How to quantify blue carbon sequestration rates in seagrass meadow sediment: geochemical method and troubleshooting

Sophia C. Johannessen

Carbon Footprints ›› 2023, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (4) : 21

PDF
Carbon Footprints ›› 2023, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (4) :21 DOI: 10.20517/cf.2023.37
Technical Note

How to quantify blue carbon sequestration rates in seagrass meadow sediment: geochemical method and troubleshooting

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Seagrasses take up carbon dioxide and transform it into organic carbon, some of which is buried in meadow sediments. Very high carbon burial rates have been claimed for seagrass meadows globally, and international protocols have been developed with a view to awarding carbon offset credits. However, recent geochemical work has shown that a misunderstanding of how marine sediment buries and processes organic carbon has led to overestimates of at least an order of magnitude. Common blue carbon methodology does not adequately account for bioturbation or remineralization in surface sediment, and there is often a conflation of standing stock with ongoing burial. To determine accurate seagrass carbon burial rates requires the following steps: (1) Determine the sediment accumulation rate below the surface mixed layer, using 210Pb and porosity; (2) Determine the burial concentration of organic carbon; (3) Multiply the sediment accumulation rate by the buried % organic carbon; (4) If excluding allochthonous carbon burial, use biomarkers to determine the proportion of seagrass-derived organic carbon; and (5) Account for the offset due to the burial of carbonate formed inside the meadow. Seagrass meadows provide valuable habitat and protect coastlines from erosion. They can also play a role in short-term carbon sequestration. However, if carbon credits are awarded based on inflated estimates and used to offset emissions elsewhere, the net effect could be an increase in carbon dioxide emissions to the atmosphere.

Keywords

Sediment / blue carbon / seagrass / sequestration / burial / methodology / remineralization / bioturbation

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Sophia C. Johannessen. How to quantify blue carbon sequestration rates in seagrass meadow sediment: geochemical method and troubleshooting. Carbon Footprints, 2023, 2(4): 21 DOI:10.20517/cf.2023.37

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Kennedy H,Duarte CM.Seagrass sediments as a global carbon sink: isotopic constraints.Global Biogeochem Cy2010;24:GB4026

[2]

Herr D. Coastal blue carbon ecosystems: opportunities for nationally determined contributions. Gland, Switzerland; Washington DC, USA: IUCN, The Nature Conservancy; 2016, 28p. Available from: https://www.unep.org/resources/policy-and-strategy/coastal-blue-carbon-ecosystems-opportunities-nationally-determined [Last accessed on 26 Sep 2023]

[3]

Hejnowicz AP,Rudd MA.Harnessing the climate mitigation, conservation and poverty alleviation potential of seagrasses: prospects for developing blue carbon initiatives and payment for ecosystem service programmes.Front Mar Sci2015;2:32

[4]

Johannessen SC.Geoengineering with seagrasses: is credit due where credit is given?.Environ Res Lett2016;11:113001

[5]

Williamson P.Carbon removal using coastal blue carbon ecosystems is uncertain and unreliable, with questionable climatic cost-effectiveness.Front Climate2022;4:853666

[6]

Anderson CM,Litterman R.Natural climate solutions are not enough.Science2019;363:933-4

[7]

Seddon N,Smith P.Getting the message right on nature-based solutions to climate change.Glob Chang Biol2021;27:1518-46

[8]

IPCC. 2013 supplement to the 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. In Hiraishi T, Krug T, Tanabe K, editors. Switzerland: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; 2014. Available from: https://www.ipcc.ch/publication/2013-supplement-to-the-2006-ipcc-guidelines-for-national-greenhouse-gas-inventories-wetlands/ [Last accessed on 26 Sep 2023]

[9]

Arias-ortiz A,Masqué P.A marine heatwave drives massive losses from the world’s largest seagrass carbon stocks.Nat Clim Chang2018;8:338-44

[10]

Lovelock CE.Variable impacts of climate change on blue carbon.One Earth2020;3:195-211

[11]

Lafratta A,Masqué P.Challenges to select suitable habitats and demonstrate ‘additionality’ in Blue Carbon projects: a seagrass case study.Ocean Coast Manag2020;197:105295

[12]

Leiva-Dueñas C,Banta GT.Capturing of organic carbon and nitrogen in eelgrass sediments of southern Scandinavia.Limnol Oceanogr2023;68:631-48

[13]

Smeaton C,Austin WEN.Coring and compaction: best practice in blue carbon stock and burial estimations.Geoderma2020;364:114180

[14]

Robbins J,Mozley S.Radioactivity in sediments of the Great Lakes: post-depositional redistribution by deposit-feeding organisms.Earth Planet Sci Lett1977;36:325-33

[15]

Carpenter R,Bennett J.210Pb-derived sediment accumulation and mixing rates for the greater Puget Sound region.Mar Geol1985;64:291-312

[16]

Lavelle J,Crecelius E.Accumulation rates of recent sediments in puget sound, Washington.Mar Geol1986;72:59-70

[17]

