From design to decarbonisation: a BIM-based comparative analysis of embodied carbon in buildings

Abstract

The construction industry is a significant contributor to global carbon emissions, with embodied carbon accounting for a growing proportion of building life-cycle emissions. Comparative analyses that assess various structural systems within a single, controlled building design remain limited, despite increasing interest in building information modelling- life cycle assessment (BIM-LCA) integration. This study addresses this gap by providing a BIM-based assessment framework that quantifies and compares the embodied carbon of three structural systems (steel, reinforced concrete, and timber) applied to an identical conceptual two-storey residential structure in the UK. Material quantities were extracted from a parametric Revit model and integrated with emission factors within a cradle-to-gate (A1-A3) system boundary. The results indicate that total embodied carbon amounts to 104,165.16 kgCO₂eq for a traditional steel house, 84,640.06 kgCO₂eq for a traditional reinforced concrete house, and 51,255.87 kgCO₂eq for a traditional timber house. By employing low-carbon material alternatives, embodied carbon is reduced by 40.4% in the steel house, 32.2% in the concrete house, and 19.7% in the timber house, respectively. Thus, encouraging early-stage sustainable design decisions can make a substantial contribution to the decarbonisation of the built environment.

Keywords

Embodied carbon / carbon footprint / building materials / low-carbon materials / building information modelling

References

[1] Sandanayake M. S.. Environmental impacts of construction in building industry-a review of knowledge advances, gaps and future directions Knowledge 2022 2 139 56

[2] Guggemos A. A.,Horvath A.. Comparison of environmental effects of steel- and concrete-framed buildings J. Infrastruct. Syst. 2005 11 93 101

[3] Chau C.,Hui W.,Ng W.,Powell G.. Assessment of CO₂ emissions reduction in high-rise concrete office buildings using different material use options Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2012 61 22 34

[4] Sartori I.,Hestnes A.. Energy use in the life cycle of conventional and low-energy buildings: a review article Energy. Build. 2007 39 249 57

[5] Seo S.,Hwang Y.. Estimation of CO₂ emissions in life cycle of residential buildings J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 2001 127 414 8

[6] Ercal O.,Shafique M.. Rethinking net zero: A new perspective on achieving net zero energy buildings Sustain. Horiz. 2026 17 100163

[7] Global Alliance for Buildings and Construction, International Energy Agency and the United Nations Environment Programme: 2019 Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction: Towards a Zero-Emission, Efficient and Resilient Buildings and Construction Sector. Global Alliance for Buildings and Construction, Nairobi, Kenya, 2019. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-status-report-for-buildings-and-construction-2019 (accessed 2026-6-3).

[8] US Department of Energy. A Common Definition for Zero Energy Buildings. US Department of Energy, Washington, DC, 2015. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2015/09/f26/A%20Common%20Definition%20for%20Zero%20Energy%20Buildings.pdf (accessed 2026-6-3)

[9] Wiedmann T.,Minx J. C.. A definition of carbon footprint. Ecol. Econ. Res. Trends. 2008, 2, 55-65. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/247152314_A_Definition_of_Carbon_Footprint (accessed 2026-6-3).

[10] Dixit M. K.,Pradeep Kumar P.,Banerjee S.. Impact of using high strength low alloy steel on reducing the embodied energy, carbon, and water impacts of building structures: a case study Dev. Built Environ. 2025 22 100671

[11] Hammond G. P.,Jones C. I.. Embodied energy and carbon in construction materials Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Energy 2008 161 87 98

[12] Wang G.,Luo T.,Luo H.,Liu R.,Liu Y.,Liu Z.. A comprehensive review of building lifecycle carbon emissions and reduction approaches City Built Enviro. 2024 2 12

[13] Basbagill J.,Flager F.,Lepech M.,Fischer M.. Application of life-cycle assessment to early stage building design for reduced embodied environmental impacts Build. Environ. 2013 60 81 92

[14] Teng Y.,Li K.,Pan W.,Ng T.. Reducing building life cycle carbon emissions through prefabrication: Evidence from and gaps in empirical studies Build. Environ. 2018 132 125 36

[15] Zhang,Y.; Sattar, S.; Cook, D. T.; Johnson, K. J.; Fung, J. F. Systematic review of embodied carbon assessment and mitigation in buildings (NIST SP 1324). National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 2024

[16] Sizirici B.,Fseha Y.,Cho C.,Yildiz I.,Byon Y.. A review of carbon footprint reduction in construction industry, from design to operation Materials 2021 14 6094

