Choosing health facilities and impact factors of the choice in context of tiered medical system: A questionnaire survey of opinions of patients with multi-morbidity^☆

Abstract

Background: In recent years, there has been limited research in China on the behavior of patients with multi-morbidity in choosing healthcare facilities under tiered medical system. Exploring the pattern of their choice will inform to better policy practice.
Objective: This study aims to analyze the behavior of patients with multi-morbidity in choosing healthcare facilities in context of tiered medical system, and its influencing factors. This will provide a reference for further implementing the tiered medical system and the rational allocation of medical resources.
Methods: Using a random sampling method, we selected patients with multi-morbidity who attended from June 1, 2019, to January 1, 2020, at the Shanghai Yangpu District Central Hospital Regional Medical Group, which includes Shanghai Yangpu District Central Hospital and three community health centers (Dinghai, Yanji, and Changbai). A self-designed questionnaire was used to collect general data from patients with multi-morbidity, to understand their awareness and actual compliance with the tiered medical system policy, their willingness to first visit community health centers under different disease control conditions, and the factors they consider when choosing healthcare facilities. Binary logistic regression was used to analyze the factors influencing the decision of patients with multi-morbidity to choose community health center for their initial consultation.
Results: A total of 1,100 questionnaires were distributed, and 1,072 valid questionnaires were completed, with a response rate of 97.45 %. Of the 1,072 participants with multi-morbidity, 912 (85.07 %) were aged above 60 years old; 624 participants (58.21 %) were aware of the tiered medical system; 940 participants (87.69 %) were willing to follow the design of medical treatment process under tiered medical system; 368 participants (34.33 %) were very familiar with the “1+1+1” (patients can choose one community health centre, one district hospital and one city hospital as preferred medical facilities, so called ‘1+1+1’ preference) combination contract project; 964 participants (89.93 %) had participated in the “1+1+1” combination contract project, but among these, 44 participants (4.56 %) chose non-contract medical facilities for their current medical treatment. 86.57 % (928/1072) patients with stable multiple conditions and 85.82 % (920/1072) patients with mild poorly controlled conditions choose community health centre as their first preferred medical provider. The factors considered by participants with multi-morbidity when choosing healthcare facilities were ranked by average score as follows: medical accessibility (5.50), medical technology level (5.13), patient satisfaction (3.74), medical insurance (3.60), medical expenses (2.93), and other factors (2.24). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that age and medical insurance were significant influencing factors in the decision to choose community health center for their initial consultation (P<0.05).
Conclusion: Older adults are the most affected group by multi-morbidity and the main group choosing community health centre as their preferred medical service providers. Compared to regional medical centers, community health center has higher accessibility, which is a favorable factor for achieving first consultations in primary care for patients with multi-morbidity. Therefore, accelerating the construction of regional medical group, promoting the sharing and applying of high-quality resources in primary care, and improving the service quality and capacity of primary care facilities are beneficial for achieving the first consultations in primary care advocated by tiered medical system.

Keywords

Tiered medical system / Multiple chronic conditions / Choice of medical treatment / Healthcare seeking behavior / Initial treatment in primary care facilities / Regional medical group / Influencing factor

Declarations

Not applicable.

Authors' contributions

Conceptualization, Z.Y.; Methodology, Z.Y.; Data curation, Z.Y.; Formal analysis, Z.Y.; Funding acquisition, not applicable; Project administration, J.H.; Resources, not applicable; Supervision, Y.D.; Validation, Z.Y.; Writing—original draft, Z.Y.; Writing—review and editing, Y.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study received approval from The First Affiliated Hospital of Yangpu Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University Ethics Review Committee (LL-2022-LW-004).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests

Funding

This research was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (2021MSXM012), Shanghai Municipal Health Commission (Ye2202103) and Shanghai Medicine and Health Development Foundation (Se1202137).

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Authors' other information

Not applicable.

References

[1] Zhang KK. Survey and Analysis of Chronic Diseases and Geriatric Syndromes Among the Elderly in Some Communities in Beijing. (Chinese). Beijing: Peking Union Medical College; 2016.

[2] Zhang HZ. Survey of the coexistence of chronic diseases in hospitalized elderly patients. (Chinese). Chin Community Doctors. 2020; 36(25):186-187.

[3] Zhang SE, Wang YP, Wang HN, et al. Study on the focus structure and trend characteristics of domestic tiered diagnosis and treatment academic narrative in the past 10 years. (Chinese). Chin Gen Pract. 2022; 25(10):1246-1253.

