Modelling of Thermodynamic and Transport Properties of R452B Refrigerant with Low GWP

Tuğba Kovacı , Arzu Şencan Şahin

Clean Energy Sustain. ›› 2025, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (2) : 10007

PDF (1911KB)
Clean Energy Sustain. ›› 2025, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (2) :10007 DOI: 10.70322/ces.2025.10007
Article
research-article
Modelling of Thermodynamic and Transport Properties of R452B Refrigerant with Low GWP
Author information +
History +
PDF (1911KB)

Abstract

Accurate and reliable estimation of the thermodynamic and transport properties of refrigerants is of paramount importance for the effective design and optimization of refrigeration cycles. In the context of growing environmental concerns, there is a pressing need to transition towards more environmentally benign refrigeration systems and applications. This imperative has driven the search for alternative refrigerants with reduced environmental impact. The refrigerant R452B has emerged as a promising candidate, particularly as a suitable replacement for R410A, due to its favorable thermodynamic characteristics and significantly lower Global Warming Potential (GWP). This research addresses the critical need for precise property data by developing mathematical models for key thermodynamic and transport properties of the R452B refrigerant. Specifically, the study focuses on modelling enthalpy, entropy, specific volume, thermal conductivity, viscosity, and thermal diffusivity. These properties are fundamental to understanding the behavior of the refrigerant within refrigeration systems and are essential for accurate system design and performance prediction. To achieve this modelling objective, the genetic expression programming (GEP) methodology, a powerful evolutionary algorithm capable of automatically generating complex mathematical expressions, was employed. GEP was selected for its ability to discover intricate relationships between variables and to produce explicit equations that can be readily implemented. The accuracy and reliability of the developed GEP models were rigorously evaluated. The coefficient of determination (R2) for the predicted thermodynamic and transport properties across a range of temperatures was found to be between 97% and 99%. This high degree of accuracy demonstrates the robustness and predictive power of the generated equations. The strong correlation between the model predictions and the actual property values indicates that these equations are sufficiently sensitive and accurate to be used with confidence in engineering calculations and simulations. The newly developed mathematical models offer a valuable tool for engineers and researchers working with R452B. These models provide a means to accurately estimate the thermodynamic and transport properties of this refrigerant without the need for complex and time-consuming experimental measurements or computationally intensive simulations. By providing dependable equations, this study facilitates more efficient and accurate design, analysis, and optimization of refrigeration systems utilizing the R452B refrigerant.

Keywords

R452B / Low GWP / Thermodynamic properties / Transport properties / Modelling / Genetic programming

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Tuğba Kovacı, Arzu Şencan Şahin. Modelling of Thermodynamic and Transport Properties of R452B Refrigerant with Low GWP. Clean Energy Sustain., 2025, 3(2): 10007 DOI:10.70322/ces.2025.10007

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Author Contributions

T.K. contributed to conceptualization, methodology, simulation, data curation, writing—original draft, and visualization. A.Ş.Ş. was involved in data curation, writing—review and editing, and supervision.

Ethics Statement

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards.

Informed Consent Statement

Consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]

Dincer I. Refrigeration Systems and Applications; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, UK, 2017.

[2]

Shaik SV, Shaik S, Gorantla K, Mahapatra D, Setty ABP. Investigation on thermodynamic performance analysis and environmental effects of various new refrigerants used in air conditioners. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 41415-41436.

[3]

Sharif M, Azmi W, Ghazali M, Samykano M, Ali HM. Performance improvement strategies of R1234yf in vapor compression refrigeration system as a R134a replacement: A review. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2023, 148, 105032.

[4]

Şahin , Kovacı T, Dikmen E. A GEP-based model approach for estimating thermodynamic properties of R513A refrigerant. El-Cezeri 2021, 8, 376-388.

[5]

Zaki OM, Abdelaziz O. Critical assessment of R410A alternatives for mini-split air conditioners in the Egyptian market. Energy Built Environ. 2024, 5, 426-445.

[6]

Pérez-Gomariz M, López-Gómez A, Cerdán-Cartagena F. Artificial neural networks as artificial intelligence technique for energy saving in refrigeration systems—A review. Clean Technol. 2023, 5, 116-136.

[7]

Noushabadi AS, Lay EN, Dashti A, Mohammadi AH, Chofreh AG, Goni FA, et al. Insights into modelling and evaluation of thermodynamic and transport properties of refrigerants using machine-learning methods. Energy 2023, 262, 125099.

[8]

Hsu C-Y, Chien L-H, Chang J-C. Experimental study of falling film evaporation of refrigerants, R32, R1234yf, R410A, R452B and R454B on horizontal tubes. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2023, 205, 123914.

[9]

Chen X, Yang J, Liu C, Chen J. Heating performance comparison of R410A and its substitutions in air-to-water heat pumps with vapor injection. Int. J. Refrig. 2018, 96, 78-87.

[10]

Saleem S, Bradshaw CR. The Thermodynamic Behavior Of Low-GWP Zeotropic Mixtures on Water-Source Heat Pump Equipment. In Proceedings of the 18th International Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Conference at Purdue, West Lafayette, IN, USA, 24-28 May 2021.

[11]

Shen B, Ally MR. Comparative performance of low global warming potential (Gwp) refrigerants as replacement for r-410a in a regular 2-speed heat pump for sustainable cooling. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8199.