[17] Giesekam J.,Barrett J. R.,Taylor P.. Construction sector views on low carbon building materials Build. Res. Inf. 2015 44 423 44

[18] Van Roijen E.,Miller S. A.,Davis S. J.. Building materials could store more than 16 billion tonnes of CO₂ annually Science 2025 387 176 82

[19] Succar B.. Building information modelling framework: a research and delivery foundation for industry stakeholders Autom. Constr. 2009 18 357 75

[20] Potrč Obrecht T.,Röck M.,Hoxha E.,Passer A.. BIM and LCA integration: a systematic literature review Sustainability 2020 12 5534

[21] CEN, EN 15978: Sustainability of construction works - assessment of environmental performance of buildings - calculation method. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, 2011. https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/cen/62c22cef-5666-4719-91f9-c21cb6aa0ab3/en-15978-2011 (accessed 2026-6-3)

[22] Blay-armah A.,Bahadori-jahromi A.,Mylona A.,Barthorpe M.,Ferri M.. An evaluation of the impact of databases on end-of-life embodied carbon estimation Sustainability 2022 14 2307

[23] Farhan S. A.,Shafiq N.,Azizli K. A.,Umar U. A.,Gardezi S. S. S.. Embodied carbon of buildings: tools, methods and strategies Appl. Mech. Mater. 2014 567 565 70

[24] MHCLG, English Housing Survey 2024-2025: Chapter 1: profile of households and dwellings. Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government, UK, 2025. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/chapters-for-english-housing-survey-2024-to-2025-headline-findings-on-demographics-and-household-resilience/chapter-1-profile-of-households-and-dwellings (accessed 2026-6-3).

[25] MHCLG. English housing survey, floor space in english homes - main report. Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government, UK, 2018. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/725085/Floor_Space_in_English_Homes_main_report.pdf (accessed 2026-6-3)

[26] Drewniok M. P.,Azevedo J. M. C.,Dunant C. F..et al. Mapping material use and embodied carbon in UK construction Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2023 197 107056

[27] ICE Database. Inventory of Carbon & Energy - Version 4.1. Circular Ecology , Bath, 2025. https://circularecology.com/embodied-carbon-footprint-database.html (accessed 2026-6-3)

[28] Myint N. N.,Shafique M.,Zhou X.,Zheng Z.. Net zero carbon buildings: a review on recent advances, knowledge gaps and research directions Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2025 22 e04200

[29] Gagg C. R.. Cement and concrete as an engineering material: an historic appraisal and case study analysis Eng. Fail. Anal. 2014 40 114 40

[30] Barcelo L.,Kline J.,Walenta G.,Gartner E.. Cement and carbon emissions Mater. Struct. 2013 47 1055 65

[31] Damineli B. L.,John V. M.. Developing low CO₂ concretes: is clinker replacement sufficient? The need of cement use efficiency improvement Key Eng. Mater. 2012 517 342 51

[32] Özkılıç Y.,Başaran B.,Aksoylu C.,Karalar M.,Martins C. Mechanical behavior in terms of shear and bending performance of reinforced concrete beam using waste fire clay as replacement of aggregate Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2023 18 e02104

[33] Qaidi S.,Al-kamaki Y.,Hakeem I..et al. Investigation of the physical-mechanical properties and durability of high-strength concrete with recycled PET as a partial replacement for fine aggregates Front. Mater. 2023 10 1101146

[34] Althoey F.,Ansari W. S.,Sufian M.,Deifalla A. F.. Advancements in low-carbon concrete as a construction material for the sustainable built environment. Dev. Built Environ. 2023, 16, 100284.

[35] Lao J.,Huang B.,Xu L.,Khan M.,Fang Y.,Dai J.. Seawater sea-sand engineered geopolymer composites (EGC) with high strength and high ductility Cem. Concr. Compos. 2023 138 104998

[36] Lao J.,Xu L.,Huang B.,Zhu J.,Khan M.,Dai J.. Utilization of sodium carbonate activator in strain-hardening ultra-high-performance geopolymer concrete (SH-UHPGC) Front. Mater. 2023 10 1142237

[37] Ahmad M. R.,Das C. S.,Khan M.,Dai J.. Development of low-carbon alkali-activated materials solely activated by flue gas residues (FGR) waste from incineration plants J. Clean. Prod. 2023 397 136597

[38] Ma X.,Hu H.,Luo Y.,Yao W.,Wei Y.,She A.. A carbon footprint assessment for usage of recycled aggregate and supplementary cementitious materials for sustainable concrete: a life-cycle perspective in China J. Clean. Prod. 2025 490 144772

