Geological structure controls CO2 hydrate sequestration in seafloor sediments: A numerical simulation study of anticline, syncline, and inclined reservoirs
Shu-xia Li , Zhong-xue Song , Yang Guo , Gao-wei Hu , Lu Liu , Hao Sun , Ben-kui Lou , Jun-hao Liu , Zhen-hao Ren
China Geology ›› 2026, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (3) : 635 -651.
Sequestration of CO2 as hydrates in seafloor sediments is an effective method for reducing CO2 emissions. However, the efficiency of CO2 hydrate sequestration can be influenced by the geological structure of seafloor reservoirs. To address this, the authors numerically investigate the effects of four reservoir structures (horizontal, inclined, anticline, and syncline) and dip angle on CO2 hydrate formation mass and sequestration security. The results show that different geological structures alter the temperature distribution within the reservoir, thereby modifying the stability zone of CO2 hydrates. At a dip angle of 30°, the hydrate formation mass (Fhyd) in the inclined, anticline, and syncline structures changes by -19.12%, +6.60%, and -7.19%, respectively, relative to the horizontal structure (baseline: 342×106 kg). The distance from the top of the CO2 hydrate cap to the seafloor mudline (DH), a key security indicator, varies significantly: Compared to 25 m in the horizontal structure, DH changes by +160%, -20%, and +20% for the inclined, anticline, and syncline structures, respectively. As the dip angle increases, Fhyd in the anticline structure increases while DH decreases. In contrast, Fhyd decreases and DH increases in both the inclined and syncline structures. The temperature variation across structures is a key factor influencing Fhyd, while permeability is a major factor affecting the safety of CO2 sequestration. Therefore, if Fhyd is the sequestration objective, the anticline structure is the optimal reservoir. If DH is the objective, the inclined structure is the best reservoir. These findings provide critical insights for site selection in marine CO2 hydrate sequestration projects.
CO2 hydrate sequestration / Geological structures / Horizontal+inclined+anticline+syncline / Numerical simulation / Structural dip angle / Phase Equilibrium zone / Sequestration capacity / Sequestration safety / Carbon neutrality / CCS
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |