Limitations of using simple indicators for evaluating agricultural emission reductions at farm level — evidence from Kenyan smallholder dairy production

Abstract

National-scale carbon footprints of livestock production are commonly computed from a set of production system characteristics that serve as inputs for greenhouse gas (GHG) emission models. We evaluated the feasibility of using such equations at a finer scale to derive a simple farm-scale indicator of emission intensity (milk yield per head). Using probabilistic simulations, we quantified the impact of input variable uncertainty on emission estimates for smallholder dairy farms in Kenya. We simulated emissions for farm-scale scenarios generated from a survey of 414 households and published or expert-estimated uncertainty bounds. We simulated the impacts of five interventions: changing breeds, retiring unproductive males, keeping fewer replacement males, feeding forage supplements, and balancing animal diets. Impacts were assessed against a true counterfactual and against a more realistic scenario affected by random effects. We estimated errors incurred in classifying farms into adopters and non-adopters of the innovations based on changes in milk yield per animal. Given the current uncertainty, such classification would either miss a large percentage of adopters or misclassify many non-adopters as adopters. As a critical uncertainty, we identified the milk yield of dairy cows. Added precision on this metric reduced but did not eliminate classification errors. We remain cautiously optimistic about using milk yield per head to proxy emission intensity, but its effective use will require further reduction of critical uncertainties. Replacing generic recommendations of parameter uncertainties with context-specific error estimates might lead to a more efficient quantification of the carbon footprint of milk production on smallholder farms.

Keywords

Greenhouse gas emissions / dairy cattle / methane / climate change mitigation / monitoring

References

[1] Xu X,Shu S.Global greenhouse gas emissions from animal-based foods are twice those of plant-based foods.Nat Food2021;2:724-32

[2] Tubiello FN,Flammini A.Pre- and post-production processes increasingly dominate greenhouse gas emissions from agri-food systems.Earth Syst Sci Data2022;14:1795-809

[3] Crippa M,Guizzardi D,Tubiello FN.Food systems are responsible for a third of global anthropogenic GHG emissions.Nat Food2021;2:198-209

[4] Colomb V,Bockel L.Selection of appropriate calculators for landscape-scale greenhouse gas assessment for agriculture and forestry.Environ Res Lett2013;8:015029

[5] Zhu B,Lesschen JP,de Vries W.Assessment of uncertainties in greenhouse gas emission profiles of livestock sectors in Africa, Latin America and Europe.Reg Environ Change2016;16:1571-82

[6] Frey C,Hanle L,Ogle S. 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories - Volume 1, Chapter 3 - Uncertainties. IPCC; 2006. Available from: https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/pdf/1_Volume1/V1_3_Ch3_Uncertainties.pdf [Last accessed on 5 Sep 2022]

[7] Nabuurs G-J,Abu Hatab A. Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Uses (AFOLU). In: Shukla PR, Skea J, Slade R, Al Khourdajie A, van Diemen R, et al., editors. Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK and New York, USA: Cambridge University Press; 2022. Available from: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/ [Last accessed on 5 Sep 2022]

[8] Lamb WF,Pongratz J.A review of trends and drivers of greenhouse gas emissions by sector from 1990 to 2018.Environ Res Lett2021;16:073005

[9] Government of the Republic of Kenya. Kenya Climate Smart Agriculture Strategy-2017-2026. Nairobi, Kenya: 2017. Available from: https://www.adaptation-undp.org/sites/default/files/resources/kenya_climate_smart_agriculture_strategy.pdf [Last accessed on 5 Sep 2022]

[10] Makoni N,Redda T,van der Lee J. White gold: opportunities for dairy sector development collaboration in East Africa. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Centre for Development Innovation, Wageningen UR, 2014. Available from: https://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/wurpubs/reports/454917 [Last accessed on 5 Sep 2022]

[11] Enahoro D,Pfeifer C.Contributions of livestock-derived foods to nutrient supply under changing demand in low- and middle-income countries.Global Food Security2018;19:1-10

[12] Bateki CA,Wilkes A,White R.Meta-analysis of the effects of on-farm management strategies on milk yields of dairy cattle on smallholder farms in the Tropics.Animal2020;14:2619-27 PMCID:PMC7645308

[13] FAO, ILRI. Smallholder dairy methodology - draft methodology for quantification of ghg emission reductions from improved management in smallholder dairy production systems using a standardized baseline. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) & International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI); 2017. Available from: https://www.goldstandard.org/sites/default/files/documents/gs_dairy_methodology.pdf [Last accessed on 5 Sep 2022]

[14] Tricarico JM,Wattiaux MA.MILK symposium review: sustainability of dairy production and consumption in low-income countries with emphasis on productivity and environmental impact.J Dairy Sci2020;103:9791-802

[15] Herrero M,Njuki J.The roles of livestock in developing countries.Animal2013;7 Suppl 1:3-18

[16] UNFCCC. Standardized baselines under the Clean Development Mechanism (capitalize). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC); 2010. Available from: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2010/tp/04.pdf [Last accessed on 5 Sep 2022]

[17] Haya B,Strong AL.Managing uncertainty in carbon offsets: insights from California’s standardized approach.Clim Policy2020;20:1112-26

[18] Dong H,McAllister T. IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories - volume 4 agriculture, forestry and other land use, 2006. Available from: https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/pdf/4_Volume4/V4_10_Ch10_Livestock.pdf [Last accessed on 5 Sep 2022]

[19] Government of Kenya. Inventory of GHG Emissions from Dairy Cattle in Kenya 1995-2017. Nairobi, Kenya: State Department for Livestock, Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, Fisheries and Cooperatives, Government of Kenya; 2020.

