Integrated carbon responsibility allocation in the electric vehicle battery supply chain: a comprehensive approach to emission reduction

Abstract

This study investigates the allocation of carbon responsibility within the entire supply chain, utilizing a comprehensive traceability framework. Using the electric vehicle battery industry as a case study, it examines the transfer and allocation of carbon responsibilities across upstream raw material production, the power battery industry, downstream industries, and end-users, resulting in a more equitable distribution of carbon responsibility. The electric vehicle battery industry bears only 6.6%-18.9% of its original carbon responsibility, with the remainder shared among related industries and consumers. Industries such as the computer, communication, and other electronic equipment manufacturing industry, the electrical machinery and equipment manufacturing industry (except the electric vehicle battery industry), the automobile product manufacturing industry, and the transport and storage industry bear a heavy carbon responsibility. Notably, the carbon responsibility of end-use categories such as exports and urban consumption is significantly higher, highlighting the substantial role of final consumers. The analysis demonstrates that a collaborative allocation strategy, integrating market-driven mechanisms, technological innovation, and policy support, can effectively drive emission reductions across the entire supply chain. This approach promotes equitable carbon reduction targets and fosters global cooperation for sustainable development.

Keywords

Carbon responsibility / electric vehicle battery industry / supply chain / emission reduction

References

[1] Zhang M,Tong B,Zhang L.Analysis of the coupling characteristics of land transfer and carbon emissions and its influencing factors: a case study of China.Front Environ Sci2023;10:1105552

[2] Chong CH,Ma L.A supply chain allocation method for environmental responsibility based on fossil energy as the anchor for carbon responsibility.J Clean Prod2023;416:137904

[3] Caro F,Tan T. Carbon-optimal and carbon-neutral supply chains. 2011. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1947343 [Last accessed on 6 Mar 2025]

[4] Chen JX.Supply chain carbon footprinting and responsibility allocation under emission regulations.J Environ Manag2017;188:255-67

[5] Kanakoudis V.Allocating the cost of the carbon footprint produced along a supply chain, among the stakeholders involved.J Water Clim Chang2014;5:556-68

[6] Lin B.Assessing consumption-based carbon footprint of China’s food industry in global supply chain.Sustain Prod Consump2023;35:365-75

[7] Al-Buenain A,Falamarzi M,Kucukvar M.The adoption of electric vehicles in Qatar can contribute to net carbon emission reduction but requires strong government incentives.Vehicles2021;3:618-35

[8] Cao J,Qiu R.Electric vehicle industry sustainable development with a stakeholder engagement system.Technol Soc2021;67:101771

[9] Hofmann J,Chalvatzis K.Assessment of electrical vehicles as a successful driver for reducing CO₂ emissions in China.Appl Energy2016;184:995-1003

[10] Liu D.Exploring the development of electric vehicles under policy incentives: a scenario-based system dynamics model.Energy Policy2018;120:8-23

[11] Abdul Qadir S,Mohsin A B Al-Wahedi A,Ali A.Navigating the complex realities of electric vehicle adoption: a comprehensive study of government strategies, policies, and incentives.Energy Strategy Rev2024;53:101379

[12] Sajid J,Ahmad MM.Energetic, economic, and greenhouse gas emissions assessment of biomass and solar photovoltaic systems for an industrial facility.Energy Rep2022;8:12503-21

[13] Zhou Y,Hao H,Wang H.Plug-in electric vehicle market penetration and incentives: a global review.Mitig Adapt Strategy Glob Chang2015;20:777-95

[14] Wen D,Qian F,Ren J.Development of solar photovoltaic industry and market in China, Germany, Japan and the United States of America using incentive policies.Energy Explor Exploit2021;39:1429-56

[15] Guo H,Tsinopoulos C.The influential capacity of carbon neutrality environmental orientation in modulating stakeholder engagement toward green manufacturing.Corp Soc Resp Environ Manag2024;31:292-310

[16] Dall-Orsoletta A,Gilson Dranka G.Low-carbon technologies and just energy transition: prospects for electric vehicles.Energy Convers Manag X2022;16:100271

[17] Wang QH. How does the new EU battery regulation affect China’s new energy vehicle and battery companies to go global. 2023. Available from: https://www.allbrightlaw.com/CN/10475/6a791f2891c23615.aspx# [Last accessed on 6 Mar 2025]

[18] Günther H,Autenrieb N.The role of electric vehicles for supply chain sustainability in the automotive industry.J Clean Prod2015;90:220-33

[19] Lu QX. New energy vehicles seek to integrate with renewable energy. China Energy News. 2021. Available from: http://paper.people.com.cn/zgnyb/html/2021-01/25/content_2031213.htm [Last accessed on 6 Mar 2025]

[20] Yao MJ. Power battery industry chain accelerates zero-carbon transition. China Energy News. 2022. Available from: http://paper.people.com.cn/zgnyb/html/2022-12/05/content_25953654.htm [Last accessed on 6 Mar 2025]

[21] Zhang Y,Hu S.New approach for carbon emission responsibility allocation with product benchmark.China Popul Resour Environ2020;30:43-53

[22] Gao Y,Meng F,Chen C.A carbon responsibility allocation approach with incentives mechanism based on carbon emissions and carbon offsets accounting.J Clean Prod2024;434:139814

[23] Cordier M,Hecq W.The shared environmental responsibility principle: new developments applied to the case of marine ecosystems.Econ Syst Res2019;31:228-47

[24] Lenzen M,Sack F.Shared producer and consumer responsibility-theory and practice.Ecol Econ2007;61:27-42

[25] China’s National Bureau of Statistics. Input-output table 2020. Available from: https://data.stats.gov.cn/ifnormal.htm?u=/files/html/quickSearch/trcc/trcc01.html&h=740 [Last accessed on 6 Mar 2025]

[26] Polaris Energy Storage Network. 2022 power battery data ranking announced! Cumulative output 545.9 GWh, an increase of 148.5%. 2023. Available from: https://m.bjx.com.cn/mnews/20230113/1282866.shtml [Last accessed on 6 Mar 2025]

[27] Lu QX. Core technology, industrial scale, cost, and price have first-mover advantages, and carbon emission management capabilities need to be strengthened: the power battery industry needs to accelerate the promotion of carbon competitiveness. 2023. Available from: http://paper.people.com.cn/zgnyb/html/2023-06/19/content_26000702.htm [Last accessed on 6 Mar 2025]

[28] China Business Information Network. Analysis of power battery production in 2020: a cumulative 83.4 GWh from January to December, down 2.3% year-on-year. 2021. Available from: https://www.askci.com/news/chanye/20210125/0958051339433.shtml [Last accessed on 6 Mar 2025]

[29] Tesla 2020 Impact Report. Available from: https://www.tesla.com/ns_videos/2020-tesla-impact-report.pdf [Last accessed on 6 Mar 2025]

[30] Tesla 2021 Impact Report. Available from: https://www.tesla.com/ns_videos/2021-tesla-impact-report.pdf [Last accessed on 6 Mar 2025]

[31] Wang FY. How do lithium companies deal with “carbon barriers”? The UN report gives guidance. 2023. Available from: https://new.qq.com/rain/a/20231120A09DGW00# [Last accessed on 6 Mar 2025]