Carbon footprint of beef cattle systems in the Southeast United States

Jose C. B. Dubeux , Liza Garcia , Luana M. D. Queiroz , Erick R. S. Santos , Kenneth T. Oduor , Igor L. Bretas

Carbon Footprints ›› 2023, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (2) : 8

PDF
Carbon Footprints ›› 2023, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (2) :8 DOI: 10.20517/cf.2022.16
Review

Carbon footprint of beef cattle systems in the Southeast United States

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Grasslands in the Southeast United States (SE US) cover 15.8 million ha and most of this area is dedicated to beef production systems. This region holds 6.3 million beef cows and 12.1 million cattle, including calves. Beef cattle systems in the SE US are mostly cow-calf based, and most of the greenhouse gas emission from cattle occurs during this phase (cow-calf) because of their forage-based diet. This review assessed the carbon footprint (C footprint) of beef cattle systems in the SE US and indicates possible ways to reduce it. Major emissions in beef cattle systems come from livestock enteric fermentation and greenhouse gases from excreta. Cow-calf systems in the SE US are typically low input, although they use some industrial fertilizers, machinery, and fossil fuel, which adds to the C footprint of the sector. There are opportunities to reduce the beef C footprint in the SE US by adopting climate-smart practices, including preservation of natural ecosystems that have potentially high carbon sequestration, afforestation, integration of forage legumes (and reduction of nitrogen fertilizer), use of slow-release fertilizers, and dietary interventions. In fact, depending on the level of adoption of some of these practices, it is possible to establish climate-neutral beef at the farm gate in the SE US. Beef is a key food for humans and has large economic effects. Development of climate-smart beef could create opportunities for a niche market that recognizes the environmental footprint of agricultural production and could incentivize producers to pursue those systems.

Keywords

Cow-calf / environment / grazing / livestock / sustainable

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Jose C. B. Dubeux, Liza Garcia, Luana M. D. Queiroz, Erick R. S. Santos, Kenneth T. Oduor, Igor L. Bretas. Carbon footprint of beef cattle systems in the Southeast United States. Carbon Footprints, 2023, 2(2): 8 DOI:10.20517/cf.2022.16

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Nair PKR.Carbon footprints and land-use systems.Carbon Footprints2022;1:2

[2]

Epa U. Inventory of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990-2020. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/inventory-us-greenhouse-gas-emissions-and-sinks [Last accessed on 8 Dec 2022]

[3]

Crippa M,Guizzardi D,Tubiello FN.Food systems are responsible for a third of global anthropogenic GHG emissions.Nat Food2021;2:198-209

[4]

USDA-NASS. Census of Agriculture. 2017. Available from: https://nass.usda.gov/AgCensus/ [Last accessed on 8 Dec 2022]

[5]

USDA-NASS. Census of Agriculture. 2012. Available from: https://nass.usda.gov/AgCensus/ [Last accessed on 8 Dec 2022]

[6]

Janssen PH.Influence of hydrogen on rumen methane formation and fermentation balances through microbial growth kinetics and fermentation thermodynamics.Anim Feed Sci Technol2010;160:1-22

[7]

Rotz CA,Place S.Environmental footprints of beef cattle production in the United States.Agric Syst2019;169:1-13

[8]

Saggar S,Giltrap DL.Soil-atmosphere exchange of nitrous oxide and methane in New Zealand terrestrial ecosystems and their mitigation options: a review.Plant Soil2008;309:25-42

[9]

Raposo E,Janusckiewicz ER.Greenhouse gases emissions from tropical grasslands affected by nitrogen fertilizer management.Agron J2020;112:4666-80

[10]

Alemu AW,Bittman S,Ominski KH.Greenhouse gas emission of Canadian cow-calf operations: A whole-farm assessment of 295 farms.Agric Syst2017;151:73-83

[11]

Angst G,Nierop KG.Plant- or microbial-derived?.Soil Biol Biochem2021;156:108189

[12]

Dubeux Jr JCB, Santos HQ, Sollenberger LE. Nutrient cycling: perspectives of improving sustainability of intensively managed pastures. Fertilidade Do Solo Para Pastagens Produtivas. Piracicaba, Sao Paulo: Luiz de Queiroz Agricultural Foundation; 2004. pp. 357-400.