Silverberg N,Delibrias G.Radionuclide profiles, sedimentation rates, and bioturbation in modern sediments of the Laurentian trough, gulf-of-st-lawrence.Oceanologica Acta1986;9:285-90Available from: https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00110/22116/ [Last accessed on 26 Sep 2023]

[18]

Hedges JI.Sedimentary organic matter preservation: an assessment and speculative synthesis.Mar Chem1995;49:81-115

[19]

Boudreau BP.Is burial velocity a master parameter for bioturbation?.Geochim Cosmochim Acta1994;58:1243-9

[20]

Marbà N,Masqué P.Impact of seagrass loss and subsequent revegetation on carbon sequestration and stocks.J Ecol2015;103:296-302

[21]

Serrano O,Lavery PS.Impact of mooring activities on carbon stocks in seagrass meadows.Sci Rep2016;6:23193 PMCID:PMC4793266

[22]

Guinasso Jr NL.Quantitative estimates of biological mixing rates in abyssal sediments.J Geophys Res1975;80:3032-43

[23]

Johannessen SC.There is no 1954 in that core! Interpreting sedimentation rates and contaminant trends in marine sediment cores.Mar Pollut Bull2012;64:675-8

[24]

CEC. Greenhouse gas offset methodology criteria for tidal wetland conservation. Montreal, Canada: Commission for Environmental Cooperation; 2014, 36p. Available from: http://www.cec.org/files/documents/publications/11597-greenhouse-gas-offset-methodology-criteria-tidal-wetland-conservation-en.pdf [Last accessed on 26 Sep 2023]

[25]

Appleby PG.The assessment of 210Pb data from sites with varying sediment accumulation rates.Hydrobiologia1983;103:29-35

[26]

Thomson ACG,Maher DT,Macreadie PI.Bioturbator-stimulated loss of seagrass sediment carbon stocks.Limnol Oceanogr2019;64:342-56

[27]

Stolpovsky K,Wallmann K.Toward a parameterization of global-scale organic carbon mineralization kinetics in surface marine sediments.Global Biogeochem Cy2015;29:812-29

[28]

Greiner JT,Gunnell J.Seagrass restoration enhances "blue carbon" sequestration in coastal waters.PLoS One2013;8:e72469 PMCID:PMC3743776

[29]

Krause JR,Gray AB.Beyond habitat boundaries: organic matter cycling requires a system-wide approach for accurate blue carbon accounting.Limnol Oceanogr2022;67:S6-18

[30]

Gallagher JB,Chuan CH.A Re-evaluation of wetland carbon sink mitigation concepts and measurements: a diagenetic solution.Wetlands2022;42:23

[31]

Emmer I,Needelman B,Emmett-Mattox S. Coastal blue carbon in practice: manual for using the vcs methodology for tidal wetland and seagrass restoration VM0033. In: Simpson S, editor, Arlington: restore America’s estuaries, Silvestrum; 2015, p. 82. Available from: https://estuaries.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/rae-coastal-blue-carbon-methodology-web.pdf [Last accessed on 27 Sep 2023]

[32]

Gullström M,Dahl M.Blue carbon storage in tropical seagrass meadows relates to carbonate stock dynamics, plant-sediment processes, and landscape context: insights from the western indian ocean.Ecosystems2018;21:551-66

[33]

Frankignoulle M,Gattuso J.Marine calcification as a source of carbon dioxide: positive feedback of increasing atmospheric CO2.Limnol Oceanogr1994;39:458-62

[34]

Saderne V,Macreadie PI.Role of carbonate burial in blue carbon budgets.Nat Commun2019;10:1106 PMCID:PMC6405941

[35]

Robbins JA. Geochemical and geophysical applications of radioactive lead. In: the biogeochemistry of lead in the environment. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press; 1978. pp. 285-393.

[36]

Dinn PM,Macdonald RW,Whiticar MJ.Effect of receiving environment on the transport and fate of polybrominated diphenyl ethers near two submarine municipal outfalls.Environ Toxicol Chem2012;31:566-73

[37]

Spooner A. Blue carbon sequestration potential in Zostera marina eelgrass beds of the K'omoks Estuary, British Columbia. Master Thesis, Royal Roads University; 2016. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10170/916 [Last accessed on 26 Sep 2023]

[38]

Geraldi NR,Serrano O.Fingerprinting blue carbon: rationale and tools to determine the source of organic carbon in marine depositional environments.Front Mar Sci2019;6:263

[39]

Duarte CM,Anton A.Stable isotope (δ13C, δ15N, δ18O, δD) composition and nutrient concentration of red sea primary producers.Front Mar Sci2018;5:298

[40]

Van Dam BR,Lopes C.Calcification-driven CO2 emissions exceed “Blue Carbon” sequestration in a carbonate seagrass meadow.Sci Adv2021;7:eabj1372

[41]

Macreadie PI,Maher DT,Beardall J.Addressing calcium carbonate cycling in blue carbon accounting.Limnol Oceanogr Lett2017;2:195-201

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

71

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/