[12]

Devecioğlu AG. Seasonal performance assessment of refrigerants with low GWP as substitutes for R410A in heat pump air conditioning devices. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2017, 125, 401-411.

[13]

Sieres J, Ortega I, Cerdeira F, Álvarez E. Drop-in performance of the low-GWP alternative refrigerants R452B and R454B in an R410A liquid-to-water heat pump. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2021, 182, 116049.

[14]

Heredia-Aricapa Y, Belman-Flores J, Mota-Babiloni A, Serrano-Arellano J, García-Pabón JJ. Overview of low GWP mixtures for the replacement of HFC refrigerants: R134a, R404A and R410A. Int. J. Refrig. 2020, 111, 113-123.

[15]

Panato VH, Pico DFM, Bandarra Filho EP. Experimental evaluation of R32, R452B and R454B as alternative refrigerants for R410A in a refrigeration system. Int. J. Refrig. 2022, 135, 221-230.

[16]

Dikmen E. A comparative study of thermodynamic properties of R466A using linear regression, artificial neural network and gene expression programming. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2024, 149, 12265-12283.

[17]

Gao N, Wang X, Xuan Y, Chen G. An artificial neural network for the residual isobaric heat capacity of liquid HFC and HFO refrigerants. Int. J. Refrig. 2019, 98, 381-387.

[18]

Yılmaz H, Şencan Şahin A, Selbaş R. An estimation of thermodynamic properties of hydrocarbon refrigerants. Int. J. Green Energy 2014, 11, 500-526.

[19]

Kang K, Gu Y, Wang X. Assessment and development of the viscosity prediction capabilities of entropy scaling method coupled with a modified binary interaction parameter estimation model for refrigerant blends. J. Mol. Liq. 2022, 358, 119184.

[20]

He Y, Feng Y, Qiu L, Tang D. Data-driven approach augmented by attention mechanism in critical and boiling thermophysical properties prediction of fluorine/chlorine-based refrigerants. Energy 2024, 306, 132490.

[21]

Yıldırım R, Şahin . Determination with data mining approach of thermodynamic properties of R471A as new HFO refrigerant. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2023, 148, 6243-6255.

[22]

Tomassetti S, Muciaccia PF, Pierantozzi M, Di Nicola G. Dynamic viscosity of low GWP refrigerants in the liquid phase: An empirical equation and an artificial neural network. Int. J. Refrig. 2024, 164, 95-104.

[23]

Pence I, Yıldırım R, Cesmeli MS, Güngör AFŞİN, Akyüz A. Evaluation of machine learning approaches for estimating thermodynamic properties of new generation refrigerant R513A. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2023, 55, 102973.

[24]

Li H, Baghban A. Insights into the prediction of the liquid density of refrigerant systems by artificial intelligent approaches. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 2343.

[25]

Pierantozzi M, Tomassetti S, Di Nicola G. Modeling liquid thermal conductivity of low-GWP refrigerants using neural networks. Appl. Sci. 2022, 13, 260.

[26]

Rathod K, Ravula SC, Kommireddi PSC, Thangeda R, Kikugawa G, Chilukoti HK. Predicting thermophysical properties of alkanes and refrigerants using machine learning algorithms. Fluid Phase Equilibria 2024, 578, 114016.

[27]

Devotta S, Chelani A, Vonsild A. Prediction of flammability classifications of refrigerants by artificial neural network and random forest model. Int. J. Refrig. 2021, 131, 947-955.

[28]

HoneywellRefrigerant. 2024. Available online: https://www.honeywell-refrigerants.com (accessed on 6 December 2024).

[29]

Ferreira C. Gene expression programming: a new adaptive algorithm for solving problems. arXiv 2001, arXiv:cs/0102027v3.

[30]

Ferreira C. Gene Expression Programming Mathematical Modeling by an Artificial Intelligence; Springer-Verlag: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2006.

[31]

Mellit A, Kalogirou SA, Hontoria L, Shaari S. Artificial intelligence techniques for sizing photovoltaic systems: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2009, 13, 406-419.

[32]

Jiang T, Yan X, Han Z. The Comparison and Analysis of GP, GEP and GEP_EDA in Modeling System. In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium, ISICA 2010, Wuhan, China, 22-24 October 2010; pp. 37-46.

[33]

Mollahasani A, Alavi AH, Gandomi AH. Empirical modeling of plate load test moduli of soil via gene expression programming. Comput. Geotech. 2011, 38, 281-286.

[34]

Gandomi AH, Alavi AH, Mirzahosseini R, Moghadas Nejad F. Nonlinear geneticbased models for prediction of flow number of asphalt mixtures. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2011, 23, 248-263.

[35]

Sadat Hosseini SS, Gandomi AH. Short-term load forecasting of power systems by gene expression programming. Neural Comput. Applic 2012, 21, 377-389.

[36]

Genetron Properties 1.4.2 Software. Available online: https://www.honeywell-refrigerants.com/europe/genetron-properties-suite (accessed on 6 December 2024).

[37]

GeneXproTools 5.0 (n.d.) Data Modeling & Analysis Software. Available online: https://www.gepsoft.com (accessed on 6 December 2024).

PDF (1911KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/