[13]

Dubeux JCB,Mathews BW,Santos HQ.Nutrient Cycling in Warm-Climate Grasslands.Crop Sci2007;47:915-28

[14]

Dubeux JCB,Interrante SM,Stewart RL.Litter decomposition and mineralization in bahiagrass pastures managed at different intensities.Crop Sci2006;46:1305-10

[15]

Haynes R.Nutrient cycling and soil fertility in the grazed pasture ecosystem; 1993.

[16]

Dubeux JC.Nutrient cycling in grazed pastures. In Management strategies for sustainable cattle production in southern pastures. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2020. pp. 59-75

[17]

Hristov AN,Firkins JL.Special topics-mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: I. A review of enteric methane mitigation options.J Anim Sci2013;91:5045-69

[18]

Cardoso AS,Leytem A.Impact of the intensification of beef production in Brazil on greenhouse gas emissions and land use.Agric Syst2016;143:86-96

[19]

Yu L,Zhang W,Sun W.Methane uptake in global forest and grassland soils from 1981 to 2010.Sci Total Environ2017;607-608:1163-72

[20]

Samuelson LJ,Butnor JR.Ecosystem carbon density and allocation across a chronosequence of longleaf pine forests.Ecol Appl2017;27:244-59

[21]

Bracho R,Gholz HL,Cropper WP.Controls on carbon dynamics by ecosystem structure and climate for southeastern U.S. slash pine plantations.Ecol Monogr2012;82:101-28

[22]

Vogel JG,Akers M.Regional assessment of carbon pool response to intensive silvicultural practices in loblolly pine plantations.Forests2022;13:36

[23]

Bracho R,Boughton R.Carbon dynamics and soil greenhouse fluxes in a Florida’s native rangeland before and after fire.Agric For Meteorol2021;311:108682

[24]

Xu S,Inglett KS,Gerber S.Effect of land-use conversion on ecosystem C stock and distribution in subtropical grazing lands.Plant Soil2016;399:233-45

[25]

Poeplau C.Carbon sequestration in agricultural soils via cultivation of cover crops - A meta-analysis.Agric Ecosyst Environ2015;200:33-41

[26]

Jian J,Reiter MS.A meta-analysis of global cropland soil carbon changes due to cover cropping.Soil Biol Biochem2020;143:107735

[27]

Rowntree JE,Maciel ICF.Ecosystem impacts and productive capacity of a multi-species pastured livestock system.Front Sustain Food Syst2020;4:544984

[28]

Villa JA.Carbon sequestration in different wetland plant communities in the Big Cypress Swamp region of southwest Florida.Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag2015;11:17-28

[29]

Xiong X,Myers DB,Harris WG.Interaction effects of climate and land use/land cover change on soil organic carbon sequestration.Sci Total Environ2014;493:974-82

[30]

Gomez-casanovas N,Delucia EH.Seasonal controls of CO2 and CH4 dynamics in a temporarily flooded subtropical wetland.J Geophys Res Biogeosci2020;125

[31]

Ghosh PK.Carbon sequestration in grassland systems.Range Manag Agrofor2014;35:173-81.Available from: https://publications.rmsi.in/index.php/rma/article/view/382 [Last accessed on 8 Dec 2022]

[32]

Adewopo J,Xu S,Sollenberger L.Management intensification impacts on soil and ecosystem carbon stocks in subtropical grasslands.Soil Sci Soc Am J2014;78:977-86

[33]

Henry DD,Araujo RC.Effects of bismuth subsalicylate and encapsulated calcium-ammonium nitrate on enteric methane production, nutrient digestibility, and liver mineral concentration of beef cattle.J Anim Sci2020;98 PMCID:PMC7431207

[34]

Patra AK.The effect of dietary fats on methane emissions, and its other effects on digestibility, rumen fermentation and lactation performance in cattle: a meta-analysis.Livest Sci2013;155:244-54

[35]

