Zoning for zero: a critical realist analysis of urban planning for carbon-neutral cities

Abstract

Urban planning has long relied on traditional zoning documents that primarily designate development rights based on land use types. The indirect environmental impacts of development are typically assessed through separate Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) commissions, which lack legal authority, while official zoning plans carry binding legal power. This division creates a disconnect between the impacts identified in EIAs (intended to be avoided) and the impacts facilitated by zoning plans (designed to be achieved). The legal authority of zoning plans often outweighs the procedural influence of EIAs. In this study, we explore whether exchanging the thematic roles of zoning and EIAs could yield better results. To investigate this, we conceptualize a transformative approach by reassigning the traditional designations in an existing zoning plan to focus instead on climate impact-oriented categories and apply this approach to a real-world case study. Using a Critical Realist analytical framework, we compare the potential impacts of this climate-centric zoning concept with those of traditional zoning. Our findings reveal extensive societal linkages embedded in what appear to be purely technical zoning decisions. We demonstrate how reimagined zoning, informed by contemporary climate impact knowledge, can drive significant systemic change in urban development - surpassing the influence of isolated strategies, policy guidelines, or EIAs, and addressing environmental effects that often fall outside the scope of conventional EIA processes.

Keywords

Carbon footprints / urban planning / zoning / critical realism

References

[1] Bhaskar R,Høyer KG,Parker J.Interdisciplinarity and climate change: transforming knowledge and practice for our global future. Abingdon, Oxon New York: Routledge; 2010.

[2] Friedmann J.The uses of planning theory: a bibliographic essay.J Plan Educ Res2008;28:247-57

[3] LeGates RT. The city reader, Seventh edition. In: Routledge urban reader series. London; New York: Routledge; 2020.

[4] Hautamäki R,Merikoski T.Greening the compact city: unarticulated tensions and incremental advances in municipal climate action plans.Cities2024;152:105251

[5] Säynäjoki E,Junnila S.The power of urban planning on environmental sustainability: a focus group study in Finland.Sustainability2014;6:6622-43

[6] Lähde E,Lahtinen E,Mahlio O.Kaupunkisuunnittelun biodiversiteettikäänne 2020-luvulla.Yhdyskuntasuunnittelu2025;62:14-40

[7] Balikçi S,Arundel R.The paradox of planning the compact and green city: analyzing land-use change in Amsterdam and Brussels.J Environ Plan Manag2022;65:2387-411

[8] Berghauser Pont M,Berg P,Heyman A.Systematic review and comparison of densification effects and planning motivations.Build Cities2021;2:378

[9] Creutzig F,Bardhan R.Bridging the scale between the local particular and the global universal in climate change assessments of cities.Nat Cities2025;2:369-78

[10] Batty M.Centenary paper: the evolution of cities: Geddes, Abercrombie and the new physicalism.Town Plan Rev2009;80:551-74

[11] Lehnerer A. Grand urban rules. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers; 2009. Available from: https://www.nai010.com/product/grand-urban-rules/ [Last accessed on 11 Aug 2025]

[12] Albrechts L.Breaking out of the box: ingredients for a more radical planning.Procedia2015;184:104-10

[13] Bruegmann R.Sprawl: a compact history. University of Chicago Press; 2005.

[14] Peck J.Economic rationality meets celebrity urbanology: exploring Edward Glaeser's city: economic rationality meets celebrity urbanology.Int J Urban Regional Res2016;40:1-30

[15] Zhao M,Zhou Y,Shen S.A global dataset of annual urban extents (1992-2020) from harmonized nighttime lights.Earth Syst Sci Data2022;14:517-34

[16] IPCC. Urban systems and other settlements. In: Climate change 2022 - mitigation of climate change. Cambridge University Press; 2023. pp. 861-952.

