the hospital. Available from: https://www.dexcom.com/en-us/hospitalfacts

[5]

Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 2020. FDA authorizes the first interoperable continuous glucose monitoring device. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-authorizes-first-fully-interoperable-continuous-glucose-monitoring-system-streamlines-review

[6]

World Health Organization. 2023. Diabetes. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/diabetes

[7]

Lipton JA, Barendse RJ, Van Domburg RT, et al. Hyperglycemia at admission and during hospital stay are independent risk factors for mortality in high risk cardiac patients admitted to an intensive cardiac care unit. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2013; 2(4): 306-313. PMid: 24338289. https://doi.org/10.1177/2048872613489304

[8]

Pasquel FJ, Lansang MC, Dhatariya K, et al. Management of diabetes and hyperglycaemia in the hospital. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021; 9(3): 174-188. PMid: 33515493. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30381-8

[9]

Gothong C, Singh LG, Satyarengga M, et al. Continuous glucose monitoring in the hospital: an update in the era of COVID-19. Current Opinion in Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Obesity. 2022; 29(1): 1-9. PMid: 34845159. https://doi.org/10.1097/MED.0000000000000693

[10]

Galindo RJ, Umpierrez GE, Rushakoff RJ, et al. Continuous glucose monitors and automated insulin dosing systems in the hospital consensus guideline. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2020; 14(6): 1035-1064. PMid: 32985262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296820954163

[11]

Wallia A, Umpierrez GE, Nasraway SA, et al. Round Table Discussion on Inpatient Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring at the International Hospital Diabetes Meeting. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology. 2016; 10(5): 1174-1181. PMid: 27286715. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296816656380

[12]

Baker M, Musselman ME, Rogers R, et al. Practical implementation of remote continuous glucose monitoring in hospitalized patients with diabetes. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy. 2022; 79(6): 452-458. PMid: 34849550. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxab456

[13]

Avari P, Lumb A, Flanagan D, et al. Continuous Glucose Monitoring Within Hospital: A Scoping Review and Summary of Guidelines from the Joint British Diabetes Societies for Inpatient Care. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology. 2023; 17(3): 611-624. PMid: 36444418. https://doi.org/10.1177/19322968221137338

[14]

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Exemptions. 2018. Available from: https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/regulations/45-cfr-46/common-rule-subpart-a-46104/index.html

PDF (326KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/