[20] Wilkes A,van Dijk S,Eshete Wassie S. Methods and guidance to support MRV of livestock emissions - methods for data collection, analysis and summary results from a pilot baseline survey for the Kenya dairy NAMA. Wageningen, the Netherlands: CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS); 2019. Available from: https://cgspace.cgiar.org/bitstream/handle/10568/105737/WP_285.pdf [Last accessed on 5 Sep 2022]

[21] Wilkes A,Odhong’ C,van Dijk S.Variation in the carbon footprint of milk production on smallholder dairy farms in central Kenya.J Clean Prod2020;265:121780

[22] Karimi-Zindashty Y,Desjardins RL,Hutchinson JJ.Sources of uncertainty in the IPCC Tier 2 Canadian livestock model.J Agric Sci2012;150:556-69

[23] Monni S,Regina K.Uncertainty in agricultural CH4 and N2O emissions from Finland–possibilities to increase accuracy in emission estimates.Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang2007;12:545-71

[24] Goopy JP,Onyango A,Lukuyu M.Simple and robust algorithms to estimate liveweight in African smallholder cattle.Anim Prod Sci2018;58:1758

[25] Migose S,Bebe B,Oosting S.Accuracy of estimates of milk production per lactation from limited test-day and recall data collected at smallholder dairy farms.Livest Sci2020;232:103911

[26] Rosenstock TS,Rioux J.Targeting conservation agriculture in the context of livelihoods and landscapes.Agric Ecosyst Environ2014;187:47-51

[27] Molina-Castro G.A Monte Carlo method for quantifying uncertainties in the official greenhouse gas emission factors database of Costa Rica.Front Environ Sci2022;10:896256

[28] Luedeling E,Schiffers K,Fernandez E. decisionSupport: quantitative support of decision making under uncertainty, 2022. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/decisionSupport/index.html [Last accessed on 5 Sep 2022]

[29] R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. 2022. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/ [Last accessed on 5 Sep 2022]

[30] IPCC. Good practice guidance and uncertainty management in national greenhouse gas inventories. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC); 2021. Available from: https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/gp/english/ [Last accessed on 5 Sep 2022]

[31] Vellinga TV,Marinussen M. Methodology used in feedprint: a tool quantifying greenhouse gas emissions of feed production and utilization. Wageningen: Wageningen UR Livestock Research; 2013. Available from: https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/methodology-used-in-feedprint-a-tool-quantifying-greenhouse-gas-e [Last accessed on 5 Sep 2022]

[32] Whitney C. uncertainty, 2022. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6640203 [Last accessed on 5 Sep 2022]

[33] FAO, NZAGRC. Options for low-emission development in the Kenya dairy sector. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) & New Zealand Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Research Centre; 2017. Available from: https://www.ccacoalition.org/en/file/8189/download?token=98laQQc7 [Last accessed on 5 Sep 2022]

[34] Makau DN,Gitau GK.Effects of Calliandra and Sesbania on daily milk production in dairy cows on commercial smallholder farms in Kenya.Vet Med Int2020;2020:3262370 PMCID:PMC7054806

[35] Richards S,Shepelo G.Randomized controlled trial on impacts of dairy meal feeding interventions on early lactation milk production in smallholder dairy farms of Central Kenya.Prev Vet Med2016;125:46-53

[36] Garg MR,Phondba BT.Greenhouse gas emission intensity based on lifetime milk production of dairy animals, as affected by ration-balancing program.Anim Prod Sci2018;58:1027

[37] Luedeling E. Decision-focused agricultural research. Solutions 2016;7:46-54. Available from: http://apps.worldagroforestry.org/downloads/Publications/PDFS/JA16154.pdf [Last accessed on 5 Sep 2022]

[38] Wold S,Eriksson L.PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics.Chemometr Intell Lab Syst2001;58:109-30

[39] Luedeling E.Partial least squares regression for analyzing walnut phenology in California.Agric For Meteorol2012;158-159:43-52

[40] Wold S. PLS for multivariate linear modeling. Chemometric Methods in Molecular Design - Methods in Medicinal Chemistry 1995;2:195-218.

[41] Chen X.Influence of emission-factor uncertainty and farm-characteristic variability in LCA estimates of environmental impacts of French dairy farms.J Clean Prod2014;81:150-7

[42] March MD,Sykes AJ.Effect of nutritional variation and LCA methodology on the carbon footprint of milk production from Holstein Friesian dairy cows.Front Sustain Food Syst2021;5:588158

[43] Hubbard DW. How to measure anything: finding the value of intangibles in business. 2nd ed. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2014. Available from: https://books.google.com.hk/books?hl=zh-CN&lr=&id=EAPXAgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR19&dq=Hubbard+DW.+How+To+Measure+Anything:+Finding+the+Value+of+Intangibles+in+Business.+2nd+ed.+Hoboken,+New+Jersey:+John+Wiley+%26+Sons%3B+2014&ots=Csf7xWFmD4&sig=kmjR-o8cGByl7rBhXo5z4GWQrEg&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false [Last accessed on 5 Sep 2022]