Assessing global carbon mitigation benefits of wind power with spatiotemporal characteristics and production-deployment pathways

Jingyan Yang , Shangheng Yao , Chaojun Li , Yuqi Su , Xuan Zhang , Guori Huang , Xi Lu

Carbon Footprints ›› 2026, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (3) : 48

PDF
Carbon Footprints ›› 2026, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (3) :48 DOI: 10.20517/cf.2026.63
Original Article
Assessing global carbon mitigation benefits of wind power with spatiotemporal characteristics and production-deployment pathways
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

As wind power capacity continues expanding, its carbon-reduction effectiveness increasingly hinges on the spatiotemporal alignment of production, deployment, and power systems. However, these dimensions are assessed separately, and the role of spatiotemporal interactions in shaping carbon mitigation benefits remains unclear. Here, we develop a spatiotemporal life cycle assessment framework and systematically evaluate the carbon mitigation benefits of global onshore wind power across historical (2014-2023) and future (2025-2060) periods. We show that global wind power achieved cumulative net carbon mitigation benefits of 3,690 Mt CO2e over 2014-2023, while carbon emissions accounted for 8.5% of the direct carbon mitigation benefits from fossil-fuel electricity displacement. Under counterfactual settings, the climate-priority deployment scenario (C3) increases cumulative mitigation to 53,711 ± 935 Mt CO2e by 2060, approximately 2.3 times that of the baseline deployment scenario (C1). The clean-oriented production scenario (M3) yields comparatively modest gains, reducing carbon emissions by approximately 14% relative to the baseline production scenario (M1). The spatially diversified production scenario (M2) achieves the lowest transportation emissions, with cumulative reductions of approximately 6% and approximately 24% relative to M1 and M3. Under the baseline and balanced deployment scenarios (C1/C2), annual net mitigation peaks around 2034 and then declines persistently. In some production-deployment combinations, it turns negative by 2060 due to grid decarbonization. Conversely, scenario C3 remains positive throughout 2025-2060. The work provides scientific evidence for enhancing the carbon mitigation effectiveness of wind power development and boosting climate benefits through international coordinated planning, alongside decision support for optimizing wind power deployment and supply chain configurations.

Keywords

Wind power / carbon mitigation / life cycle assessment / production-deployment pathways / global energy transition

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Jingyan Yang, Shangheng Yao, Chaojun Li, Yuqi Su, Xuan Zhang, Guori Huang, Xi Lu. Assessing global carbon mitigation benefits of wind power with spatiotemporal characteristics and production-deployment pathways. Carbon Footprints, 2026, 5 (3) : 48 DOI:10.20517/cf.2026.63

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Tagomori IS,Baptista LB.Promising climate progress from net-zero ambitions to the Paris Agreement goal.Nat Clim Chang2026;16:550-7

[2]

Barthelmie RJ.Climate change mitigation potential of wind energy.Climate2021;9:136

[3]

GWEC. Global Wind Report 2026. 2026. https://www.gwec.net/reports/globalwindreport (accessed 2026-8-28)

[4]

Wang J,Tan Z.Inherent spatiotemporal uncertainty of renewable power in China.Nat Commun2023;14:5379 PMCID:PMC10477199

[5]

Ruan Z,Yin Z.Spatiotemporal carbon footprint and associated costs of wind power toward China's carbon neutrality.Resour Conserv Recy2024;205:107593

[6]

Chen S,Nielsen CP.Deploying solar photovoltaic energy first in carbon-intensive regions brings gigatons more carbon mitigations to 2060.Commun Earth Environ2023;4:1006

[7]

Schleisner L.Life cycle assessment of a wind farm and related externalities.Renew Energy2000;20:279-88

[8]

Tremeac B.Life cycle analysis of 4.5MW and 250W wind turbines.Renew Sust Energ Rev2009;13:2104-10

[9]

Crawford R.Life cycle energy and greenhouse emissions analysis of wind turbines and the effect of size on energy yield.Renew Sust Energ Rev2009;13:2653-60

[10]

Raadal HL,Myhr A.GHG emissions and energy performance of offshore wind power.Renew Energy2014;66:314-24

[11]

Vargas A,Oswald U,Güereca L.Life cycle assessment: a case study of two wind turbines used in Mexico.Appl Therm Eng2015;75:1210-6

[12]

Schreiber A,Zapp P.Comparative life cycle assessment of electricity generation by different wind turbine types.J Clean Prod2019;233:561-72

[13]

Chen G,Zhao Y.Renewability of wind power in China: a case study of nonrenewable energy cost and greenhouse gas emission by a plant in Guangxi.Renew Sust Energ Rev2011;15:2322-9

[14]

Yang J.Integrated evaluation of embodied energy, greenhouse gas emission and economic performance of a typical wind farm in China.Renew Sust Energ Rev2013;27:559-68

[15]

Turconi R,Astrup T.Life cycle assessment (LCA) of electricity generation technologies: overview, comparability and limitations.Renew Sust Energ Rev2013;28:555-65

[16]

Xu K,Zhang S.Land use impacts the environmental benefits of wind energy farms in China.Commun Earth Environ2025;6:2833

[17]

Xu K,Zhou W.A comprehensive estimate of life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from onshore wind energy in China.J Clean Prod2022;338:130683

[18]

Faizan M.Life cycle assessment of wind turbine systems: A statistical synthesis approach to address greenhouse gas emissions.Renew Sust Energ Rev2026;226:116429

[19]

Arvesen A.Assessing the life cycle environmental impacts of wind power: A review of present knowledge and research needs.Renew Sust Energ Rev2012;16:5994-6006

[20]

Mendecka B.Life cycle environmental impacts of wind energy technologies: A review of simplified models and harmonization of the results.Renew Sust Energ Rev2019;111:462-80

[21]

Wang Y.Life cycle assessment of CO2 emissions from wind power plants: Methodology and case studies.Renew Energy2012;43:30-6

[22]

Long Y,Liu Y.Wind energy expansion in China produces substantial CO2 reductions and climate benefits.GeoSus2026;7:100489

[23]

Sahu BK.Wind energy developments and policies in China: a short review.Renew Sust Energ Rev2018;81:1393-405

[24]

Global Wind Energy Council BCG. Mission Critical: Building the Global Wind Energy Supply Chain for a 1.5 °C World. 2023. 05 December 2023. https://www.windtech-international.com/industry-news/mission-critical-building-the-global-wind-energy-supply-chain-for-a-1-5-c-world (accessed 2026-8-28)

[25]

Ramseur JL. Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA): Provisions Related to Climate Change. 2023. https://www.congress.gov/crs_external_products/R/PDF/R47262/R47262.3.pdf (accessed 2026-8-28)

[26]

Union EPaCotE. Regulation (EU) 2023/956 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 May 2023 establishing a carbon border adjustment mechanism. 2023. PE/7/2023/REV/1. http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/956/oj (accessed 2026-8-28)

[27]

Arvesen A.Environmental implications of large-scale adoption of wind power: a scenario-based life cycle assessment.Environ Res Lett2011;6:045102

[28]

Way R,Mealy P.Empirically grounded technology forecasts and the energy transition.Joule2022;6:2057-82

[29]

Wang Y,Tanaka K.Global spatiotemporal optimization of photovoltaic and wind power to achieve the Paris Agreement targets.Nat Commun2025;16:2127 PMCID:PMC11876700

[30]

Helveston JP,Davidson MR.Quantifying the cost savings of global solar photovoltaic supply chains.Nature2022;612:83-7

[31]

Sherman P,McElroy MB.Wind-generated electricity in China: decreasing potential, inter-annual variability and association with changing climate.Sci Rep2017;7:16294 PMCID:PMC5701265

[32]

Hertwich EG,Bouman EA.Integrated life-cycle assessment of electricity-supply scenarios confirms global environmental benefit of low-carbon technologies.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A2015;112:6277-82 PMCID:PMC4443343

[33]

Standardization IOf. International Organization for Standardization. Environmental Management: Life Cycle Assessment: Principles and Framework. ISO 14040:2006. International Organization for Standardization. 2006. https://www.iso.org/standard/37456.html (accessed 2026-8-28)