[17] Ripple WJ,Gregg JW.The 2024 state of the climate report: perilous times on planet Earth.BioScience2024;74:812-24

[18] Friedlingstein P,Jones MW.Global carbon budget 2024.Earth Syst Sci Data2025;17:965-1039

[19] Müller DB,Løvik AN.Carbon emissions of infrastructure development.Environ Sci Technol2013;47:11739-46

[20] Smith S. The world needs to build 2 billion new homes over the next 80 years. World Economic Forum; 2018. Available from: https://www.weforum.org/stories/2018/03/the-world-needs-to-build-more-than-two-billion-new-homes-over-the-next-80-years/ [Last accessed on 6 Aug 2025]

[21] Erickson P. Keeping cities green: Avoiding carbon lock-in due to urban development. SEI Working Paper No. 2015-11. Available from: https://www.sei.org/publications/keeping-cities-green-avoiding-carbon-lock-in-due-to-urban-development/ [Last accessed on 6 Aug 2025]

[22] De Giorgi G,Wheeler H.Gentrification, mobility, and consumption.arXiv2024;2407.06695

[23] Glaeser EL. Triumph of the city: how our greatest invention makes us richer, smarter, greener, healthier, and happier. New York, NY: Penguin Books; 2012.

[24] Glaeser EL. Survival of the city: living and thriving in an age of isolation. Penguin; 2022. Available from: https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/669805/survival-of-the-city-by-edward-glaeser-and-david-cutler/ [Last accessed on 11 Aug 2025]

[25] Glaeser EL,Saiz A.Consumer city.J Econ Geogr2001;1:27-50

[26] Schleicher D.How land use law impedes transportation innovation.SSRN J2016;25p

[27] Heinonen J,Juntunen JK,Junnila S.Situated lifestyles: II. the impacts of urban density, housing type and motorization on the greenhouse gas emissions of the middle-income consumers in Finland.Environ Res Lett2013;8:035050

[28] Zhu K,Li Y.Did polycentric and compact structure reduce carbon emissions? A spatial panel data analysis of 286 Chinese cities from 2002 to 2019.Land2022;11:185

[29] Ferreira A.On why planning should not reinforce self-reinforcing trends: a cautionary analysis of the compact-city proposal applied to large cities.Environ Plan B Plan Des2011;38:231-47

[30] Wachsmuth D,Angelo H.Expand the frontiers of urban sustainability.Nature2016;536:391-3

[31] Moran D,Jiborn M,Többen J.Carbon footprints of 13 000 cities.Environ Res Lett2018;13:064041

[32] Wiedenhofer D,Liu Z,Zhang N.Unequal household carbon footprints in China.Nature Clim Chang2017;7:75-80

[33] Carta S.Machine learning and the city: applications in architecture and urban design, 1st ed. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.; 2022.

[34] Jay S,Slinn P.Environmental impact assessment: retrospect and prospect.Environ Impact Assess Rev2007;27:287-300

[35] Lylykangas K,Cerrone D.Territorial and consumption-based greenhouse gas emissions assessments: implications for spatial planning policies.Land2023;12:1144

[36] Amiri A,Ottelin J.Embodied emissions of buildings - A forgotten factor in green building certificates.Energy Build2021;241:110962

[37] Næss P.Built environment, causality and urban planning.Plan Theory Pract2016;17:52-71

[38] Bhaskar R. A realist theory of science. In: Classical texts in critical realism. London: Routledge; 2015.

[39] Haila Y.Socioecologies.Ecography1999;22:337-48

[40] Haila Y.Beyond the nature-culture dualism.Biol Philos2000;15:155-75

[41] Valsson T. City and nature: an integrated whole. Reykjavík: Háskólaútgáfan; 2000.

[42] Hautamäki R.From sparse to compact city - shifting notions of nature in post-war residential landscapes in the Helsinki region.Plan Perspect2022;37:1179-203

[43] Jensen D,Wilbert M. Bright green lies: how the environmental movement lost its way and what we can do about it. In: Politics of the living series. Rhinebeck, New York: Monkfish Book Publishing Company; 2021.

[44] Jama T,Lönnqvist H.Compact city and urban planning: correlation between density and local amenities.Environ Plan B Urban2025;52:44-58

[45] European Environment Agency and European Commission. Urban sprawl in Europe - The ignored challenge. EEA report, no. 10/2006; Copenhagen, Denmark: European Environment Agency; Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 2006. Available from: https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/eea_report_2006_10/eea_report_10_2006.pdf/view [Last accessed on 11 Aug 2025]

[46] European Environment Agency; Swiss Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN). Urban sprawl in Europe: joint EEA-FOEN report. LU: Publications Office; 2016. Available from: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2800/143470 [Last accessed on 6 Aug 2025]

[47] Mayne T. Opinion: adding 1 million people along the Wilshire corridor could help L.A. create a sustainable city. Available from: https://www.latimes.com/opinion/livable-city/la-ol-thom-mayne-climate-change-density-newhall-ranch-20161103-story.html [Last accessed on 6 Aug 2025]

[48] UN Habitat. A new strategy of sustainable neighbourhood planning: five principles; 2014. Available from: https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/documents/2019-05/five_principles_of_sustainable_neighborhood_planning.pdf [Last accessed on 6 Aug 2025]

[49] Page M,Vaattovaara M,Rönnberg O.Density as an indicator of sustainable urban development: insights from Helsinki?.Eur Plan Stud2024;32:2182-202

[50] Berghauser PM. Spacematrix: space, density and urban form. Rotterdam: Nai010 Publishers; 2021.