Belanche A,Morgavi DP,Zweifel B.A meta-analysis describing the effects of the essential oils blend agolin ruminant on performance, rumen fermentation and methane emissions in dairy cows.Animals2020;10:620 PMCID:PMC7222807

[36]

Jayanegara A,Kreuzer M.Meta-analysis of the relationship between dietary tannin level and methane formation in ruminants from in vivo and in vitro experiments.J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr2012;96:365-75

[37]

Franzluebbers AJ.Cattle grazing effects on the environment: greenhouse gas emissions and carbon footprint. In Management strategies for sustainable cattle production in southern pastures. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2019. pp. 11-34

[38]

Desjardins R,Vergé X,Dyer J.Carbon footprint of beef cattle.Sustainability2012;4:3279-301

[39]

Klopatek SC,Duarte T,Yang XC.Grass-fed vs. grain-fed beef systems: performance, economic, and environmental trade-offs.J Anim Sci2022;100 PMCID:PMC8867585

[40]

Beauchemin K,Little S,Mcginn S.Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from beef production in western Canada - evaluation using farm-based life cycle assessment.Anim Feed Sci Technol2011;166-167:663-77

[41]

Rosenbaum KL,Mekouar A. Climate change and the forest sector. Possible national and subnational legislation. 2004. Available from: https://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/287cbda2-a217-4ca4-8aca-a9b8dc29e757/ [Last accessed on 8 Dec 2022]

[42]

Nielsen AS, Plantinga AJ, Alig RJ. Mitigating climate change through afforestation: New cost estimates for the United States.Resour Energy Econ2014;36:83-98

[43]

Torres CME,Fraisse CW.Quantification of greenhouse gas emissions for carbon neutral farming in the Southeastern USA.Agric Syst2015;137:64-75

[44]

Richards KR.A review of forest carbon sequestration cost studies: a dozen years of research.Clim Chang2004;63:1-48

[45]

Duffy C,Ryan M,Spillane C.Afforestation: replacing livestock emissions with carbon sequestration.J Environ Manag2020;264:110523

[46]

McCarl BA.Climate change. greenhouse gas mitigation in U.S. agriculture and forestry.Science2001;294:2481-2

[47]

Lewandrowski J,Aillery M.Carbon sequestration through afforestation under uncertainty.For Policy Econ2014;38:90-6

[48]

Nilsson S.The carbon-sequestration potential of a global afforestation program.Clim Chang1995;30:267-93

[49]

Mazzetto AM,Styles D,Brook R.Comparing the environmental efficiency of milk and beef production through life cycle assessment of interconnected cattle systems.J Clean Prod2020;277:124108

[50]

Mishurov M.Nitrous oxide flux dynamics of grassland undergoing afforestation.Agric Ecosyst Environ2010;139:59-65

[51]

Bren d’Amour C,Baiocchi G.Future urban land expansion and implications for global croplands.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA2017;114:8939-44 PMCID:PMC5576776

[52]

Zhang C,Pan S.Effects of forest regrowth and urbanization on ecosystem carbon storage in a rural–urban gradient in the Southeastern United States.Ecosystems2008;11:1211-22

[53]

Harveson PM,Collier BA.Impacts of urbanization on Florida key deer behavior and population dynamics.Biol Conserv2007;134:321-31

[54]

Boggs JL.Urbanization alters watershed hydrology in the piedmont of North Carolina.Ecohydrology2011;4:256-64

[55]

Ruhl JB.Water wars, eastern style: divvying up the apalachicola-chattahoochee-flint river basin.J Contemp Water Res Edu2005;131:47-54.Available from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1357762 [Last accessed on 8 Dec 2022]

[56]

Franzluebbers AJ.Achieving soil organic carbon sequestration with conservation agric syst in the Southeastern United States.Soil Sci Soc Am J2010;74:347-57

[57]

Mcbride WD. United States department of agriculture the diverse structure and organization of U.S. beef cow-calf farms. 2011. Available from: www.ers.usda.gov [Last accessed on 8 Dec 2022]

[58]

Causarano HJ,Reeves DW.Soil organic carbon sequestration in cotton production systems of the Southeastern United States: a review.J Environ Qual2006;35:1374-83

[59]

Rotz CA,Dillon J.Cradle-to-farm gate environmental footprints of beef cattle production in Kansas, Oklahoma, and Texas.J Anim Sci2015;93:2509-19

[60]

Bergtold JS,Jackson T. Conservation tillage systems in the southeast: production, profitability and stewardship. Washington DC: USDA; 2020. pp. 19-25. Available from: https://www.sare.org/resources/conservation-tillage-systems-in-the-southeast/ [Last accessed on 8 Dec 2022]

[61]

Baxter LL,Brown CP.Stocker beef production on low-water-input systems in response to legume inclusion: I. forage and animal responses.Crop Sci2017;57:2294-302

[62]

Santos ERS,Mackowiak C.Sward responses of bahiagrass cultivars under no nitrogen fertilization.Crop Sci2019;59:2893-902

[63]

Jaramillo DM,Sollenberger LE.Water footprint, herbage, and livestock responses for nitrogen-fertilized grass and grass-legume grazing systems.Crop Sci2021;61:3844-58

[64]

Rochette P.Towards a revised coefficient for estimating N2O emissions from legumes.Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst2005;73:171-9

[65]

Virkajärvi P,Saarijärvi K,Martikainen PJ.N2O emissions from boreal grass and grass - clover pasture soils.Agric Ecosyst Environ2010;137:59-67

[66]

Daryanto S,Wang L,Zhao W.Quantitative synthesis on the ecosystem services of cover crops.Earth Sci Rev2018;185:357-73

[67]

Nunes MR,Schindelbeck R,Ryan M.No-till and cropping system diversification improve soil health and crop yield.Geoderma2018;328:30-43

[68]

Mahboubi AA,Faussey NR.Twenty-eight years of tillage effects on two soils in ohio.Soil Sci Soc Am J1993;57:506-12

[69]

Liu S,Tian Z,Harrison S.Ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions from a subtropical wheat field under different nitrogen fertilization strategies.J Environ Sci2017;57:196-210

[70]

Connell JA,Durham RG,Harris GH.Comparison of enhanced-efficiency nitrogen fertilizers for reducing ammonia loss and improving bermudagrass forage production.Crop Sci2011;51:2237-48

[71]

Capper JL.Is the grass always greener? Comparing the environmental impact of conventional, natural and grass-fed beef production systems.Animals2012;2:127-43 PMCID:PMC4494320

[72]

Pelletier N,Rasmussen R.Comparative life cycle environmental impacts of three beef production strategies in the Upper Midwestern United States.Agric Syst2010;103:380-9

[73]

USDA. Livestock, poultry and grain market news. 2022. Available from: https://www.ams.usda.gov/market-news/livestock-poultry-and-grain-other-reports [Last accessed on 8 Dec 2022]

[74]

Bhandari BD,Scaglia G,Salassi M.Analysis of pasture systems to maximize the profitability and sustainability of grass-fed beef production.J Agric Appl Econ2015;47:193-212

[75]

Asem-hiablie S,Stout R.Management characteristics of beef cattle production in the eastern United States.Prof Anim Sci2018;34:311-25

[76]

Rouquette M.Introduction: management strategies for sustainable cattle production in Southern Pastures. In Management strategies for sustainable cattle production in southern pastures. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2020. pp. 1-10.

[77]

Archimède H,Marie Magdeleine C.Comparison of methane production between C3 and C4 grasses and legumes.Anim Feed Sci Technol2011;166-167:59-64

[78]

Garcia-Jimenez LM. Ecosystem services provided by contrasting grazing systems in North Florida. Ph.D Dissertation. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida; 2019.

[79]

DeRamus HA,Giampola DD.Methane emissions of beef cattle on forages: efficiency of grazing management systems.J Environ Qual2003;32:269-77

[80]

Thompson L.Invited Review: Methane sources, quantification, and mitigation in grazing beef systems.Appl Anim Sci2020;36:556-73

[81]

Stackhouse KR,Oltjen JW.Growth-promoting technologies decrease the carbon footprint, ammonia emissions, and costs of California beef production systems.J Anim Sci2012;90:4656-65

[82]

Moriel P,Bohnert DW,Arthington JD.Effects of energy supplementation frequency and forage quality on performance, reproductive, and physiological responses of replacement beef heifers 1; 2012.