[34]

Standardization IOf. International Organization for Standardization. Environmental Management: Life Cycle Assessment: Requirements and Guidelines. ISO 14044:2006. 2006. https://www.iso.org/standard/38498.html (accessed 2026-8-28)

[35]

Zimmermann T,Gößling-Reisemann S.Material flows resulting from large scale deployment of wind energy in Germany.Resources2013;2:303-34

[36]

Yang D,Yang J.Carbon footprint of wind turbine by life cycle assessment.Huanjing Kexue Xuebao/Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae2015;35:927-34

[37]

Razdan P. Assessment of Electricity Production from an Onshore V117-4.2 MW Wind Plant. 2019. https://www.vestas.com/en/sustainability/environment/lifecycle-assessments (accessed 2026-8-28)

[38]

Razdan P. Life Cycle Assessment of Electricity Production from an Onshore V100-2.0 MW Wind Plant. 2018. https://www.vestas.com/en/sustainability/environment/lifecycle-assessments (accessed 2026-8-28)

[39]

Razdan P. Life Cycle Assessment of Electricity Production from an Onshore V90-3.0 MW Wind Plant. 2013. https://www.vestas.com/en/sustainability/environment/lifecycle-assessments (accessed 2026-8-28)

[40]

Razdan P. Life Cycle Assessment of Electricity Production from an Onshore V150-6.0 MW Wind Plant. 2023. https://www.vestas.com/en/sustainability/environment/lifecycle-assessments (accessed 2026-8-28)

[41]

Institute JGCR. GCAM regional definitions. Joint Global Change Research Institute. https://jgcri.github.io/gcambreakout/articles/regional.html (accessed 2026-8-28)

[42]

AG t. Data from: GaBi Professional Database. 2023. Leinfelden-Echterdingen, Germany. https://www.gabi-software.com/software/gabi-professional/ (accessed 2026-8-28)

[43]

Wernet G,Steubing B,Moreno-Ruiz E.The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology.Int J Life Cycle Assess2016;21:1218-30

[44]

Ember. Data from: Lifecycle carbon intensity of electricity generation. 2025. Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/carbon-intensity-electricity (accessed 2026-8-28)

[45]

Enerdata. CO2 intensity of electricity generation trend over 2000-2050: EnerBlue scenario. 2024. https://eneroutlook.enerdata.net/forecast-world-co2-intensity-of-electricity-generation.html (accessed 2026-8-28)

[46]

Li J,Wang P.Critical rare-earth elements mismatch global wind-power ambitions.One Earth2020;3:116-25

[47]

Woo S.Modern definitions in reliability engineering. In: Reliability design of mechanical systems. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017, pp 35-59.

[48]

GAC. China Customs Statistics Database. 2026. General Administration of Customs of the People's Republic of China. http://stats.customs.gov.cn (accessed 2026-8-28)

[49]

Eurostat. Data from: International trade in goods database. 2026. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat (accessed 2026-8-28)

[50]

Bureau UC. Data from: USA Trade Online Data Tool. 2026. https://usatrade.census.gov/ (accessed 2026-8-28)

[51]

Canada Go. Data from: Canada Trade Data Online. 2026. https://ised-isde.canada.ca/app/ixb/tdo/crtr.html (accessed 2026-8-28)

[52]

IEA. Net Zero by 2050: A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector. 2021.

[53]

IRENA. Global Renewables Outlook: Energy transformation 2050. 2020. https://www.irena.org/publications/2020/Apr/Global-Renewables-Outlook-2020 (accessed 2026-8-28)

[54]

Zhang Z,Lu X,Davidson MR.Ratcheting up wind and solar targets for decarbonizing the power sector in China and beyond.Cell Rep Sustain2025;2:100389

[55]

Jacobson MZ,Coughlin SJ.Low-cost solutions to global warming, air pollution, and energy insecurity for 145 countries.Energy Environ Sci2022;15:3343-59

[56]

SEA-DISTANCES.ORG. Distances between sea ports. SEA-DISTANCES.ORG. 2026. https://sea-distances.org/ (accessed 2026-8-28)