[51] Elmqvist T. Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: challenges and opportunities: a global assessment; A part of the cities and biodiversity outlook project. Dordrecht Heidelberg: Springer, 2013.

[52] Banitz T,Johansson LG.Visualization of causation in social-ecological systems.Ecol Soc2022;27:31

[53] Tratalos J,Warren PH,Gaston KJ.Urban form, biodiversity potential and ecosystem services.Landsc Urban Plan2007;83:308-17

[54] Kroft LE.The effects of urban density on the provision of multiple health-related ecosystem services.Urban Ecosyst2024;27:491-513

[55] Cole RJ.Transition to a regenerative future: a question of time.Build Cities2023;4:457-74

[56] Zari MP.Regenerative urban design and ecosystem biomimicry, 1st ed. London: Routledge, 2018.

[57] du Plessis C.Towards a regenerative paradigm for the built environment.Build Res Inf2012;40:7-22

[58] Flyvbjerg B.Five misunderstandings about case-study research.Qual Inq2006;12:219-45

[59] Isaksen K. Reclaiming rational theory choice as central: a critique of methodological applications of critical realism.J Crit Realism2016;15:245-62

[60] Churkina G,Reyer CPO.Buildings as a global carbon sink.Nat Sustain2020;3:269-76

[61] Kinnunen A.Urban biodiversity and carbon sinks - do they overlap? Case study of Helsinki Metropolitan Area, Finland.IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci2022;1101:022005

[62] Talvitie I,Amiri A.Can future cities grow a carbon storage equal to forests?.Environ Res Lett2023;18:044029

[63] Klaasen IT. Knowledge-based design: developing urban & regional design into a science. Delft: Delft University Press, 2004.

[64] Kornberger M.Governing the city: from planning to urban strategy.Theor Cult Soc2012;29:84-106

[65] Bjånesøy S,Einarsdóttir H.Carbon storage in the built environment: a review.Environ Res Infrastruct Sustain2023;3:042003

[66] Kuittinen M,Slabik S.How can carbon be stored in the built environment? A review of potential options.Archit Sci Rev2023;66:91-107

[67] Malabi Eberhardt LC,Häkkinen T,Nibel S.Carbon handprint - a review of potential climate benefits of buildings.Build Res Inf2024;52:708-23

[68] Leppänen P,Hautamäki R.Impact of changing urban typologies on residential vegetation and its climate-effects - A case study from Helsinki, Finland.Urban For Urban Gree2024;96:128343

[69] Espoo. “Espoo’s online map service. Available from: https://kartat.espoo.fi/IMS/en/Map [Last accessed on 6 Aug 2025]

[70] Heinilä A. Suunnittelutarve- ja poikkeamispäätösmenettelyjen toimivuus. Ministry of Environment, Helsinki, 2014. Available from: https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/bitstream/handle/10138/42612/YMra_1_2014.pdf [Last accessed on 6 Aug 2025]

[71] Geels FW.Socio-technical transitions to sustainability: a review of criticisms and elaborations of the multi-level perspective.Cur Opin Environ Sustain2019;39:187-201

[72] Glaeser EL. The economics approach to cities. National Bureau of Economic Research, 2007. Available from: https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w13696/w13696.pdf [Last accessed on 11 Aug 2025]

[73] Vimpari J.Theory of valuing building life-cycle investments.Build Res Inf2016;44:345-57

[74] Hillier B. Space is the machine: a configurational theory of architecture. London: Space Syntax; 2015. Available from: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/3881 [Last accessed on 11 Aug 2025]

[75] Richardson K,Lucht W.Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries.Sci Adv2023;9:eadh2458

[76] van Westen RM,Dijkstra HA.Physics-based early warning signal shows that AMOC is on tipping course.Sci Adv2024;10:eadk1189 PMCID:PMC10857529