[83]

Scaglia G.Supplementation of growing beef heifers with starch or highly digestible fiber supplements.J Agric Sci2020;12:14

[84]

Alvarez-Hess PS,Jacobs JL.Effect of dietary fat supplementation on methane emissions from dairy cows fed wheat or corn.J Dairy Sci2019;102:2714-23

[85]

Arthington JD.Effect of early weaning on the performance of three-year-old, first-calf beef heifers and calves reared in the subtropics.In J Anim Sci2003;81.:Available from: https://academic.oup.com/jas/article/81/5/1136/4789994 [Last accessed on 8 Dec 2022]

[86]

Rae D,Chenoweth P,Tran T.Relationship of parity and body condition score to pregnancy rates in Florida beef cattle.Theriogenology1993;39:1143-52

[87]

Derouen SM. Effects of sire breed, breed type and age and weight at breeding on calving rate and date in beef heifers first exposed at three ages. 1989. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/jas/article-abstract/67/5/1128/4705051 [Last accessed on 8 Dec 2022]

[88]

Arthington JD,Miller DC. The effect of early weaning on feedlot performance and measures of stress in beef calves 1,2. 2005. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/jas/article/83/4/933/4790800 [Last accessed on 8 Dec 2022]

[89]

Houghton PL,Horstman A,Moss GE. Effects of body composition, pre-and postpartum energy level, and early weaning on reproductive performance of beef cows and preweaning calf gain. 1990. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/jas/article-abstract/68/5/1438/4705735 [Last accessed on 8 Dec 2022]

[90]

Lamb GC,Larson JE,Stevenson JS.Control of the estrous cycle to improve fertility for fixed-time artificial insemination in beef cattle: a review.J Anim Sci2010;88:E181-92

[91]

Binelli M,Gonella A.Analysis of the USDA’s 2017 cow-calf management practices results: part 2 - breeding practices/reproductive technologies.EDIS2021;6

[92]

Beef 2017 beef cow-calf management practices in the United States. 2020. Available from: http://www.aphis.usda.gov/nahms [Last accessed on 8 Dec 2022]

[93]

Kenny DA,Waters SM.Invited review: improving feed efficiency of beef cattle - the current state of the art and future challenges.Animal2018;12:1815-26

[94]

Koch RM,Chambers D.Efficiency of feed use in beef cattle.J Anim Sci1963;22:486-94

[95]

Arthur PF,Johnston DJ.Genetic and phenotypic variance and covariance components for feed intake, feed efficiency, and other postweaning traits in Angus cattle 1,2.J Anim Sci2001;79.:Available from: https://academic.oup.com/jas/article/79/11/2805/4645243 [Last accessed on 8 Dec 2022]

[96]

Nutrient requirements of beef cattle, 8th revised edition. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2015.

[97]

Lamb GC. Feed efficiency in cows. Florida beef cattle short course; 2009. pp. 35-42. Available from: https://animal.ifas.ufl.edu/beef_extension/bcsc/2009/pdf/lamb.pdf [Last accessed on 8 Dec 2022]

[98]

Basarab JA,Baron VS.Reducing GHG emissions through genetic improvement for feed efficiency: effects on economically important traits and enteric methane production.Animal2013;7:303-15 PMCID:PMC3691002

[99]

Freetly HC,Thallman RM.Heritability and genetic correlations of feed intake, body weight gain, residual gain, and residual feed intake of beef cattle as heifers and cows.J Anim Sci2020;98 PMCID:PMC6978903

[100]

Smith PE,Kenny DA,Conroy S.Effect of divergence in residual methane emissions on feed intake and efficiency, growth and carcass performance, and indices of rumen fermentation and methane emissions in finishing beef cattle.J Anim Sci2021;99 PMCID:PMC8598385

[101]

Bird-Gardiner T,Barchia IM,Herd RM.Phenotypic relationships among methane production traits assessed under ad libitum feeding of beef cattle.J Anim Sci2017;95:4391-8

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

506

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/