Environmental impact of China's semi-solid-state batteries: a cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment
Wentian Zhang , Quanwei Chen , Junjie Chen , Xin Lai , Minghao Zhi , Xunxiang Liu , Wei Huang , Yuejiu Zheng
Carbon Footprints ›› 2026, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (3) : 40
Rising demand for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) is driven by booming new energy vehicles and grid storage, yet conventional liquid LIBs face thermal runaway risks and high embodied carbon. As a transitional technology between liquid LIBs and all-solid-state batteries, semi-solid-state batteries (SSSBs) deliver outstanding electrochemical performance and match existing production lines, gaining wide industrial and academic attention. Following ISO 14040 and ISO 14044, this study applies life cycle assessment with the China Local Life Cycle Database to evaluate nine environmental indicators of SSSBs within a cradle-to-gate (CTG) scope, including global warming potential, primary energy demand, and abiotic depletion potential. Sensitivity and uncertainty analyses are conducted to validate result reliability. Quantitative outcomes demonstrate that the aggregate CTG carbon footprint of SSSBs totals 133.64 kg CO2 eq, among which NCM811 cathode materials dominate emissions at a contribution ratio of 81.1%. Raw material logistics generate 0.136 kg CO2 eq of carbon loads, with cathode transport accounting for 59.2% of logistics emissions. Over 98% of manufacturing greenhouse gas emissions stem from electricity consumption, and cell formation and dry rooms are the most energy-intensive units. Hazardous waste transportation dominates emissions in the waste treatment stage. This work fills the gap of localized industrial life cycle inventories for Chinese SSSBs, identifies key carbon hotspots, and provides low-carbon strategies and theoretical support for production optimization, industrial policy formulation, and national clean energy transition.
Life cycle assessment / semi-solid-state battery / cradle-to-gate / environmental impact
| [1] |
World Economic Forum. A vision for a sustainable battery value chain in 2030. Unlocking the full potential to power sustainable development and climate change mitigation Geneva. 2019. Available from: https://cn.weforum.org/ [Last accessed on 20 Jul 2026] |
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
EVTank. White paper on the development of China's solid-state battery industry (2025) Beijing. 2025 Available from: http://www.evtank.cn/ [Last accessed on 20 Jul 2026] |
| [10] |
China MoIaITotPsRo. Solid-state battery for electric vehicle—Part 1: terms and classification: standardization administration of the people's republic of China. 2026. Available from: https://wap.miit.gov.cn/ [Last accessed on 20 Jul 2026] |
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |