Toward climate-smart irrigation: evaluating the sustainability of negative pressure systems through carbon-nitrogen footprint and cost-benefit analysis

Abstract

In protected agriculture, irrigation methods and input structures play a critical role in shaping carbon and nitrogen footprints as well as ecological-economic performance. Using a life cycle assessment (LCA) approach, this study systematically evaluated the carbon footprint (CF), nitrogen footprint (NF), environmental damage cost (EDC), and net ecosystem economic benefit (NEEB) under conventional surface irrigation (CK) and three negative-pressure irrigation (NPI) treatments (N1, N2, N3). Compared with CK, NPI significantly reduced CF and NF by up to 74.09% and 76.45%, respectively, primarily due to reduced N₂O emissions and fertilizer inputs. NPI also alleviated soil organic carbon loss by 78.85%, underscoring its strong potential for environmental sustainability. However, the high cost of ceramic emitters (accounting for 88.36%~89.80% of Cost_{agricultural input}) and their substantial upstream emissions resulted in a significantly lower net economic benefit (NEB) for NPI compared with CK. Despite this drawback, NPI treatments demonstrated superior ecological-economic efficiency: EDC was reduced by over 85%, and the N1 treatment achieved a NEEB of -10.37 CNY ha^-1, nearly reaching break-even. These results highlight a clear trade-off between environmental benefits and economic feasibility. Policy support (e.g., subsidies, carbon credits) and innovations in emitter materials (e.g., low-carbon or biodegradable alternatives) are essential to improve the overall sustainability and scalability of NPI systems.

Keywords

Negative pressure irrigation / life cycle assessment / carbon and nitrogen footprints / environmental-economic trade-offs / greenhouse gas emissions

References

[1] Anderson R,Edwards D.Climate change and the need for agricultural adaptation.Curr Opin Plant Biol2020;56:197-202

[2] Denning G.Sustainable intensification of agriculture: the foundation for universal food security.npj Sustain Agric2025;3:47

[3] Fan C,Xiong Z.Nitrification inhibitors mitigated reactive gaseous nitrogen intensity in intensive vegetable soils from China.Sci Total Environ2018;612:480-9

[4] Kopittke PM,Wang P,Lombi E.Soil and the intensification of agriculture for global food security.Environ Int2019;132:105078

[5] Cheng K,Nayak D.Carbon footprint of crop production in China: an analysis of National Statistics data.J Agric Sci2015;153:422-31

[6] Zhang WF,He P.New technologies reduce greenhouse gas emissions from nitrogenous fertilizer in China.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A2013;110:8375-80 PMCID:PMC3666697

[7] Zhou J,Xia L,Xiong Z.Organic-substitute strategies reduced carbon and reactive nitrogen footprints and gained net ecosystem economic benefit for intensive vegetable production.J Clean Prod2019;225:984-94

[8] Yu Z.Carbon footprint of global cotton production.Resour Environ Sustain2025;20:100214

[9] Abdo AI,Yang K.Carbon footprint of synthetic nitrogen under staple crops: a first cradle-to-grave analysis.Glob Change Biol2024;30:e17277

[10] Bian Y,Long H,Li D.Water use efficiency and nutrient absorption of spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)under two material emitters and negative water supply pressures.J Plant Nutr Fertil2018;24:507-18https://www.plantnutrifert.org/article/doi/10.11674/zwyf.17171 (accessed 2025-08-27).

[11] Long H,Yue X.Design and experiment of heavy liquid-type negative pressure valve used for negative pressure irrigation.Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng2018:34:85-92https://iarrp.caas.cn/en/docs/2021-07/20210716104554533416.pdf (accessed 2025-08-27).

[12] Nalliah V.Evaluation of a capillary-irrigation system for better yield and quality of hot pepper (Capsicum annuum).Appl Eng Agric2010;26:807-16

[13] Yang P,Yang M.Negative pressure irrigation for greenhouse crops in China: a review.Agric Water Manag2022;264:107497

[14] Yang P,Long H.Comparison of emitters of ceramic tube and polyvinyl formal under negative pressure irrigation on soil water use efficiency and nutrient uptake of crown daisy.Agric Water Manag2020;228:105830

[15] Wang K,Xu J.Matching water requirements of Chinese chives planted at different distances apart from the line emitter under negative pressure irrigation subsurface system.Agric Water Manag2022;274:107928

[16] Zhang Z,Jia S.Precise soil water control using a negative pressure irrigation system to improve the water productivity of greenhouse watermelon.Agric Water Manag2021;258:107144

[17] Li S,Wu X.Negative pressure irrigation increases vegetable water productivity and nitrogen use efficiency by improving soil water and NO₃^--N distributions.Agric Water Manag2021;251:106853

[18] Li Y,Xu F.Negative-pressure irrigation improves water and fertilizer use efficiencies and fruit yield of greenhouse tomato on the North China Plain*.Irrig Drain2021;70:1027-38

[19] Li S,Wu X.Negative pressure irrigation as a potential technique for increasing vegetable yields and decreasing nitrous oxide emissions.Sci Hortic2023;318:112125

[20] Wang K,Wei Q,Min Z.The potential for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions and minimizing yield losses using the negative pressure irrigation system.Sci Hortic2024;324:112621

[21] Xiang G,Xu Y,Xie S.Prediction for swelling deformation of fractal-textured bentonite and its sand mixtures in salt solution.Clays Miner2019;54:161-7

[22] Wang K,Xu J.An automatic control device for negative pressure irrigation for continuous low-rate water supply at constant soil wetting.Biosyst Eng2022;213:175-81

[23] Zhang Z,Huang W.Growing cover crop mixtures are more sustainable than single cover crop in continuous cotton cropping: Comprehensive assessment from 3-year field experiment.J Clean Prod2023;420:138350

[24] EFDB emission factor database. https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/EFDB/main.php (accessed 2025-08-29).

[25] Wang L,Cheng K.Comprehensive evaluation of environmental footprints of regional crop production: a case study of Chizhou City, China.Ecol Econ2019;164:106360

[26] Wang C,Zhang J.Effects of different fertilization methods on ammonia volatilization from rice paddies.J Clean Prod2021;295:126299

[27] Xue J,Liu S.Carbon and nitrogen footprint of double rice production in Southern China.Ecol Indic2016;64:249-57

[28] Guinée, J. B.; Gorrée, M.; Heijungs, R.; et al. 2001. Life cycle assessment an operational guide to the ISO standards. https://scispace.com/papers/life-cycle-assessment-an-operational-guide-to-the-iso-3jmg2699qy (accessed 2025-08-29).

[29] Xia L,Li B,Yan X.Greenhouse gas emissions and reactive nitrogen releases during the life-cycles of staple food production in China and their mitigation potential.Sci Total Environ2016;556:116-25

[30] Firoozi AA,Maghami MR.Harnessing photovoltaic innovation: advancements, challenges, and strategic pathways for sustainable global development.Energy Convers Manag X2025;27:101058

[31] Pelletier N,Sims NA,Kittinger JN.Nutritional attributes, substitutability, scalability, and environmental intensity of an illustrative subset of current and future protein sources for aquaculture feeds: joint consideration of potential synergies and trade-offs.Environ Sci Technol2018;52:5532-44

[32] Van de Zande GD,Donlon E,Winter AG.Identifying opportunities for irrigation systems to meet the specific needs of farmers in East Africa.Water2024;16:75

[33] Van de Zande GD,Sheline C.Design and evaluation of a precision irrigation tool’s human-machine interaction to bring water- and energy-efficient irrigation to resource-constrained farmers.Sustainability2024;16:8402

[34] Lybbert TJ.Agricultural technologies for climate change in developing countries: policy options for innovation and technology diffusion.Food Policy2012;37:114-23