[57]

Luderer G,Merfort L.Impact of declining renewable energy costs on electrification in low-emission scenarios.Nat Energy2022;7:32-42

[58]

Ahmed SD,Shafiullah M,El-Amin IM.Grid integration challenges of wind energy: a review.IEEE Access2020;8:10857-78

[59]

Lu K,Lian J.A review of synergies between advanced grid integration strategies and carbon market for wind energy development.Energies2025;18:590

[60]

Meier J,Süssmuth B.Wind power deployment and the impact of spatial planning policies.Environ Resource Econ2024;87:491-550

[61]

IRENA. World Energy Transitions Outlook 2023: 1.5 °C Pathway. 2023. https://www.irena.org/Publications/2023/Jun/World-Energy-Transitions-Outlook-2023 (accessed 2026-8-28)

[62]

Borgonovo E.Sensitivity analysis: a review of recent advances.Eur J Oper Res Soc2016;248:869-87

[63]

Lu X,Kiviluoma J.Global potential for wind-generated electricity.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A2009;106:10933-8 PMCID:PMC2700152

[64]

Pryor SC,Bukovsky MS,Sakaguchi K.Climate change impacts on wind power generation.Nat Rev Earth Environ2020;1:627-43

[65]

IPCC. Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2022. https://www.ipcc.ch/assessment-report/ar6/ (accessed 2026-8-28)

[66]

York R.Do alternative energy sources displace fossil fuels?.Nature Clim Change2012;2:441-3

[67]

Oh SY,Lee S.Condition-based maintenance of wind turbine structures: a state-of-the-art review.Renew Sust Energ Rev2024;204:114799

[68]

Zhao Y,Shi B,Miao C.The influencing factors and scenario simulation of embodied carbon emissions in manufacturing trade in the Yellow River Basin: an analysis from the perspective of technological effects.Energy2026;342:139619

[69]

Hoehnke H,Zanocco C,Konisky D.Structural barriers and policy pathways for a just clean energy transition.Nat Rev Clean Technol2026;2:327-47

[70]

Frilingou N,Sampedro J.Regional impacts on decarbonisation under evolving financing conditions for energy technologies.Nat Commun2026;17 PMCID:PMC13381915

[71]

Hernández C, Serrano González J, Fernández-Blanco R. New method to assess the long-term role of wind energy generation in reduction of CO2 emissions - case study of the European Union.J Clean Prod2019;207:1099-111 PMCID:PMC6472682

[72]

Tang R,Li Y.Accelerating the global energy transition through carbon pricing: an ex-post analysis of emissions reduction effects and mechanisms based on international data.ENG Manag2026;13:404-22

[73]

Child M,Bogdanov D.Flexible electricity generation, grid exchange and storage for the transition to a 100% renewable energy system in Europe.Renew Energy2019;139:80-101

[74]

Brown T,Kies A,Greiner M.Synergies of sector coupling and transmission reinforcement in a cost-optimised, highly renewable European energy system.Energy2018;160:720-39

[75]

Zhao Y,Sun B,Li X.Assessing the dynamic interplay of policy, economic, and technological factors for sustainable recycling of decommissioned wind turbine blades in China: a system dynamics approach.Waste Manag2026;209:115199

[76]

Pehl M,Humpenöder F,Hertwich EG.Understanding future emissions from low-carbon power systems by integration of life-cycle assessment and integrated energy modelling.Nat Energy2017;2:939-45

[77]

IEA. The state of clean technology manufacturing: energy technology perspectives special briefing. 2023. https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/0a421001-6157-436d-893c-c37eeab54967/TheStateofCleanTechnologyManufacturing.pdf (accessed 2026-8-28)

[78]

Mckenna R,Heinrichs HU.System impacts of wind energy developments: key research challenges and opportunities.Joule2025;9:101799

[79]

Yan J,Wang H,Shang W.Wind power forecasting based on large time series model.Engineering2025;

[80]

Li J,Wu F.Research on carbon emission reduction benefit of wind power project based on life cycle assessment theory.Renew Energy2020;155:456-68

PDF

2

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