[4] Notice on the issuance of the “Key Points of Medical and Health System Reform Work in Shanghai in 2015 ”. (Chinese). (2015) [cited 2021-12-23]. Available from: https://fgw.sh.gov.cn/fgw_zhglqt/20211101/3f55105ea86d47a190ce4eb3222a0196.html.

[5] Yan W, Wang JP, Zhang HB, et al. Problems faced by elderly patients with comorbidities in diagnosis and treatment and countermeasures. (Chinese). Chin General Pract. 2018; 21(3):261-264.

[6] Nguyen TN, Ngangue P, Haggerty J, et al. Multimorbiditymulti-morbidity, polypharmacy and primary prevention in community-dwelling adults in Quebec: a cross-sec-tional study. (Chinese). Fam Pract. 2019; 36(6):706-712.

[7] Wang MJ, Zhou X, Li YJ, et al. Meta-analysis of the prevalence of comorbidity of chronic diseases among middle-aged and elderly people in China from 2010 to 2019. (Chinese). Chin General Pract. 2021; 24(16):2085-2091.

[8] Report on Nutrition and Chronic Diseases of Chinese Residents (2020). (Chinese). Acta Nutrimenta Sinica. 2020; 42(6):521.

[9] Blakemore A, Hann M, Howells K, et al. Patients’ activation in older people with long-term conditions and multimorbiditymulti-morbidity: correlates and change in a cohort study in the United Kingdom. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016; 16(1):582.

[10] Tetzlaff J, Muschik D, Epping J, et al. Expansion or compression of multimorbidi-tymulti-morbidity? 10-year development of life years spent in multimorbiditymulti-morbidity based on health insurance claims data of Lower Saxony, Germany. Int J Public Health. 2017; 62(6):679-686.

[11] Wister A, Kendig H, Mitchell B, et al. Multimorbiditymulti-morbidity, health and aging in Canada and Australia: a tale of two countries. BMC Geriatr. 2016; 16(163): 1-13.

[12] Zhao R. Survey on the cognition and behavior of chronic disease patients towards tiered diagnosis and treatment. (Chinese). World of Labor Security. 2020; 12(5):43.

[13] Lv Q, Chen YG, Guo XJ, et al. Survey on the cognition of tiered diagnosis and treatment among patients in Shanghai. (Chinese). J PLA Hospital Adm. 2020; 27(4): 373-376.

[14] Xu XL, Gu YQ, Ying SJ, et al. Study on the cognition of tiered diagnosis and treatment among community residents in Minhang District, Shanghai in the post-epidemic era. (Chinese). Mod Prev Med. 2021; 48(17):3150-3153 3171.

[15] Zhang JY, Wan HP, He BY, et al. Study on the cognition and influencing factors of family doctor contract services among community residents in Shanghai. (Chinese). China Primary Health Care. 2021; 35(3):18-21.

[16] Li QS, Zhao HL, Huang WH, et al. Study on the awareness and influencing factors of family doctor contract services among urban residents in Xuzhou City. (Chinese). Chin Gen Pract. 2019; 22(31):3797-3804.

[17] Wen TL, Chen MS, Du QF. Survey on the cognition and demand of family doctor contract services among township residents in Foshan City. (Chinese). Med Soc (Berkeley). 2019; 32(6):93-95 112.

[18] Feng YJ, Jing ZY, Ding LL, et al. Study on the cognition level and influencing factors of family doctor contract services among rural residents in Shandong Province. (Chinese). Chin Rural Health Service Adm. 2020; 40(4):235-239.

[19] Zhang XJ, Bao Y. Study on the current situation and influencing factors of “1 + 1 + 1 ” medical institution combination contract in Shanghai community visiting population. (Chinese). Chin Gen Pract. 2018; 16(8):1227-1230 1382.

[20] Shi SM, Wang J, Huang YT, et al. Current situation of family doctor contract services in a community in Shanghai. (Chinese). J Medical Forum. 2020; 41(4):95-97 101.

[21] Wang XL, Huang Z, Qian YJ, et al. Study on the demand for general medical services and intended medical institutions of community residents under the background of tiered diagnosis and treatment. (Chinese). Chin Gen Pract. 2021; 24(7):805-811.

[22] Lu C, Guan T, Yao KQ, et al. The status and influencing factors of primary care visits among middle-aged and elderly patients in China. (Chinese). Med Soc (Berkeley). 2020; 33(10):59-64.