[39] Chen Y.,Fang Y.,Feng W.,Zhang Y.,Zhao G. X.. How to minimise the carbon emission of steel building products from a cradle-to-site perspective: a systematic review of recent global research J. Clean. Prod. 2022 368 133156

[40] Suer J.,Traverso M.,Jäger N.. Review of life cycle assessments for steel and environmental analysis of future steel production scenarios Sustainability 2022 14 14131

[41] Raabe D.,Jovičević-klug M.,Ponge D..et al. Circular steel for fast decarbonization: thermodynamics, kinetics, and microstructure behind upcycling scrap into high-performance sheet steel Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2024 54 247 97

[42] Soo V. K.,Peeters J.,Paraskevas D.,Compston P.,Doolan M.,Duflou J. R.. Sustainable aluminium recycling of end-of-life products: a joining techniques perspective J. Clean. Prod. 2018 178 119 32

[43] Georgantzia E.,Gkantou M.,Kamaris G. S.. Aluminium alloys as structural material: a review of research Eng. Struct. 2021 227 111372

[44] Ding N.,Gao F.,Wang Z.,Gong X.,Nie Z.. Environment impact analysis of primary aluminum and recycled aluminum Procedia Eng. 2012 27 465 74

[45] Qian Y.,Gunawardena T.,Mendis P.,Aye L.. Carbon footprint variability in engineered wood products for timber buildings: a systematic review of carbon accounting methodologies Sustainability 2025 17 4804

[46] BioComposites Centre. Wood in construction in the UK: an analysis of carbon abatement potential. BioComposites Centre for the UK Committee on Climate Change, Bangor, 2019. https://www.theccc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Wood-in-Construction-in-the-UK-An-Analysis-of-Carbon-Abatement-Potential-BioComposites-Centre-1.pdf (accessed 2026-6-3)

[47] Forestry Commission. Sustainable construction timber: sourcing and specifying local timber. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh, 2016. https://cdn.forestresearch.gov.uk/2016/03/fcrp025.pdf (accessed 2026-6-3)

[48] Cousins S.. Low carbon bricks for your project as disruptors tackle climate change. The RIBA Journal, London, 2023. https://www.ribaj.com/intelligence/low-carbon-bricks-tackle-climate-recycled-waste-cement-free-binders? (accessed 2026-6-3)

[49] Asdrubali F.,Grazieschi G.,Roncone M.,Thiebat F.,Carbonaro C.. Sustainability of building materials: embodied energy and embodied carbon of masonry Energies 2023 16 1846

[50] Tingley D. D.,Hathway A.,Davison B.. An environmental impact comparison of external wall insulation types Build. Environ. 2015 85 182 9

[51] Giesekam J.,Moncaster A.,Pomponi F.,Wiberg A. H.,Bean J.,Allen S.. Written evidence submitted by UK nominated national experts to IEA Annex 89. UK Parliament (Environmental Audit / Built Environment), Bath, 2024. https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/133120/html/?utm_source (accessed 2026-6-3)

[52] Future Homes Hub, Embodied and Whole Life Carbon: 2023-2025 Implementation Plan for the homebuilding industry. Future Homes Hub, London, UK, 2023. https://irp.cdn-website.com/bdbb2d99/files/uploaded/Embodied%20and%20Whole%20Life%20Carbon%20Implementation%20Plan%20-%20final.pdf (accessed 2026-6-3)

[53] Debnath R.,Bardhan R.,Shah D. U..et al. Climate repair through built environment: decarbonising UK’s building sector through energy efficiency and natural materials Engineering 2021

[54] De Wolf C.,Yang F.,Cox D.,Charlson A.,Hattan A. S.,Ochsendorf J.. Material quantities and embodied carbon dioxide in structures Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Eng. Sustain. 2016 169 150 61

[55] Shi Y.,Cao X.,Yang X.. Assessment and reduction of embodied carbon emissions in buildings: a systematic literature review of recent advances Energy Build. 2025 345 116058

[56] Craft W.,Oldfield P.,Reinmuth G.,Hadley D.,Balmforth S.,Nguyen A.. Towards net-zero embodied carbon: Investigating the potential for ambitious embodied carbon reductions in Australian office buildings Sustain. Cities Soc. 2024 113 105702

[57] House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee. Building to net zero: costing carbon in construction. House of Commons, London, 2022. https://committees.parliament.uk/publications/22427/documents/165446/default/ (accessed 2026-6-3)

[58] Baltrocchi A. P. D.,Shafique M.. Circular pathways in construction: environmental life cycle assessment of bio-based fiber-reinforced building component Front. Sustain. 2026 6 1716779