The design and application of in-depth interviews in primary care research

Abstract

In-depth interviews aim to explore the lived experiences and behavioral patterns of specific social groups through detailed conversations with participants. This qualitative method is used to investigate the underlying processes behind particular phenomena and to generate insights and recommendations for problem-solving. In recent years, in-depth interviews have been widely applied in primary care research. Therefore, a solid understanding of the fundamental concepts, as well as the design and implementation of this method, is essential for researchers in the field. This paper systematically outlines the research process of conducting in-depth interviews across three key stages: before, during, and after the interviews. Prior to initiating an in-depth interview study, researchers need to familiarize themselves with the method's theoretical foundations, distinctive features, and limitations, in alignment with their research goals and processes, to determine its suitability. During the design and implementation phase, attention should be paid to four core steps: recruiting participants, developing and refining the interview guide, collecting interview data, and conducting data analysis. After the analysis is completed, researchers should write and report their findings in accordance with qualitative research reporting standards to enhance the credibility and transparency of their study. Additionally, this paper highlights five areas within primary care where in-depth interviews are particularly applicable, and it introduces useful learning resources to support researchers in mastering this method. By presenting a comprehensive overview of in-depth interviews, this paper aims to equip primary care researchers with a practical and rigorous qualitative method, contributing to improved methodological quality in primary care research.

Keywords

In-depth interview / General practice / Qualitative research / Study design / Application

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors' other information

Not applicable.

Declaration of competing interest

All authors declare that there are no competing interests.

Funding

This research was supported by grants from General Research Project of the Zhejiang Provincial Department of Education (Y202148336), Health Commission of Zhejiang Province (2023KY748).

References

[1] Cypress B. Qualitative research methods: a phenomenological focus. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2018; 37(6):302-309. doi: 10.1097/DCC.0000000000000322.

[2] Hammarberg K, Kirkman M, Lacey SD. Qualitative research methods: when to use them and how to judge them. Hum Reprod. 2016; 31(3):498-501. doi: 10.1093/hum-rep/dev334.

[3] Sofaer S. Qualitative research methods. Int J Qual Health Care. 2002; 14(4):329-336. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/14.4.329.

[4] O’Cathain A, Thomas KJ, Drabble SJ, et al. What can qualitative research do for randomised controlled trials? A systematic mapping review. BMJ Open. 2013; 3(6):e002889. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002889.

[5] Kallio H, Pietilä AM, Johnson M, et al. Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. J Adv Nurs. 2016; 72(12):2954-2965. doi: 10.1111/jan.13031.

[6] Blatt SJ. The validity of projective techniques and their research and clinical contribution. J Pers Assess. 1975; 39(4):327-343. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa3904_1.

[7] Jootun D, McGhee G, Marland GR. Reflexivity: promoting Rigour in qualitative research. Nurs Stand. 2009; 23(23):42-46. doi: 10.7748/ns2009.02.23.23.42.c6800.

[8] Wang YS, Yu CY, Xiao X, et al. A qualitative study on the service dilemmas and countermeasure suggestions for rural-oriented medical graduates in primary care. Chin Gen Pract. 2022; 25(16):2021-2027. doi: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0148.

[9] Xu ZJ, Lu YT, Liang XJ, et al. Primary care physician responses to requests by older adults for unnecessary drugs: a qualitative study. BMC Prim Care. 2022; 23(1):247.

[10] Xu ZJ, Ye YQ, Wang Y, et al. Primary care practitioners’ barriers to and experience of COVID-19 epidemic control in China: a qualitative study. J Gen Intern Med. 2020; 35(11):3278-3284. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06107-3.

[11] Lee MS, Ray KN, Mehrotra A, et al. Primary care practitioners’ perceptions of electronic consult systems: a qualitative analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2018; 178(6):782-789.

[12] Montgomery P, Bailey PH. Field notes and theoretical memos in grounded theory. West J Nurs Res. 2007; 29(1):65-79. doi: 10.1177/0193945906292557.

[13] Allmark P, Boote J, Chambers E, et al. Ethical issues in the use of in-depth interviews: literature review and discussion. Res Ethics. 2009; 5(2):48-54.

[14] Bailey J. First steps in qualitative data analysis: transcribing. Fam Pract. 2008; 25(2):127-131.

[15] Birks M, Chapman Y, Francis K. Memoing in qualitative research. J Res Nurs. 2008; 13(1):68-75.

[16] Sun XE. An example analysis of grounded theory in in-depth interview research. J Xi’an Jiaotong Univ. 2011; 31(6):87-92.

[17] Glaser BG. The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Soc Probl. 1965; 12(4):436-445.

[18] DeCuir-Gunby JT, Marshall PL, McCulloch AW. Developing and using a codebook for the analysis of interview data: an example from a professional development research project. Field Methods. 2011; 23(2):136-155.

[19] Zhao R, Bai ZG, Zhang JY, et al. A bibliometric analysis and quality assessment of qualitative research published in Chinese journals. Evid Based Med. 2016; 16(3):180-185. doi: 10.12019/j.issn.1671-5144.2016.03.014.

[20] Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007; 19(6):349-357. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042.

[21] O’Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, et al. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med. 2014; 89(9):1245-1251.

[22] Rubin HJ. Qualitative Interviewing Methods: the Art of Listening and Questioning. Chongqing: Chongqing University Press; 2010 Lu H, translator.

[23] Cassell C. Research Interviews. Shanghai: Gezhi Press; 2018 Wu M, translator.

[24] Corrine G. Introduction to Qualitative Research Guide. 5th ed. Beijing: Peking University Press; 2021 Cui M, Su JQ, translators.

[25] Roller MR. The in-depth interview method: 12 articles on design & implementation. Res Des Rev. 2020. Apr 12 [cited 2022 Jul 12]. Available from. https://researchdesignreview.com/2020/04/12/in-depth-interview-method-12-articles-design-implementation/.